logo
'Toxic': Conor McGregor's White House visit highlights fractured relationship between UFC star, Irish homeland

'Toxic': Conor McGregor's White House visit highlights fractured relationship between UFC star, Irish homeland

Yahoo19-03-2025

Conor McGregor speaks on St. Patrick's Day from the White House briefing room podium in Washington, DC. (JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)
(JIM WATSON via Getty Images)
Last week at a Limp Bizkit concert in Dublin's 3 Arena, the same venue wherein Conor McGregor boarded his rocket ship to UFC superstardom 11 years prior with a knockout of Diego Brandao, just the mention of the former two-division champion's name drew a boisterous boo from the sold-out Irish crowd.
Many would have wagered that there would be no better example of how far his stock has plummeted in his homeland, at least for the month of March. Yet, after being received as a guest of U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House on St. Patrick's Day this past Monday, the outpouring of anger within Ireland directed at the once-celebrated UFC star has been palpable.
Advertisement
Since the 1950s, the Taoiseach, the head of the Irish state, has regularly visited the White House on March 17, a day dedicated to the country's foremost patron saint. This year, the current Taoiseach Micheál Martin visited five days before McGregor, who took to the dais on Monday and unleashed a warning to Irish-Americans that 'the immigration racket is running ravage (sic) on [Ireland].'
Reaction
Both McGregor's presence and declarations at the White House garnered criticism by a number of Irish government officials, with Martin underlining that McGregor has no democratic mandate.
'St. Patrick's Day around the world is a day rooted in community, humanity, friendship and fellowship,' Martin posted on X. 'Conor McGregor's remarks are wrong, and do not reflect the spirit of St. Patrick's Day, or the views of the people of Ireland.'
Advertisement
Speaking in New York on the same day, Tánaiste Simon Harris — the second ranking member of the Irish government — echoed Martin's sentiments.
'I know there's a real sense back home though in relation to Conor McGregor being in the White House yesterday of disgust,' Harris said.
'But let me say this as a representative of the government of Ireland and to the people of Ireland: Conor McGregor does not only not speak for Ireland, he doesn't only not represent our values, he's actually the opposite of all of the values we're proud about in Ireland. He represents the very worst of toxic masculinity and I think we need to be very clear on that.'
A sampling of Irish coverage of Conor McGregor's St. Patrick's Day visit. (Photo via Petesy Carroll)
McGregor's visit garnered front page news across many of Ireland's national publications, with opinion pieces within citing 'widespread outrage' and others declaring that it was embarrassment to the country.
Advertisement
It was also featured on bulletins across radio outlets nationwide and was featured on prime time news segments ran by the national broadcaster, RTE, and Virgin Media.
'A sinister event'
McGregor's visit to the White House came four months after a High Court civil jury found he sexually assaulted Nikita Hand in Dublin hotel in 2018, awarding the plaintiff approximately €250,000. The mixed martial artist is currently in the midst of appealing the court's findings.
In the aftermath of Hand winning the civil case, more than 1,000 retailers boycotted products associated with McGregor across the U.K. and Ireland. The company that owns the whiskey brand he co-founded, Proper 12, also announced that would no longer be using his likeness or image on the products.
Advertisement
On Tuesday, the Dublin Rape Crisis Center contacted the US embassy in relation to McGregor's White House visit, describing it as a 'very sinister event'.
Speaking to RTÉ, the charity's CEO Rachel Morrogh said: '[Monday's] meeting was a very sinister event and it needs to be called out for what I believe it was, which on one hand was normalizing sexual violence and on the other hand an attempt to rebuild the very damaged reputation of Conor McGregor.'
'What is sobering and shocking is that the office of the president of the U.S., which is so respected and trusted and esteemed, is being used for both of those things. And on St Patrick's Day, that office was used to launder Conor McGregor's reputation. Every backslap, every word of flattery, every aspect of that meeting showed a really callous indifference to every survivor of sexual violence.'
She added: 'There has been a really strong reaction amongst the Irish public that this is not something they agree with, and I hope that [Monday's] performance doesn't have a chill effect on people coming forward.'
Conor McGregor speaks at the briefing room lectern, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt at his side. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)
(REUTERS / Reuters)
Presidential hopes
McGregor has been endorsed for a presidential role by the likes of Elon Musk and Andrew Tate. Despite the Irish presidency being a predominantly ceremonial institution, McGregor underlined his intention to run for election during a January trip to the U.S. for President Trump's inauguration.
Advertisement
In December 2023, nearly a year before his highly publicized civil court case, a Ireland poll showed that only 8% of people would vote for Conor McGregor, with 89% of people polled claiming they would not vote for him.
In an interview with Sky News, Gail McElroy, a professor of political science at Trinity College Dublin, gave McGregor a 'close to zero' chance of even being nominated to run for presidential election.
'There's two hurdles. First, you have to get nominated and then you have to win a majority of the vote. Both of those hurdles are almost insurmountable [for McGregor],' said McElroy.
Candidates for the Irish presidency can be nominated in two ways, one of which is securing 20 nominations from of the Oireachtas — the houses of Irish parliament.
Advertisement
'There's a lot of [Oireachtas members] — 60 senators and 174 TDs [Irish MPs], but most of those are party affiliated and they won't nominate [McGregor],' McElroy explained.
The other way a candidate can be nominated via local authorities, like county councils. McElroy, however, thinks McGregor's chances of gaining an endorsement this way are unlikely.
"You're talking about different types of characters," McElroy said. "You know Mary Davis, who runs the Special Olympics [who ran for president in 2011]. It's likable candidates who county councils feel should have the option to run. Conor McGregor is toxic in Ireland. I think it's almost inconceivable that four county councils would endorse him.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

