logo
When the sky tilted east: The Rafale shock and the quiet rise of China's airpower? — Phar Kim Beng

When the sky tilted east: The Rafale shock and the quiet rise of China's airpower? — Phar Kim Beng

Malay Mail12-05-2025

MAY 12 — In the volatile skies above South Asia, a silent tremor has shaken the self-assurance of one of the world's largest democracies.
India's acquisition of 36 Rafale fighter jets from France between 2020 and 2022, at a staggering cost of approximately US$8.7 to 9.4 billion, was widely celebrated as a game-changer. These 4.5-generation multirole fighters were touted as the crown jewels of the Indian Air Force (IAF), symbolising India's growing strategic autonomy and technological ascendancy. Today, however, that symbolism is under scrutiny.
If it is confirmed that a Rafale was either downed or deterred by Pakistan's Chinese-supplied J-10C fighters or by an integrated radar and missile system orchestrated with Chinese support, the implications go far beyond a single aerial skirmish. They signal a perceptual rupture in the global military order and a quiet but seismic shift of aerospace credibility from West to East.
The Rafale, armed with Meteor beyond-visual-range missiles and equipped with state-of-the-art Thales AESA radars, was meant to provide India with air dominance not just over Pakistan but across a broader regional arc. Yet this promise now hangs precariously.
If Pakistan, with China's assistance, has developed the capacity to detect, target, and neutralise such an advanced platform, then New Delhi must confront a strategic dilemma. Publicly, it cannot acknowledge a loss that would undermine its defence narrative and electoral confidence. Privately, it must now recalibrate doctrines that rested on presumed air superiority.
The Indian military establishment faces a sobering reassessment of whether platform-centric dominance, once assured by Western-made jets, remains viable in the age of digitally integrated and networked warfare systems.
China's J-10C fighters, once dismissed in Western circles as inferior replicas of American or Russian models, now appear to have leapfrogged those perceptions.
Paired with PL-15 long-range missiles — reaching up to 300 kilometres — and backed by the KJ-500 early warning aircraft and layered radar coverage, the People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) has constructed a battlespace that no longer resembles mere catch-up mimicry. It reflects a sophisticated doctrinal evolution aimed not just at parity but at control.
This subtle ascendancy is playing out through Pakistan, China's closest strategic partner, allowing Beijing to shape South Asia's aerial balance without deploying its own assets directly.
This development is not merely a challenge for India. It reverberates across the Global South, especially in regions caught between choosing Western or Eastern defence ecosystems. The illusion that Western systems are inherently superior and untouchable is being quietly dismantled. Many countries — especially in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia — have long weighed affordability against combat credibility when considering Chinese systems.
If those systems are now seen to outperform, or even rival, platforms like the Rafale, then the decision matrix shifts. China's arms diplomacy, long shadowed by accusations of quality deficiency, may be entering a new era — one where performance, not pedigree, dictates preference.
A French fighter aircrafts Rafale M, manufactured by Dassault Aviaition, stands on the tarmac before a practice session for a simulated landing on an aircraft carrier at the Landivisiau Navy Air Base (BAN Landivisiau) in Saint-Servais, Brittany, France, May 7, 2025. — Reuters pic
The implications for Southeast Asia are especially acute.
Asean member states — Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines — operate a mixture of Western, Russian, and increasingly, Chinese hardware.
For years, the strategic logic was to hedge between great powers while maintaining technical independence. That equation is now unstable.
The sky over South Asia has revealed not only a shift in firepower but in psychological warfare. If India's most advanced fighter can be neutralised, then Asean nations must question whether their own ageing fleets are prepared for similar confrontations.
The region's defensive complacency, once hidden behind multilateralism and the language of neutrality, is being exposed by the raw arithmetic of technological evolution.
Moreover, Asean's reliance on tactical ambiguity as a form of security strategy is looking dangerously outdated.
As China refines its doctrine and Pakistan internalises it, a new operational standard is being set — one that favours real-time data fusion, electronic warfare, and long-range kill zones over the traditional metrics of pilot skill and airframe durability.
The Rafale's apparent vulnerability, whether fully downed or simply repelled, reinforces this changing paradigm. Southeast Asian defence planners will now be forced to prioritise joint surveillance, regional radar integration, and digital interoperability over symbolic hardware acquisitions.
India's political establishment, meanwhile, finds itself in an awkward position.
The Rafale deal was as much about prestige as it was about deterrence. Prime Minister Narendra Modi personally championed the acquisition as a signal of India's global ascent.
Any dent to that narrative — especially if inflicted by Pakistani jets backed by Chinese systems — undermines more than military policy. It undercuts the ideological scaffolding of India's self-image as a rising power.
With Pakistan emboldened and China proving its military-industrial maturity through proxy performance, the regional chessboard has been reconfigured without a formal declaration of checkmate.
What we are witnessing is not the end of Western airpower, but the end of its automatic supremacy.
This is not a matter of technological obsolescence but of strategic adaptation. China has shown that it no longer needs to match the West plane for plane, missile for missile. Instead, it can field systems that work in tandem, operate on disruptive logic, and undermine the confidence of adversaries before a single shot is fired. It is an approach that values effectiveness over exhibition. And in doing so, it is tilting the strategic sky eastward, quietly and relentlessly.
The Rafale incident — confirmed or not — serves as a metaphor for a deeper transformation. The battle for air superiority is no longer about who flies higher or faster, but who sees first, connects faster, and strikes from further away. That China has achieved this through its partnership with Pakistan marks the success of a long-term, calculated strategy. The sky has not only tilted — it has realigned, and with it, so has the global perception of power.
*Phar Kim Beng is a professor of Asean Studies in the International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)
** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says China will ship rare earths in ‘done' trade deal
Trump says China will ship rare earths in ‘done' trade deal

