The campaigners demanding life sentences for reckless cyclists
For mother-of-three Savina Hewson, 56 at the time, the day she got knocked over by an Uber Eats courier riding an e-bike on the pavement was a day she feels lucky to have survived. Shuddering as she recalls the incident, she explains how a cyclist ploughed into her as she stood at a crossing, leaving her with severe concussion and bruising to her face.
After spending a night in hospital, she then suffered extreme migraines and fatigue which left her unable to work for four weeks, plus terrible lower back pain which required months of physiotherapy.
'People understand that being hit by a pushbike, let alone an e-bike, can do serious harm, and it did,' she tells The Telegraph. 'I was hit by a large man going very fast on an e-bike. It was like being struck by a motorbike driven full speed along the pavement. 'It had thick, chunky wheels and a large frame… The psychological impact on me – months on – is still awful. I often think about it.'
Hewson's story is not for the faint-hearted. Indeed, in the incident last November in Hull, East Yorkshire, her perpetrator not only knocked her down, but allegedly punched her as she lay on the ground after she had tried to reach for her phone. He then rode off, leaving passers-by to come to her aid and call an ambulance.
Despite this, her attacker – who has since been traced by Humberside Police – has not faced any criminal proceedings, a decision which has left Hewson, a community care worker, 'enraged' and 'disgusted'. 'He lost his job at Uber Eats and police said he had suffered enough,' she adds. 'But I am dumbfounded by the lack of action. It was a completely dangerous and reckless crime. I was seriously injured and he has faced no consequences. Justice has not been served and I never even got an apology. He should be serving a long sentence, or he will just do it again.'
A spokesman for Humberside Police said: 'Thankfully the cyclist [in this incident] did not sustain any serious injuries as a result of the collision. Officers spoke to the victim and the man, and a resolution was reached after the driver was given words of advice.'
But the lack of recourse has left Hewson welcoming news that the Government is planning to toughen up laws relating to cycling collisions – including those caused by e-bikes. New government proposals to the Crime and Policing Bill – which is currently going through Parliament – could see dangerous cyclists who kill face life imprisonment.Currently, those who commit such a crime can be imprisoned for only a maximum of two years under an archaic 1861 law intended for horse riders. The changes would also see serious injury caused by dangerous cycling – or death by careless or inconsiderate cycling – incur a five-year jail term, fines, or both. (Electric scooters are already classed as motorised vehicles.)
According to the Department for Transport (DfT), the amendment would see cycling offences brought into line with driving offences. A DfT spokesman said updating the more than 160-year-old legislation would 'ensure that the tiny minority who recklessly disregard others face the full force of the law'.
If the changes do come through, however, they will only be after years of campaigning. Under the previous government, Conservative MP Sir Iain Duncan Smith campaigned to amend the Criminal Justice Bill to hold cyclists accountable for reckless behaviour.Another key campaigner has been Matthew Briggs, a company director, whose wife, Kim, died from head injuries after being hit by a cyclist in February 2016.In that harrowing instance, Mrs Briggs, 44, was crossing a road, having popped out for lunch in Old Street, east London, when a cyclist riding an unroadworthy bike ploughed into her. She fell to the ground, suffered catastrophic head injuries, and died a week later in the Royal London Hospital, leaving behind a husband plus a son and daughter, then aged 12 and 10.
'Nothing can prepare you for a sudden road death,' Briggs tells The Telegraph from his home in south-east London. 'I lost my wife and best friend. But my sole focus has been on shepherding [my children] to a point where they are optimistic and positive about life. They are now 21 and 19 and are doing fantastically, which is my proudest achievement.'I met Kim at university and had 27 years with her, but my kids had less time with her, so I've always been aware it's not about me, it's about them.'
Briggs's grief was compounded by the complexity of forming a criminal case against the perpetrator, Charlie Alliston, then 18. Alliston had been riding a fixed-gear bike with no front brake, which is illegal for road use. But with no modern laws which cover such an offence, it took 18 months to secure a conviction against him for 'wanton or furious driving' under the 1861 law. He was sentenced to 18 months in prison. It was this 'torturous legal process' that led Briggs in 2017 to begin campaigning for changes to the law – something he is now cautiously optimistic may be achieved. 'Tariffs have never been important to me, although I know they are to other families who have lost loved ones,' he adds. 'I have always just wanted to close the gap in the law, so cycling offences are treated on a par with motoring offences. In my view, it doesn't matter if a person is killed by a car or a bike, the impact on the family and the victim is the same. Yes, deaths from cyclists are rare, but we still need a law to deal with this eventuality.'
