14 Of The Biggest Canned Food Recalls In History
Modern life comes with a seemingly infinite number of things you need to keep track of, but there's one very important thing that you shouldn't overlook: Food recalls. They happen a lot, and in some cases, finding out about one could be potentially life-saving. Recalls are issued for reasons ranging from unlabeled allergens and mislabeled products, to potential contamination with the kind of microorganisms that can cause serious illnesses.
It's not something that's gone away over time, either. In 2024, Boar's Head was at the center of one of the largest deli meat recalls ever, ending with 71 different products recalled for potential listeria contamination. At least ten people died, dozens were hospitalized, and seven million pounds of meat were deemed suspect. That seems almost unthinkable, but even canned foods haven't been exempt from massive recalls.
Canned food has a reputation as being shelf-stable and long-lasting, and there are a number of canned foods that are perfect or keeping your pantry stocked. But, here's the thing: Canned goods can definitely be recalled, and we'd even argue that these recalls are easy to miss. You might not remember you have a compromised product in your pantry at the time, so let's talk about some of the biggest canned food recalls in history, and put it into perspective on why you should keep an eye out for announcements that might impact you.
Read more: The 15 Absolute Best Canned Foods To Stock Your Pantry
There's a fascinating history behind the distinctive shape of SpaghettiOs, and that circular pasta was designed to be easy to eat and retain texture during the rigorous canning process. In 2010, part of that canning process went wrong and led to a recall that included 15 million pounds of three different types of SpaghettiOs with meatballs: The regular Os, A to Z, and the car-shaped noodles.
The recall wasn't just a large one in terms of quantity, and covered products that had been manufactured all the way back to December of 2008. The problem, Campbell's said, was with one of the cookers in the company's Texas-based production facility.
Although the announcement stressed that no reports of undercooked SpaghettiOs had been received, no illnesses had been connected to the cans, and there was the high likelihood that the majority of product covered in the recall had already been eaten, they were playing it safe. Defective cans had been discovered during a routine inspection, and in the following investigation, it was discovered that the cooker wasn't at the right temperature. Since it was impossible to tell how long the cooker had been malfunctioning, Campbell's decided to issue the voluntary, nationwide recall that would effectively remove all potentially affected products from the market.
Although it might be a foolproof way to keep a shelf-stable protein on hand, there are some clear signs that your canned tuna isn't good anymore. The most obvious is damage to the cans, and that's what kicked off a huge recall of Bumble Bee tuna back in 1982. It started with a complaint from one California-based customer, who found a hole in a can. More complaints from customers across the country started rolling in, and further investigation found that it wasn't a more widespread problem than initially thought: Cans were being potentially punctured by the equipment used at the company's processing facility in Honolulu, and those holes were being hidden beneath the labels.
All of the tuna processed by the plant was recalled, going all the way back to the beginning of the previous year. It amounted to about 40 million cans, and if you're thinking that's a ton of tuna, it is. At the time of the recall, experts were estimating that it was going to cause a widespread tuna shortage, and availability would take as long as eight months to rebound.
Welcoming a new little life into the family definitely comes with a ton of stress and unlocks a whole new set of things to worry about, and back in 2010, Similac added something else to the list. A whopping five million cans of infant formula were being recalled, after beetles were discovered in one of the company's processing plants. The voluntary recall covered three different sizes of powdered formula, and was issued alongside reassurances that the problem was in hand. The lot numbers of recalled cans included those sold to customers, as well as those used in hospitals.
Young children are one of the groups that are often noted as being more susceptible to foodborne illnesses, and they're also more likely to suffer severe cases that an adult's fully-developed immune system if better equipped to handle. It makes sense, then, that parents were incredibly worried when they heard of the possibility that they had been feeding their children formula containing beetle parts and larvae, and some came forward to say they'd noticed signs of discomfort in their children.
Health professionals, however, said that the worst that was likely to happen were some stomach aches. Even as they tried to reassure parents that there was only a small likelihood of contamination, they added that even if there were bugs in the powder, the outcome would not be catastrophic.
Fish goes on a long journey as it travels from ocean to the tin, and there are plenty of opportunities for things to go wrong along the way. Sometimes, that turns into something deadly, and that's what happened back in 1982. Alongside a massive recall for Bumble Bee tuna, another 50 million cans of canned salmon were recalled after an investigation spurred at least in part by the death of a Belgian man.
The cause of the death (and other reported illnesses) was botulism, which takes several forms, all of which are potentially deadly. It occurs after exposure to a spore-producing bacteria that can cause things like nerve paralysis, and in this case, the culprit was canned Alaskan salmon. It was found that cans had been damaged during the manufacturing processes of several separate facilities, and far from being an isolated incident, cans dating back to 1980 — and that were labeled under multiple brand names — were recalled.
At the time, it was one of the largest food recalls ever, and in the investigation that followed, it was found that products from other canneries had produced similar concerns. The equipment found to be at fault was changed, food safety measures were overhauled, and surprisingly, there were no other deaths or illnesses associated with the incident.
When the massive recall of canned Alaskan salmon hit headlines in 1982, The New York Times noted that as it grew, it was challenging the scale of another recall in recent history. In 1973, it was reported that botulism spores had been discovered in six-pound, nine-ounce cans of mushrooms, leading to a recall of almost 30,000 cans. Another announcement came the following day, expanding the recall.
In a bizarre footnote, most of the mushrooms were in the giant cans destined for industrial and commercial use. Many had been shipped to Papa Fabbrini's Frozen Pizzas, and testing confirmed the presence of botulism. (It was later found to be a false positive.) That led to what's called the Great Michigan Pizza Funeral, when about 30,000 pizzas were laid to rest in a ceremony that almost led to the end of Mario Fabbrini's pizza business.
Even stranger, things weren't over yet. In January of 1974, it was announced that four-ounce cans of mushrooms that had been manufactured the previous fall had also tested positive for botulism, and were being recalled. After the initial announcement, another followed a few days later. More canned mushrooms were being added to the already long list of brands and distributors impacted. Precise numbers are difficult to track down, but sources suggest that by the time it was over, somewhere around 75 million cans were recalled.
Just a few years after the massive recall of canned mushrooms hit headlines in the mid-1970s, there was another. This one happened in 1981, and the danger was once again botulism. Initially, the recall issued by Oxford Royal covered just over 65,000 cans, and was announced after testing done by the Food and Drug Administration detected the presence of botulism spores.
Food recalls often get larger and larger as more products are tested, and that's what happened here: Very quickly, that number skyrocketed to five million cans of mushrooms. After first reports suggested the mushrooms had been distributed in 10 states, that expanded to 30 states. The number of brands impacted rose, too, from 30 to 45. The cans were those that had been manufactured in the few months prior to the recall, and it caused something of a panic. That was understandable, given the previous mushroom recall, and the FDA issued statements specifying that it wasn't all mushroom products, and checking codes on cans would tell customers if it was part of the recall.
The numbers on this one are pretty shocking. Back in 2007, horrified cat and dog owners were suddenly losing their pets to an outbreak of kidney failures. The culprit was Menu Foods pet food: Ingredients imported into the Canadian manufacturing facility from China were found to contain melamine. Melamine causes blockages and kidney failure, and news reports say that it led to the deaths of hundreds of pets.
