Readers sound off on NYPD horse care, federal library cuts and an attempted assassin
Tuckahoe, N.Y.: The NYPD is reviewing its $734,000 contract with the veterinarian who oversees its mounted horses because they 'just discovered his history of violating racehorse care rules.'
Among this veterinarian's many infractions and violations, which included several drugging offenses, he was found to have committed an improper and fraudulent act at Aqueduct Race Track by submitting health certificates for horses he didn't evaluate. He refused to list medications he gave, failed to follow licensing requirements, and was fined in 2020 for professional misconduct for failing to provide information to support his treatment of a horse in Queens.
He even declared collapsed carriage horse Aysha to be in 'good condition' with 'no injuries consistent with abuse or mishandling,' despite online videos clearly showing carriage drivers pushing and dragging this poor horse directly following his collapse. Not surprisingly, the New York State Gaming Commission refuses to comment on this issue; their only interest is keeping the races going. And why won't the NYC Department of Health comment? What is it hiding?
The abuses and cover-ups of the racehorse and carriage-horse industries have been documented for decades, both rife with big-money greed and corruption, with unions and public apathy keeping them going — aided, of course, by the fact that the animals can't complain. They are the perfect silent victims.
NYPD, would you send your family to a doctor with such a horrible record? These beautiful animals can't speak for themselves. Please be their caring voice. They are put into treacherous situations with an unruly public. You depend on them — and they depend on you. They deserve better. Kiley Blackman
Jamaica Hills: The world is going to hell in a handbasket! Have no fear, NYC residents, we can save the world by sorting through our garbage (or face fines). Who are these City Council members and how many of them actually live in NYC? Robert Gibbs
Brooklyn: Voicer Gregory W. Chupa has apparently been gaslit on the NY HEAT Act. It would save New Yorkers money in a very simple way: reduce gas service charges by preventing gas companies from building unnecessary new pipelines. We pay for those, and the more people who voluntarily go electric, the smaller the pool of gas consumers left to foot the bill. NY HEAT in no way requires homeowners to electrify, buy new heating equipment or spend extra money. For low- to middle-income families, gas bills would be capped at 6% of earnings. That's what NY HEAT is really about, and why it's so important to our wallets and well-being, and why Gov. Hochul must include it in her final budget. Samantha Gore
Staten Island: Re 'Poll: AOC would beat Schumer' (April 5): That says it all about the Democrats. Dumb and dumber. Thomas Fraumeni Jr.
Manhattan: I've been a proud library card holder since I was 6 and intent on reading the entire children's section of the Bayside branch of the Queensborough Public Library. Less noticed among President Trump's giant cuts to health care, veterans' services, medical research and Social Security is the disappearance of the federal Institute of Museum and Library Services. Staff is on administrative leave — paid but not allowed to work — and grant funding for 125,000 libraries nationwide is frozen. These grants are critical life support for services Americans need, like the 30 million people who rely on public libraries for internet access. Job seekers, veterans, rural residents and local schools need public libraries. Library cuts are cruelty imposed on Americans. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand is fighting back. Everyone should be equally outraged at the harm being done to New Yorkers and Americans. Laurie Aron
Centereach, L.I.: Don't believe or repeat Voicer Tom Asher's letter regarding Bill Clinton and Barack Obama laying off more government workers than President Trump without noting major key differences. Tom pulled that info from social media and/or Fox News — not always factual sources. In fairness, Clinton and Obama did cut hundreds of thousands of government workers, but through legitimate buyouts. They did these cuts with bipartisan congressional approval. Republicans and Democrats reviewed and approved these actions with intelligent thought and consideration. Trump set loose Elon Musk, who was designated a 'special government employee,' and he wantonly swung his 'chainsaw' without regard for his actions and without congressional oversight. Musk fired and rehired critical government employees, with difficulty, hundreds of times. This is not the way democracy works. Trump keeps mum while bringing Musk's Tesla automobiles to the White House driveway. You say hypocrisy, Tom? Richard Dragani
