Baker's March Madness Expansion Plans Face Limits of TV Marketplace
NCAA president Charlie Baker on Thursday said his team has begun discussions with CBS Sports and Warner Bros. Discovery regarding a possible expansion of the March Madness men's basketball bracket from 68 to as many as 76 teams, with an eye toward bulking up the tourney next year.
'We've had good conversations with CBS and WBD,' Baker told a scrum of reporters gathered at the Big 12 spring meetings in Orlando. 'Our goal here is to try to sort of either get to 'yes' or 'no' sometime in the next few months, because there's a lot of logistical work that would be associated with doing this, if we were to go down this road.'
Baker said that the goal is to upsize the men's field to either 72 or 76 teams, though he acknowledged the logistics could be daunting. 'I mean, just think about the opening weekend … the travel alone is complicated,' he said. Baker hopes to come to terms on an expansion within the next few weeks, or 'sometime early [this] summer.'
One of the factors that makes the idea of beefing up the brackets so attractive to the NCAA—besides the bonus $$$—is the practice of awarding automatic bids to the teams that win their conference tournaments. As Baker noted, under the current system, 31 of the 68 teams that are selected each year are locks regardless of 'where they were ranked during the regular season.' As such, 'you're going to have a bunch of teams that are probably among what most people consider to be among the best … that aren't going to make the tournament, period.'
As it happens, this spring's tourney was characterized by a glaring absence of Cinderella teams, as this marked the first time since 2007 that not a single program seeded 11th or lower managed to push its way through to the Sweet 16. (The West's No. 10 seed Arkansas was the worst-ranked third-round seed on the road to what would turn out to be a Final Four slate composed entirely of No. 1 seeds.)
In Baker's estimation, 'a whole bunch of teams who win their conference tournaments' are not cut from the same cloth as many top-shelf teams that are shut out of the Madness by the automatic qualifiers. 'So, the point behind going from 68 to 72 or 76 is to basically give some of those schools that probably were among the … best teams in the country a way into the tournament,' he said.
As much as CBS and WBD would likely jump at the chance to carry a few additional basketball games in March, the prospect of the NCAA trying to separate its media partners from a bit more cash is dicey at best. The two network groups already pay an arm and a leg for the rights to carry the tourney, having extended their contract with the NCAA in March 2016 in a deal valued at $8.8 billion. According to NCAA financial documents, CBS and WBD are on the hook for $995 million in rights fees during the 2025 fiscal year alone.
'The way I think about it is, it's a way to get some of the teams into the tournament who would, as at-large teams, get in,' Baker said, before reiterating that the NCAA has no intention of doing away with the automatic bids. 'We really believe in the AQ process and the opportunities that creates for everybody to have a stake in the tournaments.'
The men's tournament expanded from 64 to 68 teams in 2011, with a similar glow up for the women's bracket coming on the heels of the 2020-21 season.
More from Sportico.com
Advertisement
Best of Sportico.com
Sign up for Sportico's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
39 minutes ago
- New York Times
Enzo Maresca says Chelsea training ‘impossible' in extreme heat ahead of Esperance match
Enzo Maresca admits it is 'impossible' for his Chelsea players to train properly in the extreme Philadelphia heat as they prepare for their final FIFA Club World Cup group match against Esperance de Tunis on Tuesday. Chelsea deployed huge industrial fans by the side of the pitch at their training base in Subaru Park on Monday and utilised cooling sprays to try to mitigate the effects of temperatures expected to peak at 37 degrees celsius (98.6 degrees fahrenheit) in Philadelphia ahead of the game, which is scheduled to kick off at 9pm local time. Advertisement An extreme heat warning has been issued with the public warned to avoid strenuous activities outside, but Chelsea have no choice but to push hard against Esperance after Friday's 3-1 defeat against Flamengo left their hopes of advancing from Group D in the balance. The Athletic reported this morning on the concerns of players, club executives and fans about conditions at the tournament with experts suggesting FIFA takes proactive moves to ensure safety. 'It's almost impossible to train, or to make a session because of the weather now,' Maresca said in his pre-match press conference. 'We are trying just to save energy for the game. This morning's session was very very very short, and it has just been about tomorrow's game plan and that's it, no more than that. Because as you can see it's not easy with these conditions, with this temperature, but we are going to try to do our best. 'I always try to avoid excuses, but I try to be honest: it's not about excuses, it's about reality. It is an excuse when it is not hot and we say that it is hot. That is an excuse. But if it's hot, it's hot. And it is difficult to work with this temperature. But we are here, we are trying to do our best and we are going to try to win again. This is the only thing that we can say and we can do.' Chelsea captain Reece James sat out Monday's open training session due to illness, and Maresca also explained why Nicolas Jackson was not involved as he prepares to serve a one-match suspension for being sent off against Flamengo. 'Nico was not in the session this morning because it's the day before the game,' Maresca said of Jackson. 'We just used the ones that we're going to prepare for the game (with) and because he's not in the game tomorrow, he was not with us. We used only the ones that are available for tomorrow.' (Darren Walsh/Chelsea FC via Getty Images)