The recall ultimately covered 60 millions cans and packets of food, 95 different brand names, and spawned more than 100 class action lawsuits that were ultimately settled with a $24 million verdict. The tragic footnote to this is that settlements only included reimbursement for things like vet bills, and not what were described to the CBC as "non-economic losses." In other words, the emotional toll of pet deaths. Some consumers lost multiple pets to the tainted food, and the incident led to changes in the legislation governing safety regulations for pet food.
Chilled vichyssoise is a classic French dish that's basically a leek and potato soup, and if you're thinking it's not super popular in the U.S., you'd be right. That could in part be because of lasting damage done to the soup's image way back in 1971, when one man died a litle over a day after he and his wife had a meal of Bon Vivant's canned vichyssoise. She, too, ended up in the hospital in critical condition, and while she survived, she was permanently paralyzed.
Doctors pinpointed the cause as botulism. Many of the recalls we're talking about happened on a cautionary basis, but initial testing on 324 cans of the company's vichyssoise confirmed there was a huge problem. Five contained the deadly toxin, and it led to the emergency seizure of 1.5 million cans.
The incident turned into a legal battle that dragged out for years, as Bon Vivant tried to appeal for the return of the seized cans. The company argued that the FDA didn't have the right to seize products because it might be contaminated, and really, that's not a great look. Bon Vivant went on to declare bankruptcy, the cans were ultimately destroyed, and after three years of hearing about deadly vichyssoise, it's no wonder that people weren't in a hurry to eat it.
Food waste happens on a massive scale, and it's always heartbreaking. Wasting meat products is extra heartbreaking, given where meat comes from, and in 2023, Conagra recalled just over 2.5 million pounds of canned meat. It represented about a month's worth of production, and the cause was given as defective cans that compromised food safety.
Products included Vienna sausages sold under several brand names as well as potted meat, and although consumers were warned that the defective cans had the potential to spoil or become contaminated with various microorganisms, no illnesses were connected to the products. Still, it's worth mentioning that it wasn't a great year for Conagra. It also recalled several thousand pounds of frozen beef shepherd's pie and about a quarter of a million pounds of chicken strips, both over concerns of the presence of foreign matter. The same year, Conagra reported a prolonged period of sales being down, which it attributed to shoppers becoming more budget-conscious.
It's nice to think that the powers-that-be have the best interests of the public at heart, but when a massive scandal hit headlines in 1985, it undoubtedly had a lot of people reconsidering. It revolved around a Star-Kist cannery in New Brunswick, Canada, and about a million cans of tuna. When random spot checks turned up rancid cans, entire batches were pulled and labeled as unsellable. When the government's fisheries manager got wind of it, it kicked off a long and complicated fight between Star-Kist — which said most of the tuna was fine — and government officials, who said that just because some of the cans looked fine, they weren't all safe to eat.
After several inspections agreed that no, the tuna was absolutely not safe, the aforementioned fisheries manager released it for sale anyway after one more investigation said that it was probably fine. Tons of complaints started rolling in, and entire shipments of the tuna were even refused by the military for being unsafe and smelling of rotting fish.
An official recall was issued, but it only covered around 28,000 cans of the million or so that were deemed a part of the questionable batches. The fisheries manager resigned (and later became the Speaker of the House of Commons), and the incident led to new legislation that prevented government officials from overriding food safety decisions.
In 2019, the Food and Drug Administration issued a warning to pet owners: 13.5 million cans of Hill's Science Diet dog food — which had been distributed in 78 different countries — were being recalled for containing deadly levels of vitamin D. High levels of this particular vitamin can cause kidney failure and death, and the stories of dogs who died in a matter of days are absolutely heartbreaking.
The recall dragged on over the course of months, as more samples were tested and more cans were added to the recall. By the time it was over, 22 million cans were recalled, and it kicked off a massive investigation into the way Hill's sourced ingredients. According to the FDA's findings, a vitamin mix included in the food hadn't been tested according to the guidelines. What slipped past contained about 33 times the amount of vitamin D as it should have, and it's unclear how many pets died. Some owners lost their dogs before the recall was initiated, and Hill's eventually agreed to pay $12.5 million to settle the lawsuits.
Even today, there are still guidelines put in place to help you decide how much tuna is safe to eat each week, and that's because mercury is still a major concern. Recent studies suggest that mercury levels in tuna are still wildly unpredictable, and back in 1970, testing for mercury content led to the recall of about a million cans of tuna.
Interestingly, that came with a caveat: The Food and Drug Administration added that they weren't asking customers to return or discard cans if they had any covered by the recall, and said that if they had been consumed, it was fine. Anything unsold was being pulled off the market, and the recall came on the heels of another announcement. The high mercury content was restricted to Grand Union's tuna, and interestingly, the guidelines at the time considered safe mercury limited to be one half part per million. Today, that's been raised to one part per million.
Experts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention say that officially, botulism is fairly rare. When four cases were reported in July of 2007, it was safe to say that something was going on. The outbreak — which ultimately grew to include more cases in more states — was traced back to Castleberry foods. It led to a recall of 91 different products and 111 million total cans of foods including chili sauce and chili. Testing done on the same day that the recall was issued found 16 cans containing botulism spores, and the subsequent investigation turned up evidence of malfunctioning and improperly monitored equipment, and badly calibrated temperature gauges that were said to have contributed to underprocessing.
While Castleberry blamed the incident on malfunctioning equipment and not lax safety measures, the facility was shut down, and the company agreed to pay an undisclosed amount to settle lawsuits. The FDA, meanwhile, blamed oversight. Decades had passed since the last major botulism outbreak, and the incident led to heightened check in other plants... which then led to another 1.2 million-can recall of New Era beans. Testing had discovered traces of botulism spores in those products, leading to a nationwide warning being issued about the dangers of cutting corners.
In 2025, the year was ushered in with an announcement that major grocery stores were recalling canned tuna in more than 25 states. The problem was with faulty can lids that potentially didn't seal properly, leaving the cans vulnerable to contamination. It's unclear just how many cans were included in Tri-Union Seafoods' voluntary recall, but just the fact that there was a laundry list of brands and retails stores in so many states suggests that it was a widespread problem. Retailers carrying the tuna included Trader Joe's, Kroger, Safeway, Walmart, Costco, H-E-B, and other, independent grocers.
Tri-Union Seafoods has been in headlines for recalls before. In 2016, they — along with H-E-B and Bumble Bee — announced that thousands of cases of tuna were being recalled after a machinery failure was discovered, and questions were raised about whether or not cans had been underprocessed. The company had another, smaller recall back in 2010, when it was announced a recall of around 1,000 cases of Chicken of the Sea tuna. Here, too, the problem was with the sealing of the cans, and it was traced back to production issues.
