UK will be forced to increase defence spending to 3.5% to keep US on side, Sky News understands
The UK will be forced to agree this month to increase defence spending to 3.5% of national income within a decade as part of a NATO push to rearm and keep the US on side, Sky News understands.
The certainty of a major policy shift means there is bemusement in the Ministry of Defence (MoD) about why Sir Keir Starmer's government has tied itself in knots over whether to describe an earlier plan to hit 3% of GDP by the 2030s as an ambition or a commitment, when it is about to change.
The problem is seen as political, with the prime minister needing to balance warfare against welfare - more money for bombs and bullets or for winter fuel payments and childcare.
Follow live updates:
Sir Keir is due to hold a discussion to decide on the defence spending target as early as today, it is understood.
As well as a rise in pure defence spending of 3.5% by 2035, he will also likely be forced to commit a further 1.5% of GDP to defence-related areas such as spy agencies and infrastructure. Militaries need roads, railway networks, and airports to deploy at speed.
This would bolster total broader defence spending to 5% - a target Mark Rutte, the head of NATO, wants all allies to sign up to at a major summit in the Netherlands later this month.
It is being referred to as the "Hague investment plan".
Asked what would happen at the summit, a defence source said: "3.5% without a doubt."
Yet the prime minister reiterated the 3% ambition when he published a major defence review on Monday that placed "NATO first" at the heart of UK defence policy.
The defence source said: "How can you have a defence review that says NATO first and then be among the last of the alliance's 32 member states - along with countries like Spain - to back this new goal?"
Unlike Madrid, London presents itself as the leading European nation in the alliance.
A British commander is always the deputy supreme allied commander in Europe - the second most senior operational military officer - under an American commander, while the UK's nuclear weapons are committed to defending the whole of NATO.
Even Germany, which has a track record of weak defence spending despite boasting the largest economy, has recently signalled it plans to move investment towards the 5% level, while Canada, also previously feeble, is making similar noises.
The source signalled it was inconceivable the UK would not follow suit and said officials across Whitehall understand the spending target will rise to 3.5%.
The source said it would be met by 2035, so three years later than the timeline Mr Rutte has proposed.
Defence spending is currently at 2.3%.
A second defence source said the UK has to commit to this spending target, "or else we can no longer call ourselves a leader within NATO".
Read more:
Sky News's political editor Beth Rigby challenged the prime minister on the discrepancy between his spending ambitions and those of his allies at a press conference on Monday.
Sir Keir seemed to hint change might be coming.
"Of course, there are discussions about what the contribution should be going into the NATO conference in two or three weeks' time," he said.
"But that conference is much more about what sort of NATO will be capable of being as effective in the future as it's been in the last 80 years. It is a vital conversation that we do need to have, and we are right at the heart of that."
New Sky News podcast launches on 10 June - simulates an attack by Russia to test UK defences
Mr Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister, said last week he assumes alliance members will agree to a broad defence spending target of 5% of gross domestic product during the summit in The Hague on 24 and 25 June.
NATO can only act if all member states agree.
"Let's say that this 5%, but I will not say what is the individual breakup, but it will be considerably north of 3% when it comes to the hard spend [on defence], and it will be also a target on defence-related spending," the secretary general said.
The call for more funding comes at a time when allies are warning of growing threats from Russia, Iran, and North Korea as well as challenges posed by China.
But it also comes as European member states need to make NATO membership seem like a good deal for Donald Trump.
The leaders of all allies will meet in The Hague for the two-day summit.The US president has repeatedly criticised other member states for failing to meet a current target of spending 2% of national income on defence and has warned the United States would not come to the aid of any nation that is falling short.
Since returning to the White House, he has called for European countries to allocate 5% of their GDP to defence. This is more than the 3.4% of GDP currently spent by the US.
Mr Rutte is being credited with squaring away a new deal with Mr Trump in a meeting that would see allies increase their defence spending in line with the US president's wishes.
