
I underestimated the Galaxy S25 Edge's camera. Here's why you shouldn't
The Galaxy S25 Edge's camera is confusing, and I understand if it's putting you off buying one. After all, the specification includes the big 200-megapixel main camera from the Galaxy S25 Ultra, but it doesn't have a telephoto like the Galaxy S25 Plus, making it an odd in-between model.
I was concerned the lack of a telephoto would hurt the S25 Edge's versatility, so have been busy taking zoom photos with the phone to find out if you can live with it, or if it's a serious downside to the coolest, thinnest smartphone we've seen in a while.
Optical vs optical quality
Samsung hasn't put a telephoto camera alongside the S25 Edge's 200MP main camera and 12MP wide-angle camera, but it does say you've got a 2x 'optical quality' zoom, enabled by the 200MP camera. It means the camera takes a full resolution photo and crops it in the sensor itself, without resorting to the pixel enhancement and digital cropping it may use when you snap photos at 4x or 10x zoom in the app. The result should be a purer, natural-looking zoom photo.
Regardless of Samsung's technical efforts to convince us otherwise, optical quality zoom shots will almost always, in our heads, sound like a compromise. Camera fans will hanker after the true optical quality telephoto camera on the back of the Galaxy S25 Plus or the Galaxy S25 Ultra, and considering the S25 Edge's $1,100 price, think the phone deserved one anyway.
Space is probably the main reason it doesn't have one. Samsung had to reduce the size of the 200MP camera module by 18% in order to fit it in the S25 Edge, which was likely no easy task, and also evidence there's very little spare room inside the phone at all. Massive sensors and engineering flair don't matter to camera fans when they're faced with 'optical quality' telephoto images though. But is this stance backed up by the photos it takes?
First S25 Edge zoom photos
I've been out shooting photos with the Galaxy S25 Edge for the last week, and have paid special attention to the 2x optical quality zoom shortcut in the camera app. While it's not quite as versatile as a 3x telephoto, zooming in at 2x does still help frame photos in an interesting way, introduce more depth of field, and concentrate on specific details which can get lost in a standard 1x photo.
I spent a day with the Hyundai Kona Electric, and captured some of the striking details on this unusual-looking car with the S25 Edge's 2x zoom. The main 2x shot of the car is excellent, with accurate white balance and just enough depth of field to make the subject pop. Crucially, there's almost no noise at all when you crop the image again, although there is some haloing when you look very closely.
Haloing is the main concern, and while it does show up in some 2x photos, it's not always there and may depend on the lighting conditions. It's also possible it'll be fixed in future software updates. The shot of the dashboard taken between the sweeping door frame shows masses of detail, with text on the buttons and screen staying sharp and clear, and with little noise in the dark footwell. The close-up of the front light and wing demonstrate the great white balance again, without any haloing this time, and excellent detail levels on the tire and inside the light unit.
More close-up shots
Now spring has arrived, bees are gathering on blooms. How does the Galaxy S25 Edge's camera cope taking photos here, as it has to focus on small subjects, quite close up. I like to use telephoto cameras for shots like these, and have been pleasantly surprised by the S25 Edge's performance.
I took dozens of photos, and you can see one of the better images here. It's not a fault of the camera I took so many, but more of an issue with the bees not staying still for long. The focus on the flower is sharp, but it has also captured the bee in flight effectively. There's some motion blur, but this is to be expected, and it doesn't ruin the photo. Factor in this is not an optical zoom, and was taken handheld with the camera in auto mode, it's decent.
But what about outside the optical quality 2x mode? The good news here, and where I also underestimated the camera, is the 3x zoom is very usable, despite Samsung not promoting it as optical quality. The second photo of the bee was taken at 3x, so a digital zoom, and the quality is excellent. There's a lot of detail, strong colors, and a pleasing depth of field. The 3x mode is far better than I expected it to be, perhaps even more so than the 2x mode.
Underestimating the Galaxy S25 Edge's camera
This isn't a complete review of the Galaxy S25 Edge's camera, but as the decision to not include a true telephoto camera caused some controversy, even if it wasn't that unexpected given the phone's design, it was far more likely to be a barrier for purchase than anything else.