Read the original article on Tasting Table.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Associated Press
39 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Dupixent® (dupilumab) Data at Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis (RAD) Conference Reinforce Use in Atopic Dermatitis Patients with Skin of Color
Atopic dermatitis is a chronic disease that disproportionately impacts communities of color Dupixent achieved 75% or greater improvement in overall disease severity, the primary endpoint, in more than three-quarters of treated patients Patients experienced substantial reductions in hyperpigmentation, dry skin and itch from baseline Results support commitment to enhance clinical understanding of chronic diseases in communities of color TARRYTOWN, N.Y. and PARIS, June 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: REGN) and Sanofi today presented results from the DISCOVER Phase 4, single-arm, open-label trial assessing Dupixent® (dupilumab) in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with skin of color. These are the first clinical trial results for Dupixent in a large population of patients with darker skin tones. The results, along with the Dupixent Phase 3 trials, demonstrated patients taking Dupixent experienced improvements in signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis from baseline across many skin tones. The data were shared in an oral presentation at the 2025 Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis (RAD) Conference. 'Atopic dermatitis, a chronic disease with underlying type 2 inflammation, has a high prevalence and quality of life impact on patients with skin of color. Unique clinical features like darker patches of hyperpigmentation versus redness typically seen on lighter skin may lead to less accurate diagnoses and underestimation of disease severity,' said Andrew Alexis, M.D., M.P.H., Professor of Clinical Dermatology at Weill Cornell Medicine. 'The results from the DISCOVER trial showed that Dupixent patients with atopic dermatitis and darker skin not only experienced reduced disease severity and itch but also saw improvements in areas of particular concern including dyspigmentation and dry skin. These data deepen the clinical understanding of atopic dermatitis within this underserved population, including use of newly validated scales.' In the trial, 120 patients with atopic dermatitis and skin of color (82% Black, 11% Asian, 2% American Indian/Alaska Native, 5% Arab, Central American or other) were treated with Dupixent every two weeks using a weight-based dosing regimen. At 24 weeks: The safety results in the DISCOVER trial were generally consistent with the known safety profile of Dupixent in its approved dermatological indications. The overall rate of adverse events (AEs; n=124) in the DISCOVER trial was 42%, with the most common (≥2%) AEs being headache (3%), upper respiratory tract infection (2%), eczema (2%), conjunctivitis (3%) and allergic conjunctivitis (2%). About Atopic Dermatitis in Skin of Color Atopic dermatitis is a chronic skin disease with underlying type 2 inflammation that causes intense, persistent itch and skin lesions that cover much of the body, resulting in skin dryness, cracking, pain, crusting and oozing. In patients with skin of color, the type and location of the lesions can vary, and they are more likely to have hardened skin lesions and severe skin dryness, itch, dyspigmentation and greater disease severity than those with lighter skin. Additionally, redness that is observed on lighter skin typically appears as darkened, grey or violet on darker skin tones. Because the disease presents differently in people with skin of color, it can be misdiagnosed or the severity underestimated, which can contribute to higher levels of healthcare resource utilization. About the DISCOVER Clinical Trial The DISCOVER Phase 4 open-label, single-arm trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of Dupixent in adults and adolescents aged 12 years and older with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and skin of color, as defined by Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI (those with high melanin; light brown to black). During the 24-week treatment period, all patients in the trial received Dupixent monotherapy every two weeks based on weight after a loading dose: patients weighing ≥30 to <60 kg received 200 mg and patients weighing ≥60 kg received 300 mg. The primary endpoint assessed the proportion of patients who achieved at least 75% improvement on the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients who achieved ≥4-point improvement on the Peak-Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) at 24 weeks. Additional endpoints included pigmentary changes on the clinician-reported Post-Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation Severity Scale (PHSS; scale: 0-8) and skin dryness on the newly developed patient-reported Xerosis NRS (X-AD; scale: 0-10) at 24 weeks. About Dupixent Dupixent, which was invented using Regeneron's proprietary VelocImmune® technology, is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits the signaling of the interleukin-4 (IL-4) and interleukin-13 (IL-13) pathways and is not an immunosuppressant. The Dupixent development program has shown significant clinical benefit and a decrease in type 2 inflammation in Phase 3 trials, establishing that IL-4 and IL-13 are two of the key and central drivers of the type 2 inflammation that plays a major role in multiple related and often co-morbid diseases. Dupixent has received regulatory approvals in more than 60 countries in one or more indications including certain patients with atopic dermatitis, asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), prurigo nodularis, chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in different age populations. More than 1,000,000 patients are being treated with Dupixent globally.1 About Regeneron's VelocImmune Technology Regeneron's VelocImmune technology utilizes a proprietary genetically engineered mouse platform endowed with a genetically humanized immune system to produce optimized fully human antibodies. When Regeneron's co-Founder, President and Chief Scientific Officer George D. Yancopoulos was a graduate student with his mentor Frederick W. Alt in 1985, they were the first to envision making such a genetically humanized mouse, and Regeneron has spent decades inventing and developing VelocImmune and related VelociSuite ® technologies. Dr. Yancopoulos and his team have used VelocImmune technology to create a substantial proportion of all original, FDA-approved fully human monoclonal antibodies. This includes Dupixent® (dupilumab), Libtayo® (cemiplimab-rwlc), Praluent® (alirocumab), Kevzara® (sarilumab), Evkeeza® (evinacumab-dgnb), Inmazeb® (atoltivimab, maftivimab and odesivimab-ebgn) and Veopoz® (pozelimab-bbfg). In addition, REGEN-COV® (casirivimab and imdevimab) had been authorized by the FDA during the COVID-19 pandemic until 2024. Dupilumab Development Program Dupilumab is being jointly developed by Regeneron and Sanofi under a global collaboration agreement. To date, dupilumab has been studied across more than 60 clinical trials involving more than 10,000 patients with various chronic diseases driven in part by type 2 inflammation. In addition to the currently approved indications, Regeneron and Sanofi are studying dupilumab in a broad range of diseases driven by type 2 inflammation or other allergic processes in Phase 3 trials, including chronic pruritus of unknown origin, bullous pemphigoid, and lichen simplex chronicus. These potential uses of dupilumab are currently under clinical investigation, and the safety and efficacy in these conditions have not been fully evaluated by any regulatory authority. U.S. INDICATIONS DUPIXENT is a prescription medicine used: DUPIXENT is not used to relieve sudden breathing problems and will not replace an inhaled rescue medicine. DUPIXENT is not used to treat any other forms of hives (urticaria). IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION Do not use if you are allergic to dupilumab or to any of the ingredients in DUPIXENT®. Before using DUPIXENT, tell your healthcare provider about all your medical conditions, including if you: Tell your healthcare provider about all the medicines you take, including prescription and over-the-counter medicines, vitamins, and herbal supplements. Especially tell your healthcare provider if you are taking oral, topical, or inhaled corticosteroid medicines; have asthma and use an asthma medicine; or have atopic dermatitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, eosinophilic esophagitis, prurigo nodularis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or chronic spontaneous urticaria, and also have asthma. Do not change or stop your other medicines, including corticosteroid medicine or other asthma medicine, without talking to your healthcare provider. This may cause other symptoms that were controlled by those medicines to come back. DUPIXENT can cause serious side effects, including: The most common side effects include: Tell your healthcare provider if you have any side effect that bothers you or that does not go away. These are not all the possible side effects of DUPIXENT. Call your doctor for medical advice about side effects. You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit or call 1-800-FDA-1088. Use DUPIXENT exactly as prescribed by your healthcare provider. It's an injection given under the skin (subcutaneous injection). Your healthcare provider will decide if you or your caregiver can inject DUPIXENT. Do not try to prepare and inject DUPIXENT until you or your caregiver have been trained by your healthcare provider. In children 12 years of age and older, it's recommended DUPIXENT be administered by or under supervision of an adult. In children 6 months to less than 12 years of age, DUPIXENT should be given by a caregiver. Please see accompanying full Prescribing Information including Patient Information. About Regeneron Regeneron (NASDAQ: REGN) is a leading biotechnology company that invents, develops and commercializes life-transforming medicines for people with serious diseases. Founded and led by physician-scientists, our unique ability to repeatedly and consistently translate science into medicine has led to numerous approved treatments and product candidates in development, most of which were homegrown in our laboratories. Our medicines and pipeline are designed to help patients with eye diseases, allergic and inflammatory diseases, cancer, cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, neurological diseases, hematologic conditions, infectious diseases, and rare diseases. Regeneron pushes the boundaries of scientific discovery and accelerates drug development using our proprietary technologies, such as VelociSuite, which produces optimized fully human antibodies and new classes of bispecific antibodies. We are shaping the next frontier of medicine with data-powered insights from the Regeneron Genetics Center® and pioneering genetic medicine platforms, enabling us to identify innovative targets and complementary approaches to potentially treat or cure diseases. For more information, please visit or follow Regeneron on LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook or X. About Sanofi Sanofi is an R&D driven, AI-powered biopharma company committed to improving people's lives and delivering compelling growth. We apply our deep understanding of the immune system to invent medicines and vaccines that treat and protect millions of people around the world, with an innovative pipeline that could benefit millions more. Our team is guided by one purpose: we chase the miracles of science to improve people's lives; this inspires us to drive progress and deliver positive impact for our people and the communities we serve, by addressing the most urgent healthcare, environmental, and societal challenges of our time. Sanofi is listed on EURONEXT: SAN and NASDAQ: SNY. Regeneron Forward-Looking Statements and Use of Digital Media This press release includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties relating to future events and the future performance of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ('Regeneron' or the 'Company'), and actual events or results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Words such as 'anticipate,' 'expect,' 'intend,' 'plan,' 'believe,' 'seek,' 'estimate,' variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These statements concern, and these risks and uncertainties include, among others, the nature, timing, and possible success and therapeutic applications of products marketed or otherwise commercialized by Regeneron and/or its collaborators or licensees (collectively, 'Regeneron's Products') and product candidates being developed by Regeneron and/or its collaborators or licensees (collectively, 'Regeneron's Product Candidates') and research and clinical programs now underway or planned, including without limitation Dupixent®(dupilumab); uncertainty of the utilization, market acceptance, and commercial success of Regeneron's Products and Regeneron's Product Candidates and the impact of studies (whether conducted by Regeneron or others and whether mandated or voluntary), including the studies discussed or referenced in this press release, on any of the foregoing; the likelihood, timing, and scope of possible regulatory approval and commercial launch of Regeneron's Product Candidates and new indications for Regeneron's Products, such as Dupixent for the treatment of chronic pruritus of unknown origin, bullous pemphigoid, lichen simplex chronicus, and other potential indications; the ability of Regeneron's collaborators, licensees, suppliers, or other third parties (as applicable) to perform manufacturing, filling, finishing, packaging, labeling, distribution, and other steps related to Regeneron's Products and Regeneron's Product Candidates; the ability of Regeneron to manage supply chains for multiple products and product candidates and risks associated with tariffs and other trade restrictions; safety issues resulting from the administration of Regeneron's Products (such as Dupixent) and Regeneron's Product Candidates in patients, including serious complications or side effects in connection with the use of Regeneron's Products and Regeneron's Product Candidates in clinical trials; determinations by regulatory and administrative governmental authorities which may delay or restrict Regeneron's ability to continue to develop or commercialize Regeneron's Products and Regeneron's Product Candidates; ongoing regulatory obligations and oversight impacting Regeneron's Products, research and clinical programs, and business, including those relating to patient privacy; the availability and extent of reimbursement or copay assistance for Regeneron's Products from third-party payors and other third parties, including private payor healthcare and insurance programs, health maintenance organizations, pharmacy benefit management companies, and government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid; coverage and reimbursement determinations by such payors and other third parties and new policies and procedures adopted by such payors and other third parties; changes in laws, regulations, and policies affecting the healthcare industry; competing drugs and product candidates that may be superior to, or more cost effective than, Regeneron's Products and Regeneron's Product Candidates (including biosimilar versions of Regeneron's Products); the extent to which the results from the research and development programs conducted by Regeneron and/or its collaborators or licensees may be replicated in other studies and/or lead to advancement of product candidates to clinical trials, therapeutic applications, or regulatory approval; unanticipated expenses; the costs of developing, producing, and selling products; the ability of Regeneron to meet any of its financial projections or guidance and changes to the assumptions underlying those projections or guidance; the potential for any license, collaboration, or supply agreement, including Regeneron's agreements with Sanofi and Bayer (or their respective affiliated companies, as applicable), to be cancelled or terminated; the impact of public health outbreaks, epidemics, or pandemics on Regeneron's business; and risks associated with litigation and other proceedings and government investigations relating to the Company and/or its operations (including the pending civil proceedings initiated or joined by the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts), risks associated with intellectual property of other parties and pending or future litigation relating thereto (including without limitation the patent litigation and other related proceedings relating to EYLEA®(aflibercept) Injection), the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings and investigations, and the impact any of the foregoing may have on Regeneron's business, prospects, operating results, and financial condition. A more complete description of these and other material risks can be found in Regeneron's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 and its Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2025. Any forward-looking statements are made based on management's current beliefs and judgment, and the reader is cautioned not to rely on any forward-looking statements made by Regeneron. Regeneron does not undertake any obligation to update (publicly or otherwise) any forward-looking statement, including without limitation any financial projection or guidance, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Regeneron uses its media and investor relations website and social media outlets to publish important information about the Company, including information that may be deemed material to investors. Financial and other information about Regeneron is routinely posted and is accessible on Regeneron's media and investor relations website ( and its LinkedIn page ( Sanofi Disclaimers or Forward-Looking Statements This media update contains forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts. These