Richmond Hill: To Voicer JoAnn Lee Frank: Regarding you desiring Trump for a third term, therefore you agree to disregard the Constitution? You are comfortable living under a dictatorship, agree with disrupting Social Security, the IRS, Medicaid, Medicare and the U.S. Postal Service, and his promotion of assault weapons? How about stripping memorials and all history of courageous Black and female heroes from government websites and history books? You must also approve of cuts to USAID, the National Institutes of Health and health departments. And because of his tariffs, all of us will pay more for every single item we purchase. Lastly, you must be comfortable with Musk sharing the presidency. All of our worldwide allies have deserted the U.S. and we now stand alone. I don't think most Americans will accept this for four more years. Ene Kelly
Staten Island: It is said that Nero fiddled while Rome burned. Fast-forward two millennia and he has returned. This time he has a golf club in his hand rather than a fiddle. Ralph D'Esposito
Ridgewood, N.J.: Trump's tariffs can be expected to increase U.S. unemployment and inflation. This double hit will not be easy to correct. Expect a Democratic congressional landslide in 2026. Ed Houlihan
Jefferson City, Mo.: I am worried about the recent Trump administration decision to stop all USAID world food programs when millions of people in Sudan, Yemen and other areas are in danger of dying of starvation. U.S. aid provides at least five major benefits: 1) Saves millions from death of starvation and malnutrition-related infection. 2) Allows millions of children to grow into a healthy and productive adulthood. 3) Reduces the risk of war in impoverished areas. 4) Creates worldwide goodwill for the U.S. 5) Creates income for U.S. farmers and food processors. In the past 70 years, U.S. food programs have fed 3 billion people in 150 nations and have long enjoyed strong bipartisan support. To fight world hunger, I urge the government to reinstate funding for USAID food programs and urge the public to donate generously to charities that fight hunger abroad and in the U.S.A. Luke Curtis
Jefferson City, Tenn.: I'm 66. I've been pro-Israel my entire life. However, being pro the country doesn't mean I support the actions of its government in Gaza, just as I am pro-U.S. but disagree with nearly everything my government has done since Jan. 20. Have the Israelis forgotten what the Nazis did to the Jews in the 1930s and '40s? Have they no sympathy for a minority people? I'm sure there are terrorists in Gaza — Hamas and others. But you don't annihilate an entire people to get at a few bad ones in their midst. Cutting off electricity and water is inhumane, as is bombing hospitals, schools and other places of refuge. Do you remember your fight for a homeland? Do you remember the Haganah and what they did to the British to gain a homeland? What makes you think the Palestinians won't do the same? Sean M. Talty
Brooklyn: To all of you who write in all the time and seem to be very aware of things going on in this country, I have a question: Remember a few months back when the Secret Service arrested a man with a rifle on the golf course where Trump was playing? Does anyone know what happened to Ryan Routh? After that happened, we never heard a word. Norma Joseph
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Magazine
16 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump
The breakdown in relations between President Donald Trump and his one-time ally Elon Musk has played out over social media in spectacular fashion, with the two engaging in a tit-for-tat spat. The row initially started over politics. Musk expressed his vehement disapproval of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and encouraging people to 'kill the bill.' Meanwhile, Trump maintained that the fall-out was prompted by Musk being upset over the removal of electric vehicle subsidies —a provision that made Tesla vehicles more affordable. But the fight has since taken a far more personal turn, bolstered by Musk's allegation that Trump is listed in the files related to the late financier and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk said in a post shared via his social media platform, X. He did not provide evidence pertaining to this. The accusation has spurred Democrats to chase the full unsealing of the Epstein files. California Rep. Robert Garcia and Massachusetts Rep. Stephen F. Lynch—Democratic members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform—sent a letter on June 5 to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Kash Patel. 