logo
Elon Musk 'Wasn't Helpful' in His Criticism of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill', Republican Lawmaker Says

Elon Musk 'Wasn't Helpful' in His Criticism of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill', Republican Lawmaker Says

A Republican Representative has called billionaire Elon Musk's sentiments towards the GOP spending bill "unhelpful", further stating that Musk's criticism was "disappointing" for the party.
Kentucky Representative James Comer appeared on the Fox News show Mornings with Maria in conversation with host Maria Bartiromo on Wednesday, where he talked about Musk's censure of the bill.
"I want to support President Trump and his agenda. The big, beautiful bill is that. So it's disappointing that Elon Musk said what he said. It wasn't helpful. But at the end of the day, I don't think it's going to sway very much influence," said Representative Comer.
"We're focused on passing President Trump's agenda. I'm confident that there are enough Senators that will pass that bill out of the Senate and hopefully we can agree to the changes they make, and get President Trump his first major legislative victory of his second term," he continued.
Social media users promptly took to online platforms to criticize Comer for seemingly expecting helpfulness from Musk's criticism.
"Maybe if you passed better bills, Elon Musk wouldn't have any issues," said one user.
Maybe if you passed better bills, Elon Musk wouldn't have any issues. — Red Alert Florida (@RedAlertFlorida) June 4, 2025
"It's disappointing that someone pointed out true things about our bill we didn't read," mocked another.
'It's disappointing that someone pointed out true things about our bill we didn't read' — Kevin D. Water Law (@docKev_) June 4, 2025
"So is he wrong? He's trying to get your attention," wrote a third user.
So is he wrong? He's trying to get your attention. — Howell Ellerman (@howellsacto) June 4, 2025
"Disagreement is fine but silencing valid concerns helps no one. Let's debate, not dismiss," said a fourth user.
Disagreement is fine but silencing valid concerns helps no one. Let's debate, not dismiss. — Press Crate (@presscrate) June 4, 2025
"Wasn't helpful to WHO?!?!" questioned a fifth.
Wasn't helpful to WHO?!?! — FLOPHEADS_GONNA_FLOP (@flopheads_gonna) June 4, 2025
Musk took to his social media platform, X (formerly Twitter), on Tuesday and posted some intense criticism of the bill.
"I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," wrote the world's wealthiest man. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," the Tesla CEO wrote.
Originally published on Latin Times Elon musk Donald trump Congress

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump and Musk trade barbs in public falling out – DW – 06/06/2025
Trump and Musk trade barbs in public falling out – DW – 06/06/2025

DW

time9 hours ago

  • DW

Trump and Musk trade barbs in public falling out – DW – 06/06/2025

Donald Trump and Elon Musk's disagreement over a budget bill has exploded into an open feud as Musk links US president to Epstein files. US President Donald Trump and his former adviser, Elon Musk are having a very public falling out. As Trump hosted German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the White House, the US president expressed his "disappointment" with Musk over his public criticism of Trump's tax and spending bill that is up for approval by the Senate. Trump-Musk relationship unravels Trump said he didn't know if his "great relationship" with Musk would remain the same after the billionaire slammed the bill on social media as "a disgusting abomination." "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore. I was surprised," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. Trump claimed Musk's opposition to the bill was driven by its elimination of tax credits for electric vehicles, which would potentially hurt Tesla. The US president later posted on his media platform Truth Social that Musk "just went CRAZY" after "I took away his EV Mandate." Musk, however, says he opposes the bill because it would increase federal deficits, posting on X on Wednesday that "Congress was spending America into bankruptcy." It was part of a barrage of sniping posts that Musk launched on Wednesday evening. His posts then moved from politics to the personal, with Musk linking Trump and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Musk claims Trump in Epstein files "Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" Musk posted late Wednesday evening. Musk provided no evidence for his claims. Trump's previous association with the wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein, who hanged himself while awaiting trial, has been widely reported in the past. Trump has said the two had a falling-out 15 or so years ago and hasn't publicly objected to the release of the Epstein files. These are the documents linked to the sex-trafficking investigation into Epstein. The files are currently under review by the Justice Department. Trump threatens to cut Musk's government contracts Trump hasn't responded to Musk's posts about Epstein. But late on Wednesday evening, he threatened to cut Musk's government contracts in a Truth Social post. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" Trump said. Elon Musk sported a black eye which he said came from his son as his time as special adviser to President Trump wrapped up Image: Nathan Howard/REUTERS Elon was "wearing thin," Trump posted. Musk spent at least $250 million (€218 million) backing Trump's bid to return to the White House and was tasked with heading up the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Just under a week ago, Trump gave Musk a sendoff in the Oval Office in which Musk appeared with a visible black eye which he said came from his young son. This article was updated on June 6, 2025 to include more recent posts. Edited by: Wesley Rahn and Saim Dušan Inayatullah

