Annual review needed if Triple Lock removed, committee will hear
Without the Triple Lock mechanism in place, any future Irish peacekeeping missions should be subjected to an annual review to ensure they align with the UN Charter, an Oireachtas committee has been told.
Professor Ben Tonra, of the UCD School of Politics and International Relations, said the Government must establish robust mechanisms to guarantee that overseas missions align with the UN Charter and international law.
Legislation to reform the Triple Lock is before the Oireachtas Committee on Defence and National Security for pre-legislative scrutiny.
The General Scheme of the Defence (Amendment) Bill 2025 would remove the need for UN Security Council and General Assembly approval when deploying more than 12 members of the Defence Forces overseas when they are serving as part of an international force.
Professor Tonra will tell the committee that the Government should consider whether democratic oversight of an overseas missions ends with the initial approval.
He said an annual review mechanism could empower the Dáil to monitor ongoing missions to ensure they remain within the scope of peacekeeping, conflict prevention and support for international security.
The legislation states that a contingent of the Defence Forces can be dispatched outside the State where there is Government approval along with a resolution passed by the Dáil.
However, a subsequent Dáil resolution is not required when deploying a replacement contingent.
A Dáil resolution will also not be necessary when the Defence Forces contingent deploying abroad has 50 members or less.
Prof Tonra will also suggest that any overseas mission should be subjected to a formal legal review before approval to ensure that it is consistent with the UN Charter and international law.
This review could be carried out by the Attorney General or an independent counsel, he said.
"With greater flexibility comes greater responsibility. If we are no longer to rely on the Security Council as the gatekeeper of legitimacy, if we are finally to remove the veto given to the five permanent members of the Security Council over Ireland's overseas military deployment, we must establish robust mechanisms of our own," he said.
"The Defence (Amendment) Bill 2025 is a significant acknowledgement that Ireland's defence posture is evolving and needs to change in an increasingly volatile region and less stable world.
"The Bill's proposals do enhance the flexibility of Government in dealing with an international crisis that requires military forces to underpin peace or guarantee security.
"With that flexibility, however, comes greater responsibility
"If - as proposed - UN Security Council members are not to serve as gatekeepers to overseas deployment of Irish peacekeepers, then the Government - and opposition parties - are required to step up to specify by what precise mechanism such deployments will continue to reflect Irish foreign policy values and interests," Prof Tonra will say.
The draft legislation is being examined over a period of eight weeks, after which a bill will be sent for Government approval.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Ireland's neutrality and proposed scrapping of triple lock 'entirely unrelated', Dáil committee hears
Ireland's neutrality and the proposed scrapping of UN authorisation for future Irish peacekeeping missions are 'entirely unrelated', a former senior Department of Defence official has said. Ciarán Murphy told the Oireachtas defence committee that there would be 'absolutely' no change to Ireland's neutrality — defined as non-membership of a military alliance — if the so-called 'triple lock' is removed. The former assistant secretary, and defence policy director at the department, said it was a 'fallacy' to argue the UN was a protector of Ireland's neutrality and told committee members 'this house' — as in the Dáil — was the protector. Mr Murphy said the UN Security Council — which mandates UN missions — is in 'gridlock' and there had been no new missions mandated since 2014. He added the current UN missions to Lebanon, which Ireland has been part of since 1978, were now in danger of not being renewed by the council. Mr Murphy was one of three people attending committee hearings on the Defence Bill 2025. The draft legislation proposes to remove the requirement for UN approval to send Defence Forces abroad. It also plans to increase the number of personnel that can be sent overseas — from 12 to 50 — without the Government needing the support of the Dáil. The 'triple lock' refers to three hurdles required — Government, Dáil, and UN — before sending troops beyond 12 personnel abroad. The bill authorities Irish troops to take part in an 'international force' for the purposes of peace-keeping, conflict prevention and international security 'consistent with the principles of the United Nations Charter'. Examples of such bodies include the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the EU, or 'any other body' operating in a manner consistent with UN principles. Professor Ben Tonra, UCD School of Politics and International Relations, said within tradition definitions of neutrality — non membership of a military pact — Ireland's neutrality would be "unaffected' by the proposed amendment. He accepted the removal of the triple lock was a 'major' development in Irish policy, but he not believe it was a 'fundamental one' that required constitutional change. But he did suggest safeguards that could replace UN authorisation, such as a formal legal review of proposed deployments and an annual review mechanism. Solicitor Joe Noonan agreed with the other contributors that the UN Security Council was not working properly, but cautioned Ireland 'should not throw the baby out with the bathwater', and said the focus should be on reforming and improving the UN processes. He said senior figures within the European Commission appeared eager to push for closer agreement with Nato in defending Europe, and said Ireland was being subjected to 'unrelenting' pressure to get on board to where the commission was heading. Mr Noonan said if the current proposals were passed, a Government which had a simple majority in the Dáil could 'send Irish troops anywhere in the world'. But he said he did not believe the proposals had constitutional implications and did not see the Lisbon and Nice treaties being affected, which could give rise to a challenge in the European Court of Justice — as claimed by an academic at a previous hearing. Mr Murphy said suggestions the UN General Assembly could provide UN backing to peace-keeping operations, without requiring the UN Security Council — comprising five major powers, each with a veto — to sanction it, were 'operationally not feasible' and happened once, 80 years ago.
