Bill seeks to rein in sales of THC-infused drinks and edibles in SC
A display of Nowadays THC drinks at a Your CBD store. (Photo courtesy of Dylan Lyons)
COLUMBIA— Teenagers in South Carolina can buy drinks infused with THC — the compound in cannabis that gets people high — at gas stations around the state due to a legal gray area that has unintentionally fostered the alcohol-alternatives in a state where marijuana remains illegal.
Bipartisan legislation in the House aims to stop that.
'The cow has left the barn on this, and we need to corral it,' GOP Rep. Chris Wooten of Lexington, the main sponsor, recently told the SC Daily Gazette.
The industry's growth was made possible by the 2018 federal farm bill, which effectively legalized hemp and very low levels of THC extracted from it.
While it specified that delta-9 THC concentrations in hemp up to 0.3% 'on a dry weight basis' were legal, neither it nor a 2019 state law that mirrored the federal language set any parameters for how much of the legal compound could be added to drinks or edibles, such as gummies, or set any age requirements for consumption.
They also didn't at all address other THC derivatives from hemp, such as delta-8 and delta-10.
Vape shops and CBD stores selling products with those compounds have sprung up statewide since 2018 — sometimes getting the attention of law enforcement but largely left alone. It was the realization that infused drinks were available at gas stations that really got legislators' attention.
Now they're trying to make clear what's legal and what's not — without unnecessarily putting people out of business.
A House panel opened debate last week on a bill that would ban sales of a 'hemp-derived consumable' to anyone under 21 years old.
That part seemed to have widespread support by legislators, makers of infused beverages, and store owners.
'That should be across the board,' Dylan Lyons, the owner of five Your CBD stores in South Carolina, said about setting a legal age.
What's drawing the opposition, unsurprisingly, is where to set the limit for infused products.
As introduced, the bill limits the level of intoxication in consumables at 0.5 milligrams of delta-9 THC per serving, or 25 milligrams maximum of CBD in gummies, chocolates or other ingestibles.
'That would basically kill us, we'd be out of business. Our employees would be gone,' Lyons said about the proposed milligram limits.
He and another owner of Your CBD stores touted the medicinal uses of their products. Jim Olson said he stopped needing even ibuprofen after he started using CBD.
For the state's hemp-infused beverage industry, the half-milligram limit on delta-9 products is a killer, said Pierce Wylie, co-founder of Rebel Rabbit made and packaged in Greenville.
If that's the per-can limit, customers will simply turn back to alcohol, he said.
'It would eliminate my business,' Wylie told the Gazette last week.
Rep. Seth Rose called it hypocritical to put such restrictions on alternatives to alcohol. He noted that a friend of his stopped drinking alcohol but enjoys the occasional hemp-infused drink.
His friend's biggest side effect, said the Columbia Democrat, is that he gets tired and goes to bed.
'If you're going to nitpick this one, then we need to have an amendment that starts nitpicking the beer, wine and liquor industry,' he said.
The infused beverage industry in South Carolina is relatively new.
Other brewers include High Rise Cannabis Dry Bar, which opened on James Island in 2023 and serves both delta-8 and delta-9 drinks.
In October, Columbia-based Peak Drift Brewing Co. released its own line of delta-9 seltzers.
Their drinks typically have 5 mg to 10 mg of THC per can. Wylie noted that Rebel Rabbit, High Rise and Peak Drift all require consumers to be 21 to buy their products.
Drastically decreasing the dosage to less than a milligram would essentially eradicate the hemp beverage market in the state, Wylie said.
'There'd be very few products, probably less than 10% that would be viable with this limit,' he told the House Judiciary subcommittee on Wednesday.
The next day, Wooten introduced a new bill that would set the limit of hemp-derived delta-9 THC in beverages at 10 mg. He stressed the effort 'is going to take a lot of work' before anything becomes law.
Another piece of the legislation would ban compounds other than delta-9.
To be legal, the THC in hemp must be 'extracted or purified from an agricultural product without chemical alteration.'
The bill lists 15 chemically created THC derivatives banned outright, including delta-8 and delta-10.
Unlike delta-9, they have not been approved for safe consumption by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The federal agency has warned the public about harmful consequences due to use of the unapproved forms of THC.