School presidents celebrate the value of faith-based higher education
School presidents celebrate the value of faith-based higher education

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

School presidents celebrate the value of faith-based higher education

WASHINGTON — Nearly 2 million students attend faith-based colleges and universities, a fast-growing segment of American higher education that now has a new tool to share its story. Over 50 college and university presidents gathered Monday at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in the nation's capital and vigorously applauded after watching the first episode of a new BYUtv documentary series, 'Higher Ed: The Power of Faith-Inspired Learning in America." 'Faith-based institutions are the bedrock of American higher education, and we've not paid adequate attention to that role and to that responsibility,' said Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education. ACE launched a Commission on Faith-based Colleges and Universities last year and Monday's event drew the presidents of dozens of commission member schools, including Notre Dame, Yeshiva University and Brigham Young University. The event also drew representatives of the U.S. Department of Education, the Faith Angle Forum, the American Enterprise Institute and the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, as well as reporters from The Washington Post and other media outlets. The new BYUtv documentary highlights students and presidents at three faith-based schools — Catholic University of America, Taylor University and BYU-Hawaii. 'This is a way of saying, 'Faith institutions have a contribution to make,'' said Elder Clark G. Gilbert, the commissioner of education for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Two additional episodes will be released in August and will include students from other commission schools. Those schools amount to 10% of the nation's colleges and universities and are excited to tell their stories, four presidents said during a panel discussion. Their stories need to be told even to people of faith, said Ryan Burge, the event's keynote speaker and a well-known analyst of data on faith and religion at Eastern Illinois University. Burge said it's a myth that college is a place where students lose their faith. 'College is not antithetical to religion,' he said. 'In some ways, it accelerates religion, enhances religion.' Data shows that the more educated Americans are, the more faithful they are, Burge said. He has found that the more Americans are educated and faithful, the more they flourish in numerous data sets. 'To summarize, education is good. Religion is good. Education plus religion is good,' he said. 'It causes trust. It makes us more loving of our neighbors. It increases our income. It increases all these outcomes.' In the documentary, Isabela Barboza said she decided to attend Catholic University of America because she decided that 'if religion is part of my life, it has to be part of my education and formation.' Taylor University student Hannah Wylie, whose parents attended Harvard and Brown, said she struggled before turning down her own Ivy League offer to attend the small evangelical school in Upland, Indiana. She is grateful she did. 'I wanted to be taught to think deeply about things I was doing,' she said in the documentary. 'I wanted to do things for a purpose.' Every college and university president in America is grappling with data that shows students facing a crisis of meaning in their lives. Rabbi Avi Berman, the president of Yeshiva University, took a moment of gratitude during the panel discussion because he found the documentary powerful. 'Young people are looking to university to find themselves and their values because they are not seeing answers to their deep, existential questions in the ephemeral choices being offered them in other institutions,' he said. Lipscomb University President Candice McQueen said she was grateful the documentary illustrated what colleges and universities like her Churches of Christ school in Nashville, Tennessee, bring to the table. The Rev. Robert Dowd, president of the University of Notre Dame, said his school takes a both-and approach to the holistic growth of its students. 'Notre Dame is a place where we educate the whole person, where both faith and reason are engaged, where matters of the heart as well as the life of the mind are very much valued,' he said. 'We want our students to grow not only in understanding, in knowledge and in technical skills but in wisdom, and we want them to grow in faith, hope and love.' Among those in attendance were BYU President Shane Reese, BYU-Idaho President Alvin Meredith, BYU-Pathway Worldwide President Brian Ashton and Ensign College President Bruce Kusch. BYU-Hawaii President John Kauwe wasn't at the Kennedy Center, but he was seen in the documentary riding a skateboard on the Laie, Hawaii, campus in white Nikes with a black swoosh and a splash of blue. 'What faith-based institutions offer is another type of belonging,' Kauwe says in the 30-minute film. The presidents met in working groups in the morning to learn about best practices around issues like hiring people who fit a school's mission and how to share and elevate stories about their faith-based schools. Elder Gilbert said the Commission on Faith-based Colleges and Universities creates a friendship for every school. 'There is connectivity for those who always feel like the odd man out,' he said.

