Ohio voters support state and federal backing for child care, new poll shows
Child care worker Marci Then helps her daughter, Mila, 4, put away toys. (File photo by Elaine S. Povich/Stateline.)
New polling of Ohio voters shows vast support and demand for action to improve child care access and affordability on the federal and state level.
The research firm Public Opinion Strategies has released poll results taken in 2024 asking questions about child care and its impact on family dynamics, the ability for parents to work and the implications for the overall economy if child care solutions aren't found.
'This has an undeniable impact on the state economy,' said Jarrett Lewis, a partner at Public Opinion Strategies, in a joint meeting with child advocacy group Groundwork Ohio on Tuesday.
Parents who participated in the study said they are buying fewer groceries, deferring or delaying medical care, and struggling to pay housing costs because of the high costs of quality child care.
But that's just for those who can afford it. Many parents polled, including 61% of non-full-time working mothers said they would gladly go back to work if not for the need to stay home with their kids because child care is out of reach.
According to the polling, nearly 5 in 10 parents surveyed said they've had to cut back on work hours because they needed to care for their children. Lewis said using U.S. Census data numbers, that accounts for more than 1 million parents in the state.
'Ohio voters agree that labor shortages in the state are in part due to a lack of access to quality, affordable child care,' Lewis said.
In fact, 86% of those polled agreed that increasing access to good quality child care that's affordable 'will help strengthen Ohio's economy and help its workers.'
Lewis said Ohio parents saw work performance decline, have refused a job opportunity or promotion, had to call off or miss a shift, or have had to leave the workforce all together, all due to the lack of necessary child care. The study found that 68% of Ohio parents with children under five noted at least one of those impacts on their working life.
For all voters in the study, controlling inflation and the cost of living rose above other issues like reducing the tax burden or reducing illegal drugs flowing into the state.
Looking at parents of young children specifically, inflation and the cost of living topped a list of concerns, but early childhood education programs and child care ranked higher than they did for overall Ohioans in terms of priorities for the state to address.
Reports of issues accessing high quality child care have gone up since the survey was conducted last year. In December 2024, 66% of parents with children under five or who were pregnant said they were having access issues, compared to 56% in February 2023.
The lack of access is also leading Ohioans to express concern about the readiness of children to enter school, with 86% of voters polled saying 'we can do a better job of preparing young children for learning when they enter kindergarten.'
The survey showed overwhelming and bipartisan support for child care tax credits and increased funding for childhood education programs.
'Voters who support increased state funding focus on building the next generation of Ohioans who will form the backbone for the state's workforce and leadership,' according to Lewis. 'Further, they argue that increased access to affordable, quality child care allows more parents, particularly women, to remain employed, providing economic benefits to their families and to businesses in the state.'
The desire for a child tax credit above the federal child and dependent tax credit spans political ideologies, with 84% of all voters supporting a state-level tax credit. Of those, 83% of Republicans supported it, along with 78% of independents and 94% of Democrats.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Having state support through a tax credit might become even more important since the federal tax credit is 'up for debate,' as Brittany Boulton, Groundwork's managing director of advocacy and engagement, put it.
A list of options being considered during federal budget reconciliation and obtained by Politico shows the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee could be considering eliminating the child and dependent care tax credit, under which taxpayers can claim up to $2,100 in credit for child and dependent care expenses.
Troy Hunter, managing director of policy for Groundwork, said the study's findings came as no surprise to the group, which has been advocating for improvements to child care access and the system of child care workers as well for years.
Goals to improve child care in Ohio were included in Groundwork's newest policy agenda for the Ohio General Assembly.
Hunter said one of the biggest priorities Groundwork has, and the group thinks the state should have, is increasing the publicly funded child care eligibility window from 145% of the federal poverty level to 200%.