Associated Press
41 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Nuggets revamp front office by promoting Ben Tenzer, bring in Jonathan Wallace from Timberwolves
DENVER (AP) — The Denver Nuggets revamped their front office Monday by promoting interim general manager Ben Tenzer to executive vice president of basketball operations and bringing in Minnesota's Jonathan Wallace to serve as the executive VP of basketball operations. The announcement was made by the team days before an NBA draft where the Nuggets don't have a first-round pick. Tenzer and Wallace will try to find creative ways to build depth around a nucleus that includes three-time NBA MVP Nikola Jokic, Jamal Murray, Michael Porter Jr., Aaron Gordon and Christian Braun. Tenzer was named interim GM in April when Josh Kroenke, the vice chairman Kroenke Sports and Entertainment, made a stunning move by firing the team's all-time winningest coach, Michael Malone, and general manager Calvin Booth with three games left in the regular season. Malone led the Nuggets to their lone NBA title in 2023. David Adelman stepped in as interim coach and landed the full-time gig last month after steering the team in the right direction. The Nuggets beat the Los Angeles Clippers in seven games and then took the newly crowned NBA champion Oklahoma City Thunder to a Game 7 in the second round before bowing out of the playoffs. 'Ben did a terrific job leading the organization as the interim general manager during a challenging stretch, and it was clear during that time that he had earned the respect of our players, coaches, staff and his peers,' Josh Kroenke said in a statement. 'In spending time with Jon, his leadership, quiet confidence and relationship-oriented mindset stood out and we are excited to bring such a fast-rising executive back home to Denver.' ESPN first reported the hiring of Tenzer and Wallace. Tenzer is entering his 17th season with the organization, the last four as the VP of basketball operations. He worked with Booth on all aspects of the game. He also was the GM of the Nuggets' G-League affiliate the Grand Rapids Gold for the last two seasons. Wallace rejoins the Nuggets after three seasons as the director of player personnel for the Timberwolves. In addition, he was the GM of Minnesota's G-League affiliate, the Iowa Wolves. Before his time in Minnesota, Wallace was a scouting coordinator for the Nuggets. He originally joined the organization as a basketball operations associate in 2019. 'We have the utmost confidence in both Ben and Jon,' owner E. Stanley Kroenke said in a statement. 'They have been integral parts of our team already, so we know their dedication and hard work first-hand and we're looking forward to their continued growth and the vision they have for this team.' ___ AP NBA:
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Should we buy breakout catcher seasons from Hunter Goodman, Carson Kelly?
Catchers are having an offensive surge this season, with numerous breakouts around the league. Looking at catcher OPS over the past few seasons compared to league average, the gap has been narrowing every year. And, so far this season, catchers are actually outperforming the MLB average OPS by 9 points: *Catcher OPS calculated among catchers with a minimum of 100 plate appearances. Data from FanGraphs Backstops like Cal Raleigh and Will Smith are major contributors to this shift in offensive production, but the catcher position is also deeper than in seasons past. Several lesser-known breakout catchers are supporting and contributing to this trend. Let's dive into some of them and determine whether they can maintain their year-to-date performances. Advertisement 2025 stats: .842 OPS / 27% K Rate / 5% BB Rate Age: 25 Bats: Right Key question: Can Goodman's power continue to carry him, even if his whiffs and walks do not improve? Biggest strength: Goodman is showing elite power with a 116.2 max exit velocity (tied for 14th in MLB) and 52% hard hit rate (25th in MLB). His contact quality is much improved over last season, particularly against fastballs. He is slugging .468 against them so far, with a high .559 xSLG. This improvement is backed by a 94.4 mph average exit velocity and a 23-degree launch angle, a strong pairing for consistent power. Area for improvement: Goodman has an aggressive approach, but it can often be too aggressive, leading to chases and poor swing decisions. His below-average contact skills are exacerbating the poor results of his swing decisions by frequently causing him to fall behind in the count. Pitchers can capitalize on his aggressive approach — Goodman is easily tempted by high fastballs and breaking pitches down and away. His results against breaking and off-speed pitches look strong, but are not backed up by his contact quality against them. His xSLG is significantly worse than his actual SLG, which indicates Goodman has had some luck: Data from Baseball Savant Outlook: While Goodman's power is real, he needs to work on his plate discipline. Pitchers with good command are already exploiting his approach. Without making some adjustments (adjustments are unlikely), regression is likely as we head toward the second half of the season. 