China's museums get new mission: promote ethnic unity, counter ‘wrong historical views'
China's museums should not portray the
Han ethnicity in confrontational historical contexts with ethnic minorities, and they should tell the 'China story' by using archaeological findings, according to the country's top ethnic policy official.
Advertisement
Pan Yue , director of the National Ethnic Affairs Commission, made the remarks during an event billed as the first national training class for museum directors in Beijing on Wednesday.
Museums should 'refute all kinds of wrong historical views, including attempts to create a binary opposition between China's Central Plains and the border areas, between Han and non-Han groups and between Han culture and cultures of
ethnic minorities ', said Pan, who is ethnically Han.
Pan Yue is the director of the National Ethnic Affairs Commission. Photo: Weibo
The one-day session was aimed at cultivating a 'sense of community' within the country, and included representatives from the Palace Museum and the Museum of the War of Chinese People's Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, the commission said.
Museums should place every cultural relic and historical narrative within 'a system of overall development of the Chinese nation',
Pan said, adding that the country should be represented as 'diverse but unified', emphasising that it respects and accommodates differences.
Some museums have already heeded Beijing's call to tell the China story. The Sanxingdui Museum, an archaeological site on major Bronze Age culture in southwest China's Sichuan province, has created a course entitled 'Viewing Chinese Civilisation from Sanxingdui'.
Advertisement
Last year, the Hubei Provincial Museum staged an exhibit of 150 cultural relics intended to 'cast a strong sense of community for the Chinese nation', according to a museum statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asia Times
7 hours ago
- Asia Times
The US attack on Iran and the collapse of negotiations
President Donald Trump's decision to launch attacks on three of Iran's major nuclear enrichment sites took place after negotiations in Geneva collapsed. Iran's foreign minister met with the foreign ministers of Germany, Britain and France, known as the E3, plus the EU. The E-3 and EU group pressed the Iranians to engage in negotiations with the United States. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi said Iran would only consider talks of some kind (not with the United States) after Israel halted its attacks on Iran and was punished. The E-3 tried to sell Araghchi and the Iranians on a formula, not supported by Washington, that would impose strict nuclear inspections and other similar measures as a 'solution' to the impasse, disregarding Trump's policy of no enrichment of uranium by Iran. Araghchi wasn't buying the European suggestions. Behind the scenes there were a number of attempts to broker deals, the Geneva meeting the last in a line of contacts. All the various initiatives were blocked by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei. This image grabbed from a United Nations video shows Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi addressing the 59th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on June 20, 2025. Top European diplomats are meeting with Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Geneva on June 20 to discuss Iran's nuclear program. The US attack on Iran's nuclear facilities featured some 75 precision weapons including 14 GBU-57 bunker busters, 30,000-pound dual warhead weapons dropped by B-2 stealth bombers. Twelve GBUs were used against Fordow, two on the nuclear site at Isfahan. The B-2's flew directly from the United States and were refueled several times enroute to their targets. The US also deployed fourth and fifth generation fighter jets, likely from Prince Sultan Airbase in Saudi Arabia, although that is unconfirmed. A US submarine, probably Ohio class, located some 400 miles from Iran, launched 30 TLAM (Tomahawk Land Attack) cruise missiles aimed at Natanz and Isfahan. Other targets may also have been involved, but that information has not been disclosed. A B-2 bomber releasing a GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb. The US aircraft were not attacked by any Iranian air defenses, suggesting that most of these had previously been neutralized by Israel's Air Force. An IDF infographic indicating the layout of Iran's Natanz nuclear facility, June 13, 2025. China deployed two surveillance ships, numbers 855 and 815A, apparently to provide early warning to Iran and to try and jam Israeli air attacks. These same ships, it appears, were unsuccessful in detecting the US attack, either because they were jammed or because they never saw the B-2 bombers and other stealth aircraft such as the F-22 or F-35. Even if the Chinese were able to pass warnings to Iran, Israel had already destroyed most of Iran's air force and other air defenses. Reportedly, China also was shipping supplies into Iran and evacuating Chinese citizens. One of the Chinese surveillance and radar ships. The US operation, called Midnight Hammer, was coordinated with Israel and managed by CENTCOM. President Trump, speaking a few minutes after 10pm from the White House said that Iran should now make peace, but if it did not, there were plenty of targets in Iran that were far easier than Fordow, Isfahan or Natanz. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, speaking at an early Sunday morning news conference at the Pentagon, said, 'I can only confirm that there are both public and private messages being directly delivered to the Iranians in multiple channels, giving them every opportunity to come to the table. They understand precisely what the American position is, precisely what steps they can take to allow for peace, and we hope they do so.' Reportedly Iran's foreign minister is traveling to Moscow to coordinate with Russia and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Putin had sought a mediation role between Iran and the United States. For Putin the main focus is on Ukraine, where Russia is making significant breakthroughs, especially in areas that apparently are outside of the stated territorial goals of Russia's 'special military operation.' Russian support for Iran, if Russia actively challenged the United States, could force a turnaround in how the US views Russia in strategic terms. Putin likely will not want to see any change that would induce the United States to commit airpower to defend Ukraine and, by extension, risk a wider European conflict. Therefore, it is unlikely that Russia will take any action that would undermine the 'warming trend' with the United States. Russia's ability to influence Khamenei and the Mullahs, or for that matter Iran's Revolutionary Guards, to make a deal with the United States, is highly limited. At present any chance for Iran to change course and to consider a diplomatic solution that would definitively end Iran's nuclear program seems unlikely, considering Iran's current power structure. The US insists it is not promoting regime change in Iran, but that policy could very well change if there continues to be no progress in resolving the nuclear issue. Reportedly President Trump's envoy, Richard Grenell has asked Elon Musk to provide Starlink terminals to 'our friends' in Iran, a strong hint that the US is getting ready to support efforts to overthrow the Khamenei regime. Meanwhile hardliners in Iran are calling for Iran's navy to block the Straits of Hormuz, effectively ending oil exports through the Persian Gulf. Iran has a small navy and some submarines, including fairly quiet but older Kilo-class submarines. The idea that Iran could stop commercial traffic under current circumstances may be wishful thinking, considering the naval and air power put in place by the United States. Similarly, there is a Houthi threat to stop commercial traffic in the Red Sea, but Houthi capabilities have already been reduced and Iran is no longer in a position to resupply the Houthis with missiles and drones. A Russian-built, Kilo-class diesel submarine recently purchased by Iran, is towed by a support vessel in this photograph taken in the central Mediterranean Sea during the week of December 23. The submarine and the support ship arrived at Port Said, Egypt, on Tuesday and were expected to begin transiting the Suez Canal today, Jan. 2, 1996. Ships and aircraft from the US Navy's Sixth Fleet are tracking the submarine, which has been making the transit on the surface. This is the third Kilo-class submarine the Iranians have purchased from Moscow. Meanwhile the Iranian government has lost face at home. Suppressing the Internet and other steps won't stop the flow of information outside of regime control. The possibility of an internal upheaval cannot be discounted. Whether it will materialize remains to be seen.
RTHK
a day ago
- RTHK
'Iran reserves all options to defend itself'
'Iran reserves all options to defend itself' A satellite image shows trucks positioned near the entrance of the Fordow fuel enrichment facility. Image: Reuters Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Sunday said the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities were "outrageous" and "will have everlasting consequences.' In a post on X, Araqchi said the attacks were a "grave violation" of the UN charter, international law and the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. "Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people," he said. Iran's Atomic Energy Organization said it would not allow development of its 'national industry' to be stopped, and an Iranian state television commentator said every US citizen or military member in the region would be legitimate targets. State media in Iran reported that there were "no signs of contamination" at the nuclear sites at Esfahan, Fordo and Natanz which were hit in the US airstrikes, quoting a statement from the country's National Nuclear Safety System Center. "There is no danger to the residents living around the aforementioned sites," the statement said. Hassan Abedini, deputy political director of Iran's state broadcaster, said the three targeted nuclear sites had been evacuated 'a while ago,' adding that Iran "didn't suffer a major blow because the materials had already been taken out." (Xinhua, AFP)
HKFP
a day ago
- HKFP
Japan spots Chinese ships near disputed isles for record 216 straight days
Japan spotted Chinese vessels sailing near disputed islets in the East China Sea for a record 216 consecutive days, Tokyo's coast guard said Sunday. The Tokyo-administered islands, known as the Diaoyu in China and Senkaku in Japan, have long been a sore point between the neighbours. On Sunday, Japan said it observed four Chinese coast guard vessels sailing in the 'contiguous' zone, referring to a 12-nautical-mile band that extends beyond Japan's territorial waters. Last year, Chinese vessels sailed near the Tokyo-administered island chain a record 355 times, including for a period of 215 consecutive days, a Japanese coast guard spokesman told AFP. Japanese officials regularly protest the presence of the Chinese coast guard and other vessels in the waters surrounding the remote, disputed islands. Relations between Japan and China were strained by Tokyo's decision to 'nationalise' some of the islands in 2012. On Friday, Japan's coast guard and its US and Filipino counterparts staged joint training drills off Japan's southwest shore — the second time the countries' coast guards have held training drills together, and the first in Japan. Territorial disputes with China have pushed Japan to forge deeper ties with the Philippines and the United States. Earlier this month, Tokyo and Beijing traded barbs over close encounters between their military planes over the Pacific high seas.