The NATO chief is due to visit London on Monday, it is understood.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
24 minutes ago
- Washington Post
NATO set to approve new military purchases as part of a major defense spending hike
BRUSSELS — NATO defense ministers are set Thursday to approve plans to buy more weapons and military equipment to better defend Europe, the Arctic and the North Atlantic, as part of a U.S. push to ramp up security spending . The 'capability targets' lay out plans for each of the 32 nations to purchase priority equipment like air and missile defense systems, artillery, ammunition, drones and 'strategic enablers' such as air-to-air refueling, heavy air transport and logistics.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
voestalpine AG (VLPNF) Full Year 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Challenges with ...
Revenue: Decreased from EUR16.7 billion to EUR15.7 billion, a reduction of EUR1 billion. EBITDA: Declined from EUR1.7 billion to EUR1.3 billion. EBIT: Reported at EUR455 million, with adjusted EBIT at EUR770 million after accounting for non-recurring items. Net Debt: Stable at EUR1,650 million. Equity Ratio: 47%. Free Cash Flow: EUR309 million, down from EUR394 million the previous year. Earnings Per Share: Increased to EUR0.90 from EUR0.60. Gearing Ratio: Stable at 22%. Investment in Greentec Steel Project: EUR500 million of EUR1.5 billion already invested. Adjusted EBITDA: EUR1.5 billion after adjustments for non-recurring items. Outlook for EBITDA: Forecasted in the range of EUR1.4 billion to EUR1.55 billion for fiscal year '25-'26. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Sign with DLTR. Release Date: June 04, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. voestalpine AG (VLPNF) achieved solid results despite a challenging environment, particularly due to strong performance in railway systems and aviation sectors. The company maintained a stable, low-debt situation, focusing on free cash flow generation. The greentec steel project is progressing well, with one-third of the EUR1.5 billion investment already completed. The Steel Division showed strong performance, benefiting from stable demand in the automotive and energy sectors. The company is actively pursuing growth projects, including long-term contracts with truck manufacturers in North America and expansion in high-bay warehouse production. There was ailing demand in Automotive Components, mechanical engineering, and construction sectors, prompting reorganization projects. The European market, particularly Germany, was weak, impacting overall performance. The High Performance Metals Division faced low demand and underutilization of steel plants, especially in Europe and North America. The Metal Forming Division's Automotive Components business is still recovering from low domestic production levels in Europe. The company is facing uncertainties due to potential US tariffs, which could impact demand and production. Q: Could you share what happened with your sales to the US with the 25% tariffs in place? Have you been able to share the tariff cost with customers, or are you bearing the full cost? And regarding the 50% tariff, would the impact be greater because you could lose orders and production? A: Herbert Eibensteiner, CEO: Yes, the 25% tariffs led to a rise in steel prices, allowing us to pass some costs to customers through longer-term contracts. However, the 50% tariffs could lead to reduced orders from the US, as some products cannot be sourced locally, potentially impacting our production and demand. Q: Regarding European trade policy, you mentioned the potential extension of the free allocation path to 2034. Is this part of the Steel Action Plan, or is it something the European Commission is considering? A: Herbert Eibensteiner, CEO: We are lobbying for this extension as we invest in CO2 reduction. While some politicians are considering it, we are not sure of success. Other issues like safeguard measures and CBAM are also being discussed, but we may not get everything we want. Q: What is your base case scenario for the steel price cycle between now and the end of the year? A: Hubert Zajicek, Head of the Steel Division: We expect stable steel prices with no significant movement. Yearly contracts reflect current levels, and while there was an upturn earlier this year, prices have stabilized. We anticipate stable prices through the fiscal year with slight fluctuations. Q: Could you share the profit contribution from the railways business within the Metal Engineering Division? A: Gerald Mayer, CFO: The railway systems segment accounts for over 50% of the division's revenue and outperforms in terms of profitability and margin compared to the rest of the division. Q: On the CapEx side, how much of the EUR1.15 billion is for decarbonization, and where have you cut versus earlier guidance? A: Gerald Mayer, CFO: Approximately EUR350 million of the EUR1.15 billion CapEx is for decarbonization this year. We aim not to exceed this amount in future periods, with 25-30% of the total EUR1.5 billion decarbonization budget already spent. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump announces travel ban and restrictions on 19 countries
