Richard Torrez Jr. outpoints Guido Vianello in first career decision; Abdullah Mason destroys Carlos Ornelas
Richard Torrez Jr. preserved his unbeaten professional record Saturday against Guido Vianello. ()
(Ian Maule via Getty Images)
Richard Torrez Jr. showed some new wrinkles in his game as he went to the scorecards for the first time as a pro.
The 2020 Olympic silver medalist went all 10 rounds in a well-earned unanimous decision victory over Guido Vianello. Torrez overcame a four-inch height disadvantage and a cut over his right eyelid to win by scores of 97-92, 98-91 and 98-91 in their Saturday headliner at Palms Casino Resort in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Advertisement
'Tonight taught me they don't all go down,' Torrez said after his first distance win. 'He's a strong fighter, he's resilient.'
The crossroads bout was a battle of Olympians at vastly different stages of their career. Torrez, a 25-year-old southpaw from Tulare, California, is a well-educated heavyweight on the rise. Vianello, who represented Italy in the 2016 Rio Olympics, has quickly reached win-or-go-home status at age 30 after already suffering multiple professional defeats.
It was Torrez (13-0, 11 KOs) who fought with the greater sense of urgency right from the opening bell, though not always to his advantage. The 6-foot-2 southpaw pushed the action and fought through Vianello's constant clinches. Vianello, a 6-foot-6 heavyweight from Rome, enjoyed select moments of success with his straight right hand against an onrushing Torrez.
Advertisement
Vianello (13-3-1, 11 KOs) was warned by referee Thomas Taylor early in the second round to adjust his clinch-first approach to the fight. The advice didn't take, as he suffered a point deduction less than five minutes into the main event for repeated offenses of the infraction.
Torrez enjoyed a sizable lead through two rounds but failed to make Vianello further pay. Action was stop-and-start in the third, but the best moments were enjoyed by Vianello, who landed several straight rights and an uppercut as Torrez was caught rushing inside.
An accidental clash of heads left Torrez with a cut over his left eye in the fourth. Both fighters were warned for their constant holding, while the crowd also voiced its displeasure over the lack of sustained action. Torrez drew far more favorable reviews when he landed a right hook over the top near the end of the round.
Advertisement
Both men picked up the pace considerably in the fifth round. Vianello slammed home a right hand but was rocked moments later by a Torrez right hook. Another exchange near the final 30 seconds of the round saw Vianello connect to the body and Torrez again respond with a counter right hook upstairs.
Vianello grew tired of the shorter Torrez leading with his head and repeatedly attempted to offset it with a forearm nudge. The tactic drew a warning from the referee, though he adjusted and clipped Torrez with body shots from the outside. Torrez connected with a right hook and left hand later in the frame.
Guido Vianello suffered his third professional loss Saturday in Las Vegas. ()
(Al Bello via Getty Images)
Both fighters made better use of their respective jabs in the seventh round. Vianello used his stick to capitalize on his considerable height and reach advantage for the first time in the fight. Torrez flicked his right jab as means to set up power shots, though not very often to the desired effect.
Advertisement
The lone other time that Torrez saw the eighth round of a fight ended with his deepest career stoppage to date when he halted Curtis Harper with just 57 seconds to go in their December 2023 clash.
He sought a similar outcome as he landed a right hook to hurt Vianello in the first minute of the eighth. It was a much-needed momentum shift for Torrez as the fight tightened up on the scorecards. Torrez later connected with an overhand left, which badly buzzed Vianello. The visiting Italian barely survived the round but was unstable on his way back to the corner.
Torrez entered uncharted territory as the bell sounded to start the ninth. He went on the attack but a headbutt left him with a cut above his right eyelid. Vianello couldn't find a way to leverage the situation, as he was still mindful of his heavy-handed foe, other than a one-two down the middle toward the final minute of the round. Torrez closed the frame with a pair of overhand lefts.
Vianello fought the 10th round like a man who trailed on the scorecards. He threw right hands with purpose, which prompted Torrez to box more and offer just enough movement to lessen the incoming impact.
Advertisement
Torrez slammed home a right hook to draw a rise of the crowd with just over a minute left in the fight. A body shot had Vianello hurt but Torrez could not put together that final combination to avoid his first career distance fight.
'He's an Olympian, I have nothing but respect for him,' Torrez said of Vianello. 'I knew it would come out today.'
Torrez made up for Vianello's greater activity with precision punching. The squat heavyweight landed 92 of 245 total punches (37.6%), compared to 88 of 318 (27.7%) for Vianello, who has now lost three of his past six fights.
Torrez only had one other fight not end in a stoppage throughout his more than five years as a professional. Joey Dawejko avoided that fate, though only because he was disqualified in the fifth round of their clash this past September at Desert Diamond Arena in Glendale, Arizona.
