logo
SA's manufacturing activity firmly in contractionary territory in May

SA's manufacturing activity firmly in contractionary territory in May

IOL News2 days ago

The Absa Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) released on Monday indicated that the seasonally adjusted PMI decreased by 1.6 points to 43.1 in May 2025.
Image: Supplied
The Absa Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) released on Monday indicated that the seasonally adjusted PMI decreased by 1.6 points to 43.1 in May 2025. Absa said that the PMI remained in contractionary territory for a seventh consecutive month.
The PMI suggests that the manufacturing sector continued to suffer in May, despite some flickers of activity and demand improvement, albeit at extremely low levels. 'However, a decline in the supplier deliveries index pushed the headline PMI lower. The business activity index indicated some improvement, increasing by 3.4 points to 43.4 in May. New sales orders also increased, by 2.2 points to 38.3 in May. This was likely due to domestic demand recovering slightly as export sales continued to deteriorate at a rapid rate.'
Absa said the supplier deliveries index has been tricky to interpret since the Covid-19 pandemic. 'Across the globe, the traditional signal of an increase being positive (with the index being inverted, so slower deliveries are seen as a positive sign as they are caused by increased demand for supplies) was no longer valid, as supply-chain bottlenecks and delays, and not higher demand, caused slower deliveries.'
The purchasing price index decreased by 7.9 points to 60.4 in May due to fuel price cuts at the start of the month. 'A lower Brent crude oil price and a stronger rand, despite the fuel levy increase, bode well for further fuel price declines at the start of this month.'
Absa added that the index tracking expected business conditions in six months' time increased by a significant 13.9 points to 62.5 in May, the highest level since the end of 2024. 'Sentiment improved as global tariffs were suspended, and businesses showed faith that local political disagreements on policy within the government would be resolved.'
Investec economist Lara Hodes said, "The slide in the index was partly underpinned by a decrease in the suppliers' delivery index, which fell from 56.6 to 49.0. According to the BER, the decline in the index (the index is inverted so a decline suggests faster deliveries) could technically mean that logistical constraints are easing.'
Hodes added that the business activity and new sales orders' indices remained subdued, well below 50, but did pick up modestly in May, despite a continued weakening in export sales. 'Worryingly, the employment index fell further into contractionary territory in May with a reading of 40.0 (42.9 previously). It has been in negative territory for fourteen consecutive months.
Hodes said addressing the country's unemployment crisis remains a key imperative of the government. 'However, to achieve this, we need a substantial lift in confidence, driving investment and accordingly economic growth. Purchasing prices declined notably in May by 7.9 points to 60.4, supported by a further cut in fuel prices. Favourably, the index measuring anticipated business conditions (in six months' time) moved back into expansionary territory, reaching the highest level since the end of 2024. It climbed 13.9 points to 62.5.'
Dr Eliphas Ndou, an economist and author at Unisa's Department of Economics, said the latest Absa Purchasing Manager Index indicates the manufacturing sector is struggling and is susceptible to weak demand conditions, political and trade uncertainty, which has implications for economic growth and employment outlook in the country. 'The Absa PMI has a statistically strong and positive co-movement with economic growth and is a leading indicator of economic growth. This means an improvement in the indicator would signal an improvement in economic growth. Whilst a weakening in the Absa PMI signals a weakening in economic growth.'
Professor Waldo Krugell, an economist at North-West University, said that the PMI is still in contractionary territory and this is worrying for the growth prospects of the economy. 'The expectations are that this week's quarter one growth figures are not going to look good, but the PMI has shown business struggling in April and May as well.'
Professor Bonke Dumisa, an independent economic analyst said that he is not surprised about this negative Absa PMI. 'The buyers in most manufacturing companies are usually the most conservative in the business, believing it is safest to adopt a cautious approach and be accused of opportunity cost in case they run short of products. The global uncertainty created by Trump's tariffs, wars and other consequential impacts of his "Executive Orders" have resulted in most buyers becoming very pessimistic about the business conditions.
BUSINESS REPORT
https://businessreport.co.za/

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Business confidence tanks in second quarter due to pessimism about trading conditions
Business confidence tanks in second quarter due to pessimism about trading conditions

The Citizen

timea day ago

  • The Citizen

Business confidence tanks in second quarter due to pessimism about trading conditions