US President Donald Trump has resurrected a hallmark policy of his first term, announcing that citizens of 12 countries would be banned from visiting the United States and those from seven others would face restrictions. The ban takes effect Monday at 12.01am, a cushion that may avoid the chaos that unfolded at airports nationwide when a similar measure took effect with virtually no notice in 2017. Mr Trump, who signalled plans for a new ban upon taking office in January, appears to be on firmer ground this time after the Supreme Court sided with him. Some, but not all, of 12 countries also appeared on the list of banned countries in Mr Trump's first term. The new ban includes Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. There will be heightened restrictions on visitors from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. In a video released on social media, Mr Trump tied the new ban to Sunday's terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The suspect in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Mr Trump's restricted list. The Department of Homeland Security says he overstayed a tourist visa. Mr Trump said some countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their own citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report of visa overstays of tourists, business visitors and students who arrive by air and sea, singling out countries with high percentages of remaining after their visas expired. 'We don't want them,' Mr Trump said. The inclusion of Afghanistan angered some supporters who have worked to resettle its people. The ban makes exceptions for Afghans on Special Immigrant Visas, generally people who worked most closely with the US government during the two-decade war there. Afghanistan was also one of the largest sources of resettled refugees, with about 14,000 arrivals in a 12-month period through September 2024. Mr Trump suspended refugee resettlement on his first day in office. 'To include Afghanistan – a nation whose people stood alongside American service members for 20 years – is a moral disgrace. It spits in the face of our allies, our veterans, and every value we claim to uphold,' said Shawn VanDiver, president and board chairman of #AfghanEvac. Mr Trump wrote that Afghanistan 'lacks a competent or co-operative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents and it does not have appropriate screening and vetting measures'. He also cited its visa overstay rates. Haiti, which avoided the travel ban during Mr Trump's first term, was also included for high overstay rates and large numbers who came to the US illegally. Haitians continue to flee poverty, hunger and political instability deepens while police and a UN-backed mission fight a surge in gang violence, with armed men controlling at least 85% of its capital, Port-au-Prince. 'Haiti lacks a central authority with sufficient availability and dissemination of law enforcement information necessary to ensure its nationals do not undermine the national security of the United States,' Mr Trump wrote. The Iranian government offered no immediate reaction to being included. The Trump administration called it a 'state sponsor of terrorism', barring visitors except for those already holding visas or coming into the US on special visas America issues for minorities facing persecution. Other Middle East nations on the list – Libya, Sudan and Yemen – all face ongoing civil strife and territory overseen by opposing factions. Sudan has an active war, while Yemen's war is largely stalemated and Libyan forces remain armed. International aid groups and refugee resettlement organisations roundly condemned the new ban. 'This policy is not about national security – it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America. The travel ban results from a January 20 executive order Mr Trump issued requiring the departments of State and Homeland Security and the director of national intelligence to compile a report on 'hostile attitudes' toward the US and whether entry from certain countries represented a national security risk. During his first term, Mr Trump issued an executive order in January 2017 banning travel to the US by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries — Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It was one of the most chaotic and confusing moments of his young presidency. Travellers from those nations were either barred from getting on their flights to the US or detained at US airports after they landed. They included students as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family. The order, often referred to as the 'Muslim ban' or the 'travel ban', was retooled amid legal challenges, until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. The ban affected various categories of travellers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families. Mr Trump and others have defended the initial ban on national security grounds, arguing it was aimed at protecting the country and not founded on anti-Muslim bias. However, the president had called for an explicit ban on Muslims during his first campaign for the White House.