Advertisement
There were moments of adversity presented Saturday night, something which Torrez called for as he makes his way toward the contender stage.
'My shortcomings and my doubts, they push me in the gym,' insisted Torrez. 'I have to follow my coaches' advice.'
The question now is who Top Rank — Torrez's career-long promoter — next puts in front of him.
Whatever decision is made will be just fine with Saturday's victor.
'I don't say no to fights,' Torrez said. 'Whoever you guys give me, I'm going to say yes.'
Delgado edges Rodriguez via majority decision
The meeting of two of boxing's most brilliant minds — Hall of Fame trainer Freddie Roach and former IBF junior lightweight titlist Robert Garcia — saw a physically tactical battle come down to the final round.
Advertisement
In the end, it was the Garcia-trained Lindolfo Delgado who edged Roach-trained Elvis Rodriguez via majority decision. Delgado (23-0, 16 KOs), who represented Mexico in the 2016 Rio Olympics, won by scores of 96-94 and 96-94 to overrule a 95-95 tally in their 10-round junior welterweight contest.
The matchup never really caught fire despite the suggestion for a fun action battle on-paper. The slow pace worked to the advantage of Delgado early on, as he patiently poked his jab against the defensively responsible Rodriguez (17-2-1, 13 KOs).
Lindolfo Delgado stayed unbeaten as a pro Saturday with his win over Elvis Rodriguez. ()
(Michael Owens via Getty Images)
Action picked up in the fourth round when Rodriguez chose to increase his punch output. The Dominican southpaw felt a sense of urgency as swelling developed around his left eye. Delgado briefly lost his balance after Rodriguez landed a left hand around the Mexican's high guard.
Advertisement
Rodriguez was the busier fighter in the fifth, after which he held a 42-to-29 edge over Delgado in total landed punches. It came as swelling began to form under his right eye as well. Delgado adjusted and connected with combinations in the sixth, during moments where Rodriguez attempted to load up on his lead hand.
Both fighters exchanged one-twos in the seventh round. Delgado landed the more telling of the two but was later forced to absorb a straight left hand on the chin. He responded with a left hook later in the round but left his guard down long enough to take a straight left and a right hook from Rodriguez.
Delgado paid the price for looking for one big shot in the eighth. Rodriguez was the busier fighter and punctuated the round with a body shot and right hook over the top.
Advertisement
Rodriguez missed out on a huge moment late in the ninth, as Delgado boxed and moved before a straight left hand put him on wobbly legs along the ropes. There was an argument to be made that the ropes broke Delgado's fall, which should've resulted in a knockdown. The lack of a follow-up by Rodriguez, however, allowed Delgado to fully recover and resume control of the action by round's end.
Rodriguez's Hall of Fame trainer Roach suggested pre-fight that his charge would close the show with a right hook. That moment never came close to materializing. Conversely, it was Delgado who hurt a fatigued Rodriguez inside the last minute of the 10th and final round. A pair of left hooks to the body by Delgado closed out the fight as both fighters sweated out the final scorecards.
In the end, the judges liked Delgado's accuracy (89 of 300; 29.7%) over Rodriguez's greater punch output (94 of 408; 23.0%). Rodriguez snapped a six-fight win streak as a result, while Deglado remained unbeaten just days ahead of his eighth full year as a pro.
Delgado vs. Rodriguez was previously budgeted to serve as an IBF title eliminator for the No. 2 position at junior welterweight. Sanctioning was removed, however, since the bout was only scheduled for 10 rounds; the IBF requires 12-rounds for its elimination contests.
Mason stops Ornelas after six rounds
There was no place Abdullah Mason wanted to be on his 21st birthday other than in a boxing ring.
Advertisement
The fast-rising lightweight celebrated his transition to adulthood with a one-sided stoppage of late replacement Carlos Ornelas. Mason (18-0, 16 KOs) scored three knockdowns — all courtesy of left hands which caused Ornelas to take a knee in delayed reaction — to force the stoppage prior to the start of the seventh round.
Mexico's Ornelas (28-5, 15 KOs) hadn't fought in 16 months prior to Saturday but agreed to replace an unavailable Giovanni Cabrera on barely one month's notice. His body language during each knockdown suggested that he quickly ran out of answers.
Mason — a Bedford, Ohio native who has now stopped each of his past eight opponents — entered his first scheduled 10-round affair. It was clear that he wouldn't need that much time to get the job done, though he was tight early and had moments in the fight where he looked for the knockout rather than build toward that moment.
Advertisement
'I felt myself loading up trying to get him out of there earlier,' Mason admitted after the fight 'He's a strong guy and I was looking for a perfect shot. You still have to break these guys down.'
