After 7 years, a plan to legally trap, neuter, return ferals in Costa Mesa may see light of day
Costa Mesa's Animal Services Committee has been working on ordinance that would permit citizens to participate in the humane trapping, sterilization and return of feral cats into the areas in which they were found, a practice that is currently illegal in the city.
And in the seven years it's taken for an ad hoc group to research and draft ordinance language and get the necessary permissions to place the new proposal before the City Council, feral cat populations continue to proliferate.
How much so? One unspayed female cat producing an annual average of three litters with four kittens apiece, half of which live to reach sexual maturity, could result in a net population of 22,908 felines in a seven-year period, according to an online population calculator.
That soon could change, however, as the committee is scheduled on Wednesday to formally discuss recommending the new policy for approval at the council level.
Proponents of trap, neuter and return, or TNR, say the process helps reduce the number of ownerless cats and their exponential legions of progeny, potentially decluttering shelters and reducing the cost burdens associated with their care and treatment.
The strategy is currently illegal in Costa Mesa, where the municipal code prohibits individuals from allowing animals 'to stray or run or be at large in or upon any public street or other public place within the city.'
Local laws also fail to make a distinction between true ferals and 'community cats,' who do not have traditional owners but are commonly recognized and fed by a loose coalition of neighbors known to them.
Instead, any cat without an owner is brought to Priceless Pets, a contractor that historically handled pet adoptions for the city and last year became its veterinary services provider. There, they are held for a period of seven days, like any other ward.
Priceless Pets owner Lisa Price said Friday while her staff technically have the ability to alter feral cats and release them where they were found, their hands are tied by the city's laws.
'At this very moment we're not allowed to release them back into Costa Mesa,' Price said. 'I know Costa Mesa has such a heart for the animals. Animal [Services] has been amazing. They've been very good and they're very pro-animal. Then you get down to this [law] and you're like, 'You want me to kill ferals?' The city stops short right there.'
This leaves the contractor with two options — euthanize the cat, which costs roughly the same as spaying or neutering, or find somewhere else for it to go.
Price and her team work with barn cat groups and sanctuaries willing to take on ferals as 'mousers,' sometimes in exchange for accepting 10 socialized, adoptable felines in return. It's daunting work that, despite saving the life of one cat, results in a higher population and even more work for the nonprofit.
'It's becoming increasingly difficult because those [organizations] are not easy to find, and there are only so many animals they can take,' Price said, adding that the organization strives not to euthanize healthy animals simply for being feral. 'But if there's not someone readily available at that moment, unfortunately, that could be their fate.'
Costa Mesa resident Becca Walls serves as vice chair on the Animal Services Committee and has worked on the ad hoc group since 2018 to codify a trap, neuter and return policy, despite committee turnover, the COVID-19 pandemic and the reassignment in 2023 of Animal Services from the city's parks department to its police department.
A lack of data on the effectiveness of trap, neuter and return specifically in Costa Mesa made it more complicated to convince city leaders that some kind of law change or program is needed, Walls said. But if the process were legalized, then data could be collected.
'I know several people who are already doing it, but they're never going to come forward with the data if it's illegal,' Walls added, referencing a 2023 cat hoarding incident in Costa Mesa that drew illegal trappers out of the shadows and into conflict with city workers.
'That incident was so negative for the community and people were so mad, it set back the relations we had with Animal [Services],' Walls recalled.
Meanwhile the issue, like the cat population, continues to grow. Before Priceless Pets began in 2024 working to transition feral cats to other communities, many were euthanized for behavioral problems. Between 2020 and 2023, a total of 91 cats were killed, compared to zero last year.
'Lisa's doing everything she can to not let them die,' Walls said of the current situation. 'Fosters are getting burned out on kittens — these are kittens that shouldn't have been born in the first place. It's just about making [TNR] legal.'
The proposed ordinance aims to legalize the practice by granting Costa Mesa residents a one-year permit, in exchange for agreeing that they will not trespass or enter a private property without permission, along with other conditions. Once altered, feral and community cats would be ear-tagged, a visible sign to avoid re-trapping, before being released.
After six months, the committee and Animal Services personnel would review the data and see whether a city-sponsored trap, neuter, return program might be an effective solution in the longer term.
Price said Friday she heartily agrees with legalizing the practice.
