logo
Ong Beng Seng's HPL jumps almost 10% in heavy trading; company says it's not aware of reason for spike

Ong Beng Seng's HPL jumps almost 10% in heavy trading; company says it's not aware of reason for spike

Business Times16-05-2025

[SINGAPORE] Shares of Hotel Properties Ltd (HPL) jumped almost 10 per cent in active trading on Friday morning (May 16), prompting queries from Singapore Exchange Regulation (SGX RegCo).
At about 11.30 am, the counter was up 9.2 per cent at S$4.72 with over 350,000 shares traded, an unusual volume for the tightly held property and hotel group. But by mid-afternoon, it had given up more than half the day's gains and was trading at S$4.42, up just 10 cents for the day.
After news broke that founder and erstwhile managing director Ong Beng Seng was stepping down, there has been talk that new players may be keen on the company. The Business Times columnist Leslie Yee has also argued that with Ong's exit, selling his stake is the logical next step.
HPL had announced on Apr 14 that Ong, 79, would be relinquishing his position as managing director to manage a medical condition – multiple myeloma, a form of white blood cell cancer. He had also stepped down as a director of the company after not seeking re-election at the company's annual general meeting on Apr 29.
On Friday, the local bourse regulator asked the company to explain the stock's 'unusual price movements'. Any previously unannounced materially sensitive information that may explain the trading should be disclosed promptly, SGX RegCo's query stated.
The regulator also requested if the company was aware of other possible explanations for the trading activity, while asking HPL to affirm its compliance with listing standards. It added that if appropriate, the company might want to request a trading halt.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Responding to the query on Friday afternoon, HPL said that it was not aware of any unannounced information that might explain the trading. It said it was in compliance with SGX RegCo's listing rules, particularly its obligation to disclose any material information concerning the company.
Ong, known for bringing in the Formula 1 night race to Singapore, is embroiled in the high-profile conviction of former transport minister S Iswaran for accepting gifts as a minister and obstructing justice.
On Apr 24, the court granted Ong permission to leave Singapore for over two weeks to allow the businessman time to obtain further reports from his doctors on his medical condition. A spokeperson said he would travel to England, the US and Italy between Apr 28 and May 16 for both medical and work-related purposes.
The hotelier and property magnate was named in some charges to which Iswaran pleaded guilty, including abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, and one charge of obstruction of justice.
The Malaysian had previously been scheduled to plead guilty to both charges on Apr 2. The hearing was rescheduled to Apr 25, then again to Jun 10.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Singapore and Johor Regent swap prime Holland Road land plots as royal family eyes development
Singapore and Johor Regent swap prime Holland Road land plots as royal family eyes development

Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Business Times

Singapore and Johor Regent swap prime Holland Road land plots as royal family eyes development

[SINGAPORE] The government has agreed to swap an 8-hectare land parcel along Holland Road, for a 13 ha-plot in the same area belonging to the Regent of Johor His Royal Highness Tunku Ismail (ROJ). The 13 ha-parcel is part of a larger 21.1 ha swathe just outside the Singapore Botanic Gardens, owned by the Johor royal family for generations. The plots sit in an exclusive residential neighbourhood and a designated Good Class Bungalow area, where mansions command tens of millions with one at nearby Gallop Park recently going for S$58 million. The land swap agreement comes as the Johor Regent plans to develop his land, said the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) and Singapore Land Authority (SLA) in a joint statement on Tuesday (Jun 10). 'The Singapore government and the ROJ have agreed to undertake a land swap, so that the ROJ's planned developments will be further away from the Singapore Botanic Gardens Unesco World Heritage Site,' the authorities said. 'The land parcels to be swapped are of compatible value,' they said at a briefing on Tuesday, without disclosing the actual amount. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up The ROJ will transfer a 13 ha-plot, along Tyersall Avenue, to the government. In exchange, Singapore will transfer 8.5 ha of state land to the ROJ. With the swap, the ROJ will own 16.6 ha of land in an area bounded by Tyersall Avenue and Holland Road, including the 8.1 ha-plot which he already owns. The exchange is expected to be completed this year, and the land owned by the ROJ is suitable for low-rise and low-density residential use. The Business Times understands that the authorities have assessed that the state land parcel to be transferred to the ROJ can be potentially used for residential purposes. The plot is currently vacant and vegetated. It has been zoned 'special use' since the 1958 Master Plan. After the land swap, the ROJ can determine the use and submit an application for rezoning. It is unclear how much in land betterment charges, which developers pay for intensified use of land, will be charged. The surrounding area, to the west, is zoned residential with a gross plot ratio of 1.4. The plot is expected to have a value comparable to other nearby residential plots due to its similar development potential. In contrast, a plot located further away, such as the parcel to be transferred to Singapore, can be developed for lower-density residential use. Any development plans will be subject to due process, said the authorities. 'URA and agencies will assess any development applications and ensure that the proposed development is sensitive to the surrounding site context.' The agreement was made between the Singapore government and a private individual, and the Malaysian government and Johor State governments were not involved in negotiations. News of the land swap comes a week after the Singapore government announced it would acquire two separate small land parcels totalling about 0.79ha from the Malaysian government, as part of plans to redevelop Woodlands Checkpoint, a major land border crossing between the two countries. Singapore had previously written to Malaysia in May 2022 and November 2023 to propose the purchase. Expansion works will begin in 2025, with the first phase to be fully operational from 2032. Development works on the Johor Regent's Holland Road plots will be subject to environmental studies to mitigate any potential impact on the environment, said URA and SLA. The government will keep the plot it receives from the ROJ undeveloped for now. The 13 ha-plot along Holland Road is currently zoned an open space. Media reports in 2021 speculated that the Johor royal family had plans to develop the land which housed Istana Woodneuk, a palace built by the royals' ancestors in the late 19th century. One analyst estimate put the value of the land at S$4.5 billion if it were to be sold for development. The 2.3 million sq ft area owned by Johor royalty was once larger but has gradually reduced as the Singapore government acquired land to extend the Botanic Gardens. According to Bloomberg, the Singapore government bought a chunk in 1990 for US$25 million and another 1.05 million sq ft, as big as some 12 football fields, in 2009 for an undisclosed sum. The latter plot is under the purview of the Singapore Botanics Garden and it brings the total size of the 154-year-old Botanic Gardens to nearly 74 ha.