Mason took that key step late in the second round. A left-hand shot landed on the chin of Ornelas, who stepped back before deciding to take a knee. The same sequence occurred in the closing seconds of the fourth round and again near the end of the sixth.
The final knockdown was preceded moments earlier by a left hand which left Ornelas with a cut on the corner of his right eye. An in-ring wellness check conducted by referee Raul Caiz Jr. at the start of the seventh revealed that Ornelas was no longer fit to continue.
Mason — Uncrowned's top runner-up for 2024 Prospect of the Year — connected on 94 of 227 total punches (41.4%), compared to just 68 of 229 (29.7%) for Ornelas, according to Compubox statistics.
Main card
Heavyweight: Richard Torrez Jr. def. Guido Vianello via UD (98-91, 98-91, 97-92)
Advertisement
Junior welterweight: Lindolfo Delgado def. Elvis Rodriguez via MD (96-94, 96-94, 95-95)
Lightweight: Abdullah Mason def. Carlos Ornelas via seventh-round TKO
Prelims
Junior bantamweight: Steven Navarro def. Juan Esteban Garcia via fourth-round TKO
Featherweight: Albert "Chop Chop" Gonzalez def. Dana Coolwell via UD
Junior middleweight: Jahi Tucker def. Troy Williamson via UD
Junior lightweight: DJ Zamora def. Hugo Castañeda via fourth-round TKO
Junior middleweight: Art Barrera Jr. def. Daijohn Gonzalez via second-round TKO
Junior welterweight: Samuel Contreras def. Robert Jimenez via first-round TKO

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
22 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Germany picks experienced squad for Euro 2025 but leaves out two critics
RUST, Germany (AP) — Germany has retained 11 players who reached the 2022 Women's European Championship final for Euro 2025. There's no place for two prominent critics of coach Christian Wück. The 23-player squad announced on Thursday is captained by Bayern Munich's Giulia Gwinn, one of the returning players from the team which lost to England in the 2022 final . North Carolina Courage defender Felicitas Rauch and Eintracht Frankfurt forward Nicole Anyomi were in the 2022 squad but aren't this time. Both have previously criticized Wück for what they called a lack of communication around his decision not to pick them for earlier squads. Rauch was among 12 players included in a reserve list on Thursday. The 20-year-old forward Cora Zicai is considered one of Germany's brightest young players after scoring two goals in her three national team games. Germany starts its Euro 2025 campaign in Switzerland on July 4 with a group game against Poland followed by Denmark on July 8 and Sweden on July 12. Since the last Euros, Germany suffered its worst ever World Cup result in 2023 with elimination in the group stage, but rebounded to win the bronze medal at last year's Paris Olympics. ___ AP soccer:
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jon Rahm says his 21 straight top-10 LIV Golf finishes aren't telling the whole story
Jon Rahm hits out of the bunker on the fourth hole of his U.S. Open practice round on June 11, 2025. OAKMONT, Pa. — Jon Rahm has 21 consecutive top-10 finishes in his LIV Golf events and was asked about that streak. 'I would happily trade a bunch of them for more wins, that's for sure, but I keep putting myself in good position,' he said. 'Listen, I'm a realist in this case. I've been playing really good golf, yes, but I'd be lying if I said that it wasn't easier to have top 10s with a smaller [48-player] field. Advertisement 'Had I been playing full-field events, would I have top 10 every single week? No. Jon Rahm hits out of the bunker on the fourth hole of his U.S. Open practice round on June 11, 2025. Getty Images 'But I've been playing good enough to say that I would most likely have been inside the top 30 every single time and maybe even top 25, which for 21 straight tournaments I'd say that's pretty good. I still would have had a lot of top 10s, that's for sure. 'As much as I want to give it credit personally for having that many top 10s, I wouldn't always give it as the full amount just knowing that it's a smaller field.' John Bodenhamer, the USGA's chief championships officer, on Wednesday hinted that it's possible Phil Mickelson, who's playing in his 34th U.S. Open but is in the final year of his five-year exemption into the event, would be in consideration for a special invitation next year should be not otherwise qualify. Advertisement The 2026 U.S. Open will be played at Shinnecock Hills, where Mickelson finished runner-up in 2004. Mickelson actually received a special exemption in 2021, but went on to win the PGA Championship to earn his way in as well as a five-year exemption. This week is the final year of that exemption. 'We would review things for Shinnecock ahead of next year and look at all of those possibilities and evaluate it from there,' Bodenhamer said when asked about another special invite. 'We hope he earns his way in, and I think he'd tell you the same thing. That's what he did last time. We gave him one and then he went out and won the PGA Championship. So, [we] wouldn't put it past him.'' Rory McIlroy was asked how 'big a factor' it was in his subpar PGA Championship performance last month having to play with his backup driver after he was forced to take his No. 1 out of play when it was deemed nonconforming by the USGA. Advertisement 'It wasn't a big deal for Scottie [Scheffler], so it shouldn't have been a big deal for me,' he said. Rory McIlroy hits a tee shot on the first hole of his U.S. Open practice round on June 11, 2025. Charles LeClaire-Imagn Images Scheffler, the world No. 1 player who went on to win the PGA, also had his driver taken out of play because it was found to be nonconforming.

