Trump Attacks Immigration Rulings In Memorial Day Message
President Donald Trump on Monday marked Memorial Day by attacking 'USA HATING JUDGES' who have ruled against his immigration policies, including recent decisions accusing the Trump administration of violating court orders by carrying out mass deportations.
Trump has used holiday messaging to criticize opposition to his immigration policies, including 'USA ... More HATING JUDGES.'
Trump wished a 'HAPPY MEMORIAL DAY TO ALL' in a Truth Social post Monday, including those he called 'SCUM,' who he accused of trying to 'DESTROY OUR COUNTRY THROUGH WARPED RADICAL LEFT MINDS.'
Trump claimed 'USA HATING JUDGES' judges were 'ON A MISSION' to allow 'MURDERERS, DRUG DEALERS, RAPISTS, GANG MEMBERS AND RELEASED PRISONERS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD' in the U.S. so they could 'ROB, MURDER AND RAPE AGAIN.'
His comments come nearly a week after a federal judge ruled the Trump administration violated a court order by deporting migrants to South Sudan without giving them a 'meaningful' opportunity to protest, as the White House defended the action and accused Judge Brian Murphy of being 'an activist judge' by ruling against it.
Other recent court rulings have blocked the Trump administration from carrying out mass firings of federal workers and Trump's plans to dismantle the Department of Education, after a judge ruled Trump doesn't have the authority to get rid of the agency without Congress' approval, while earlier decisions scrutinized the government for not allowing migrants time to protest their deportations.
Trump called on the Supreme Court to support his immigration actions, after the court last week ruled in favor of his administration's efforts to remove protections for Venezuelan immigrants.
Trump will speak at Arlington National Cemetery at 11 a.m. EDT.
Trump attacked Harvard University on Monday, writing on Truth Social he was considering redirecting $3 billion in grant funds 'and giving it to TRADE SCHOOLS all across our land.' He also renewed demands for Harvard to release the names of its international students, a request Trump defended by suggesting the list would allow his administration to determine 'how many radicalized lunatics, troublemakers all, should not be let into our country.' Last week, the Trump administration revoked Harvard's ability to enroll foreign students. A federal judge later blocked the move, as Harvard argued the action violated the First Amendment and would have an 'immediate and devastating effect' on the university and thousands of visa holders.
Trump has long used holiday messaging to attack critics he has described as 'Radical Left Lunatics.' In December, Trump wished a merry Christmas to the 'wonderful soldiers of China,' whom he accused of 'lovingly, but illegally,' operating the Panama Canal. He also referred to then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as 'governor' as Trump pushed for Canada to become the 51st state. In recent months, Trump has focused his attacks on judges who have ruled against his sweeping immigration actions, writing on Easter that 'Radical Left Lunatics' were trying to bring 'Murderers, Drug Lords, Dangerous Prisoners, the Mentally Insane, and well known MS-13 Gang Members and Wife Beaters, back into our Country.' His post appeared to refer to Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, as a Maryland District Court judge earlier ordered the Trump administration to facilitate his return to the U.S.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows Where Americans Are Being Detained Overseas
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. More Americans are being held in Venezuela than in any other foreign country, the State Department revealed last week, buried in a travel warning urging U.S. citizens not to travel to the troubled South American nation. While a spokesperson for the department told Newsweek they could not provide specific numbers of wrongful detentions abroad out of security concerns, there are at least 43 U.S. citizens currently being held hostage or in wrongful detention, based on data provided by a group that advocates for Americans held overseas. President Donald Trump and his administration have taken an urgent approach to bringing detained Americans home, securing the release of 47 people since January 20. Dozens more remain either imprisoned in or unable to leave a foreign country. "The thing we need to keep in mind when we talk wrongful detention, this is hostage taking by foreign powers," Elizabeth Richards, director of hostage advocacy and research at the Foley Foundation, told Newsweek. "We are not looking at legitimate charges or legitimate judicial processes, as we understand them in United States. When we talk capture countries, we're talking about countries, and the leaders in those countries, who have purposely decided to treat human beings as bargaining chips." The Foley Foundation, set up in memory of the journalist James Foley who was brutally murdered by ISIS in 2014, advocates for the return of Americans being held overseas. Its most recent annual report, published in March, tracks those detained and released in the past year. It estimates that 54 Americans were held hostage or wrongfully detained in 17 countries in 2024, with between six and nine in Venezuela, eight in China, five in Russia and four in Afghanistan. Others were held in Egypt, Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian Territories. What Is Wrongful Detention? Wrongful detention does not refer to the roughly 98 percent of American arrests overseas each year linked to legitimate law enforcement and judicial processes, the Foley Foundation says. In other words, it does not include those arrested following alleged criminal or civil actions in which evidence of a crime has been made public. The federal government typically allows those to play out in the respective country's legal system. In order for the State Department to consider a detention "wrongful", a case has to pass through a series of tests known as the