Doing away with SGX watch list may help the firms focus more on the long term: market watchers
Doing away with SGX watch list may help the firms focus more on the long term: market watchers

Singapore Law Watch

time3 hours ago

  • Singapore Law Watch

Doing away with SGX watch list may help the firms focus more on the long term: market watchers

Doing away with SGX watch list may help the firms focus more on the long term: market watchers Source: Business Times Article Date: 10 Jun 2025 Author: Ranamita Chakraborty As investors become more sophisticated, the onus remains on them to conduct their own due diligence before investing. The proposed removal of Singapore Exchange's (SGX) financial watch list could benefit companies by allowing them to focus on business growth without the burden of public stigma. 'This shift moves away from 'name and shame' and encourages a more constructive environment for corporate recovery and transformation,' Yap Wee Kee, partner of the capital markets group at professional services firm KPMG in Singapore, told The Business Times. Such regulatory measures are expected to steer Singapore more decisively towards a disclosure-based regime. They form part of a broader set of recommendations aimed at revitalising the local market, which were announced by the Monetary Authority of Singapore's (MAS) Equities Market Review Group in February 2025. Established in August last year, the review group comprises representatives from both the private and public sectors. Its objective is to enhance the competitiveness of Singapore's equities market by attracting investor interest, increasing the supply of quality listings, and streamlining the regulatory process for initial public offerings (IPOs). The group is seeking to shift the regulatory focus towards ensuring adequate disclosure of material issues, rather than prescribing how issuers should mitigate risks before listing. In line with this direction, Singapore Exchange Regulation (SGX RegCo) is currently seeking feedback on changes to rules on listing admission and post-listing disclosures. SGX RegCo last month proposed provisionally suspending the half-yearly reviews used to place issuers on the watch list. During this period, companies already on the list will remain listed, regardless of whether they meet the exit criteria. The financial watch list targets mainboard-listed companies with three consecutive years of pre-tax losses and a six-month average market capitalisation below S$40 million. Companies have 36 months to turn it around or face delisting. Some, like Intraco, managed to exit after financial recovery. Others, such as SMI Vantage, were delisted after failing to meet the exit criteria. As at Jun 5, 30 companies remain on the list. Notable names include Trek 2000, known for inventing the thumb drive. Being on the watch list can hurt a company commercially Nigel Toe, a director of business development at local wealth manager ICH Asset Management (ICHAM), told BT that being placed on the watch list can undermine a company's commercial prospects, as it may erode the confidence of clients and business partners. This loss of trust can, in turn, hinder the company's ability to raise capital, reducing its chances of achieving a successful turnaround. Ong Hwee Li, CEO of investment banking firm SAC Capital, said: 'Companies on the watch list often suffer from reduced trading interest as some brokerages may restrict trading for such counters.' As a result, liquidity for these stocks tends to be minimal, given that firms on the watch list face the risk of delisting if they fail to achieve profitability within a specified timeframe. Investor due diligence The need for the watch list appears to be diminishing. Before it was introduced in March 2008 during the global financial crisis, the Singapore market saw several corporate governance lapses. High-profile cases like Chuan Soon Huat, whose directors were arrested over disclosure failures, and Stratech Systems, which faced legal action over a failed software deal, underscored the need for greater oversight. Both were among the first companies placed on SGX's watch list, which sought to improve transparency and flag financially distressed firms. Many believe that investors today are more sophisticated and better equipped to assess the financial health and risk profiles of companies on their own. Investors should exercise the principle of caveat emptor or 'buyer beware' and do their due diligence when investing, said Toe. 'Initially, when you remove a watch list, there will be a bit of apprehension among smaller investors, but they will soon realise that there's no substitute for good due diligence and educating themselves when they invest,' he added. Ong sees value in the watch list, noting that it has served as a catalyst for underperforming firms to restructure, raise capital, or pursue strategic shifts in order to meet exit requirements. He said: 'It will be good if being on the watch list doesn't necessarily lead to a delisting. The watch list could be useful as an investor alert and not a deterrent. 'It is most important that we understand what we are investing in and that the issuer is very transparent with any form of potential sensitive or material information.' While the removal of the watch list may raise concerns about reduced transparency, particularly among less experienced investors, Yap noted that 'the emphasis on timely and quality disclosures can enhance transparency, provided it is well-executed'. With proper disclosures in place, a watch list becomes unnecessary, Toe said, describing its removal as a 'necessary step to promote market dynamism'. Ong similarly argued that the removal of the watch list does not inherently reduce transparency. He said: 'Listed companies will still be required to make timely disclosures, including announcements, if they incur losses for three consecutive years. These disclosures remain available to all investors and continue to provide insight into the company's financial performance.' This approach, Yap added,'affords transparency and accountability to shareholders while giving management the space to execute long-term plans without market pressure'. Source: The Business Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print

