Conflict and contemplation
A photojournalist takes photos of what is left of a residential building, which was recently hit in an Israeli strike, in Tehran. — AFP photo
'YOUNGER children were quite shaken as we heard and felt the explosions. Our glass doors shook.'
This was an excerpt of the report on Tuesday from my cousin living in Doha, similar to a multitude of accounts from Malaysians who observed Iran's missiles the evening before (June 23, 2025) targetting Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, which hosts the United States Air Force, among others.
Qatar has become increasingly familiar to Malaysians over the years: I was offered a job there in 2007 (after my stint in Washington, DC) but I didn't take it up because I was already committed to be home – and Doha did not yet have the glitz and glamour it is now famous for.
Hundreds of Malaysians visited Qatar for the football World Cup in 2022, and today many of us fly Qatar Airways to connect around the world (two daily flights), the National University of Malaysia (UKM) has a branch there, and the frequency of official bilateral visits have been steadily rising.
Thus, we associate Qatar with opulent luxury amid energetic development and geopolitical deftness, and that is why a single barrage of missiles becomes a significant talking point, even though it is absolutely minuscule in impact compared to what people in Gaza experience every minute of every day.
Many games are being played, of course, in war just as in diplomacy, with shows of strength and submission being used either to pacify domestic audiences or intimidate enemies and allies alike.
US President Donald Trump swore on live television in expressing anger with both Israel and Iran in violating the ceasefire that he claimed he had brokered, having ordered the use of sophisticated bunker-busting bombs to attack Iran's nuclear facilities, even though his presidential campaign stressed that he would not get the USA involved in more foreign wars.
This, of course, after Israel began those attacks, its prime minister insisting (as he has been for decades) that Iran was imminently close to developing a nuclear bomb.
In the end, a leaked Pentagon report claimed that the nuclear sites were not, as Trump claimed, completely obliterated – rather, the bombs pushed back Iran's progress by a mere few months.
Iran, for its part, showed restraint in warning Qatar of its counter-attack beforehand, indicating a desire to respond, but also to not escalate things further.
Domestically, there is no sign of an uprising against Iran's leaders (as the attackers had hoped), on the contrary as I write, there is reportedly a crackdown on internal dissent.
Meanwhile, the leaders of Arab countries – many of whom have long regarded Iran as a major threat to their stability – continue walking the tightrope between dissatisfaction among their populations (for not doing enough to help Palestine, chiefly) and maintaining good relations with the West.
It was just a month ago that Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) feted Trump amid ostentatious scenes of camel and horse-lined motorcades and traditional dances, with billions of dollars' worth of business deals and investments announced – and sanctions on the transitional government of Syria lifted.
Certainly, many Malaysians online and over 'teh tarik' are blunt in expressing admiration for Iran for appearing to support Palestine and confront Israel more robustly.
Arab friends – who almost always characterise the tension as an ethnic (Arab/Persian) rather than a theological (Sunni/Shia) one – are quick to point out that they tried to confront Israel militarily before but failed, and now, the living standards are higher for millions around the region as a result of peace: 'You guys are far away, you don't understand.'
Reactions elsewhere were keenly watched: China and Russia condemned the attack, but did not offer Iran any material support, while Europe meekly called for a return to diplomacy, characterised by several ambassadors in Kuala Lumpur as essentially a capitulation to President Trump that probably would not be rewarded anyway.
But there is some interesting news from US politics, or rather New York politics in particular.
On Wednesday, Zohran Mamdani emerged victorious in the Democratic Party primary for New York mayor, meaning that he will be the party's official candidate for the election in November.
If successful, he would become the Big Apple's first Muslim mayor, and the first to describe himself as a democratic socialist, who has been endorsed by Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Running on a platform of freezing housing rents, free buses, and free childcare, he has the opportunity to energise the Democratic Party by offering a new kind of leadership that is not reliant on billionaire donors that made it increasingly difficult to distinguish against the Republican Party.
The reinvigoration of political parties is vitally important in a mature democracy, and perhaps his story will trigger bold thinking across Muslim democrats the world over.