Levinson Criteria. That includes whether a person is being held purely because they are an American citizen, if the foreign country is doing so in order to influence the U.S. government, and even if the person is being held in violation of the foreign country's own laws. Richards told Newsweek that this criterion does not cover all Americans who cannot come home. "Now we know the U.S. government doesn't publicly put out any numbers, and when we say 43 Americans, we count exit bans in our numbers," Richards said. "Our understanding is the U.S. government currently doesn't count exit bands as wrongful detentions, though we think that might be evolving, and we would hope that the U.S. government would eventually treat exit bands as any other type of wrongful detention." Exit bans stop people from leaving the country they are in, though they are not held in a prison or jail. The Foley Foundation estimated that around a quarter of Americans wrongfully held last year were subjected to such orders. A spokesperson for the State Department told Newsweek that the department does not provide specific numbers on wrongful detentions due to privacy, security and "other reasons." A Difficult Dance of Diplomacy Left: U.S. President Donald Trump welcomes Marc Fogel back to the United States after being released from Russian custody, at the White House on February 11, 2025 in Washington, DC. Right: US-Russian ballet dancer Ksenia... Left: U.S. President Donald Trump welcomes Marc Fogel back to the United States after being released from Russian custody, at the White House on February 11, 2025 in Washington, DC. Right: US-Russian ballet dancer Ksenia Karelina and her boyfriend South African boxer Chris van Heerden embrace as she arrives at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, following her release from Russia on April 10, 2025. More Al Drago/ROBERTO SCHMIDT/AFP via Getty Images On May 6, the White House put out a list of some of the 47 Americans the Trump administration had successfully brought back to the U.S. since January, including ballerina Ksenia Karelina, held in Russia for 14 months, and Marc Fogel, a teacher also held in Russia for several years. While high-profile cases like these receive the bulk of media attention, Richards said many wrongfully detained Americans remain overseas without much hope. "Sometimes it's difficult for families to get attention to their case and we only know cases where there's public information available, or the family has come to us for support," she said. "Some families will choose to be quiet, choose not to work with anyone and that's fine, that their right, and we work with plenty of families too, where we don't publish the name of their loved one," she added. "But that's always the choice of that family advocating for them, but if we don't have clear metrics, it makes it difficult I think for the general public to understand the scale and the scope of the problem." The State Department spokesperson told Newsweek that President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio were committed to bringing all Americans unjustly detained overseas home, but factors such as a lack of U.S. embassy or poor diplomatic relations can make the work of State Department officials difficult. Many Americans wrongfully detained are held for months or years. George Glezmann was taken by the Taliban in Afghanistan, where there is no longer an American embassy, and held for 836 days. He was finally released in March. Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro speaks to supporters as he celebrates the results of the parliamentary and regional elections at the Bolivar square in Caracas on May 25, 2025. Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro speaks to supporters as he celebrates the results of the parliamentary and regional elections at the Bolivar square in Caracas on May 25, 2025. FEDERICO PARRA/AFP via Getty Images Venezuela, highlighted by the State Department on May 27, also does not have a U.S. embassy. The relationship between the two countries remains strained. "Venezuelan security forces have detained U.S. citizens for up to five years without respect to due process, in harsh conditions—including torture—frequently based solely on their U.S. nationality or U.S. passport," the department said in a press release. The Foley Foundation noted in its annual report that through the end of 2024, the State Department had not included those held in Venezuela as wrongfully detained. The Trump administration's announcement last week, which included a warning for Americans not to travel to Venezuela over fears of wrongful detention, marked a shift in U.S. foreign policy. Work Ongoing to Bring Americans Home The Bring Our Families Home project, funded by the Foley Foundation, lists the names and faces of those still wrongfully held abroad, including Wilbert Castaneda, an American sailor and father of four who was "forcibly disappeared" by the Venezuelan government, according to the project. The project lists nine others it is actively working on behalf of to secure their release, from Venezuela, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Afghanistan. Humanitarian organizations like the Foley Foundation and Amnesty International are continuing their work to free U.S. citizens alongside the federal government. In 2024, 17 Americans were released — including three hostages — with some freed as part of prisoner exchanges. That number has been far surpassed already in 2025, with the White House making the announcement in early May that the new administration had already secured the release of 47 Americans. "We are tracking more returns so far for this year than all of 2024, so that is excellent and we would love to see that continue," Richards said, adding that she believes there is always more which could be done by the government. "One challenge we know our families routinely face is just trying to get U.S. government leaders to meet with them, to learn the stories of their loved ones, and trying to get that up to the president of the United States."