Deaths are rare: between 2013 and 2024, roughly 30 pedestrians were killed by cyclists in England and Wales, roughly three a year. But when they happen, often the victims are elderly.
They include 91-year-old Army veteran Jim Blackwood, who died of internal injuries in July 2023 after being hit by an e-bike in Rochester, Kent, while putting out his recycling, plus Hilda Griffiths, 81, who was struck as she walked her dog in Regent's Park by a cyclist doing peloton laps.
Serious injuries from cyclist collisions are also growing. Official figures show that there were 308 pedestrians injured by cyclists in 2020, compared with 437 in 2021 and 462 in 2022.Experts fear the numbers may be increasing as the popularity of battery-powered e-bikes means more people are travelling at speed on heavier machines. Cycling in general is also on the rise, with the City of London seeing a more than 50 per cent increase in the past two years.
According to Eman Hassan, a senior associate at London law firm Fieldfisher, which represented Briggs in his civil and criminal cases against Alliston, incidents of pedestrians being hit by cyclists seeking advice from her firm are on the rise. 'We are seeing more and more people hit by bikes, especially, I feel, since the London cycle superhighways were introduced,' she says. 'Often, it's from a normal pedal bike, where the person has been hit directly or knocked over into the road.
'We see clients suffering injuries ranging from severe brain injury to upper and lower limb fractures. These injuries can be life-changing.'
Hassan welcomes the changes, but feels that if cyclists are to be treated on a par with motorised vehicles in the law, they should also be expected to get insurance.'If cyclists had insurance and collided with someone, causing serious injury, the victim may well need specialist rehabilitation to support their recovery. But currently, there is nothing that can be done unless the cyclist has some form of home insurance or the accident occurs during the course of their employment and a claim could be made against their company.
'It is never right that the careless actions of one person should hugely disadvantage another, often to the extent of ruining their and their family's lives for ever.'
Changes to the law are also welcomed by writer Annette Kellow, whose disabled son, Felix, six, was 'bulldozed' by a cyclist riding an e-bike along London's Kensington High Street pavement in October 2024.'It was rush hour so the cyclists were using the pavement to beat the cars,' Kellow tells The Telegraph. 'My son was about a metre from me, and I saw a cyclist just plough into him. Felix smacked his head on the pavement and was bleeding on his arm. I was in complete shock but the cyclist said, 'I couldn't stop,' then pedalled off.' As Felix suffers from a rare bleeding disorder, where a single 'bump' can cause life-threatening bleeds, Kellow immediately took him in a taxi to Chelsea and Westminster A&E.
'Felix was completely dazed and wasn't responding to any communication, which absolutely terrified me as it could be a sign of bleeding on the brain,' she adds. 'Doctors gave him an injection to stop the bleeding on his arm, and gave him an MRI. Luckily, he didn't have a bleed on his brain, but the experience was horrific – essentially a lawless hit and run on my child.''Changes are necessary,' she says. 'But I think the law also needs to tackle cyclists mounting pavements, jumping red lights and riding above the speed limit.'Cycling in general is a good idea, but so many cyclists – especially on the Lime bikes and e-bikes – are reckless. My son was lucky but they really are a danger to life.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
5 GA men charged with distributing meth, cocaine following investigation
Multiple people are being held without bond after complaints about drug sales led to their arrests. [DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] Monroe County Sheriff Brad Freeman tasked the MCSO Narcotics Unit to investigate the multiple complaints about drug sales in and around the city of Forsyth. Deputies said after a lengthy investigation and several purchases made in the city of Forsyth on Monday and Tuesday, they arrested several people. The MCSO arrested Emory Denby, 50, Rex Williams, 69, Fredrick Zellner, 42, Robert Downs, 48, and John Blake Smith, 54, all of Monroe County. All five were charged with sale and distribution of methamphetamine and or cocaine. They are being held without bond at the Monroe County Jail. TRENDING STORIES: Asian needle ants crawling across US, now found in 20 states, sting cause life-threatening reaction Fake Uber Eats killing suspect in court, victim's family removed from hearing Atlanta woman accused of using stolen IDs, fake prescriptions to get medicine [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rough sleeping to be decriminalised in England and Wales
