logo
Sangrur court seeks minister Aman Arora's response on ‘wrong facts' in application

Sangrur court seeks minister Aman Arora's response on ‘wrong facts' in application

Hindustan Times25-05-2025

The district and sessions court, Sangrur, has sought a reply from cabinet minister Aman Arora on an application seeking action against him for allegedly stating wrong facts in an exemption application during a hearing held on Friday in a 2008 assault case.
As per the court order, the matter has been adjourned to June 5, for the filing of his reply.
Cabinet minister Aman Arora's counsel initially sought exemption from his personal appearance, citing an urgent meeting. However, a second application was subsequently moved, stating that the minister had travelled to the USA due to an emergency involving his daughter. The counsel clarified that the first application was moved inadvertently and under a bona fide impression, and that the true facts came to his notice later.
The court had exempted Arora's presence for the day. The order reads, 'Since the case is fixed only for consideration on the application under Section 362, read with Section 389 CrPC, and not for arguments on the main appeal, therefore, presence of appellant is exempted for today only.'
However, the counsel for the complainant, Rajinder Deepa, moved an application seeking appropriate action against Arora for stating wrong facts in the exemption application. The court granted an adjournment for Arora's counsel to file a reply to this.
Arora's counsel Yogesh Gupta confirmed that the court had exempted Arora's presence for a day and that the case has been adjourned to June 5 for reply on the application filed by complainant.
The case pertains to a 2008 incident in which Arora's brother-in-law, Rajinder Deepa, had accused Arora and nine other persons of forcibly entering his house in Sunam and assaulting him.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Piyush Jain case: Court dismisses accused application, hearing on July 4
Piyush Jain case: Court dismisses accused application, hearing on July 4

Time of India

time13 hours ago

  • Time of India

Piyush Jain case: Court dismisses accused application, hearing on July 4

1 2 Kanpur: Special chief judicial magistrate Kanpur Nagar Kumud Lata Tripathi on Friday dismissed the application of accused Piyush Jain and Sunil A Hirani in the much-publicised case in which the GST department had recovered approximately Rs 195 crore cash and gold bars weighing around 22 kgs. The DGGI Ahmedabad had raided perfume trader Piyush Jain's houses situated at Anandpuri Kanpur and Kannauj on December 21, 2021. The department had seized Rs 196 crore in cash and 23 kg gold from his possession. Piyush was ultimately arrested on December 27, 2021. He was bailed out after about eight months. The prosecution had made thirteen other persons accused apart from Piyush. All are currently on bail. Both accused had previously applied for the case diary and other documents as per provisions of the Cr PC which was strongly opposed by the prosecution. According to Ambrish Tandon, special prosecutor for DGGI Ahmedabad, the accused applicants pressed their demand on last date while he submitted that CD/DVD containing 479 to 11,455 pages of the charge sheet had already been provided to the counsel of Sunil A Hirani and the same had also been provided to Piyush Jain on October 20, 2023. Both had acknowledged receipt on the order sheet of the case file present in the court. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Hamburg: GEERS sucht 700 Testhörer für Hörgeräte ohne Zuzahlung GEERS Undo He stated that since copies of the documents had already been furnished by the court, it appears that this application had been filed only to delay proceedings. Therefore, the court should dismiss the application of Hirani and Piyush Jain. The court, which had reserved its order on the previous date, delivered the verdict and dismissed the accused applicants' plea. The magistrate in her order observed that since all documents had already been delivered by the prosecution to the accused, there was no reason to deliver them again. The application was viewed as a tactic to delay the trial and thus was dismissed. The next date was fixed as July 4 for hearing. Tandon informed that the prosecution would now present its evidence. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !

'Victims' can challenge acquittal under Sec 372 CrPC: Supreme Court
'Victims' can challenge acquittal under Sec 372 CrPC: Supreme Court

Time of India

time15 hours ago

  • Time of India

'Victims' can challenge acquittal under Sec 372 CrPC: Supreme Court

NEW DELHI: Referring to provision of Section 372 of CrPC which was amended in 2009 on recommendation of Law Commission to allow a victim to file appeal, Supreme Court has held that a "victim" of an offence like in cheque bouncing cases has the right to challenge the order of acquittal of the accused under CrPC and corresponding Section 413 of BNSS. Differentiating between Sec 372 & Sec 378 (which allows a complainant to file appeal), a bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Sharma said Section 378 circumcised the right to file an appeal which is not the case with Section 372. "The proviso to Sec 372 of CrPC was inserted in statute book with effect from 31.12.2009. The object and reason for such insertion must be realised and must be given its full effect to by a court. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we hold that the victim of an offence has the right to prefer an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of CrPC, irrespective of whether he is a complainant or not. Even if the victim of an offence is a complainant, he can still proceed under the proviso to Section 372 and need not advert to sub-section (4) of Section 378 of CrPC, SC said victim of a crime must have an absolute right to prefer an appeal which cannot be circumscribed by any condition and the right of a victim of a crime must be placed on par with right of an accused who after being convicted has a right to file an appeal under Section 374 of CrPC. TNN

Mega DSC exams off to a peaceful start in Eluru
Mega DSC exams off to a peaceful start in Eluru

The Hindu

timea day ago

  • The Hindu

Mega DSC exams off to a peaceful start in Eluru

Eluru District Collector K. Vetriselvi on Friday (June 6) said the Mega District Selection Committee (DSC) exams has begun peacefully in the district. On Friday, she made a surprise inspection of the examination centre at Siddhartha CBSE School in Vatluru, Eluru. She examined the arrangements and the conduct of the examinations at the centre. She said that three exam centres have been arranged in the district for the DSC exams, being held from June 6 to June 30. Each day, the exams will be held in two shifts: from 9:30 a.m. to noon and from 2:30 p.m. to 5 p.m. A total of 17,584 candidates are expected to appear for these exams. Police security has been arranged at all exam centres, and Section 144 (CrPC) has been enforced. For the convenience of candidates, a control room has also been set up with the following phone numbers: 9030723444 and 9505644555. The Collector advised all candidates to reach their assigned exam centres well ahead of time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store