When business confidence is low, businesses are not investing, and the low level in the second quarter will definitely not help. Business confidence tanked in the second quarter of 2025 due to pessimism about trading conditions. The survey among business owners took place during May, when there was also a lot of tension between South Africa and the US. The RMB/BER Business Confidence Index (BCI) decreased by five points to 40 in the second quarter of 2025, after the recovery that started in the first half of 2024 stalled in the first quarter of 2025. This implies that only four out of ten business respondents in the most cyclically sensitive sectors of the economy were satisfied with prevailing business conditions, Isaah Mhlanga, chief economist at RMB, says. 'While remaining above the average of 2023 and 2024, confidence is now a touch below the long-term average level. The underlying survey results point to a loss of momentum in the South African economy.' He says some optimism returned to equity markets after a 90-day pause in the US reciprocal trade tariffs announced on Liberation Day, but the global trade uncertainty and continued local logistical issues were still flagged by respondents as factors negatively affecting their businesses. ALSO READ: No fireworks expected, but GDP figures are disappointing — economists Rand recovered and GNU looks more stable but did not boost business confidence The rand exchange rate also experienced a volatile quarter, weakening past R19.90/$ early in April but clawing its way back to below R18/$ during the survey period. On the local front, respondents would have known that the contentious proposed VAT hike was off the table, but many questionnaires were returned before the tabling of Budget 3.0 on 21 May. News around the government of national unity (GNU) and the DA's continued participation in it was mixed over the time period, with fears of an imminent collapse easing a little through May, Mahlanga says. Business confidence was driven by declines in four of the five sectors in the second quarter, partially offset by a sharp increase in wholesale trade confidence, leaving overall confidence lower. Mahlanga says this almost mirrored the previous quarter outcome, where declines in four of the five sectors were more than fully offset by a sharp increase in new vehicle dealer confidence, resulting in overall confidence rising. In addition to being the only sector to register an increase in confidence, wholesale traders also have the highest sentiment reading at 50 points. Non-consumer wholesale traders fared well during the quarter, but consumer goods traders suffered and faced a sharp drop in sales. 'This is a worrying sign for consumer demand in the second half of the year, despite supportive macroeconomic factors such as low inflation, interest rate cuts and two-pot pension fund payouts.' ALSO READ: Surprise that all MPC members were in favour of repo rate cut Business confidence in retail trade sector also deteriorated For now, business conditions in the retail trade sector remained largely in line with the long-term average, although confidence deteriorated by 8 points to 42. Motor trade dealers saw a slightly bigger drop of 10 points, but also to 42 in the second quarter. Generally, Mahlanga says, respondents in the sector remained fairly upbeat about business conditions and sales volumes, which underscores that the consumer likely still fared fairly well in the second quarter. He says the 25-basis-point reduction in the repo rate, which took place after the survey period but was largely expected, could provide some further support, although this is countered by an increased personal tax burden. However, building contractors in the residential sector have not yet benefited from past rate cuts, and the cut last week may also be insufficient to turn their fortunes around. According to the second quarter results, activity came under further pressure, which weighed on sentiment. Non-residential contractors, on the other hand, fared better, but overall confidence among all building contractors decreased by 10 points to an almost three-year low of 35 points. ALSO READ: Manufacturing PMI falls to lowest level since April 2020 — bad news for GDP Business confidence in manufacturing sector remains very low Despite a notable deterioration in business conditions, confidence in the manufacturing sector remained virtually unchanged at a low 33 points, with manufacturers reporting a decline in domestic and export demand, leading to a drop in production. Many of the constraint indicators, including the general political climate, increased in the second quarter. Mahlanga says the warning lights from last quarter are certainly flickering brighter. 'The fact that confidence in four of the five sub-sectors declined and that [for two consecutive quarters] confidence in three of the five sub-sectors declined suggests that momentum in overall economic activity slowed down. 'During this period, just two sectors, wholesalers and new vehicle dealers, alternated to do the heavy lifting, but it was insufficient to lift confidence this quarter.' He says after the meagre 0.1% quarter-on-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate recorded in the first quarter, we cannot risk losing any further momentum. 'The reduction in the repo rate will provide some relief, but more is needed to reignite the spark in the South African economy. There is arguably more certainty on the local political front, with Budget 3.0 tabled and broad agreement among GNU partners to continue working together for now. 'The global environment will remain uncertain, but an easing of tension regarding diplomatic relations between the US and South Africa should support sentiment.' ALSO READ: This is where we would be if SA sustained an economic growth rate of 4.5% Experts agree we need structural economic reforms to boost business confidence Mahlanga says the core of South Africa's long-term economic recovery and resilience remains faster implementation of structural economic reforms. 'Without these reforms, the economy will remain vulnerable to global economic shocks and too slow to reduce the social ills that burden many with unemployment, poverty and inequality.' Jacques Nel, head for Africa Macro at Oxford Economics Africa, says the business confidence survey results are particularly concerning after the 1.7% drop in gross fixed capital formation in the first quarter. 'Businesses are not investing, and the uncertainty pervasive throughout the second quarter would have only dampened investment appetite further. Recent developments, including a more favourable monetary environment with benign inflation and lower interest rates and signs of improvement in US-SA relations, will boost confidence, but the risk is that this will be another lost quarter with economic momentum slowing down further.'