Irish Post
an hour ago
- Irish Post
Omagh bombing victims demand full accountability
NEARLY 27 years after the deadliest attack of the Troubles, victims and survivors of the Omagh bombing are demanding more than condolences and symbolic gestures. They want the full truth - and they believe that can only be achieved through meaningful cooperation from both the British and Irish governments. The Omagh bombing on August 15, 1998, carried out by the Real IRA, killed 29 people, including a pregnant woman expecting twins. It happened shortly after the signing of the Good Friday Agreement, shocking both sides of the Irish border. Despite civil actions in 2009 that found four men liable, no one has ever been criminally convicted for the attack. Today, an ongoing public inquiry that began in january, chaired by Lord Turnbull is investigating whether the bombing could have been prevented. While the inquiry primarily focuses on the actions of British authorities, victims' families have expressed deep frustration with the perceived lack of genuine cooperation from the Irish government. Barrister Alan Kane KC, representing several families, did not mince words. Speaking during the inquiry's recent hearings, Kane said the victims are 'sick and tired of platitudes, false assurances and broken promises' from Dublin. The Republic of Ireland's failure to establish a parallel inquiry or to engage in what the families consider meaningful cooperation is a central point of contention. 'There is a moral, human and legal imperative for the Republic of Ireland to establish its own inquiry,' Kane said. 'The perpetrators of the bombing found cowardly refuge in the Republic, and there are serious concerns about intelligence failures on that side of the border.' A memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed earlier this year was supposed to allow the inquiry access to relevant materials held by Irish authorities. However, Kane described the MOU as 'wholly unsatisfactory' and 'redundant', criticising its clauses that allow the Irish government to unilaterally decide what is deemed relevant. The inquiry also heard troubling revelations about missing documents and alleged intelligence gaps. Counsel Hugh Southey KC highlighted concerns that intelligence-sharing between British and Irish security services was ineffective, noting that the Garda Síochána rarely provided actionable intelligence to preempt threats. He also raised the disturbing possibility that state informants were allowed to operate without oversight, possibly endangering public safety. Families have likened the current inquiry to inspecting only the engine of a vehicle when the whole car - including where the bomb was planted - is what's truly relevant. As one victim's representative put it: 'This inquiry can only examine the parts of the car made in the UK. It cannot examine the rest of the car where the terrorists sat or the boot area where the deadly bomb was hidden.' For many, this limitation underscores the need for a full, transparent parallel inquiry in the Republic of Ireland. Without it, they argue, the truth will remain incomplete and justice unfulfilled. Taoiseach Micheál Martin has defended his government's position, insisting that cooperation has been full and transparent. Speaking to RTÉ, he called accusations of bad faith 'not fair comment' and pointed to the MOU as proof of their willingness to collaborate. However, the families remain unconvinced. They see years of inaction and redacted documents as evidence of evasion, not engagement. 'There is reason to believe that intelligence was known by the Garda but not the RUC,' said Southey. 'Effective protection would have required cooperation across the border, and that simply didn't happen.' As the Omagh Bombing Inquiry continues, the families hope their long pursuit of truth and accountability will finally yield results.
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Price of upcoming College Green Plaza soars from estimated €10m to €80m as councillors urge restraint
In an update provided to a Dublin City Council (DCC) Mobility and Public Realm Strategic Policy Committee, project head Marie Galvin said the anticipated cost had now risen to €80m, which includes a 40pc contingency. The project has doubled in scope from its initial design, revealed nine years ago, and inflation and labour costs have also significantly contributed to the increase since then. Pedestrianisation is now proposed to extend from Trinity College all the way down Dame Street as far as the junction with George's Street. Local Sinn Féin councillor Kourtney Kenny said that Government should be stepping in to provide funding for the project, as it was one that would benefit the whole country. "Everyone in Ireland at some stage is going to come to Dublin, so there needs to be more pressure on Government to be paying some of those costs,' she said. Ms Kourtney said even though she supports public realm improvements, allowing costs to soar in such a dramatic fashion was 'heinous'. 'We need to put more attention on how we can get the best bang for our buck and not just be burning money and allowing the costs to balloon like this,' she added. Independent councillor Mannix Flynn said the plaza was a waste of public money, and the funds should be spent instead on more pressing issues. "We don't have a pedestrian or a plaza crisis. We have a homeless crisis, we have a housing crisis, we have a medical crisis, we have a crisis of anti-social behaviour in these very areas,' he said. "And they think by doing this, they're going to solve problems. It's nonsense.' ADVERTISEMENT Mr Flynn said he could foresee costs continuing to 'escalate' with the project. "The €80m figure is just bullshit, this is an architectural conservation area (ACA). Anybody who even looks at this will want treble the money because it's an ACA,' he said. "They don't know what they're going to find when they dig into the ground. You've got the Luas, you've got all those different things there, and this will absolutely escalate in costs.' Green Party councillor Feljin Jose said costs had risen so much because the project had taken so long to proceed, but cautioned that the €80m figure was an estimate at this stage, not a costed figure. 'We've seen three different visions of this over the last ten years, and the longer we leave this, the higher the total cost of inflation, labour costs, and the scope of the project has increased so much as well.' 'We have nobody to blame but ourselves [for the increased cost]. You know, we've been talking about this project for so long.' He said the project had been further delayed by the National Transport Authority's slow rollout of BusConnects, but that the council should still proceed with the plaza. 'The city needs this, we desperately need this, and we should absolutely go ahead with it. And if we wait it's not going to get any cheaper.' Funded by the Local Democracy Reporting Scheme