Increasing access to full-time public preschool slots and creating a better payment practice for child care programs are also on the list of goals for Groundwork, Hunter said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
An Inside Look At Disney's Affordable Housing Development In Florida
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. If someone asked you to play a word association game using the term "Walt Disney World," your first response might be "Magic Kingdom" or maybe Mickey Mouse. It's a safe bet that "affordable housing" would be way down your list, but the economics of Florida's housing market have forced a paradigm shift. Florida living has become so expensive that Walt Disney World is building an affordable housing community for its employees in Florida. Florida used to be synonymous with affordable housing, but several factors have changed the Sunshine State's housing market. First, a post-COVID influx of new arrivals from Los Angeles and New York with deep pockets caused property prices to spike statewide. If that weren't enough, a home insurance rate crisis and high interest rates have made buying a home in Florida harder than ever before. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Invest Where It Hurts — And Help Millions Heal: The affordability issue is felt most acutely by workers at the middle to lower end of the wage spectrum. That's historically the economic demographic that staffs Walt Disney World and the company's other Florida attractions. Business Insider reports that despite paying its employees $15 per hour, they still have trouble keeping pace with rising rents and property values. Disney responded by teaming up with a real estate development company, the Michaels Organization, to build a new affordable community on 80 acres of land near the city of Horizon West. According to Business Insider, the community will include 1,400 housing units, and 1,000 of them will be designated as affordable units. Walt Disney World already owns the land, which is about 20 minutes west of the theme park. 'We selected this land because it is part of a thriving community, close to employers, shopping, services, public schools, and areas of rest and recreation. We feel there is no better-positioned community in Central Florida to provide residents the opportunity to start a new chapter of their story,' Disney said in a statement. Trending: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a ? It sounds like a great deal for Walt Disney World employees, but the plan is not without its detractors. The Horizon West area has experienced rapid population growth and development in the past several years. Area residents are becoming more vocal in expressing their belief that their community can't handle any more development. Orange County District One Commissioner Nicole Wilson has heard those complaints, and Business Insider says she voted against the project last year. Business Insider cites U.S. Census data showing Horizon West's population has grown from 14,000 people in 2010 to 58,000 in 2020. The post-pandemic era brought about another boom, and now 75,000 people live in Horizon West. Area real estate agent Nicole Mickle told Business Insider that the Horizon West real estate market was so hot during the post-pandemic boom that she was selling homes via is constant in real estate, and those changes can be incredibly jarring to local residents when markets get overheated. Naturally, that causes residents to fret that their community is losing the small-town feel that originally attracted them to the area. 'What some want to do is keep the integrity of the community,' Mickle told Business Insider. It looks like they will have to adjust to the new reality. Wilson's "no" vote wasn't enough to stop the project from going forward. Construction is set to begin, and 1,400 new housing units are coming to Horizon West. This may also be a look at the future of real estate development. Attracting employees for regular jobs is becoming increasingly difficult due to the lack of affordable housing. Larger companies may take note of Horizon West and follow suit in other areas. . With over $1 million in dividends paid out last quarter and a growing selection of properties across various markets, Arrived offers an attractive alternative for investors seeking to build a diversified real estate portfolio. In October 2024, Arrived sold The Centennial, achieving a total return of 34.7% (11.2% average annual returns) for investors. Arrived aims to continue delivering similar value across our portfolio through careful market selection, attentive property management, and thoughtful timing in sales. Looking for fractional real estate investment opportunities? The features the latest offerings. Image: Shutterstock This article An Inside Look At Disney's Affordable Housing Development In Florida originally appeared on
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Federal panel rules in favor of state in Arkansas congressional redistricting lawsuit