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The mail is slow ... and that's no accident
There's a concerted effort going on to tamper with the U.S. mail. Delivery times of mail through the U.S. Postal Service have become glacial. And I'm beginning to think that the problem is the plan. The postal service recently announced it was cutting 10,000 jobs while partnering with Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to find 'further efficiencies' in delivering the mail. One man's 'further efficiencies' is another man's sabotaging of what used to be a reliable government service. Part of those so-called efficiencies has been to re-route the mail through 60 Regional Processing and Distribution Centers, often sending undelivered mail through understaffed stops on long journeys far from its eventual destination. For the first time in my life, I don't trust the mail. And I've got good reason. My bank, Wells Fargo, put out a notice to customers, urging them not to pay bills through the mail because the delivery time was five or more days late for letters. Paying the bills through the U.S. Mail might result in late-payment fees on those bills due to long delivery delays, Wells Fargo advised. I mailed a first-class envelope to my son in Philadelphia on Friday, May 9. The postal clerk at the counter of the Boca Raton branch where I hand delivered the mail told me the mail would arrive at my son's apartment on Wednesday, May 14. More than two weeks after that due date, the envelope still hasn't arrived. It's apparently undergoing 'further efficiencies' somewhere in America. And that wasn't an isolated incident. I mailed a birthday card in March that arrived in the middle of April – weeks after the birthday had passed. It all seems very intentional. President Donald Trump has threatened to disband the postal service's governing board, and consolidate his control over the mail service by putting it in the Department of Commerce. For years, right-wing think tanks have been arguing that the U.S. Postal Service should be replaced by private companies. The Heritage Foundation in its 'Blueprint for Balance: A Federal Budget for 2017' called for 'eliminating restrictions on competition in the postal business, including the prohibition on private delivery of letter mail.' Making crippling cuts to the U.S. Postal Service, which then results in long delays of mail service seems more like a concerted attempt to turn the public against this public service. Cerabino: Don't tell Trump, but in Florida, voting by mail was once considered 'phenomenal' The more well-founded dissatisfaction with mail delivery gets generated, the fewer the objections will be when the architects of this chaos move in for the kill. You might want to write to your Congressman about this … on second thought, call. Frank Cerabino is a news columnist with The Palm Beach Post, which is part of the USA Today Florida Network. He can be reached at fcerabino@ This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: DOGEing the mail: Degrading "further efficiencies" in Postal Service
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BarEhud Barak: Israel Must Back Trump's Gaza Deal
U.S. President Donald Trump greets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as he arrives at the White House on April 7, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Credit - Alex Wong—Getty Images In the coming few days, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will face a defining choice between a politically motivated "war of deception" in Gaza and a deal to release all hostages while ending the war. He must choose between his extreme-right ministers—Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—or aligning with Donald Trump. There is no symmetry here. Accepting a hostage deal, ending the war, and working with Trump and free world leaders, won't be effortless. Any choice requires detailed negotiations and compromises. But this path is far superior to any realistic alternative. Based on the achievements of the Israel Defense Forces—including damage to Hamas, weakening Hezbollah, destroying Syria's military arsenal during Assad's collapse, and demonstrating Israel's capability to strike deep into Iran—Israeli leadership could, from a position of strength, pursue releasing all hostages simultaneously, halt this senseless war, end the humanitarian crisis, and uproot Hamas from power. This would enable Israel, though belatedly, to join Trump's vision of a New Middle East, including normalization with Saudi Arabia, regional deployment to tackle the Iranian challenge, and participation in the trade corridor project from India through the Gulf to Europe. Choosing a "war of deception" instead—where misleading propaganda presents political warfare as serving Israel's security—would be a grave mistake. It's highly doubtful that continuing the war could produce results different from previous Gaza rounds over the past 20 months. But it would certainly constitute a death sentence for some or most living hostages and deepen the diplomatic tsunami and International Criminal Court claims Israel already faces. This approach might make sense if it could achieve "total victory" over Hamas, but that won't happen. When this new war inevitably halts—under diplomatic pressure, humanitarian crisis, battlefield events, or domestic political developments—we would find ourselves in precisely the same situation as today. To understand, examine recent history. The October 7th barbaric attack created a compelling imperative for Israel to ensure Hamas could never again reign over Gaza or threaten Israel from there. The question was how to achieve this goal. Since Ben-Gurion, Israel has followed four strategic maxims: wars should be aggressive, fought on enemy territory, ended quickly to translate battlefield results into diplomatic and political realities while maintaining international legitimacy, and—extremely important—never lose the