statements include projections and estimates regarding the marketing and other potential of the product, or regarding potential future revenues from the product. Forward-looking statements are generally identified by the words 'expects', 'anticipates', 'believes', 'intends', 'estimates', 'plans', and similar expressions. Although Sanofi's management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, investors are cautioned that forward-looking information and statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond the control of Sanofi, that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and statements. These risks and uncertainties include among other things, unexpected regulatory actions or delays, or government regulation generally, that could affect the availability or commercial potential of the product, the fact that product may not be commercially successful, the uncertainties inherent in research and development, including future clinical data and analysis of existing clinical data relating to the product, including post marketing, unexpected safety, quality or manufacturing issues, competition in general, risks associated with intellectual property and any related future litigation and the ultimate outcome of such litigation, and volatile economic and market conditions, and the impact that global crises may have on us, our customers, suppliers, vendors, and other business partners, and the financial condition of any one of them, as well as on our employees and on the global economy as a whole. The risks and uncertainties also include the uncertainties discussed or identified in the public filings with the SEC and the AMF made by Sanofi, including those listed under 'Risk Factors' and 'Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements' in Sanofi's annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2024. Other than as required by applicable law, Sanofi does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information or statements. All trademarks mentioned in this press release are the property of the Sanofi group except for VelociSuite and Regeneron Genetics Center . 1 Data on File
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Welcome to the fattest place in America, where fresh fruit is a 12-mile trip away
Clyde Anderson has a thick, raised scar, three centimetres wide, that runs down the centre of his chest where his ribcage was cut open. In 2020, surgeons extracted veins from Anderson's leg and grafted them to his heart in a quadruple bypass. His original coronary arteries had become so clogged with fat that he had had a heart attack. 'I was truck-driving and eating when I could, eating fast food,' says Anderson, 54. At the time, he weighed around 19 stone (120kg). 'Then my health checked up on me.' But by many accounts, Anderson, who has since sworn off fried food and is several stone lighter, is one of the luckier residents of Holmes County in rural Mississippi. 'I have classmates who died from diabetes and heart attacks in their 30s,' says Roneda Lowe, 42, another local. This is the reality of living in the fattest place in America. Of the 3,140 US counties with comparable statistics in the 2023 US Health Census, five have an obesity rate of more than 50pc. In Holmes County, Mississippi, 53.2pc of all adults are obese, meaning they have a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or more. It is a microcosm of the problems plaguing rural America, as residents are on the frontline of an obesity crisis that is destroying the nation's health. How long this malaise has left is another matter. Robert F Kennedy Jr has vowed to wage war on America's expanding waistlines. Kennedy, appointed US health secretary by Donald Trump, has claimed that something in the food supply is 'poisoning the American people', with fast food giants largely to blame. 'The problem is, [the] industry is making money on keeping us sick,' he said in April. His Make America Healthy Again (Maha) report last month claimed the ultra-processed foods (UPFs) that make up nearly 70pc of children's calorie intake are 'detrimental' to their health. This crackdown has drawn support from many of America's leading food experts, who have been won over despite Kennedy's reputation for spreading conspiracy theories. 'His rhetoric is fantastic,' says Marion Nestle, emerita professor of nutrition, food studies, and public health at New York University. 'I've just never heard anybody in government take on the food industry in this way.' If he follows through with his ambitions, Kennedy will engage in all-out war with a $2.4 trillion (£1.8 trillion) food industry that has held sway in America for decades. However, to achieve his health revolution, he faces a gargantuan fight. In the darkened gymnasium of an abandoned school six miles outside Tchula, Holmes County, an irrigation system for a new hydroponics farm is being prepared. When Calvin Head flicks a switch, LED lights hum and water spurts from the tubes looped around the metal trays. They do not yet hold any plants, but Head hopes to grow microgreens, bok choi and strawberries once he receives grant funding for the necessary renovations. Head, 63, is the director of the Mileston Farmers Cooperative Association, which is focused on regenerative farming and training local young people. Elsewhere, he is growing corn, squash, watermelon, purple hull peas, and 'every green you can imagine'. As part of the group's mission, Head and his colleague Tom Collins, 70, are battling to address a paradox. Despite their base in the Mississippi Delta, which boasts some of the richest soil in the state, many Holmes County residents live in what are known as 'food deserts'. Agriculture is Mississippi's number one industry. There are more than 31,000 farms across the state covering a combined 10.3m acres. And Holmes County itself is unbelievably lush. Everything is green, apart from the flaming yellow black-eyed susans that grow wild in banks at the side of the road. Things grow well here, but grocery stores in Holmes County are few and far between. In most, the fresh food sections are tiny, and many have empty shelves. For example, in Tchula's Dollar General store – a discount chain with a small grocery section – the crates supposed to house fresh tomatoes and bananas are barren. The closest supermarket is 12 miles away in Lexington, the nearest city. But that does not mean it is plentiful or cheap. 'The closest reasonably good supermarket is about 30 miles away,' says Collins. Even the healthy food available in stores isn't always tasty or nutritious. 'They use preservatives,' says Collins. 'Maybe it takes a week before it gets here. You take a bite of an apple, and it tastes like beeswax. 'We live in a community where you have fields of traditional crops like cotton, corn, and soybeans, but that's not going to actually put food in your belly. Holmes County is a desperate area for nutritional food.' Like many places in rural America, there is no public transport whatsoever in Holmes County. There are no pavements beside 55mph roads, no cycle lanes and no public pathways through the countryside. This makes it difficult to exercise and impossible to get anywhere without a car. Lack of access to healthy food is also compounded by poor healthcare services. Holmes County's economy was built by slaves, defined by agriculture and has long-standing inequalities. But farming jobs have now long been lost to machines. 'We were really dirt poor and educationally destitute,' says Sylvia Gist, who grew up in the county in the 1950s and 60s during the Civil Rights movement and now runs a scholarship programme called the Migration Heritage Foundation. 'If you were black, you were poor, but for whites it was booming.' Sixty years on and everyone is struggling. Median household income in Holmes County is just $29,434 – the lowest of any county with a population of more than 10,000. Every single child is eligible for free school meals. 'Real poverty in America is defined by access,' says Jason Coker, who grew up in the Mississippi Delta and is president of Together for Hope, a rural development coalition. 'People might have access to a gas station, but they don't sell fruits and vegetables. They sell fried food and that food is cheaper. The cheapest food is the worst food. 'So you get a full diet of the worst foods that make you obese and prone to diabetes, which kills your health outcomes.' But even when healthy food is available, people often do not choose it. It can be more expensive and less convenient. And it is not omnipresent in TV commercials. Dennis Horton, 65, was born and raised in the small town of Goodman and opened Christine's Restaurant here seven months ago. He drives an hour each way to buy the produce he needs from markets in the Mississippi towns of Grenada, Philadelphia and Jackson. When he started, Horton and his partner tried offering dinners with vegetables on the menu, but that didn't last long. 'We had to stop about three months ago,' he says. 'It was wasting food. We weren't selling them.' Price is also key. He charges around $14 for a more nutritionally complete meal, whereas Horton's hamburgers cost $10. This can often make all the difference. 