'We write with profound alarm at allegations that files relating to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have not been declassified and released to the American public because they personally implicate President Trump,' read the letter titled 'Is Trump Suppressing The Epstein Files?' The White House responded, saying that the move by the Oversight Committee members was 'another baseless stunt that bears no weight in fact or reality.' Here's what to know about the Epstein files and the renewed push to declassify them following Musk's allegation. What do we know about the Epstein files so far? On Feb. 27, Bondi released more than 100 pages of declassified documents related to Epstein—as part of the Trump Administration's vow to be more transparent regarding the high-profile case. During the presidential election, Trump promised to appease the clamoring for the alleged 'client list' of Epstein's since his arrest and subsequent death by suicide in 2019. Though Bondi called this the 'first phase' of declassified files, people were underwhelmed by the published pages, as much of the text had been redacted. Bondi's release included Epstein's 'black book,' which had previously been published. It featured names like Trump and former President Bill Clinton, but as the New York Times reported, there were people in the book with whom Epstein had never even met, and thus listed names are not necessarily connected to Epstein's activities. One of the only never-before-seen documents included in the release was an 'Evidence List' of catalogued evidence obtained by investigators. Bondi blamed the FBI for the fact that the report was incomplete, suggesting in a published letter to Patel that the FBI had more information related to Epstein. Bondi ordered Patel to deliver the rest of the investigation documents and 'conduct an immediate investigation' to understand why she had only received parts of the files. There is much discussion as to whether a fully-fledged 'Epstein client list' even exists. Jacob Shamsian, Business Insider's legal correspondent who has covered the Epstein case for years, said via social media on Feb. 27: 'I should also point out that the 'Jeffrey Epstein client list' does not exist and makes no sense on multiple levels (you think he made a list???). But if Pam Bondi wants to prove me wrong, I welcome it.' Will the Musk allegations prompt the release of further Epstein files? Musks' allegations have brought the Epstein files back into the spotlight, but there were already calls for them to be published in full. In April, Trump was asked by a reporter about when the next phase of the files are due to be released, to which he responded: 'I don't know. I'll speak to the Attorney General about that. I really don't know.' Since then, Democrats have continued to push for more documents to be released. Democratic Rep. Dan Goldman of New York released a statement in May, 'demanding that [Bondi] promptly release the Jeffrey Epstein Files in full.' Spurred by Musk's allegation, Democrats including Garcia, Goldman, and Lynch are now renewing these calls for more transparency. But it remains to be seen whether or not the pressure will be enough for Bondi, Patel, or Trump to provide more answers. What do we know about Trump's relationship with Epstein? Trump's connection to Epstein dates back decades. In a 2002 interview with New York magazine, he famously said that Epstein was 'a lot of fun to be with.' 'It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side,' Trump told the reporter. In July 2019, NBC News' TODAY released unearthed video footage believed to be from 1992, which showed Trump greeting Epstein at his Mar-a-Lago estate. The two men could be seen laughing as they engaged in conversation. After Epstein's 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Trump made strides to distance himself. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office in 2019, Trump said: 'I had a falling out with him [Epstein]. I haven't spoken to him in 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you.'
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Two minors charged for incident with Waverly School Resource Officer
WAVERLY, N.Y. (WIVT/WBGH) — Two juveniles have been charged by the Waverly Police Department following an investigation into an incident involving the students and the School Resource Officer at Waverly High School on June 3. WPD did not provide details on the incident itself, or the charges brought against the two minors involved. 'The investigation is now complete, and the case is officially closed,' WPD said in a statement. WPD worked closely with Waverly School District officials in order to get to the bottom of the investigation, which involved a 'thorough and objective review.' 'The Waverly School District and the Waverly Police Department remain committed to working together to ensure the safety and well-being of all students, staff, and members of the community,' the statement said. The case officially closed on Friday, June 6. Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump Trump administration faces growing bipartisan pressure over Job Corps Shark-freeing diver says Trump pardon surprised him Democrats call for halt of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac privatization Two minors charged for incident with Waverly School Resource Officer Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk says Trump is in the 'Epstein files.' Here's where the president has shown up in unsealed records.