Malaysian Reserve

time24 minutes ago

  • Malaysian Reserve

Trump says China will ship rare earths in ‘done' trade deal

PRESIDENT Donald Trump said a trade framework with China has been completed, with Beijing supplying rare earths and magnets 'UP FRONT' and the US allowing Chinese students into its colleges and universities. The US and China will maintain tariffs at their current, lower levels following the two nations' agreement this week in London, Trump said Wednesday. That number is still higher than before the president took office. Trump said Chinese President Xi Jinping and he must still formally sign off on the agreement. 'OUR DEAL WITH CHINA IS DONE, SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL WITH PRESIDENT XI AND ME,' Trump posted on social media. 'WE ARE GETTING A TOTAL OF 55% TARIFFS, CHINA IS GETTING 10%. RELATIONSHIP IS EXCELLENT!' Yet after months of tense back-and-forth between Washington and Beijing, it remained unclear if the latest round of negotiations brought the two sides closer to an ultimate understanding on trade — or if it just amounted to more talk. 'Trump is mentioning the current tariff status, in a misleading way, to show he has the upper hand,' said Neo Wang, lead China macro analyst at Evercore ISI. Trump's comments prompted fresh questions about the terms of the pact US and Chinese negotiators reached Tuesday. Markets had a mixed reaction on Wednesday to comments from Trump and his team, with US equity indexes fluctuating throughout the day. In a later post, Trump said Xi and he 'are going to work closely together to open up China to American Trade. This would be a great WIN for both countries!!!' US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, speaking briefly to reporters at the White House later Wednesday, said he thinks the latest pact will be completed within days and that he didn't expect a written version to be released publicly. Trump's initial post suggested China may have to restart rare earth shipments before the US agrees to lower export controls on key technology. And his comments left doubt about whether Beijing could negotiate tariff rates lower. 'They are going to approve all applications for magnets from United States companies right away,' Lutnick said on CNBC. 'As they do that, we'll take off our measures.' Read more: GLOBAL INSIGHT: US-China Tariffs' Wild Ride – In One Chart Some Chinese suppliers to US companies recently received six-month rare earth export licenses, but uncertainty remained about a large backlog of applications, the American Chamber of Commerce in China said last week. Beijing is putting a six-month limit on the licenses in order to keep leverage if trade tensions flare again, the Wall Street Journal reported. The tariff figure Trump posted includes a 10% baseline duty, a 20% charge tied to fentanyl trafficking and roughly 25% from preexisting levies from his first term as well as most favored nation rates, according to a White House official — though the precise total remained unclear. Asked on CNBC if tariff levels will remain unchanged, Lutnick responded 'you can definitely say that.' China's Ministry of Commerce did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The US and China reached an agreement on Tuesday following marathon negotiations to implement the terms of a tariff truce reached last month in Geneva. Investors were closely watching the talks, amid fears that recent tensions could spiral out of control and reignite open trade warfare between the world's two largest economies. Still, details were scarce at the conclusion of the two-day negotiating session and Trump rushed to fill in the void. 'FULL MAGNETS, AND ANY NECESSARY RARE EARTHS, WILL BE SUPPLIED, UP FRONT, BY CHINA,' Trump said in his post. 'LIKEWISE, WE WILL PROVIDE TO CHINA WHAT WAS AGREED TO, INCLUDING CHINESE STUDENTS USING OUR COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES (WHICH HAS ALWAYS BEEN GOOD WITH ME!).' The London meeting came together on short notice following a call last week between Trump and Xi, after both nations accused the other of violating the Geneva accord. US officials accused China of stalling magnet shipments, while Beijing vented anger with fresh Trump administration controls on chip design software, jet engines and student visas. That quarrel demonstrated the central role of export controls in the economic rivalry between the two superpowers. China dominates the market for rare earths necessary for defense and electric vehicle production globally, and it also craves more advanced chips to advance its artificial intelligence ambitions. Under the pact, China pledged to speed up shipments of rare earths critical to US auto and defense firms, while Washington agreed to ease some of its own export controls, according to Lutnick. Curbs related to the most advanced chips would remain in place, the Commerce chief said Wednesday. 'It's very clear we are competing with China in the AI race' Lutnick said on CNBC. 'We are just not going to give them our best chips, and of course they want them.' He also said limits on key items like plane parts and ethane the US recently imposed were meant to create leverage for negotiations with Beijing. 'When they pulled out their card of these rare earth magnets, we put in ours that said, 'look, you just can't do that to America,'' Lutnick said. 'If you want to annoy us, the United States of America under Donald Trump is strong enough to annoy you back equally.' The Geneva agreement included a 90-day pause on very high tariffs both nations implemented on each others' imports that amounted to a de facto trade embargo. It's unclear whether that deadline, which expires in August, remains in effect and if the two sides could use the time to further reduce import taxes. The recent round of discussions also did little to repair fundamental issues, such as China's massive trade surplus with the US, and a belief in Washington that Beijing is dumping goods on its markets. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said Tuesday that no further meetings are scheduled, though noted that the sides talk frequently. China's chief trade negotiator Li Chenggang struck a similar tone, telling reporters Tuesday that 'we hope the progress we made will be conducive to building trust.' –BLOOMBERG

