logo
Zelensky welcomed to No 10 for meeting with Starmer ahead of Nato summit

Zelensky welcomed to No 10 for meeting with Starmer ahead of Nato summit

The Ukrainian president arrived in Downing Street where he was expected to discuss Britain's ongoing support for his war-torn nation on Monday afternoon, after being welcomed to Windsor Castle for lunch with Charles.
Mr Zelensky, who is usually seen wearing military fatigues, wore a black blazer and trousers throughout his Monday visits.
He and Sir Keir embraced on the doorstep of No 10, where a red carpet had been rolled out for the Ukrainian leader.
Speaker of the House of Commons Sir Lindsay Hoyle with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Lord McFall at Speaker's House in the Palace of Westminster (Stefan Rousseau/PA)
Charles and Mr Zelensky were earlier pictured chatting as they made their way through Windsor Castle, and smiling as they shook hands in the Grand Corridor.
During his visit to London, the Ukrainian leader was also welcomed to the Palace of Westminster and met Commons speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle and his Lords counterpart, Lord McFall of Alcluith.
His arrival in the UK follows reports that Russia fired 352 drones and 16 missiles at Ukraine overnight, killing at least 10 civilians including seven in Kyiv.
Mr Zelensky said preliminary reports indicated Russia had used North Korean missiles to attack Kyiv and described those two countries, and Iran, as a 'coalition of murderers'.
His visit to London takes place the day before Nato leaders are set to meet in The Hague for a two-day summit, with increased defence spending top of the agenda.
The King with Volodymyr Zelensky at Windsor Castle (Jonathan Brady/PA)
Mr Zelensky has been invited to the summit but will not take part in its main discussions, and it is still unclear whether he will attend at all.
Ahead of the visit, a Downing Street spokesman said Sir Keir would 'reiterate our steadfast support for Ukraine' during his meeting with Mr Zelensky.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lammy urges Reform's newest MP to ‘get some help' over ‘conspiracy theories'
Lammy urges Reform's newest MP to ‘get some help' over ‘conspiracy theories'

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Lammy urges Reform's newest MP to ‘get some help' over ‘conspiracy theories'

Responding during a statement on the Middle East, Mr Lammy said the MP for Runcorn and Helsby should 'get off social media'. Foreign Secretary David Lammy (Parliament TV/PA) The UK-operated base in the Chagos Islands was not used in the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty has said. He added that the US did not ask to use it, as he answered questions from the Foreign Affairs Committee on Monday. Speaking in the Commons, Ms Pochin said: 'Is he (Mr Lammy) able to explain to the House whether the United States felt unable to use the Diego Garcia base and have to refuel, in a highly dangerous operation three times because of that, because of your deal that you did with the with the Mauritians, that would then tell the Chinese, that would then tell the Iranians?' Mr Lammy replied: 'The honourable lady has got (to) get off social media, has got to get some help… because she is swallowing conspiracy theories that should not be repeated in this House.' The deal over the Chagos Islands follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice which says the islands should be handed over to Mauritius. As well as establishing a £40 million fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay Mauritius at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. During the statement on Monday, Mr Lammy was pressed by MPs on the UK's position following the US military action. Conservative MP Lincoln Jopp (Spelthorne) said: 'Does His Majesty's Government support or oppose US military action against Iran at the weekend?' Mr Lammy replied: 'His Majesty's Government will continue to work with our closest ally, as I was last week in Washington DC.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin (Tunbridge Wells) said: 'What is UK Government policy on whether regime change should be pursued in Iran?' Mr Lammy replied: 'It is not our belief that it's for us to change the regime of any country, that it must be for the people themselves.' SNP MP Brendan O'Hara (Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber) said: 'We've been here for an hour, and still the Foreign Secretary appears incapable of saying whether he supports or condemns America's actions, or whether he regards them as being legal or not. 'And nowhere in this statement does the role of international law even merit a mention. So will the Foreign Secretary take this opportunity now to tell us whether he believes that America's unilateral action was compliant with international law?' Mr Lammy replied: 'I've got to tell (Mr O'Hara), I qualified and was called to the bar in 1995, I haven't practised for the last 25 years. 'It is not for me to comment on the United States' legal validity. I would refer him to article 51 and article two of the UN Charter, and he can seek his own advice.'

David Lammy has nothing to say
David Lammy has nothing to say

Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Spectator

David Lammy has nothing to say

The day started badly for David Lammy. Well – we don't know that for sure – it's feasible that first thing this morning he won a great victory over his toothpaste tube, however his appearance on the Today programme wasn't exactly a triumph. Asked by Justin Webb whether the US action was legal he told him that 'we weren't involved'. That's the spirit: answer the question you want, not the question you were asked. The Sage of Tottenham continued to manifest his dream interview rather than the one that was actually going on. We had a rather fun segue into the periodic table and percentages of uranium enrichment. 'Oh Justin', said Lammy at one point, 'we've always been clear'. As a rainy day in Dundee. Lammy continued his grand clarity tour in parliament where he made a statement on the state of the Middle East. It was hardly a great moment in the history of British foreign policy. Essentially, he told the House that there was almost nothing that Britain could or would do. 'We will continue to persist with diplomacy', was his repeated statement. As if this were some sort of active choice rather than the inevitable result of declining power. Imagine the equivalent statement in the natural world: 'we will continue to persist with this tidal drift', proclaims plankton. At the end of Lammy's clarity extravaganza, not much was announced Once upon a time the foreign secretary would come to the House of Commons to tell them that Britain had sent gunboats to sort out a recalcitrant country: nowadays he comes to announce that 'we've opened an email portal'. Next to Lammy sat Hamish Falconer, whose nepotistic rise in the contemporary Labour party makes the thousand-year Iranian Shahdom look like an exercise in raw meritocracy. The government benches tut-tutted when Sarah Pochin of Reform UK asked whether the Americans had felt unable to launch their attacks from the Diego Garcia base, owing to the terms of the Chagos surrender deal. 'Dear, dear' harrumphed one back-bencher. At that precise moment, Stephen Doughty, a flustered junior minister, was umming and ahhing before the Foreign Affairs Select Committee about whether the Mauritian taxpayer's bonza payout was being funded from the UK defence budget. Stuttering commenced. Today's mediocrity war was being waged on many fronts. 'The Honourable Lady has got to get off social media,' oiled the Foreign Secretary, accusing Pochin of 'swallowing conspiracy theories'. 'Answer the question!' bellowed Richard Tice. A valiant effort but he might as well have been screaming at a lump of plasticine. At the end of Lammy's clarity extravaganza, not much was announced, even less concretely achieved. Britain's foreign policy continues to look depressingly like a bald man giving his opinion on the design of a comb.