Some argue those compounds are legal because they're not specifically addressed in federal or state law, Todd Hughey, lab director for the State Law Enforcement Division, told the House panel.
But they're concerning 'because they are psychoactive substances that need to be studied,' he said.
One Horry County lawmaker said he's concerned that hemp-derived THC is being used as a legal substitute for marijuana, which remains illegal in South Carolina.
Over the last decade, the Legislature has repeatedly rejected legislation allowing marijuana for medicinal use.
'When we get to the point where we're talking about this to circumvent legalizing marijuana, that's a bad deal for me,' said Rep. William Bailey, R-Little River.
The Legislature legalized cannabidiol, or CBD, in 2014 but only for very limited purposes.
The non-psychoactive oil extracted from hemp — a marijuana cousin — was specifically supposed to be used by patients certified by a doctor as suffering from severe epilepsy. And proponents of hemp farming touted the plant's usage for a variety of products, including clothing and paper.
But then the 2018 federal law overrode the state's limits and opened up the industry.
The legal murkiness it created prompted SLED in 2021 to ask the attorney general's office to weigh in on it. In an eight-page legal opinion, Assistant Attorney General David Jones agreed with SLED that the Hemp Farming Act legalized THC very narrowly to allow for the licensed, regulated production of industrial hemp.
'We believe … the Hemp Farming Act does not provide an exception for, and does not legalize, delta-8 THC or any other isomer of THC in itself,' Jones wrote.
But he ultimately concluded that it was up to law enforcement and the local prosecutor's office to determine if and when someone was violating the law.
When — or whether — the Legislature will add any clarity remains to be seen.
The chairman of the House subcommittee said he expects to take testimony for several more weeks.
'Whenever you put money into your business, that becomes your baby,' said Rep. Jeff Johnson, R-Conway. 'We don't want to do something that would adversely affect that without making sure we know exactly what it is going to do.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers
Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers The threat culminated a week of clashes between Trump and Musk over federal policy. Show Caption Hide Caption Six takeaways from the President Donald Trump, Elon Musk feud From disappointment to threats, here are six takeaways from the public spat between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Trump told NBC News there would be 'very serious consequences' if Musk financed challenges to Republicans who support his legislative priorities. Musk, who contributed nearly $300 million to help Republicans including Trump win the 2024 election, has harshly criticized the legislative package. President Donald Trump said his former adviser, billionaire Elon Musk, would face 'very serious consequences' if he financed candidates to challenge Republicans who support the president's legislative package for tax cuts and border security. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News on June 7. He declined to share what those would be. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that.' The rupture between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man reaches far beyond their own relationship. Musk contributed nearly $300 million to help Republicans, including Trump, win the 2024 elections. He was a special White House adviser recommending ways to dismantle federal agencies and lay off workers. Trump thanked him repeatedly for his service and presented him with a gold key in the Oval Office on May 30. But in the week after, Musk harshly called the House-passed legislative package of Trump's top priorities a "disgusting abomination" and urged lawmakers to kill it, as the Senate debates the measure. In response, Trump has already threatened to cancel Musk's government subsidies for electric carmaker Tesla and contracts for rocket company SpaceX. Trump said he thought Musk turned on him because the legislation would end subsidies for electric vehicles and because Trump discarded Musk's choice to lead NASA. Musk replied by threatening to shut down the Dragon spacecraft program that helps the U.S. transport astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station. Trump has seemingly tried to temper his public comments about Musk, wishing his companies well. But he told reporters on Air Force One on June 6 that retaliation was possible. 'He's got a lot of money. He gets a lot of subsidy, so we'll take a look at that,' Trump said. 'Only if it's fair for him and for the country, I would certainly think about it. But it has to be fair.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Polling on Elon Musk glaring red light for Republicans