Tengku Zafrul: Malaysia to gain from improved US-China cooperation
Tengku Zafrul: Malaysia to gain from improved US-China cooperation

New Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Tengku Zafrul: Malaysia to gain from improved US-China cooperation

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia stands to gain from improved US-China cooperation, according to Minister of Investment, Trade and Industry, Datuk Seri Tengku Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz. At a press conference held after the Regional Socialisation of the AEC Vision 2045 Asean Community Strategic Plan today, Tengku Zafrul addressed the implications of global geopolitical developments, including former US President Donald Trump's recent statement that negotiations with China have concluded. "As a government, we view this situation positively because negotiations have moved from Geneva to London and are progressing on the right track," he said. "We hope this will bolster the global economy. As a trading partner to both the US and China, Malaysia stands to benefit if they enhance cooperation." Industry insiders believe the outcome of US-China negotiations will have a significant impact on Malaysia's economy, given the country's strong trade and investment ties with both global powers. They said improved relations between the two nations could help ease trade tensions, lower tariffs, and stabilise global supply chains, all of which would benefit Malaysia, particularly as a major exporter and regional manufacturing hub. "As Asean positions itself as a neutral trade bloc, Malaysia has the potential to act as a bridge between East and West, strengthening its role in global trade and supply chain resilience," one insider noted. Calmer US-China ties, they said, could also boost global investor confidence, drawing more capital into Malaysia. The country stands to gain further from multinational companies looking to diversify away from China under the "China +1" strategy, especially in sectors like electronics, semiconductors, and high-tech manufacturing.

Asian rally snaps as Trump threatens ‘take it or leave it' levies
Asian rally snaps as Trump threatens ‘take it or leave it' levies

Malay Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Asian rally snaps as Trump threatens ‘take it or leave it' levies

HONG KONG, June 12 — Asian shares were rattled today after Donald Trump said he would impose unilateral tariffs on partners in the next two weeks, reigniting trade war fears soon after reaching a deal with China to dial down tensions between the superpowers. The mood was also shaded by geopolitical concerns after the US president said personnel were being moved from the Middle East as nuclear talks with Iran faltered and fears of a regional conflict grew. The equity losses snapped a recent rally fuelled by talks between Beijing and Washington in London that saw them hammer out a framework agreement to move towards a pact to reduce levies. Investors have been on edge since Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff blitz on April 2 that sent shockwaves through stock and bond markets and stoked global recession fears. Days later he announced a pause in those measures until July 9 to allow for countries to cut deals with the White House, sparking relief rallies that have pushed some markets towards all-time highs. However, he once again shook confidence by saying yesterday that he intended to send letters telling governments what levies Washington would be imposing. 'We're going to be sending letters out in about a week and a half, two weeks, to countries, telling them what the deal is,' he told reporters. 'At a certain point, we're just going to send letters out. And I think you understand that, saying this is the deal, you can take it or leave it.' While some analysts indicated that previous threats had been rowed back, the comments added to the ongoing uncertainty about Trump's policies, reviving fears about sky-high levies and the impact on the economy. They also came not long after he had flagged the London agreement, and posted on social media that 'President XI and I are going to work closely together to open up China to American Trade', referring to his counterpart Xi Jinping. 'The uncertainty doesn't help,' Nick Twidale at AT Global Markets Australia said. 'And his overall comments overnight have led to more uncertainty for the market rather than the clarity we were hoping for.' Most Asian markets fell today, with Tokyo, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Wellington, Taipei and Jakarta in the red after a broadly healthy run-up this week. There were gains in Sydney, Singapore and Seoul. The weak performance followed losses on Wall Street, where trade worries overshadowed another below-forecast inflation reading that provided fresh speculation the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates. Oil prices slipped but held most of yesterday's surge of between four and five per cent that came after Trump said US personnel were being moved from the potentially 'dangerous' Middle East as Iran nuclear talks stutter. The move came as Tehran threatened to target US military bases in the region if a regional conflict broke out. The US president said the staff were 'being moved out because it could be a dangerous place'. 'We've given notice to move out and we'll see what happens.' With regard to Iran, he then added: 'They can't have a nuclear weapon, very simple. We're not going to allow that.' Trump had until recently expressed optimism about the talks, but said in an interview published yesterday that he was 'less confident'. — AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store