(Getty Images) A three-judge federal court panel on Friday dismissed with prejudice a case challenging Arkansas' congressional district map. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas by a group of voters and the Christian Ministerial Alliance. It claimed boundaries for Arkansas' 2nd Congressional District were racially gerrymandered and diluted the votes of Black Arkansans. Congressional and state legislative districts are redrawn after the U.S. Census each decade in a process known as redistricting. The goal is to create districts that contain roughly the same population. The Ministerial Alliance's lawsuit was one of four filed to challenge Arkansas' 2021 redistricting process and the only one that hadn't been dismissed. On Friday, U.S. Circuit Judge David Stras, U.S. District Judge D.P. Marshall Jr. and U.S. District Judge James Moody Jr. granted the state's motion for summary judgment, saying there was not enough evidence to support the plaintiffs' racial discrimination claims. 'Multiple Arkansas citizens challenge how the General Assembly redrew the state's congressional district lines,' Friday's order states. 'Although their allegations were plausible enough to survive a motion to dismiss [Docs. 35, 42], the evidence does not back up their claims of racial discrimination. For that reason, we grant summary judgment to Secretary of State John Thurston.' Thurston, who was secretary of state when the lawsuit was filed in 2023, was elected state treasurer in 2024 during a special election. The governor appointed Cole Jester to succeed Thurston. Previously, the entirety of Pulaski County was included in Arkansas' Second Congressional District, which is represented by Republican U.S. Rep. French Hill. During the 2021 redistricting process, Pulaski County was split between three congressional districts. Plaintiffs alleged the General Assembly considered racial data when redrawing district lines and unconstitutionally 'cracked' the Black voting bloc in southeast Pulaski County. The state's attorneys submitted a motion for summary judgment in favor of the state last October. According to Friday's order, the original complaint alleged two constitutional claims — one for racial gerrymandering under the Fourteenth Amendment and one for vote dilution under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. The federal panel said race needed to be 'the predominant factor' motivating the General Assembly's decision and that awareness or acceptance of a 'racially disparate impact is not enough.' Three-judge panel hears arguments but doesn't rule in Arkansas redistricting lawsuit Creating 'an alternative map' is one way to prove redrawn boundaries were racially motivated, the panel said. However, that only works if the alternative map still accomplishes the Legislature's partisan goals. 'If it does not, then it just highlights how the pursuit of a nonracial aim — like retention, partisanship, or geography — could have led to an unintended racial disparity,' the panel wrote. 'All three of the plaintiffs' alternatives fall short in exactly this way.' Citing a U.S. Supreme Court reversal of a decision by a three-judge panel that found South Carolina had discriminated against Black voters in a 2023 redistricting lawsuit, Stras and his counterparts noted the high court emphasized that the courts must 'start with the presumption that the legislature acted in good faith.' 'Absent direct evidence of racial discrimination and with only weak circumstantial evidence supporting the plaintiffs' case, the presumption of legislative good faith tips the balance,' Stras wrote. That coupled with the fact that no alternative map achieves the General Assembly's goals with 'significantly greater racial balance,' meant the judges could not reasonably find that the plaintiffs had proved enough for their claim of racial gerrymandering to survive summary judgment, according to the ruling. The primary obstacle of the presumption of good faith holds true for the plaintiffs' vote-dilution claim, according to Friday's order. While the vote-dilution claim requires race to be a 'motivating factor' instead of the predominant one, the panel argued 'the plaintiffs do not have enough evidence to get there.' 'Most of what the plaintiffs offer are the materials we have already discussed: maps, statistics, and legislative history, none of which are enough to infer a racial motivation,' the panel wrote. The federal judges acknowledged as evidence a report from a university doctoral candidate that describes Arkansas' 'long history' with racism and resistance to Black voters, but wrote that much of that predates the passage of the 1964 Voting Rights Act. 'Even if he identifies a few scattered examples since then, none are 'reasonably contemporaneous with the challenged decision,' giving us little insight into what the General Assembly may have been thinking four years ago,' the panel wrote. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX


Bloomberg
2 days ago
- Bloomberg
Allegra Stratton: Can Restoration, not Revolution, Work for UK?
Today I'd love you to read this wonderful dispatch from our Irina Anghel. She's been to Lewis in the Outer Hebrides, the island where Donald Trump's mother was born, to see how they are braced for the effect of her son's tariffs. It's illustrated with a beautiful photo portrait by Emily Macinnes of fourth-generation Harris Tweed weaver Iain Martin, dressed in a handsome wool blazer, working on his loom at home.