Even as Elon Musk and President Donald Trump no longer appear to be on speaking terms, the Tesla CEO's popularity among the Republican base is on the rise, according to polling. Trump and Musk's friendly relationship came to a dazzling end on Thursday as their disagreement over the Republicans' spending package went into full bloom. Musk called the bill, which significantly increases the deficit, a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump said his former friend had gone 'crazy' as Musk called for his impeachment and removal and claimed that the president is included in the 'Epstein Files.' He later deleted that post. While Musk isn't set to take over as the top figure in the Republican Party, he could create chaos surrounding the GOP's agenda and its plans for the 2026 midterms. Seventy-six percent of Republicans see Musk favorably, according to the most recent poll by The Economist and YouGov. Meanwhile, just 18 percent view him unfavorably. According to a poll conducted by The New York Times and Siena College in late April, 77 percent of Republicans view Musk favorably. Since the start of the second Trump administration, Musk's popularity has been over 70 percent in most polls, Politico noted. The billionaire is more popular than House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, or almost anyone else in the GOP. Among Republicans, both Trump and Vice President JD Vance are more popular than Musk, with 87% and 80% approval, respectively, according to the Economist/YouGov survey. Musk's polling strength with the Republican base may partly be rooted in the fact that GOP voters believed in the mission of the Department of Government Efficiency from the outset, with almost 90 percent backing the notion that the government needs to be downsized. A recent Harvard-Harris poll found that about the same percentage of Republicans believe that DOGE has been effective at scaling back spending. Meanwhile, Democrats and independents are less likely to trust DOGE's accomplishments and are much less likely to view Musk favorably. Fifteen percent of Democrats and 34 percent of independents have favorable views of the billionaire. Musk may become a dangerous rival for the Republican Party, whose values align with the DOGE mission of cutting spending and reducing the deficit. Musk's wealth and social media influence as the owner of X may pose a threat to Trump and his party. This comes as Trump told NBC News on Saturday that he has 'no intention' of speaking to Musk or attempting to repair the relationship. 'I'm too busy doing other things,' said Trump. 'I have no intention of speaking to him.' 'I would assume so, yeah,' he said when asked if his relationship with Musk was over. 'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President,' he added. He also issued a threat, saying that Musk will face 'very serious consequences' if he chooses to use his significant wealth to fund Democrats. Musk's opposition to the spending bill could lead the billionaire to fund challengers to Republicans who voted in favor of it. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump: Musk will face ‘serious consequences' if he donates to Democrats
President Trump on Saturday said tech billionaire Elon Musk will face 'serious consequences' if he moves to support Democratic political candidates in any upcoming elections, following a public rift between the two in recent days. In a phone interview with NBC News, Trump said Musk 'will have to pay the consequences' if he backs opponents to GOP lawmakers who support the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' he told the outlet. The president's remarks comes after he signaled his bromance with Musk is over as a tiff about the GOP megabill spiraled into an all-out brawl on social media. Musk went so far as to allege that Trump is named in the Jeffrey Epstein files, backed a call for impeachment and suggested he would have lost the presidential election without his support. Trump in response threatened to cancel federal government contracts for Musk's companies while calling the Tesla and SpaceX CEO 'crazy.' Prior to the implosion of the duo's relationship, the tech mogul indicated he would roll back his political spending in upcoming elections. 'In terms of political spending, I'm going to do a lot less in the future,' Musk said last month. 'If I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it,' he added. 'I do not currently see a reason.' The billionaire became one of the most powerful forces in U.S. politics after he threw his support behind Trump's reelection bid last summer, spending at least $250 million. He soon became a central figure in the White House as he advised the Department of Government Efficiency and the administration's efforts to reduce the size and scope of the federal government. Musk left the administration late last month as he voiced opposition to the House-crafted GOP spending bill over its potential impact on the national debt. When asked by NBC on Saturday if the president intends to reconcile with Musk, Trump replied in the negative. But he reiterated his confidence in his budget bill despite some GOP concerns in the upper chamber. 'The Republican Party has never been united like this before. It's never been. It's actually more so than it was three days ago,' Trump said, stating Musk's outburst benefited his push to get the bill passed before July 4. 'I think, actually, Elon brought out the strengths of the bill because people that weren't as focused started focusing on it, and they see how good it is,' the president added. 'So in that sense, there was a big favor. But I think Elon, really, I think it's a shame that he's so depressed and so heartbroken.' Some of Musk's social media posts that intensified the feud on Thursday have since been deleted. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.