* Tunku Zain Al-'Abidin is Founding President of IDEAS. Gaza Israel middle east us war
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
North Korea eyeing Russian tourists for new beach resort: Seoul
North Korean leader Kim Jong-y-un (left) and his daughter Kim Ju-ae (front right) visiting the Wonsan Kalma coastal tourist area in Kangwon Province, North Korea.- AFP SEOUL: North Korea is expected to court Russian tourists following the completion of its Wonsan-Kalma coastal tourist zone, which is set to open first to domestic travellers in July, South Korea's Unification Ministry said on Thursday (June 26). It noted that construction – which was suspended for an extended period – resumed in 2024, possibly with support from Russia and expectation of attracting Russian tourists. North Korean state media reported on June 26 on the completion ceremony of the Wonsan-Kalma beach resort. It was held on June 25 and attended by leader Kim Jong Un and family members. The resort is set to open to domestic visitors on July 1, the state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) said. It reported that the tourist zone is 'equipped with hotels and inns capable of accommodating around 20,000 people, allowing domestic and international visitors to choose accommodations that suit their preferences' in a Korean-language report. The Russian ambassador to North Korea and embassy members were invited as special guests, according to the state media report. A Unification Ministry official said on condition of anonymity during a closed-door briefing: 'Operations are expected to gradually expand to include Russian tourists, beginning with domestic tourism on July 1. 'The fact that the Russian ambassador was invited and highlighted (in the state media report) also appears to have been intended with Russian tourists in mind.' The official added: 'North Korea has regarded tourism as very important while recognising it as a key means of earning foreign currency. 'Tourism itself is not a violation of sanctions. However, tourism operations that involve bulk cash transfers or are conducted in the form of cooperative projects or joint ventures with North Korea could constitute a violation of sanctions.' 'On the other hand, individual tourists paying their own expenses on a cost-reimbursement basis would not be considered a sanctions violation,' the official said. UN Security Council Resolution 2270 prohibits the transfer of bulk cash to North Korea, and Resolution 2375 bans all UN member states from creating any new joint ventures with North Korean entities or individuals. North Korea's decision to resume years-long construction of the Wonsan-Kalma coastal tourist zone in 2024 could be related to a closer alignment with Russia during the country's grinding war against Ukraine. 'Since North Korea's involvement in the Ukraine war, it is believed that the country has received various forms of material support from Russia – support that may have contributed economically to the completion of the Wonsan-Kalma tourist zone,' the official said. 'Additionally, there is a possibility that North Korea will actively seek to attract Russian tourists, which could explain the renewed push to promote the project.' North Korea initially designated the area along the coast connecting Wonsan and Mount Kumgang as a tourist zone in 2014. KCNA previously reported that a groundbreaking ceremony for the Wonsan region took place in May 2015. North Korea originally set a goal of completing the tourist zone by April 15, 2019 to mark the birth anniversary of the country's late founder Kim Il Sung. However, the project was repeatedly delayed due to difficulties in securing construction materials under international sanctions. Construction was halted following the outbreak of Covid-19 and remained suspended until 2024. The official, however, underscored that Seoul needs to watch how much tourism in the Wonsan-Kalma coastal zone can actually be realised 'due to various limitations in transportation infrastructure'. Based on the number of flights and the size of aircraft operating between Pyongyang and Vladivostok, the maximum number of people who could travel via Pyongyang to the Wonsan-Kalma coastal zone in a single day would be around 170. The official also explained that there has been no progress in resuming Chinese group tours, which were suspended after the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic in January 2020. - The Korea Herald/ANN
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Trump defends US strikes on Iran nuclear facilities at Nato summit
US President Donald Trump rejected media reports that US air strikes only partly damaged Iran's nuclear facilities as 'fake news' on Wednesday, maintaining his claim that the targeted sites had been 'obliterated'. Speaking to reporters during the Nato summit in The Hague, Trump said that the US had carried out a 'massive' precision strike on Saturday against Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities.
Herald Malaysia
2 hours ago
- Herald Malaysia
Stan Swamy's death questions India's humanity today
It prompts us all to ask: What kind of society do we want to become? Jun 27, 2025 Candles flicker outside a church holding a memorial Mass for Indian rights activist and Jesuit priest Father Stan Swamy in Mumbai on July 6, 2021. (Photo: AFP) By Dr. John Singarayar Fr Stan Swamy's death in custody raises profound questions about India's commitment to humanity under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 84-year-old Jesuit priest and tribal rights activist died on July 5, 2021, while imprisoned under harsh anti-terror laws, triggering outrage and sorrow across the passing resonates with the crucifixion narrative of Good Friday — both represent sacrifices made by those who challenged power structures and defended the in Tamil Nadu, Swamy dedicated over two decades of his life to the indigenous Adivasi communities of Jharkhand. He consistently opposed corporate interests that threatened tribal lands for mining and industrial advocacy for young Adivasis unjustly imprisoned and labeled as Maoists made him a target. Despite his commitment to peaceful activism, the government perceived him as a threat to the established order. In October 2020, the National Investigative Agency arrested Swamy, linking him to the 2018 Bhima Koregaon violence in Maharashtra. Charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), the elderly priest with Parkinson's disease faced deteriorating health in prison. His trembling hands made basic tasks like eating and bathing impossible without assistance. The courts repeatedly denied him bail, even after he contracted COVID-19. Transferred to a Mumbai hospital