moral high ground. That's how we won in 1967 in six days and 1973 in three weeks. Netanyahu has betrayed almost all these principles. Read More: The Israel-Hamas Ceasefire Was Never Going to Last Another strategic maxim, from Clausewitz to Kissinger, holds that war must have a clearly defined, operationally feasible political purpose. As the Roman saying goes: "If you don't know which port you want to reach, no wind will take you there." This maxim was deliberately ignored. Netanyahu has blocked any discussion of this issue since October 7th, 2023. It was clear to any serious observer that Hamas suffered major military blows daily, losing most weapons systems and leadership figures since October 7th. However, since any Hamas group or individual can easily "disappear" within minutes, hiding among the Strip's 2 million civilians and emerging from tunnels or building windows to attack Israelis, their absolute elimination remains a Sisyphean task. Even after 58 years in the West Bank, we never fully eliminated Hamas' presence in Jenin or Tulkarm. The only way to ensure Hamas cannot reign over Gaza and threaten Israel is by replacing it with another governing entity legitimate to the international community, Arab neighbors like Egypt, UAE, and Saudi Arabia, and Palestinians themselves. Practically, this means a temporary inter-Arab force backed by the Arab League, potentially supported by UN Security Council resolution, funded by Saudi Arabia and UAE, with a technocratic government overseeing Palestinian bureaucracy and a new, non-Hamas security body trained by the inter-Arab force under U.S. supervision. Israel would present only two conditions: no Hamas military branch member could participate in the new entity's organs, and the IDF, initially deployed to the Strip's perimeter, would withdraw to the border only after all pre-agreed security benchmarks are met. This plan, easily implementable a year ago, and appearing to save Gaza and Gazans from further destruction, is harder now, because it could be interpreted as saving Israel from sinking into Gazan mud. But the plan remains viable despite the Israeli government's refusal to consider it. Since this is the only practical "day after" plan, there's no sense sacrificing hostages' lives or endangering Israeli troops in pointless warfare. Who can look into the eyes of future bereaved parents, newly widowed spouses, new orphans, disabled and traumatized soldiers, and claim with clear conscience that everything was done to prevent loss, or that it had justification? As long as Israel rejects hostage release and war's end, the risk increases of international initiatives, including Arab neighbors calling for Israel boycotts and steps toward recognition of a Palestinian state by European countries—many of them stable friends of Israel. Read More: I Am a Former Hamas Hostage. Here's My Message to Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu Permanent occupation of the Gaza Strip, population transfer of 2 million Palestinians, and Israeli resettlement on the that land are base and delusional visions that would backfire and accelerate confrontation with the world. Why is Netanyahu, an intelligent, experienced, savvy politician, failing? The answer isn't simple. Netanyahu has ruled since 2015 through an alliance with ultra-Orthodox parties who don't serve in the army and care only about sectoral needs, and since January 2023 added ultra-right zealots believing Gaza resettlement and Palestinian transfer are heavenly orders. He's caught in a dilemma: 80% of the public sees him as primarily responsible for the country's worst day, 60% believe he should resign. A heavy majority perceives his judicial reform, initiated immediately after January 2023 elections, as a "judicial coup d'état"—an attempt to castrate the legislative branch and demolish Supreme Court independence. Many believe the aim of his blatant attack on democracy is to escape his bribery, fraud, and breach of trust court case. For him, any pause in the war—even 60 days, certainly longer—would immediately bring reckoning and accountability: accelerated court proceedings; demands for national inquiry committee investigating October 7th, and events before, during and after; coalition meltdown; and probable disgraced ejection from public life. I believe Netanyahu genuinely wants all hostages home. But when this clashes with immediate threats to his political survival, he prefers leaving them in Gaza. He has already torpedoed several hostage deal opportunities, and seems to be doing it once again over the weekend, by resisting U.S. guarantee to Hamas for an end to the war in exchange for release of all hostages and entering, together with the Trump Administration, into Trump's New Middle East Order (to include the replacement of Hamas, described above). Netanyahu sticks to his eternal war in order to avoid a pause in fighting, which might lead to the end of his political career. This behavior is unacceptable to Israel and Israelis. We are, as former Supreme Court President Aharon Barak wrote years ago, 'defending democracy' that "should be capable of defending itself against those who try to use the very freedoms and tools it provides to destroy it from within." We're led by someone who lost his strategic and moral compass, dragging the nation into war motivated by personal political interests against our security and common future. Israel urgently needs new, sober leadership with clear realistic vision and self-confidence—leadership capable of reading our people's soul, understanding partners' and rivals' minds, and above all, having courage to make decisions and power to implement them. The world will pass judgment. But the burden of bringing Israel back on track is ours—Israeli citizens. I believe we will overcome. This war will end soon, and Israel's worst ever government will be replaced by a responsible, effective one. A long path of repair must follow. Contact us at letters@