'People like to eat cheap,' he says. This reflects the loss of autonomy over food in Holmes County. On Tuesday in Goodman, families gathered around barbecues under pavilions at the side of the main street. Over the generations, the residents of Holmes County have noticed a dramatic change in their relationship with food. 'My mom grew up here with their family's own food gardens,' says Roneda Lowe. Her mother, Nellie Scott, 71, recalls how she 'could eat all day long'. 'But it was fruit,' she says. 'We had apple trees, figs and peas from our garden. We didn't get cake until Sundays and we didn't have problems with obesity.' For Lowe, the contrast was stark. 'Between my mum's generation and mine, something got disconnected,' she says. 'I grew up on Pop-Tarts. The things we eat are different. People eat a lot of French fries and chicken wings. We should go back to whole foods.' This is where 'big food' comes in. 'Years back, when the grandparents and extended family all lived under one roof, there was somebody to cook and prepare food,' says Robin McCrory, the outgoing mayor of Lexington. 'Now we live in the age of fast food and instant gratification and drive-ins and drive-throughs.' Marion Nestle argues that much of this shift has been driven by profits. 'The food industry made an enormous concerted effort in the 1950s to convince women in particular that cooking was a chore, difficult, complicated,' she says. 'They said, 'We're going to make it easy for you. We're going to produce TV dinners. We're going to produce packaged foods. All you have to do is open them and heat them up.'' Food companies pursuing higher profits for shareholders are quite naturally geared towards encouraging people to eat more. That means companies seek to manufacture food that is cheaper, tastier and has a longer shelf life. Cue the rise of ultra-processed foods. UPFs are industrially manufactured food items that have undergone intense processing and contain ingredients not found in home kitchens, such as stabilisers and emulsifiers. They include fizzy drinks, sausages, mass-produced bread and most packaged snacks. These foods now make up more than half of America's calorie intake. UPFs typically have very high levels of refined sugars, unhealthy fats and salt. They are typically high in calories and low in nutrients. But they are convenient and cheap. 'For people who are poor, who are working two or three jobs and are absolutely exhausted, they don't have money to buy expensive things for their kids,' says Nestle, the emerita professor of nutrition. 'But they can give their kids food as treats, and their kids want fast food because it's marketed. These are kids who have no idea what real food is like.' UPFs have been linked to increased risk of conditions such as heart disease and cancer. And what is particularly clear from scientific studies is that UPFs make people eat more. 'It's the processing, the texture, the flavour. These foods are deliberately designed so that you keep eating them,' says Nestle. 'These products are advertised, that's what you think you're supposed to eat. That's extremely profitable for companies. 'There's a real problem, and RFK has hit on that problem.' UPFs are a key flashpoint in Kennedy's Maha report, which describes them as 'detrimental to children's health' and draws a direct link between the higher prevalence of UPFs in America and the nation's higher rate of obesity compared to Europe. It also states that UPFs have led to 'nutritional depletion' in children and points to studies that various additives have been linked to an increase in mental disorders. The rise of UPFs and fast food marketing has coincided with fewer young people learning how to cook. 'We've forgotten how to grow our own food and cook it,' says Coker. Nestle adds: 'If you don't know how to cook, you can't go around the periphery of the supermarket, pick up real, unprocessed foods and turn them into something that your family is willing to eat in a short amount of time.' Poor health extends far beyond Holmes County. Around two in five American adults are obese, by far the highest rate in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) of rich nations. Another third are overweight. When Kennedy spoke at his Senate committee hearing back in January, his diagnosis of the problem was not dissimilar to Lowe's, but he was far more aggressive. 'When my uncle [John F Kennedy] was president [in 1961-63], 3pc of Americans were obese. Today, 74pc of Americans are either obese or overweight,' he said. 'No other country has anything like this. In Japan, the obesity rate is still 3pc. And epidemics are not caused by genes. Genes may provide the vulnerability. But you need an environmental toxin. 'Something is poisoning the American people and we know that the primary culprits are changing food supply, the switch to highly chemical-intensive processed foods.' Even Donald Trump, a loyal McDonald's customer, has come out fighting. At the launch of the Maha report in May, he said: 'Unlike other administrations, we will not be silenced or intimidated by the corporate lobbyists or special interests, and I want this group to do what they have to do. It won't be nice or won't be pretty, but we have to do it.' Rarely has a previous administration been so overt in its criticism of America's food industry. Alexia Howard, a senior food industry analyst at Bernstein, says: 'I've covered the space for 20 years, and in that time frame, I haven't seen anything quite like this in food. 'It's interesting to see how far and how fast things are moving right now.' Kennedy has promised comprehensive policy plans in August, while one of his first steps has been to announce measures to phase out petroleum-based synthetic food dyes. This was low-hanging fruit. Food producers will not need to reformulate a product if the dye is changed. Flavourings, by contrast, will be more complicated. 'I think that over time, that will expand into other additives and ingredients that are not demonstrably safe,' says Howard. 'Things like preservatives and additives used to bulk ingredients up.' Kennedy has begun the process of closing the 'generally recognised as safe' (Gras) loophole, which allows food companies to secure approval for additives without applying to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA is in a consultation period on proposals to introduce a new mandate for front-of-package nutrition labels to highlight salt, added sugar and saturated fat contents of foods. 'I don't want to take food away from anybody,' Kennedy said at his committee hearing earlier this year. 'If you like a McDonald's cheeseburger or a Diet Coke, which my boss [Trump] loves, you should be able to get them. But you should know what the impacts are on your family and on your health.' Holmes County is one of the bluest hubs in a state that voted red at the last election, although Kennedy's war on fast food is winning over local voters. 'I'm really not a Trump fan, but as far as Robert F Kennedy is concerned, I agree with him to a great extent,' says Gist, who voted Democrat in November. The first task for Kennedy will be gaining influence over the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), which is responsible for many of the policy areas the health secretary wants to tackle. In particular, USDA oversees the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), which provides what are effectively food stamps to one in eight Americans. Kennedy says he wants to change Snap so that unhealthy foods do not qualify for taxpayer cash. Currently, the scheme is dominated by UPFs. Analysis by Bernstein shows that sweetened beverages are the second-largest category of expenditure for Snap recipients, accounting for nearly a tenth (9.3pc) of all benefits. This is double what is spent on fruit (4.7pc). A further 19.4pc is spent on frozen ready meals, shop-bought desserts, salty snacks and sweets combined. Kennedy has encouraged states to apply for individual waivers. Texas has already passed a bill to make fizzy drinks, crisps and sweets no longer eligible for Snap benefits, while nine other states are drawing up similar plans. But federal rule changes will depend on the USDA, which is being lobbied hard by some of America's biggest companies. There are already signs that big agriculture has achieved some success, particularly as the Maha report fell far short of an anticipated attack on pesticides. There are also questions over Kennedy's credibility. His Maha report has been widely panned for referencing scientific studies that do not exist and for evidence it was written with the help of AI. It has also drawn scrutiny for raising doubts about children's vaccines, a longstanding bugbear for Kennedy, who recently made a false claim that prescription medicines were the third leading cause of death in the US. 'It's very difficult to take this seriously,' says Nestle. As for big food, it is not only Kennedy who poses a threat. It is also under pressure from big pharma. Over the past year, weight-loss drugs such as Wegovy, known as GLP-1s, have exploded across the US. Between 8pc and 10pc of the US population are using these drugs, while analysts expect this figure will soon rise to 15pc. Taking GLP-1s means patients reduce their calorie consumption by 27.5pc, potentially slashing obesity rates across the country. 'The food industry is terrified because they make people eat less,' says Nestle. However, while politicians and lobbyists wage war in Washington, the residents of Holmes County are crying out for change. Before he ran the farm, Head was Holmes County's transportation director. It was during this role that he was confronted with the bleak reality that Mississippi is the only state in America where more than a quarter of children (26.1pc) are obese. Head knows that fixing such damning statistics is the only way to prevent another era of obesity in America. 'The school buses were overcrowded because some of the kids were so big that only two of them could be where three ought to sit,' he says. 'We just want to work hard to make life better for ourselves.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Welcome to the fattest place in America, where fresh fruit is a 12-mile trip away