'Everyone is aware of my stance on that,' she said Friday. 'This is a huge step in being able to end overpopulation of cats, which means an overall less burden on everyone. It does make a difference, and the proof is in the pudding.'
The Costa Mesa Animal Services Committee's next meeting takes place Wednesday at 5:30 in the Community Room at Costa Mesa City Hall, 77 Fair Drive.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Feral cat crisis in Salem has residents fed up
SALEM, Ohio (WKBN) – A cat crisis in Salem has residents clawing for action. Feral cats are taking over neighborhoods, causing property damage and major concerns over public health. In a quiet corner of Salem, signs of a growing crisis slink through backyards and abandoned homes. For Brenda Austin, the issue is impossible to ignore. 'Everyone knows there is a cat problem here,' Austin said. This week, she took the issue to Salem City Council. Austin is calling on the city to support a Trap, Neuter and Release program (TNR) to address the city's growing feral cat population. 'They go into heat; they're screaming, howling, fighting. If you get them fixed, it reduces the spraying. It reduces the nuisance,' Austin said. Councilman Jeff Stockman, who chairs the Rules and Ordinance committee, said the city is ready to act and prepared to move full steam ahead with ordinances to help address the problem. The move comes after years of stalled action, largely due to a lack of enforcement resources, such as a dedicated humane officer. 'It's a community problem. It's not just a cat problem or this neighbor's problem. It's really a community problem,' Austin said. The problem is not isolated to just one or two neighborhoods. Residents are sounding the alarm citywide. 'I've spent over $10,000 out of my own pocket,' said Karena Holenchick, a Salem resident. 'So far, I have spayed and neutered six cats. Three extra cats had to be put down.'Supporters say a coordinated TNR effort would not only reduce suffering but also the nuisance behaviors that come along with the uncontrolled breeding. 'Can't enjoy the yard because they're defecating and urinating all over it,' said Amanda Baier, a Salem resident. 'We can't keep the cushions on the chairs on the front porch. It just causes all sorts of property damage, and we can't enjoy the property that we purchased.'City council is expected to begin discussing formal ordinances in the coming weeks. Austin says the solution is simple– stop the breeding and stop ignoring it. 'They're already here. So just fix the ones that are here and go from here,' she said. Councilman Stockman says the matter will be brought up at the next Rules and Ordinance Committee meeting on June 24. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
‘Legalizing pigs': Tacoma to change city code to address animal overpopulation
Tacoma soon will implement changes to the city's municipal code to better address animal overpopulation, an issue that some say has overburdened organizations like the Humane Society of Tacoma and Pierce County. The changes include higher fees for the licensing of certain pets and a new definition for 'community cats' – neighborhood cats that are cared for by the community but don't necessarily count as strays. The code update also includes changes that affect more nontraditional pets, including one that essentially legalizes domestic pig ownership so long as the pigs are licensed, spayed or neutered, microchipped and weigh under 100 pounds. Council member John Hines, who put forward the ordinance to the City Council, said he wanted to do so after hearing from Humane Society staff that the city code on animals is outdated. He said the series of code changes that the City Council first discussed at its June 3 meeting sought to simultaneously address the outdated language while also combating animal overpopulation. According to the city, complaints to Tacoma's 311 system related to animal issues have skyrocketed in recent years – reaching 1,467 between 2024 and 2025, compared to the 758 it received between 2022 and 2023. The proposed changes also come after the council in 2023 passed a ban on declawing. 'This is an important issue, people care about it a lot,' Hines told The News Tribune. 'We can do this and also take on some bigger issues in our city at the same time.' He said the new community cats designation will help ease the workload for Tacoma's animal control and the Humane Society. Residents often call animal control to pick up neighborhood cats and take them to the Humane Society – but sometimes, those cats are feral or semi-feral cats that are being cared for by neighbors. They just don't always have one owner or live indoors. The changes to the Tacoma Municipal Code would also repeal a section of the code on 'hogs.' Hines said the distinction between hogs and pigs is unclear, but the city generally has understood hogs to be pigs that weigh over 200 pounds that are raised for slaughter. Until the council gave its approval to the changes at its June 10 meeting, the code stated that keeping a hog in Tacoma was a 'public nuisance,' and people who did so would be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum of a $1,000 fine or up to 90 days of imprisonment. Hines said the strict punishment is likely a holdover from a decades-old policy that doesn't quite fit in 2025 when many people own potbellied or 'teacup' pigs. Pigs have recently made headlines in Tacoma – in 2024, Tacoma police officers gave chase to a small pig that trespassed through Tacoma's Eastside neighborhood. 