Wall Street Journal
38 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Schools Can Pay Their Athletes—and College Sports Will Never Be the Same
College sports are dying, college sports are dead, college sports aren't about college anymore—it's Christmas in June for anyone feeling apocalyptic about the state of college sports, now that a settlement has been approved allowing schools to directly pay their athletes. This isn't a salary, technically. This is compensation from schools to athletes for use of their 'name, image, likeness,' but it's not a measly NIL like a burly offensive lineman getting all the bratwurst he can eat. This is a real paycheck, directly from the college. It's really happening—for Division I schools that have opted in. It's set to start July 1. 'A new beginning,' NCAA boss Charlie Baker called it. Is it going to work? Will it cannonball Olympic and nonrevenue sports? How does it square with Title IX? Will it withstand legal challenges? Will it all fall apart? I have no idea! Neither does anyone else! Hold on to your helmets, everyone. We're all jumping off the diving board together. (I will now pause 90 seconds for you to climb the ladder and jump off the diving board with the rest of us.) The settlement of this class action—House vs. NCAA, in which current and former athletes sought name, image and likeness opportunities and a share of athletic department revenue—had been in the works for a while. On Friday, a federal judge signed off on the $2.6 billion settlement, which includes back pay to litigants but also creates a revenue-sharing system 'in which each Division I school will be able to distribute roughly $20 million a year to their athletes,' the Journal reported. That's right. Colleges can chop up $20 million and split it among their jocks. It will take some getting used to. Naturally, the revenue sharing is already provoking some to bemoan the demise of 'amateurism' and the college sports landscape. But schools have to be oblivious to not see who's to blame: They are! College sports did this to itself. The NCAA and its member schools set professionalization into motion with decades of arrogance and denial about the bountiful but warped economy they built around the games we love to watch. When college sports started chasing every dollar as a market-driven business—and frankly, there's a case that college sports has always been a business—paying athletes became inevitable. The bigger the money got, the harder the system was to defend. When college sports started indulging in the $10 million dollar coach, the billion-dollar television deal, the megabuck locker rooms and the assistant to the assistant strength coach making more than a surgeon, the hypocrisy was easy to see. Everyone was making a buck, except the talent on the field. It's why the Supreme Court more or less reacted to the NCAA's claims of amateur status with the following: Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Public opinion shifted, too. A decade ago, I'd write about proposals to pay athletes and I could hear the jeering a mile away. Boooooooo! That's not what college sports are about, man! Eventually, those big-dollar media deals, private jets and Pop-Tart Bowls caught up with college sports. It was hard to argue there was anything amateurish about it anymore. Now schools will have to figure it out for themselves. I mean that literally: schools and conferences are navigating a new wilderness in which they are permitted to directly compensate athletes—but without a precedent or a clear road map. Yikes. We do know a few things: The bulk of those $20 million allotments are expected to go to high-revenue sports like football and men's basketball—that's where the money's coming from, after all. Other beneficiaries may be growing sports like women's basketball and softball. The settlement also attempts to inject some calm into the craziness around name, image and likeness. The revenue sharing payments will come from the schools, and third party NIL deals over $600 will be subject to review by 'NIL Go,' an oversight group overseen by Deloitte. The idea here is to put outside NIL deals under a microscope—find out what player deals are legitimate arrangements, and what are booster largesses masquerading as NIL. Good luck! Enforcement will be a headache. So will the invariable league challenges. Defenders of the settlement maintain it shouldn't be entangled with Title IX protections against gender discrimination. Already there are parties who want to argue. Also unknown is the impact on nonrevenue Olympic sports. Do schools start eliminating or rolling back certain sports because they're not big contributors to the bottom line? Possible! We'll see. The new setup isn't free of denial, either. While colleges are now entitled to pay athletes, the system still resists the idea that athletes are employees. Good luck with that, too. There will likely be challenges to the revenue sharing system—is the proportion of revenue (22 percent) given to athletes a fair amount, or should it be renegotiated? Is it tantamount to a salary cap? It's hard to not see this heading in the direction of classifying athletes as employees, and eventually, collective bargaining. If you're lying down on a couch right now with a bag of ice on your head, I understand. It's a lot. It's confusing. Imagine being an athletic director in 2025. No job has changed more. A new day is here. It might not be the apocalypse, but college sports will never be the same. Write to Jason Gay at