Clyde Anderson has a thick, raised scar, three centimetres wide, that runs down the centre of his chest where his ribcage was cut open. In 2020, surgeons extracted veins from Anderson's leg and grafted them to his heart in a quadruple bypass. His original coronary arteries had become so clogged with fat that he had had a heart attack. 'I was truck-driving and eating when I could, eating fast food,' says Anderson, 54. At the time, he weighed around 19 stone (120kg). 'Then my health checked up on me.' But by many accounts, Anderson, who has since sworn off fried food and is several stone lighter, is one of the luckier residents of Holmes County in rural Mississippi. 'I have classmates who died from diabetes and heart attacks in their 30s,' says Roneda Lowe, 42, another local. This is the reality of living in the fattest place in America. Of the 3,140 US counties with comparable statistics in the 2023 US Health Census, five have an obesity rate of more than 50pc. In Holmes County, Mississippi, 53.2pc of all adults are obese, meaning they have a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or more. It is a microcosm of the problems plaguing rural America, as residents are on the frontline of an obesity crisis that is destroying the nation's health. How long this malaise has left is another matter. Robert F Kennedy Jr has vowed to wage war on America's expanding waistlines. Kennedy, appointed US health secretary by Donald Trump, has claimed that something in the food supply is 'poisoning the American people', with fast food giants largely to blame. 'The problem is, [the] industry is making money on keeping us sick,' he said in April. His Make America Healthy Again (Maha) report last month claimed the ultra-processed foods (UPFs) that make up nearly 70pc of children's calorie intake are 'detrimental' to their health. This crackdown has drawn support from many of America's leading food experts, who have been won over despite Kennedy's reputation for spreading conspiracy theories. 'His rhetoric is fantastic,' says Marion Nestle, emerita professor of nutrition, food studies, and public health at New York University. 'I've just never heard anybody in government take on the food industry in this way.' If he follows through with his ambitions, Kennedy will engage in all-out war with a $2.4 trillion (£1.8 trillion) food industry that has held sway in America for decades. However, to achieve his health revolution, he faces a gargantuan fight. In the darkened gymnasium of an abandoned school six miles outside Tchula, Holmes County, an irrigation system for a new hydroponics farm is being prepared. When Calvin Head flicks a switch, LED lights hum and water spurts from the tubes looped around the metal trays. They do not yet hold any plants, but Head hopes to grow microgreens, bok choi and strawberries once he receives grant funding for the necessary renovations. Head, 63, is the director of the Mileston Farmers Cooperative Association, which is focused on regenerative farming and training local young people. Elsewhere, he is growing corn, squash, watermelon, purple hull peas, and 'every green you can imagine'. As part of the group's mission, Head and his colleague Tom Collins, 70, are battling to address a paradox. Despite their base in the Mississippi Delta, which boasts some of the richest soil in the state, many Holmes County residents live in what are known as 'food deserts'. Agriculture is Mississippi's number one industry. There are more than 31,000 farms across the state covering a combined 10.3m acres. And Holmes County itself is unbelievably lush. Everything is green, apart from the flaming yellow black-eyed susans that grow wild in banks at the side of the road. Things grow well here, but grocery stores in Holmes County are few and far between. In most, the fresh food sections are tiny, and many have empty shelves. For example, in Tchula's Dollar General store – a discount chain with a small grocery section – the crates supposed to house fresh tomatoes and bananas are barren. The closest supermarket is 12 miles away in Lexington, the nearest city. But that does not mean it is plentiful or cheap. 'The closest reasonably good supermarket is about 30 miles away,' says Collins. Even the healthy food available in stores isn't always tasty or nutritious. 'They use preservatives,' says Collins. 'Maybe it takes a week before it gets here. You take a bite of an apple, and it tastes like beeswax. 'We live in a community where you have fields of traditional crops like cotton, corn, and soybeans, but that's not going to actually put food in your belly. Holmes County is a desperate area for nutritional food.' Like many places in rural America, there is no public transport whatsoever in Holmes County. There are no pavements beside 55mph roads, no cycle lanes and no public pathways through the countryside. This makes it difficult to exercise and impossible to get anywhere without a car. Lack of access to healthy food is also compounded by poor healthcare services. Holmes County's economy was built by slaves, defined by agriculture and has long-standing inequalities. But farming jobs have now long been lost to machines. 'We were really dirt poor and educationally destitute,' says Sylvia Gist, who grew up in the county in the 1950s and 60s during the Civil Rights movement and now runs a scholarship programme called the Migration Heritage Foundation. 'If you were black, you were poor, but for whites it was booming.' Sixty years on and everyone is struggling. Median household income in Holmes County is just $29,434 – the lowest of any county with a population of more than 10,000. Every single child is eligible for free school meals. 'Real poverty in America is defined by access,' says Jason Coker, who grew up in the Mississippi Delta and is president of Together for Hope, a rural development coalition. 'People might have access to a gas station, but they don't sell fruits and vegetables. They sell fried food and that food is cheaper. The cheapest food is the worst food. 'So you get a full diet of the worst foods that make you obese and prone to diabetes, which kills your health outcomes.' But even when healthy food is available, people often do not choose it. It can be more expensive and less convenient. And it is not omnipresent in TV commercials. Dennis Horton, 65, was born and raised in the small town of Goodman and opened Christine's Restaurant here seven months ago. He drives an hour each way to buy the produce he needs from markets in the Mississippi towns of Grenada, Philadelphia and Jackson. When he started, Horton and his partner tried offering dinners with vegetables on the menu, but that didn't last long. 'We had to stop about three months ago,' he says. 'It was wasting food. We weren't selling them.' Price is also key. He charges around $14 for a more nutritionally complete meal, whereas Horton's hamburgers cost $10. This can often make all the difference. 'People like to eat cheap,' he says. This reflects the loss of autonomy over food in Holmes County. On Tuesday in Goodman, families gathered around barbecues under pavilions at the side of the main street. Over the generations, the residents of Holmes County have noticed a dramatic change in their relationship with food. 'My mom grew up here with their family's own food gardens,' says Roneda Lowe. Her mother, Nellie Scott, 71, recalls how she 'could eat all day long'. 'But it was fruit,' she says. 'We had apple trees, figs and peas from our garden. We didn't get cake until Sundays and we didn't have problems with obesity.' For Lowe, the contrast was stark. 'Between my mum's generation and mine, something got disconnected,' she says. 'I grew up on Pop-Tarts. The things we eat are different. People eat a lot of French fries and chicken wings. We should go back to whole foods.' This is where 'big food' comes in. 