Many SA households don't have enough food to eat — study
Many SA households don't have enough food to eat — study

TimesLIVE

timea day ago

  • TimesLIVE

Many SA households don't have enough food to eat — study

Over 23% of SA households experienced inadequate or severely inadequate access to food, a recently released report on food security has revealed. The report, Food for Thought: Reflections on Food Insecurity, — which was launched by the Socio-Economic Rights Institute (Seri) on Tuesday, — aims to better understand how vulnerable communities in the country experience hunger and food insecurity, particularly in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. The results of the report comes from interviews Seri conducted with partner organisations representing informal workers, recyclers, domestic workers, and residents in informal settlements. The report also exposes the harsh realities of food poverty in both rural and urban settings. While SA produces enough food to feed its population, the report highlighted that economic access, not food availability, is the biggest barrier. 'Many households may 'move in and out of hunger' during the course of the month as they have to make decisions about food based on their income. In addition to economic or direct access, another way in which households or individuals are able to access food in dire economic circumstances, is through food aid,' read the report. Low wages, rising food prices, and structural inequalities leave many unable to afford nutritious meals. This not only affecting the unemployed but also working-class families earning minimum wage, the report added.

When we think about hunger we don't think about peace — here's why we should
When we think about hunger we don't think about peace — here's why we should