2025 stats: .725 OPS / 26% K Rate / 3% BB Rate Age: 26 Bats: Right Key question: Is Dingler's power enough to overcome his plate discipline issues at the MLB level? Biggest strength: While Dingler does not have a ton of raw power, he does well at translating the power he does have. His .465 xSLG is almost 100 points better than last season and is better than his actual .424 SLG. He also has a high 46% hard hit rate, both of which indicate that the power he has shown so far is not just a result of luck. He's done a great job of putting the ball in the air consistently and limiting ground balls. This is true against fastballs and off-speed pitches. Advertisement Area for improvement: Dingler's biggest area for improvement is plate discipline, especially against breaking pitches. His 3% walk rate is tied for the second-worst in baseball among players with at least 200 plate appearances this season, and pitchers are now throwing breaking pitches to Dingler 39% of the time (more often than league average), as Dingler often chases pitches well off the plate: The video shows a slider that starts and ends well off the plate. Dingler's combined run value against sliders and sweepers is a poor -5 runs, and his 49% whiff rate against sweepers is the second worst in baseball. Outlook: So far, Dingler's ability to barrel and elevate pitches has helped offset his poor swing decisions. But looking ahead, the plate discipline issues, especially against breaking pitches, limit Dingler's ceiling. 2025 stats: .795 OPS / 25% K Rate / 12% BB Rate Age: 26 Bats: Right Key question: Is Narváez's sound approach and results against fastballs enough to overcome his results against other pitch types? Biggest strength: Narváez has two strengths to highlight: plate discipline and his results against fastballs. He's shown an ability to walk consistently at the MLB level, and it's backed by his walk rates in the minors. His in-zone swing decisions are above average, and he does a good job of limiting chase. He does the most damage when he's attacking fastballs. His .420 SLG is backed by his almost identical .419 xSLG, and his 63% hard-hit rate against four-seamers ranks second among qualified catchers. He is benefitting from seeing fastballs 60% of the time, more often than average. This raises an interesting question: If fastballs are the only pitch he is doing damage on, then why are pitchers leaning on fastballs so heavily? Advertisement My guess is that it has to do with count leverage. Because of his above-average plate discipline, Narváez is finding himself in favorable counts more frequently than others. If we break down his success against fastballs by count, we can see that pitchers are leaning on their fastballs when they are in tight spots and behind in the count: Data from Baseball Savant This suggests that Narváez is not just waiting for a fastball; he is forcing a pitcher to throw them, which helps with predictability. So far, he is capitalizing. If Narváez continues to command the zone this well, it will be interesting to see whether pitchers start taking more risks in terms of throwing their breaking and off-speed stuff in unfavorable counts. Area for improvement: Narváez is not having the same success against non-fastballs. His contact quality drops significantly — his xSLG drops below .400, and his whiff rates jump to over 30%. Narváez will need to find a way to adapt, as this is a clear area for pitchers to exploit. Data from Baseball Savant Outlook: Narváez's plate discipline and contact quality against fastballs provide him a strong foundation to build upon and should help him continue to have competitive at-bats. That being said, when pitchers start mixing in more breaking and offspeed pitches in-zone to Narváez, he will need to find a way to adapt, make even more refined swing decisions and improve his contact quality against them. Until then, his offensive ceiling is limited. 2025 stats: .817 OPS / 17% K Rate / 14% BB Rate Age: 30 Bats: Right Key question: Did Kelly make any changes that support his offensive improvements? Biggest strength: Kelly has improved his contact quality against fastballs, he's making better swing decisions by swinging in-zone more without increasing his chase rate, and he is whiffing less. Advertisement Comparing his mechanics this season to last, Kelly made some adjustments to his pre-pitch and load positions. Kelly is now starting more closed and with his front heel raised during his pre-pitch setup. In terms of flat foot versus heel raise, I am unsure if there is any meaningful impact on the swing, and it may simply be a matter of the hitters' comfort level with the starting position. Looking at his load position, Kelly is showing more counter-rotation and has his elbow in a slightly lower position than in 2024. These changes are allowing Kelly to simplify his mechanics while putting him in a more hitter-ish position to release and make quality contact. Also of note is his plate discipline. Looking at the difference between Kelly's zone swing