Elon Musk says the "Epstein files" haven't been released because Trump is in them. The president's name has cropped up repeatedly in Epstein-related court documents. Trump's name is included in Epstein's contact book and flight records. Elon Musk has an allegation about why President Donald Trump hasn't released all of the so-called "Epstein files." He's in them. Musk's claim, tying the president to the dead financier and sex trafficker, is the latest punch in the escalating beef between the richest man in the world and the president of the United States. "Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public," Musk posted on X Thursday afternoon. "Have a nice day, DJT!" "Mark this post for the future," he added in a follow-up post. "The truth will come out." Musk didn't elaborate on his claim or provide evidence that backed up his assertion. House Democrats nonetheless seized on Musk's claim, with two members of the oversight committee demanding a response from Justice Department officials. Trump's relationship with Epstein has long been part of the public record. None of that record supports any notion that the president was involved in Epstein's sex trafficking. The two were friends in the 1980s, spending time in the same wealthy social circles in Palm Beach and Manhattan, and Trump's name has repeatedly come up in litigation related to Epstein. The two had a falling-out in the 2000s. Trump has previously denied involvement in any wrongdoing related to Epstein. In 2019, following criminal charges against the financier, Trump said he "wasn't a fan." White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that Musk's claims about Trump and Epstein were "unfortunate." "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted," Leavitt said in a statement. "The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." During his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump indicated he supported making government documents related to Epstein public if he were elected. It's not clear exactly what Musk meant by the "Epstein files." Attorney General Pamela Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel have promised to release documents in possession of the Justice Department related to the wealthy pedophile. Other agencies that may have Epstein-related documents, like the CIA, have been publicly silent about the matter. Bondi and Patel have published one batch of documents, in February. Aside from a three-page list of evidence seized during a 2019 criminal investigation into Epstein, it included only information that had previously been made public during the criminal case against his associate Ghislaine Maxwell and in other civil litigation. Among those records are a copy of one of Epstein's contact books, which lists Trump and some of Trump's family members among hundreds of entries. The records also include some flight logs for Epstein's private jets; Trump is mentioned as a passenger. Trump's Mar-a-Lago club featured prominently in Maxwell's criminal trial. One woman who said Epstein raped her testified that the financier took her to the club when she was 14 years old and introduced her to Trump. Another of Epstein's most prominent accusers, Virginia Giuffre, who died by suicide in April, has said she was recruited as a victim by Maxwell while at Mar-a-Lago. A Mar-a-Lago employee briefly testified at Maxwell's criminal trial about Giuffre's father's employment at the club. Trump's name has also been included in long-running civil litigation related to Epstein. Documents including Trump's name became public in January 2024, when a federal judge unsealed and unredacted thousands of pages of court documents in a lawsuit that Giuffre brought against Maxwell. The judge had previously referred to Trump with the pseudonym "Doe 174." The lawsuit did not accuse Trump of any wrongdoing. Many of the people whose names were initially kept under seal in the court documents were identified as Epstein's victims or had only an incidental connection to the financier. The documents from that lawsuit include excerpts of a deposition by Johanna Sjoberg, who has accused Epstein of rape. At one point during the deposition, Sjoberg was asked about giving massages to various associates of Epstein at his residences, and she denied giving any to Trump. Asked about a trip to Atlantic City, she described visiting one of Trump's casinos after flying on Epstein's private jet. "Jeffrey said, 'Great, we'll call up Trump, and we'll go to' — I don't recall the name of the casino, but — 'we'll go to the casino,'" Sjoberg said in the deposition. Other documents mention Trump only in passing, referencing him as one of the many high-profile people who have been friends with Epstein. Epstein — who also spent time with other powerful figures, including Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Steve Bannon, and Ehud Barak — died by suicide in a federal Manhattan jail while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges in 2019. As part of the same investigation, Justice Department prosecutors brought sex-trafficking charges against his associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted in late 2021 and sentenced to 20 years in prison. Musk was famously photographed with Maxwell at a 2014 Vanity Fair event. He has said she "photobombed" him. The Tesla CEO has denied a connection to Epstein. Following a 2023 subpoena in litigation related to JPMorgan's ties to Epstein, Musk said he never took financial advice from him. "That cretin never advised me on anything whatsoever," Musk posted on social media at the time. Read the original article on Business Insider