China's WeRide, Malaysia's Causeway Link among firms bidding to run driverless public buses in S'pore
China's WeRide, Malaysia's Causeway Link among firms bidding to run driverless public buses in S'pore

Business Times

time6 hours ago

  • Business Times

China's WeRide, Malaysia's Causeway Link among firms bidding to run driverless public buses in S'pore

[SINGAPORE] The local offshoot of Chinese self-driving technology company WeRide and a consortium led by Malaysian bus operator Handal Indah, also known as Causeway Link, are among four companies that have submitted bids to participate in a trial of autonomous public bus services here. The Land Transport Authority (LTA) called a tender in January seeking proposals for the trial, which is slated to start from mid-2026, on two public bus routes – one in Marina Bay and Shenton Way, and the other in one-north in Buona Vista. The tender, which closed on June 9 and is expected to be awarded by the end of 2025, drew four submissions in total. Apart from WeRide (Singapore) and the Handal Indah consortium, the other two tenderers are vehicle distributor Cycle & Carriage Automotive and another consortium led by MKX Technologies. According to business records, MKX Technologies was incorporated in Singapore in April and has two shareholders. The majority owner is X Star Technology, a Singapore subsidiary of Chinese online vehicle financing company Yixin Group, and the minority owner is MK.X, a Japanese electric car-sharing company. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up Government procurement website GeBiz did not state the other companies that make up the Handal Indah and MKX Technologies consortiums. The Straits Times has contacted WeRide, Handal Indah, Cycle & Carriage and X Star Technology for comment. LTA previously said that it will start the trial by buying six autonomous buses with at least 16 seats and deploying them on bus services 400 and 191. This is so the authority can assess the feasibility of self-driving technology for public bus services and gain operational insights. Former transport minister Chee Hong Tat had said that the use of autonomous vehicles would help to address pressing manpower challenges in the public transport sector, where it has been difficult to hire drivers. LTA's plan is for the autonomous public buses to operate alongside existing manned buses for an initial three-year period. Depending on how they perform, LTA may buy up to 14 more autonomous buses to expand the trial to two more routes later. LTA said it chose to trial the self-driving buses on services 400 and 191 because they are shorter and simpler routes. The authority is also taking a phased approach so it can thoroughly assess the reliability of autonomous vehicle technology while ensuring public safety. During the initial phase of the trial, the self-driving buses will have bus drivers on board to act as safety operators, and the buses will be monitored in real time by LTA. Extra safeguards, such as requiring all passengers to be seated and to wear seat belts, will be put in place, and a remote safety operator will be allowed to take over the supervisory role only after at least six months of testing. LTA had said that the autonomous vehicle developer selected for the trial will have to work with public transport operator SBS Transit, which runs services 400 and 191, to come up with operational concepts and plans for operating the autonomous public buses. The authority said it will evaluate the proposals it receives based on the maturity of the technology, the record of the autonomous vehicle developer and its ability to meet operational needs. Other factors being considered include the supporting infrastructure, such as fleet management and vehicle charging systems. WeRide, which holds driveless vehicle operator permits in China, the US, the United Arab Emirates and France, is no stranger to self-driving vehicle operations in Singapore. Since April 2024, it has been running an autonomous shuttle bus service at integrated resort Resorts World Sentosa. Two of WeRide's driverless road sweepers have also been on trial on public roads in the Marina coastal area since October 2024. Handal Indah has some autonomous vehicle know-how, too, via company founder Lim Han Weng's other business, Yinson Holdings. In 2021, Yinson backed Singapore-based autonomous vehicle start-up MooVita, which today operates a driverless shuttle bus service at Ngee Ann Polytechnic – albeit with a safety driver on board. THE STRAITS TIMES

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store