'I want to say that I really wanted to ban pigs, because this is a city, it's not a farm, it's not Pierce County that has larger land areas,' Council member Sarah Rumbaugh said at the June 3 meeting. 'The reason I agreed to it is that people have potbellied pigs. That's a thing and they have them as pets.' The changes also include higher annual license fees for dogs and cats – it will soon cost $40 to license an altered dog and $175 for an unaltered dog, up from the $30 and $65, respectively. Licensing altered cats will now cost $30 and unaltered cats will cost $175, up from $20 and $65, respectively. The new ordinance also sets an annual license fee for indoor pigs at $40. The increased fees will help fund the city's Trap-Neuter-Return program for community cats, to help address the city's animal overpopulation. It also includes stricter requirements for pets to be microchipped and spayed or neutered, to prevent further animal overpopulation and to ensure that lost pets can be returned to their owners. Local Humane Society chief executive officer Leslie Dalzell called the changes 'thoughtful,' saying they will help reduce unnecessary shelter intake and ensure that the Humane Society can focus its efforts on helping animals 'truly in need.' 'Together, these changes reflect the city of Tacoma's continued leadership in progressive animal welfare policy and our shared commitment to treating every animal as an individual,' Dalzell told The News Tribune in an email. The city won't begin enforcing the increased fees until Sept. 1 to give the public time to become aware of the change and to pay the fees at a lower rate before they go up. Hines said the educational component that comes with the new fees is more the city's focus over strictly enforcing them – the changes are aiming to ensure that lost pets can be found and cared for. The city soon will begin to inform the Humane Society and local veterinarians of the changes who then can help inform pet owners, he said. 'If animals are licensed and microchipped, then if they are lost, it'll be easy to get them back to their owners. So there's a benefit to owners to have your animals licensed and microchipped,' Hines said. When the council gave its final approval June 10, the ordinance included an amendment that provided flexibility to the ownership of ducks and other fowl. The city code previously stated that residents can own a minimum maximum of six baby chicks, rabbits, ducklings or other fowl, but it didn't allow for people to buy fewer than six animals to replace them in the event that some pass away. 'By changing the code to allow you to purchase the number that gets you back to six actually honors the original intent of the rules [from] back in 1958,' Hines said at the meeting.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Conservation director responds to concerns raised by local businesses
WESTFIELD — Conservation Director Anna Meassick said people are confused about the city's new wetlands protection ordinance that was approved by the City Council in May, and the rules and regulations that will apply to the local ordinance that are currently in draft form and inviting comments until July 7. 'There is a deep misunderstanding of what we're trying to do,' Meassick said. Meassick and Wetlands Compliance Officer Julia Hampton were in their office on June 10 putting together a complete set of documents relating to the new ordinance, including agendas, minutes, peer review conversations and notes in response to a public records request. The Conservation Commission meeting that had been scheduled that evening was cancelled due to a lack of quorum. She said in 2022, the Conservation Commission first started talking about making minor corrections to the local ordinance, but it was put on hold. She said the language in the previous ordinance was very 'gray,' and there were no rules and regulations on how to apply it to such areas as the 50-foot no disturb zone. 'When alteration is absolutely unavoidable is the only time you can do work in the no disturb zone' was added in 2022 to the previous ordinance. She said public feedback at the time was, 'if absolutely unavoidable, don't do the project,' Meassick said, adding, 'We can't just say no with no legal justification. We needed to make it less gray without being prohibitive.' Meassick said it's about setting standards to do the work. 'If you can meet the standards, you can do the work. The local ordinance didn't set the standards.' She said at the same time in 2022, the paragraph about the Commission setting the rules and regulations, which she said is common to all local ordinances, had been deleted. Asked why change the local ordinance, Meassick said the state Wetlands Protection Act doesn't protect all resource areas, such as vernal pools, which are only protected if they fall within a resource area. She said under the Home Rule Authority, cities can set rules and regulations that are stronger than those of the WPA. Intermittent streams, vernal pools, isolated wetlands, ephemeral pools, and land subject to flooding if smaller than a certain amount of square feet are not protected under the WPA, but local protections around them are common across the Commonwealth. She said Westfield always protected vernal pools, for example. 