Welcome to hot Palestine Action summer
Welcome to hot Palestine Action summer

New Statesman​

timean hour ago

  • New Statesman​

Welcome to hot Palestine Action summer

A policeman spoke into his radio, a touch nervously: 'They've not got much space.' The occasion was Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's anticipated proscription of Palestine Action (PA) as a terrorist organisation. In response, the campaign group had called for an 'emergency mobilisation' outside Westminster Palace at noon today, 23 June 2025. Soon before that, though, the Metropolitan Police declared Westminster an 'exclusion zone', so the protest relocated to Trafalgar Square. But, as the square itself was fenced off for the dismantling of a stage from a weekend event, the protest was packed into the northeast corner of the square, outside St-Martin-in-the-Fields church, blocking the traffic on the Charing Cross Road for over an hour. Proscription would allow the police to use greater force when suppressing PA's activities. A moderately heavy police presence had issued from vans with recruitment appeals on the side. Some officers held cameras aloft, pointing at the crowd. Protestors filmed them back, as well as passing around boxes of face masks and distributing 'Bustcards'. Produced by volunteer group Green and Black Cross, Bustcards contain advice about your rights and the best course of action if you are arrested while protesting. For example, 'Say 'NO COMMENT' to all police questions during casual chats…For your protection and that of other people don't answer further questions.' Amnesty International said it was 'deeply concerned at the use of counter-terrorism powers to target protests'. Cooper's announcement follows two PA activists infiltrating Oxfordshire's RAF Brize Norton and tampering with two planes on Friday. Keir Starmer called the break-in 'disgraceful'. The Times estimated that Palestine Action has now caused £55 million of damage to military equipment. Other reports hold that the activists only spray-painted the jets, and that anyway they had just cycled or e-scootered into the base with no obstruction from any security. Protestors mocked the government's response on these grounds. One man's sign read 'Oh no I spilled some paint! Does that make me a terrorist?' He told me he had been on the same spot in 2003 to protest the Iraq war, and said 'It's ridiculous that Palestine Action, which has never killed anyone, is labelled a terrorist group. In that case the word terrorism has no meaning.' He wondered if any other non-lethal group had attracted the same proscription. Another man asked me, laughing, 'Are you a terrorist, sir?' More seriously, the first protestor said, the proscription was 'quite clearly an attempt to suppress pro-Palestinian voices… especially when this government has quite clearly contributed to the deaths of tens of thousands of people in Gaza.' To 'uphold the law', one sign insisted, was to 'stop the genocide.' Others echoed the sentiment: 'To us, terrorism is killing kids', 'terrorists don't spray paint they bom kids', 'Protest is a human right: protesting genocide is a human obligation'. One protestor, Alex, said he was supporting Palestine Action 'because they are fighting actively to stop this government colluding with genocide. We believe that the people who need to be proscribed, and counted as terrorists, are Starmer and his government.' The first eddy of confrontation came when the police forced two men to the ground to arrest them. One of them was elderly and appeared to be winded and quite dazed once he was brought back to his feet. Chants of 'shame on you' rose. The rest of the physical confrontation occurred as the police escorted these detainees to a corner and behind a cordon, then as they escorted them from the scene. I did not see the violence escalate beyond firm shoving, but several of those shoved were old or otherwise frail. One man shouted 'You can't just push me what the fuck are you doing?' Another, after arguing with an unreactive officer, said 'They're not human. They're dehumanised.' The crowd asked 'Who do you serve? Who do you protect?', jeered 'Oink oink piggy wiggy', and cried, most potently, 'Over a hundred thousand dead, you're arresting us instead.' Cooper made her announcement while the protest was ongoing. She said 'this government will not tolerate those that put that security at risk.' A draft proscription will be laid before parliament next Monday, 30 June. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe There was a broad cross-section of people protesting, and I was told there is broad support for Palestine Action in the country. It was raised that 350,000 people in the UK marched for Gaza on the weekend and that Jeremy Corbyn, in both the general elections he fought, won more votes than Keir Starmer did when he entered Downing Street. So if we are past the longest day of the year, the hottest are still to come. One activist said, 'Whether you're fighting for benefit rights, whether you're an asylum seeker breaking the blockade of the channel coming here to fight for themselves, whether you're a refugee, whether you're a worker, a public sector worker on low pay. There's a spirit of rebellion and it's coming together. This summer is going to be a very hot summer.' [See also: The British Left will not follow Trump into war] Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store