rate and chase rate, he ranks third among all catchers with at least 90 PAs (the higher the better, MLB average is 39%): Data from Fangraphs The difference between in-zone swing and chase rate is a good measure for plate discipline, as it demonstrates the ability of a hitter to swing at strikes and to lay off pitches out of the zone. Area for improvement: Kelly needs to make quality contact at the bottom half of the zone. He gets his best results when he makes contact on pitches that are middle and upper third in the zone. Looking at his batted balls with a launch angle of at least 10 degrees (minimum for a line drive), there is a noticeable gap in the lower third of the zone: If we look at the location of Kelly's swinging strikes, suddenly the lower third is filled: Kelly is unable to get the same consistent quality contact off pitches thrown to the lower third of the zone. As a result, pitchers who command well can throw in-zone until Kelly proves he can do damage against these pitches. Outlook: While Kelly started the season hot, he is beginning to regress. Since May 2, Kelly has a .547 OPS (down from 1.347 OPS in March and April). Even though his adjustments have simplified Kelly's mechanics, they have not proven to be a solution to making quality contact in the lower third. Until that issue is addressed, opposing pitchers will be able to exploit this and limit Kelly's offensive output. 2025 stats: .734 OPS / 17% K Rate / 7% BB Rate Age: 23 Bats: Right Key question: Can Ramírez sustain having a league-average offensive profile (above average for a catcher) if pitchers continue challenging him on the edges of the zone? Biggest strength: Ramírez has above-average contact quality against both fastballs and non-fastballs. His raw power is above average for a catcher, and he's done a great job of translating it during games. He has an average exit velocity above 90 mph against all pitch types, and his production is backed up by his xSLG. Advertisement What really separates Ramírez from other young catchers is his well-rounded offensive profile. In addition to having power, he has a low whiff rate, better than average strikeout rate, and he doesn't expand the zone too frequently. Even though his walk rate is slightly below average, he is showing sound swing decisions, especially on pitches in the heart and chase regions. Graphic from Baseball Savant Area for improvement: Ramírez's biggest area of improvement is on pitches in the shadow region of the zone, which is the hardest region to improve upon. Among qualified hitters, he ranks 246th in swing performance in this zone. While he can effectively take pitches out of the zone and do damage on mistakes to the heart, he struggles with pitches on the edges and with borderline strikes. Outlook: While Ramírez's stats don't jump off the page, his well-rounded profile is allowing his tools to play up at the position. His power, bat-to-ball skills and plate discipline provide him with a strong floor. Improving in the shadow zone would take Ramírez to the next level. 2025 stats: .818 OPS / 22% K Rate / 4% BB Rate Age: 26 Bats: Right Key question: Is Amaya's breakout real, or is it more about matchups? Note: Amaya was placed on the 10-day IL on May 25 and is expected back around the All-Star break. Biggest strength: Amaya is dominating against fastballs this season with an elite .626 xSLG and 13% whiff rate against. Looking at the radial chart below, we can see how consistently Amaya is making hard contact against fastballs (the darkest section indicates barreled hits). Area for improvement: Amaya has two major areas of improvement: his plate discipline, especially against breaking pitches, and his inability to do damage against lefty pitchers. Starting with his plate discipline, Amaya's walk rate is the lowest of his career, and his chase rate is the highest of his career. This has a lot to do with the types of pitches he is seeing. Amaya performs significantly worse against non-fastballs than he does against fastballs, and as a result, he is seeing fastballs much less frequently this season. Data from Baseball Savant Unlike Carlos Narváez (discussed earlier), Amaya does not have the same plate discipline ability that forces a pitcher to throw fastballs. Many of these non-fastballs Amaya is chasing are not competitive pitches and land well out of the zone. In terms of damage against lefties, Amaya has reverse splits. Looking at his career splits, there is a major difference when it comes to OPS. Data from Fangraphs This gap has widened this season, with a .516 OPS versus LHP compared to a .896 OPS versus RHP. Outlook: Amaya's success is real, but it is platoon-based. The Cubs are using him in favorable matchups by limiting his at-bats against lefties. This opportunity has allowed Amaya's success to surge. As long as this role continues and he returns from the IL healthy, he should remain a valuable contributor. Examining the mix of players and their skills — from power hitters to disciplined ones — the catcher position has more depth and diversity than in the past. Not all of these catchers will be able to keep up their breakout pace. But, more importantly, there does seem to be a league-wide shift in what MLB clubs are looking for in their catchers. As pitch framing becomes less of a priority, we might see the trend of rostering offensive catchers continue. (Top photo of Hunter Goodman: Scott Taetsch / Getty Images)