'Years back, when the grandparents and extended family all lived under one roof, there was somebody to cook and prepare food,' says Robin McCrory, the outgoing mayor of Lexington. 'Now we live in the age of fast food and instant gratification and drive-ins and drive-throughs.' Marion Nestle argues that much of this shift has been driven by profits. 'The food industry made an enormous concerted effort in the 1950s to convince women in particular that cooking was a chore, difficult, complicated,' she says. 'They said, 'We're going to make it easy for you. We're going to produce TV dinners. We're going to produce packaged foods. All you have to do is open them and heat them up.'' Food companies pursuing higher profits for shareholders are quite naturally geared towards encouraging people to eat more. That means companies seek to manufacture food that is cheaper, tastier and has a longer shelf life. Cue the rise of ultra-processed foods. UPFs are industrially manufactured food items that have undergone intense processing and contain ingredients not found in home kitchens, such as stabilisers and emulsifiers. They include fizzy drinks, sausages, mass-produced bread and most packaged snacks. These foods now make up more than half of America's calorie intake. UPFs typically have very high levels of refined sugars, unhealthy fats and salt. They are typically high in calories and low in nutrients. But they are convenient and cheap. 'For people who are poor, who are working two or three jobs and are absolutely exhausted, they don't have money to buy expensive things for their kids,' says Nestle, the emerita professor of nutrition. 'But they can give their kids food as treats, and their kids want fast food because it's marketed. These are kids who have no idea what real food is like.' UPFs have been linked to increased risk of conditions such as heart disease and cancer. And what is particularly clear from scientific studies is that UPFs make people eat more. 'It's the processing, the texture, the flavour. These foods are deliberately designed so that you keep eating them,' says Nestle. 'These products are advertised, that's what you think you're supposed to eat. That's extremely profitable for companies. 'There's a real problem, and RFK has hit on that problem.' UPFs are a key flashpoint in Kennedy's Maha report, which describes them as 'detrimental to children's health' and draws a direct link between the higher prevalence of UPFs in America and the nation's higher rate of obesity compared to Europe. It also states that UPFs have led to 'nutritional depletion' in children and points to studies that various additives have been linked to an increase in mental disorders. The rise of UPFs and fast food marketing has coincided with fewer young people learning how to cook. 'We've forgotten how to grow our own food and cook it,' says Coker. Nestle adds: 'If you don't know how to cook, you can't go around the periphery of the supermarket, pick up real, unprocessed foods and turn them into something that your family is willing to eat in a short amount of time.' Poor health extends far beyond Holmes County. Around two in five American adults are obese, by far the highest rate in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) of rich nations. Another third are overweight. When Kennedy spoke at his Senate committee hearing back in January, his diagnosis of the problem was not dissimilar to Lowe's, but he was far more aggressive. 'When my uncle [John F Kennedy] was president [in 1961-63], 3pc of Americans were obese. Today, 74pc of Americans are either obese or overweight,' he said. 'No other country has anything like this. In Japan, the obesity rate is still 3pc. And epidemics are not caused by genes. Genes may provide the vulnerability. But you need an environmental toxin. 'Something is poisoning the American people and we know that the primary culprits are changing food supply, the switch to highly chemical-intensive processed foods.' Even Donald Trump, a loyal McDonald's customer, has come out fighting. At the launch of the Maha report in May, he said: 'Unlike other administrations, we will not be silenced or intimidated by the corporate lobbyists or special interests, and I want this group to do what they have to do. It won't be nice or won't be pretty, but we have to do it.' Rarely has a previous administration been so overt in its criticism of America's food industry. Alexia Howard, a senior food industry analyst at Bernstein, says: 'I've covered the space for 20 years, and in that time frame, I haven't seen anything quite like this in food. 'It's interesting to see how far and how fast things are moving right now.' Kennedy has promised comprehensive policy plans in August, while one of his first steps has been to announce measures to phase out petroleum-based synthetic food dyes. This was low-hanging fruit. Food producers will not need to reformulate a product if the dye is changed. Flavourings, by contrast, will be more complicated. 'I think that over time, that will expand into other additives and ingredients that are not demonstrably safe,' says Howard. 'Things like preservatives and additives used to bulk ingredients up.' Kennedy has begun the process of closing the 'generally recognised as safe' (Gras) loophole, which allows food companies to secure approval for additives without applying to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA is in a consultation period on proposals to introduce a new mandate for front-of-package nutrition labels to highlight salt, added sugar and saturated fat contents of foods. 'I don't want to take food away from anybody,' Kennedy said at his committee hearing earlier this year. 'If you like a McDonald's cheeseburger or a Diet Coke, which my boss [Trump] loves, you should be able to get them. But you should know what the impacts are on your family and on your health.' Holmes County is one of the bluest hubs in a state that voted red at the last election, although Kennedy's war on fast food is winning over local voters. 'I'm really not a Trump fan, but as far as Robert F Kennedy is concerned, I agree with him to a great extent,' says Gist, who voted Democrat in November. The first task for Kennedy will be gaining influence over the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), which is responsible for many of the policy areas the health secretary wants to tackle. In particular, USDA oversees the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), which provides what are effectively food stamps to one in eight Americans. Kennedy says he wants to change Snap so that unhealthy foods do not qualify for taxpayer cash. Currently, the scheme is dominated by UPFs. Analysis by Bernstein shows that sweetened beverages are the second-largest category of expenditure for Snap recipients, accounting for nearly a tenth (9.3pc) of all benefits. This is double what is spent on fruit (4.7pc). A further 19.4pc is spent on frozen ready meals, shop-bought desserts, salty snacks and sweets combined. Kennedy has encouraged states to apply for individual waivers. Texas has already passed a bill to make fizzy drinks, crisps and sweets no longer eligible for Snap benefits, while nine other states are drawing up similar plans. But federal rule changes will depend on the USDA, which is being lobbied hard by some of America's biggest companies. There are already signs that big agriculture has achieved some success, particularly as the Maha report fell far short of an anticipated attack on pesticides. There are also questions over Kennedy's credibility. His Maha report has been widely panned for referencing scientific studies that do not exist and for evidence it was written with the help of AI. It has also drawn scrutiny for raising doubts about children's vaccines, a longstanding bugbear for Kennedy, who recently made a false claim that prescription medicines were the third leading cause of death in the US. 'It's very difficult to take this seriously,' says Nestle. As for big food, it is not only Kennedy who poses a threat. It is also under pressure from big pharma. Over the past year, weight-loss drugs such as Wegovy, known as GLP-1s, have exploded across the US. Between 8pc and 10pc of the US population are using these drugs, while analysts expect this figure will soon rise to 15pc. Taking GLP-1s means patients reduce their calorie consumption by 27.5pc, potentially slashing obesity rates across the country. 'The food industry is terrified because they make people eat less,' says Nestle. However, while politicians and lobbyists wage war in Washington, the residents of Holmes County are crying out for change. Before he ran the farm, Head was Holmes County's transportation director. It was during this role that he was confronted with the bleak reality that Mississippi is the only state in America where more than a quarter of children (26.1pc) are obese. Head knows that fixing such damning statistics is the only way to prevent another era of obesity in America. 'The school buses were overcrowded because some of the kids were so big that only two of them could be where three ought to sit,' he says. 'We just want to work hard to make life better for ourselves.'