Daily Maverick

timea day ago

  • Daily Maverick

When we think about hunger we don't think about peace — here's why we should

Hunger isn't just about food. It's about power. It's about who gets to eat, who decides and who is heard. If we're serious about justice, then no one should be hungry. In South Africa, hunger is not just about empty stomachs, but also about unequal systems. It exists in crèches that exclude children whose parents can't pay fees, in homes where grant applications fail quietly, and in the lives of people with disabilities navigating systems that overlook their most basic needs. The student who is excluded from funding because they are considered too poor to afford university, yet not poor enough to qualify for state assistance, caught in the gap of eligibility. The woman who sits at the traffic lights with her child asking for small change or food. The problem is not that the country does not produce enough food, the problem is about who eats and who does not. Hunger is not just about food, it is about power, it is about peace, and it is deeply gendered. Women, especially Black women, carry the heaviest load in South Africa's food crisis. They cook, stretch budgets, sell in the informal economy and absorb the emotional violence of food insecurity. They go hungry so children can eat. And when food runs out, so does safety. As we've seen time and again, from the Covid lockdowns to the July KwaZulu-Natal unrest, scarcity breeds violence and is expressed against Black bodies. Despite producing enough food to feed everyone, South Africa has more than 63.5% of households facing food insecurity. We live in a country with one of the world's most progressive constitutions, in which section 27 guarantees the right to food and water. Yet every day millions go hungry. And too often we forget who exactly is being left behind. Hunger is a multidimensional crisis that undermines health through malnutrition, poor disease resistance and skipped medication. It fractures social cohesion, creating stigma, shame and desperation, worsening economic outcomes, especially for women and young people already at the margins. Women in informal settlements skip antiretrovirals because they can't take them on an empty stomach. The missing population that is not reported on include those not in employment, education or training, outside of the Not in Education, Employment or Training (Neets) active or inactive. There are people who are not in employment who are not receiving social grants and are not in the youth category, including children who are not in early childhood development, and are left without resources to access food​​. Despite policy interventions such as school feeding schemes, social grants and the 2023 SAHRC-led right-to-food study commissioned by the Department of Agriculture, significant structural gaps remain. Many interventions are not reaching those outside formal systems – such as children excluded from early childhood development programmes or people with disabilities navigating inaccessible services. These omissions reveal a deeper issue: our food security mechanisms are not designed with the most marginalised in mind, reinforcing cycles of invisibility and exclusion. This is not just a failure of delivery. It is a failure of vision. If we think of hunger only as a developmental or nutritional issue, we miss its full impact. Hunger is relational. It creates shame, fuels desperation and destabilises communities. We need to stop treating hunger like an economic inconvenience and start addressing it as a political and peace issue, one that is deeply gendered. The Centre for Social Justice, under the leadership of Professor Thuli Madonsela, has reframed hunger as a constitutional crisis. In the recent expert symposium I attended on 10 April in Pniel discussions rightly rooted the right to food in section 27 of the Constitution, making the case for structural change that is systems-based and a rights-driven approach to food insecurity. The research on Gendered Dimensions of Hunger and Peacebuilding by the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and University College Dublin drives the conversation further, urging for a widened lens where food security is a catalyst for peace. Because hunger, when it intersects with gender, exclusion and poverty, becomes something even more dangerous – a disruptor of peace. A participant in the ongoing research said that in one of the dialogues they conducted a man asked: 'How do you expect me and my people to engage on peace when we are hungry?' Let's be clear: we have the policy tools, we have the research and we have the constitutional mandate. What's needed now is a shift in mindset from hunger as a welfare issue to hunger as a peace and justice imperative. When hunger intersects with gender inequality, disability and exclusion, it fuels gender-based violence, erodes trust in the state and drives protests, looting and resentment. As the UN Security Council warned in 2025, hunger isn't just a consequence of conflict. It's a cause. We must act like it. That means embedding gender, peace and inclusion into every food policy. It means tracking how hunger affects social cohesion, how it exacerbates violence, how it chips away at democratic trust. It means giving voice and space to those most affected not after the fact, but as architects of the solutions. If we are serious about building a future rooted in justice and peace, then we must start treating hunger as both a political emergency and a moral failure. This means going beyond food parcels and short-term aid. We need women-led food and peace councils that place care, equity and lived experience at the heart of decision-making. We need disability-sensitive food access tools that acknowledge the everyday barriers disabled people face in reaching nourishment. And above all, we must ensure that no child goes invisible simply because their stomach is empty outside of school hours. Hunger is not just a symptom it is a warning signal. And ignoring it now means paying the price in conflict, unrest and fractured futures. Hunger isn't just about food. It's about power. It's about who gets to eat, who decides and who is heard. If we're serious about justice, then no one should be hungry – not a mother, not a child, not a person navigating hunger with a disability. Because food justice is peace work. Because peace doesn't start in Parliament – a place where conflict should be dealt with – it starts in homes where children eat, with women who aren't forced to trade their bodies for bread, and with the ability of persons with disabilities to access food without stigma. Where food security is not a charity but a human right. So, what would it look like to build a hunger strategy rooted in gender justice and peace? We are at a turning point. With the National Food and Nutrition Security Plan (2024-29) in development, and a government of national unity on the table, the political moment is ripe. But the question remains: will we continue with business-as-usual? Or will we reimagine hunger as the crisis of dignity, justice and peace that it is? As one working at the intersection of gender, hunger, and peace, I say this: until hunger is addressed as a breach of peace and women are recognised as leaders in healing it, our democratic promises remain half-written. We don't often think of food when we talk about peace. But we must – because in every empty stomach lies a silent protest against injustice. If we want peace to flourish, it must begin with food security, dignified women and inclusive food systems. DM Naledi Joyi is a gender programme officer at the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation. Her work focuses on the intersections of gender-based violence, food systems and structural inequality. She has conducted research across rural and urban South Africa and post-conflict Liberia, exploring how violence is embedded in institutions, economies and everyday survival.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store