I underestimated the Galaxy S25 Edge's zoom camera mode, and in doing so also underestimated just how good Samsung's optical quality zoom has become. I should have had more faith, given I has the same concerns about the Galaxy S24 Ultra's 10x hybrid zoom, after the switch over from the Galaxy S23 Ultra's 10x optical telephoto. It also turned out to be very good.
It doesn't deserve to put you off the phone, or to feel shortchanged compared to the Galaxy S25+ if you choose it instead. It's very capable, even at 3x zoom, and a brilliant example of how to use technology to solve the problem of simply not being able to squeeze another camera into the body. I've really enjoyed the Galaxy S25 Edge so far, and adore the wonderful portability and superb ergonomics of the 5.8mm thick case. If you're tempted by it, but worried about it having only two cameras on the back, you can tick that concern off your list.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Verge
17 minutes ago
- The Verge
The new Nissan Leaf will have ‘seamless Plug and Charge capability.'
It will also be able to add 250 kilometers (155 miles) of charge in just 15 minutes of DC fast-charging, according to a new video from the Japanese automaker. Nissan already revealed that the new Leaf will come with a native NACS charging port, enabling it to charge at Tesla Superchargers. The addition of Plug and Charge appears to fit in with the narrative that Nissan aims to address charging headaches with the new Leaf.


Vogue
22 minutes ago
- Vogue
Just How Accurate a Portrait of the Tech-Bro World is ‘Mountainhead'?
It can be a lot of fun to see a world you know well get lampooned, which is maybe why I felt ever-so-slightly out-of-the-loop while watching Mountainhead. Jesse Armstrong's feature directorial debut stars Steve Carell, Jason Schwartzman, Ramy Youssef, and Cory Michael Smith as the world's most powerful and annoying tech-bro clique convening for a weekend retreat in the midst of roiling, worldwide chaos that one of them may or may not be responsible for (and that more than a few of them feel uniquely capable of quelling). I've never worked in tech—except for a few months temping at a search-engine giant that shall remain nameless, from which I stole a ton of pens before unceremoniously quitting—so it was hard for me to tell whether the rapidly paced, Succession-esque dialogue of Mountainhead bore any relationship to the real thing (especially since nobody who was permanently employed at said company spoke to me at my temp job). So, I turned to some anonymous current and former big-tech employees for their thoughts on how the film reflected their industry. Below, find analyses of Mountainhead from some of the people who would know best: Anonymous tech-world veteran and startup founder: 'Mountainhead felt like somebody had listened to a LOT of All-In podcasts in the creation process. I think it over-rotated on the bro-ness of the guys. Tech moguls may do bro-y stuff, but they don't have bro-y personalities. They're still more nerdy than they are bro-y. The 'sure, we can run the world' casual confidence is more common amongst venture capitalists than people who actually operate companies.' Cory Michael Smith (as Venis), Steve Carell (as Randall), Ramy Youssef (as Jeff), and Jason Schwartzman (as Hugo Van Yalk, aka Souper) in Mountainhead. Photo: Courtesy of HBO Anonymous journalist who has covered tech: 'This whole 'We can marry a Facebook-like company to AI and it will become superhuman overnight' thing is ridiculous. Naturally, so is killing the head of the AI company. Tech has too much power, but AI is going to be at least as good as it is bad (for a while, at least). Everyone in the movie is either a doomer or a tech boomer; it's silly.' Anonymous big-tech alum: 'Was Jason Schwartzman gay? He should have been. Visibility matters! Ramy's look was the best because it was the most schlubby. That hit. But someone should have looked absurdly bad, if you asked me, i.e. Sam Altman's Henleys or Mark Zuckerberg's current Eastern Bloc-drug-dealer phase. The chat was so slick from the beginning and, in my experience, these guys have a lot more awkward pauses. I would have had more security, both in person (Elon has more security than Trump!) and on their phones. The venue was right, in that rich techies love an expansive breakfast bar that no one eats, so I was happy to see that. The decor was also right; modern-ish and quiet luxury-ish, but not, like, mid-century-modern chic. I also liked that the chief of staff was a woman old enough to be Cory's mom (that's the Sheryl Sandberg nod).'


Fox News
22 minutes ago
- Fox News
AI robots help nurses beat burnout and transform hospital care
All times eastern The Evening Edit with Elizabeth Macdonald FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: House Democratic leader holds news conference