MAGA Pleads With Trump to End Feud With Musk: 'America Needs Both of You'
MAGA Pleads With Trump to End Feud With Musk: 'America Needs Both of You'

Int'l Business Times

time10 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

MAGA Pleads With Trump to End Feud With Musk: 'America Needs Both of You'

MAGA supporters are pleading with President Donald Trump to end his feud with Elon Musk as the two engaged in an ongoing social media public spat Thursday. The back-and-forth intensified when the president shared in a Truth Social post that the "easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts." "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" Trump added. The breakdown between Trump and Musk began after the world's richest man criticized the "Big, Beautiful Bill," calling it "disappointing." His comment seemingly triggered the end of his relationship with Trump, leading to his swift departure from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). While most of the internet reveled in the breakdown, many MAGA supporters took to Truth Social to beg the president to end the feud, with some reminding Trump it was he who gave Musk the platform throughout his campaign and at the start of his presidency. "Not a good look Trump," one Truth Social user wrote. "I wish President Trump and Musk would not trade public barbs like this. It diminished both of your accomplishments and makes you look like high school girls in a social media fight. Please, guys. Rein [sic] it in. We are so proud of you of both of you!" Patriot Grandma wrote. "I'm not sure you're gonna see this. I really hope and pray that you do! The country needs you and Elon so if you two could just work out your differences that would be fantastic," another begged. Other Truth Social users defended Musk and his accomplishments in the White House as the head of DOGE. "Elon makes more sense than you do, Donald. I supported you - YOU brought Elon to the table and he produced. Now you want to pass yet another bogus bill which does very little to cut govt waste - And your targeted 'suggestion' is not what needs to be cut here and YOU KNOW IT," one user wrote. "Why are you picking a fight with one of your best allies. So stupid," another echoed. "Oh man, don't jump all over Elon," a third advised. "What is wrong with you??? Please stop," a fourth Truth Social user stated. "As my first comment on this platform I can say in a bipartisan manner, quit being an ungrateful douchebag Mr. President," another added. "You are making a terrible mistake! Elon and Doge was about saving money, lots of it! What good is saving $1 Trillion if you raise the debt ceiling $4 Trillion? Think clearly about this. Congress is playing you like a fiddle!" one user warned. Many criticized both parties for not addressing their issues outside of the public eye. "Please just shut up about issues that should be addressed man to man," a user stated. "America needs both of you or the corrupt will destroy our country," another added. "I am disappointed in the blowup between you and Elon. Together you were an unbeatable force. Apart, you are both weakened - something that makes our enemies very happy," a third wrote. "We love you POTUS, but we love Elon as well. We're a team, stop the infighting," another stated. "Please don't display your differences on social media," a fourth advised. "Pretty sure that infighting isn't what the people voted for," a fifth added. "Wtf are you doing dude... stop blasting your infighting over social media... this isn't 'mean girls,'" another Truth Social user wrote. While the feud shows not signs of slowing down, Musk has taken aim at Trump's alleged involvement in the Epstein files. Trump claimed he doesn't "mind Elon turning against me," and Steve Bannon chimed in to call for the Tesla CEO's deportation. Originally published on Latin Times

What does US President Donald Trump's new travel ban mean?  – DW – 06/05/2025
What does US President Donald Trump's new travel ban mean?  – DW – 06/05/2025