Smithsonian rejects Trump's attempt to fire National Portrait Gallery director
Smithsonian rejects Trump's attempt to fire National Portrait Gallery director

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Smithsonian rejects Trump's attempt to fire National Portrait Gallery director

The Smithsonian Institution asserted its independence Monday evening in a statement that could be read as a rejection of President Trump's late-May firing of National Portrait Gallery Director Kim Sajet. The Smithsonian's statement said the organization's secretary, Lonnie G. Bunch, "has the support of the Board of Regents in his authority and management of the Smithsonian." The statement suggested that all personnel decisions will be made by Bunch, not Trump. The announcement came after a much-anticipated Board of Regents meeting to discuss the fate of Sajet. The Washington Post had reported that Sajet quietly continued to show up for work each day after Trump's social media post, which said he was firing Sajet for being 'a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI.' The Smithsonian's statement Monday did not explicitly state that Sajet would remain in her position, and the institution did not respond to a Times question on that subject. But the text of the statement is clear in its intent, beginning: "In 1846, the Smithsonian was established by Congress as an independent entity." It continues: "Throughout its history, the Smithsonian has been governed and administered by a Board of Regents and a Secretary. The board is entrusted with the governance and independence of the Institution, and the board appoints a Secretary to manage the Institution." The Smithsonian's move comes shortly after the White House proposed a 12% reduction in funding to the Smithsonian in the 2026 budget — including the elimination of funding for the National Museum of the American Latino, which is in the development stages and aims to open on or near the National Mall; and the Anacostia Community Museum, which opened in 1967 and honors Black culture. The Smithsonian became a target for Trump beginning March 27, when he issued an executive order titled "Restoring truth and sanity to American history." That order demanded an end to federal funding for exhibitions and programs based on racial themes that 'divide Americans.' "Once widely respected as a symbol of American excellence and a global icon of cultural achievement, the Smithsonian Institution has, in recent years, come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology," the order read. It also instructed Vice President JD Vance to remove 'improper ideology' from the Smithsonian's 21 museums and the National Zoo in Washington. The order followed Trump's ongoing attempts to reshape federal cultural institutions, including his February takeover of the Kennedy Center. One major difference between the Kennedy Center and the Smithsonian: The Kennedy Center's board is appointed by the president, but the Smithsonian's board consists of officials representing all three branches of government. Vance is on the Smithsonian's Board of Regents, as is Chief Justice John G. Roberts. "Since its inception, the Smithsonian has set out to be a nonpartisan institution," the statement Monday read. "As the nation's museum, the Smithsonian must be a welcoming place of knowledge and discovery for all Americans. The Board of Regents is committed to ensuring that the Smithsonian is a beacon of scholarship free from political or partisan influence, and we recognize that our institution can and must do more to further these foundational values. "To reinforce our nonpartisan stature, the Board of Regents has directed the Secretary to articulate specific expectations to museum directors and staff regarding content in Smithsonian museums, give directors reasonable time to make any needed changes to ensure unbiased content, and to report back to the Board on progress and any needed personnel changes based on success or lack thereof in making the needed changes." Get notified when the biggest stories in Hollywood, culture and entertainment go live. Sign up for L.A. Times entertainment alerts. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce reliance on US defense, Carney says
Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce reliance on US defense, Carney says