Rough sleeping will be decriminalised next year under government plans to scrap a 200-year-old law. Ministers are planning to scrap the Vagrancy Act, which outlaws rough sleeping in England and Wales. The law was introduced in 1824 to deal with rising homelessness, but Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has called it "cruel and outdated". The government's plan includes new legislation which will target crimes such as organised begging by gangs and trespassing, a statement said. Rayner, who is also housing secretary, said Labour was "drawing a line under nearly two centuries of injustice towards some of the most vulnerable in society". "No one should ever be criminalised simply for sleeping rough and by scrapping this cruel and outdated law, we are making sure that can never happen again," she said. The number of prosecutions and convictions under the 1824 act has declined over the past decade. According to government statistics, there were a total of 79 prosecutions and 59 convictions for offences related to rough sleeping in 2023 - down from a peak of 1,050 and 810 respectively in 2011. Repealing the Vagrancy Act was first announced in 2022 by the previous Conservative government. It had wanted to pass alternative legislation first, but this did not happen before the general election was called last year. The party's Criminal Justice Bill would have allowed police to move on "nuisance" rough sleepers and fine them if they did not comply. The Labour government said it plans to replace the Vagrancy Act with "targeted measures" that will "ensure police have the powers they need to keep communities safe". These measures, which will be introduced through amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill, will include new offences of facilitating begging for gain and trespassing with the intention of committing a crime. Homeless charities have long called for the Vagrancy Act to be scrapped. Crisis chief executive Matt Downie said: "This is a landmark moment that will change lives and prevent thousands of people from being pushed into the shadows, away from safety." He praised the government for having "shown such principled leadership in scrapping this pernicious Act". He said: "We hope this signals a completely different approach to helping people forced onto the streets and clears the way for a positive agenda that is about supporting people who desperately want to move on in life and fulfil their potential." People living on London's streets rises by 26% Pressure grows over rough sleeping clampdown
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
The UK is about to pass Europe's most extreme abortion law
Britain may soon have one of the most extreme abortion regimes in the world. Next week, the Commons will vote on amendments, proposed by Labour MPs Stella Creasy and Tonia Antoniazzi, to the Crime and Policing Bill that seek to decriminalise abortion up to the moment of birth. In Britain, abortion is currently legal until 24 weeks of pregnancy. But for the pro-abortion lobby this isn't enough. A YouGov survey revealed that 70 per cent of MPs think women should not be liable for prison sentences if they have abortions outside current restrictions. Yet this is wildly out of step with public opinion. Just 1 per cent of British people support abortion up to birth. How is such a wildly unpopular opinion on the verge of becoming law? Let's rewind to 2020. The UK was in lockdown. Face-to-face appointments for abortions were suspended. Women were allowed to access over-the-phone appointments with clinicians and have abortion pills sent to them by post. These pills can only be used legally until 10 weeks' gestation. But without an in-person appointment, there is no way of knowing how far along a pregnancy has progressed. And there is no way of preventing women who are well past 10 weeks – and even past the 24-week limit – from claiming, or being coerced into claiming, that they are less than 10 weeks pregnant. Due to the risks, this arrangement was intended to be temporary. But in 2022, pro-abortion MPs hijacked an unrelated Bill to make pills-by-post permanent. Many people – including me – warned that this would lead to an increase in illegal abortions, dangerous late-stage terminations, coercion and undetected abuse. And we were right. In June 2023, Carla Foster was found guilty of aborting her baby eight months into pregnancy. She was given abortion pills after claiming she was only seven weeks pregnant. In December 2024, Stuart Worby was jailed after spiking a woman's drink with fraudulently-obtained abortion pills and ending the life of her unborn child. In just 18 months after pills-by-post was introduced, some estimates suggest that more than 10,000 women had to receive hospital treatment after taking abortion pills at home. These cases only exist because of pills-by-post, a scheme for which abortion providers enthusiastically campaigned. Before 2022, there were just three prosecutions for illegal abortions in 160 years. Yet instead of arguing for a return to face-to-face appointments, the abortion lobby is now capitalising on these prosecutions to convince MPs that women are being wrongly criminalised. The consequences of full decriminalisation will be grim, with inevitable increases in coercion and medical complications. The experience of Victoria, Australia suggests we will see more babies born alive after failed 'DIY' late-term abortions, and a rise in sex-selective abortions. Abortion is a sensitive issue and there is no public consensus on what the legal time limit should be. But in a society where human rights are respected and the vulnerable protected, it is unthinkable that there should be no consequences for ending the life of an unborn, fully-formed human child. Just moments after birth, such an action would incur life in prison. MPs must not allow the unpopular obsession of a handful of activists to change the law. Stand up to the extremists – the public are behind you. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.