DW

time12 hours ago

  • DW

What does US President Donald Trump's new travel ban mean? – DW – 06/05/2025

From June 9, most nationals from 19 countries will not be allowed to enter the United States. What are the reasons and who is exempt? This time it is not a new executive order but a presidential proclamation that is causing a worldwide stir. The policy signed by US President Donald Trump on Wednesday is entitled "Restricting the Entry of Foreign Nationals to Protect the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats" and due to take effect on June 9. Like executive orders, presidential proclamations are one of the instruments with which a US president can implement the administration's will, particularly regarding national security and immigration. Unlike laws, these documents do not require the approval of Congress. However, they must be based on powers granted by law. In terms of content, Trump's new proclamation ties in with previous travel bans imposed during his first term as president, which the Supreme Court upheld in 2018. Which countries are affected? The proclamation bans entry to the US for all nationals from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, regardless of their reasons for travel, unless the State Department deems their entry into the US to be in the national interest. In addition to these 12 countries, there are seven more whose nationals will face partial restrictions: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Stricter visa checks and restrictions will apply, but these will also be case-dependent. A wealthy businessperson might be allowed to enter, while tourists or students could face higher hurdles. Trump cites Boulder, Colorado attack In a video published on social media, Trump cited Sunday's attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it "underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted." He also said that nationals from certain countries posed "significant risks" of overstaying their visas. An Egyptian man has been charged with injuring several people when he hurled Molotov cocktails at a demonstration calling for the release of Hamas-held hostages in Gaza. According to the US Department of Homeland Security, he had overstayed his tourist visa. Egypt is not listed in Trump's newest proclamation. In the proclamation, the Republican president argues that the countries affected by the new travel ban do not provide enough information on their nationals to assess potential security risks. Some countries listed — Iran and Cuba, for example — the US designates as "State Sponsors of Terrorism." This new ban will tighten up already existing measures. The Trump administration has criticized the fact that some countries do not take back their nationals when the US requires them to leave. However, critics have speculated that the ban has political and economic reasons, pointing out that Saudi Arabia and other countries, with which the Trump family has close business ties, will not be affected. Donald Trump said that other countries could be added to the list in future Image: Leah Millis/REUTERS Who will be exempt from the new restrictions? • Green Card holders • Dual nationals with a US passport • Athletes and coaches participating in "major" competitions in the US • Afghan nationals, who worked for or on behalf of the US government or ISAF, with Special Immigrant Visas (SIV) • Iranian nationals with immigrant visas for ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran • Foreign diplomats and representatives of international organizations on official visits to the US • Close relatives of US citizens (parents, children, spouses) • Adopted children of US citizens • Certain foreign national employees of the US government who have served abroad for at least 15 years • Those who were granted asylum or admitted to the US as refugees before the ban came into effect If not exempt, those nationals from the banned countries will no longer be able to enter the US from June 9 for business trips, educational travel or family visits. The decision is also likely to have economic repercussions. The poorer countries on the list in particular, such as Haiti and Yemen, have benefitted from trade ties with the US, as well as remittances sent by people living and working in the US. Human rights groups have slammed the travel ban as being racist and discriminatory, pointing out too that refugees and asylum-seekers from conflict regions will now lose access to protection programs in the US. Harvard students from China and Taiwan in limbo To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Harvard University targeted Trump also announced specific measures to block new foreign students from attending Harvard University, whom he accused of developing "extensive entanglements with foreign countries, including our adversaries" and flouting "the civil rights of its students and faculty." In his proclamation, he stated: "I have determined that it is necessary to restrict the entry of foreign nationals who seek to enter the United States solely or principally to participate in a course of study at Harvard University or in an exchange visitor program hosted by Harvard University. " Initially, entry to almost all foreign nationals seeking to study or participate in educational programs at Harvard will be suspended for six months. The suspension period could be extended. The US State Department will be directed to examine whether to revoke the existing visas of students at the university. In a statement, Harvard said this was " yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights." Earlier this year, Harvard President Alan Garber wrote that the university, which is based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, would not "surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights." This article was translated from German.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store