'Most important in the new ordinance is establishing a 100-foot buffer zone as its own resource area,' Meassick said. 'It's not that it's all protected. We can set rules and regulations to go with it that aren't already in the act.' She said the state has a 100-foot buffer zone, but it is not considered a resource area, so currently Westfield reviews projects in buffer zones by how they impact the resource areas they are protecting. Meassick said the Conservation Commission has been working on rewriting the new local ordinance since June 2023, and the item was listed on every agenda until it was completed. It then went to the City Council for review in the Legislative & Ordinance Committee for four months, which went over the ordinance line by line. Prior to going to the City Council, Meassick sat in a peer review for five months with Tighe & Bond. 'I worked with Tighe & Bond once a week for three hours over the course of five months before even giving it to the mayor,' Meassick said. She said before the peer review with Tighe and Bond, the ordinance was written by the commission, including now retired longtime members David Doe and James Murphy. 'Anything I do is at the direction of the commission,' Meassick said. The City Council had a public hearing on the new ordinance at the end of April with no public feedback. It was approved by the council on May 1 and signed into law on May 6. 'The revision of the ordinance was on the agenda for two years. There was plenty of opportunity for public feedback. Suddenly, there is a huge problem regarding intermittent streams,' Meassick said. She said intermittent streams are not protected by the state WPA, but are protected in many local ordinances. Regarding the charge that the ordinance would regulate a stormwater swale, she said it does not. 'The definition of a stream says it has to flow from a resource area,' she said, adding that in the draft rules and regulations, it specifically states that intermittent streams do not apply to stormwater swales. 'The ordinance that is currently approved is not very different from the previous city ordinance,' Meassick said. She said the only resource area that was added to the previous ordinance was 200 feet from intermittent streams. She said there is confusion from the public about the 200-foot protection area, and the department wants public feedback on how the draft regulations that are currently proposed will impact people. 'If something is truly undoubtedly a hardship, we want to modify that,' she said. Another claim is that the city added a new, separate permitting system. Meassick said they didn't add a permit, but created a local version of the state permit in order to streamline and add clarity to the process. 'One of the things I felt was the most important was to add an administrative approval process. Under the former local ordinance, it didn't exempt projects that were usually exempt under the state act. We created an administrative approval process to streamline it so people who want to do minor projects, such as fencing, cutting a tree or pathways, don't have to go through the local permit process anymore, which they would have had to do under the old ordinance. Instead, Julie or I can just sign off on it, Meassick said. 'We're trying to make it easier and clearer for the public on what they have to do because we haven't had regulations before. The previous local ordinance had no regulations — there was no clear way to apply it locally,' she said. 'Just saying no was bad. You need to justify it somehow.' Meassick said the rules and regulations are the 'nitty gritty' of the ordinance, giving the example of the state's WPA, which is seven pages, and its rules and regulations, which is hundreds of pages. She said they are two separate documents. Meassick said the Conservation Department is seeking constructive feedback. Why would it be a burden, how will it negatively impact projects, instead of inflammatory comments such as catastrophic for our business. 'What we want to know is how,' she said, adding, 'The majority would be more appreciated as constructive criticism. We appreciate their feedback.' The public comment section for the rules and regulations of the Wetlands Protection Ordinance may be found at Meassick said she has only had one comment submitted to date. 'There is nothing wrong with the way the ordinance is written. The ordinance sets the baseline,' Meassick said. She said the wording is typical and was compared to 21 other communities in the state. They also extensively referenced the Massachusetts Association of Conservation Commissions handbook, guidance and literature by law, and modified it to fit Westfield. 'Our ordinance is science-based. It does not undermine property rights, due process and fairness. Yet again, we would greatly appreciate someone showing us how it does those things,' Meassick said. She also encouraged people to apply for projects at this time so the Conservation Commission can review their projects under the new ordinance, and give them feedback. 'The goal is never to be prohibitive, it's to regulate and protect our resources,' Meassick said. Read the original article on MassLive.