in May 2021, he suffered a cardiac arrest and died weeks later — a death many believe could have been prevented with proper care or release. Swamy's case exemplifies a troubling pattern in contemporary India. Numerous activists, journalists, and ordinary citizens have been detained under draconian laws like the UAPA, which makes obtaining bail exceptionally difficult. Human rights organizations report a significant increase in such arrests since Modi's government assumed power in 2014. While authorities claim these measures combat terrorism, critics see them as tools to silence dissenting voices. That an elderly, ailing man died in custody for his advocacy work indicates the extreme lengths to which this silencing extends. The plight of minorities in India has intensified in recent years. Muslims face mob violence over alleged cow slaughter, while legislative measures like the Citizenship Amendment Act and the National Register of Citizens create obstacles for Muslims establishing their Indian identity. Christians encounter harassment under anti-conversion laws that require governmental permission for religious conversion — statutes ostensibly designed to prevent forced conversions but frequently weaponized against minority faiths. Violence against women has taken disturbing religious dimensions. The 2018 Kathua case, involving the rape and murder of an eight-year-old Muslim girl in Jammu, was allegedly aimed to intimidate the local Muslim community. Political leaders' support for the accused revealed how religious hatred can shield perpetrators. Such incidents, occurring with alarming frequency, represent a fundamental betrayal of India's professed values. Modi's administration stands accused of advancing Hindu nationalism at the expense of inclusivity. Policy decisions like revoking Kashmir's special status under Article 370 and constructing the Ram Temple in Ayodhya have galvanized Hindu supporters while alienating religious minorities. Though the government portrays these actions as unifying the nation, many perceive them as exacerbating religious divisions and targeting non-Hindu communities. Anti-conversion legislation has proliferated across states like Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh. These laws, requiring official approval for religious conversion, have resulted in the arrests of individuals sharing their faith. Critics argue that such measures violate the constitutional guarantee of religious freedom and contribute to the ongoing harassment of minorities, reflecting governmental attempts to control personal beliefs. While the government maintains it safeguards national security, its actions suggest alternative priorities. Laws like the UAPA and sedition statutes effectively suppress criticism, with dissenters branded as "anti-national" or "urban Naxals." The National Investigation Agency's insistence on keeping Swamy imprisoned despite his suffering, coupled with policies like the Citizenship (Amendment) Act and prominent Hindu temple projects, indicates a preference for power consolidation over human welfare. Swamy's death garnered international attention. The United Nations expressed concern for human rights defenders and urged India to release unjustly detained individuals. The United States and European Union highlighted religious freedom issues, suggesting India's democratic foundations were eroding. The government defended its actions as legally sound, but global reaction demonstrated that Swamy's fate resonated beyond India's borders. Three years after Swamy's death, the Indian Church has responded with varying degrees of engagement. Catholic leaders initially expressed grief, with Cardinal Oswald Gracias calling for justice. The Jesuits committed to continuing Swamy's mission and clearing his name through legal petitions, including one filed with the Bombay High Court in 2021. Annual memorial services on July 5 in Mumbai, Delhi, and Ranchi bring together religious and lay communities to honor Swamy and raise awareness about tribal rights and unjust legislation. Through the Bagaicha center in Jharkhand, Jesuits train young activists to advocate for Adivasi communities, preserving Swamy's legacy. However, some criticize the Church for insufficient opposition to governmental policies. While Catholics protested against Swamy's arrest, the institutional Church — including the Catholic Bishops' Conference of India — remained relatively quiet. This restraint extends to confronting anti-conversion laws and religious persecution. Some clergy and activists demand more assertive action reflective of Swamy's courage, while others cite political tensions as justification for caution. In 2023, certain bishops addressed human rights at conferences and supported tribal communities through education and legal assistance. The Jesuits' back campaigns against UAPA, and Swamy's example inspires younger priests to serve marginalized populations. The Church navigates between institutional self-preservation and fidelity to Swamy's bold witness. Swamy's narrative serves as a cautionary tale for contemporary India. His death — sick, imprisoned, and neglected despite a lifetime aiding the vulnerable — connects to broader issues of persecution, religiously motivated violence, and anti-minority legislation. Like Jesus on Good Friday, Swamy's fate demonstrates how power structures can crush those dedicated to justice and compassion. Though the government claims legal justification, laws should never compromise fundamental rights and human dignity. India's Constitution guarantees equality and freedom, yet many citizens experience neither. Swamy's death mirrors India's current condition, as does the crucifixion narrative. Arbitrary arrests, religious hatred, and institutional silence reflect a nation losing its moral compass. When citizens sent sippers to Swamy in prison because he couldn't drink independently, they expressed a fundamental concern for humanity that demands broader application. India must confront whether it values every life equally or allows fear and division to prevail. The path forward requires governmental restraint in silencing critics, genuine protection for minorities, expedited judicial processes, a more vocal Church, and citizens demanding humane treatment for all. Without such changes, more will suffer Swamy's fate, and India's commitment to humanity will continue to diminish. Swamy's death prompts us all to ask: What kind of society do we want to become? Will we honor the sacrifices of those who stand for justice, or will we remain complicit in systems that punish compassion? The answer lies not merely in memorializing Swamy, but in transforming the conditions that led to his tragic