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce reliance on US defense, Carney says

Canada will meet NATO's military spending guideline by early next year and diversify defense spending away from the United States, Prime Minister Mark Carney said Monday, asserting that Washington no longer plays a predominant role on the world stage. The announcement means Canada will achieve NATO's spending target of 2% of gross domestic product five years earlier than previously planned. 'Our military infrastructure and equipment have aged, hindering our military preparedness,' Carney said. 'Only one of our four submarines is seaworthy. Less than half of our maritime fleet and land vehicles are operational. More broadly, we are too reliant on the United States.' According to NATO figures, Canada was estimated to be spending 1.45% of GDP on its military budget, below the 2% target that NATO countries have set for themselves. Canada previously said it was on track to meet NATO's target by the end of the decade. 'Our goal is to protect Canadians, not to satisfy NATO accountants,' Carney said in a speech at the University of Toronto. Canada is about to host US President Donald Trump and other leaders at a summit of the Group of Seven leading industrialized nations in Alberta on June 15-17, and before the NATO summit in Europe. NATO allies are poised to increase the commitment well beyond the 2% target. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said last week that most US allies at NATO endorse Trump's demand that they invest 5% of gross domestic product on their defense needs and are ready to ramp up security spending even more. 'We are meeting 2%. And that is the NATO target as it is today,' Carney said at a later news conference. 'We will need to spend more.' He said there will be discussions on the increased spending amount and its timeline at the NATO summit. Carney has said he intends to diversify Canada's procurement and enhance the country's relationship with the EU. 'We should no longer send three-quarters of our defense capital spending to America,' Carney said in a speech at the University of Toronto. 'We will invest in new submarines, aircraft, ships, armed vehicles and artillery, as well as new radar, drones and sensors to monitor the seafloor and the Arctic.' Canada has been in discussions with the European Union to join an EU drive to break its security dependency on the United States, with a focus on buying more defense equipment, including fighter jets, in Europe. Carney's government is reviewing the purchase of U.S. F-35 fighter jets to see if there are other options. 'We stood shoulder to shoulder with the Americans throughout the Cold War and in the decades that followed, as the United States played a predominant role on the world stage. Today, that predominance is a thing of the past,' Carney said in French, one of Canada's official languages. He added that with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the United States became the global hegemon, noting that its strong gravitational pull became virtually irresistible and made the US 'our closest ally and dominant trading partner.' 'Now the United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contributions to our collective security,' Carney said. Trump's calls to make Canada the 51st US state have infuriated Canadians, and Carney won the job of prime minister after promising to confront the increased aggression shown by Trump. The prime minister said 'a new imperialism threatens.' Carney said the long-held view that Canada's geographic location will protect Canadians is increasingly archaic. The government is adding $9 billion Canadian (US$6.6 billion) in spending this year and Carney said the Canadian Coast Guard will be now be a part of the military. European allies and Canada have already been investing heavily in their armed forces, as well as on weapons and ammunition, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store