Hong Kong rights group shuts down after years of advocating for workers
HONG KONG (AP) — A Hong Kong group that advocated for workers rights for decades announced its shutdown abruptly on Thursday, citing financial difficulties and debt issues.
China Labor Bulletin planned to stop updating its website content and appeared to have deleted Facebook and Instagram social media accounts used by the nonprofit rights organization.
'The company can no longer maintain operations and has decided to dissolve and initiate the relevant procedures,' it said in a statement on an archived web page Friday.
Founded in 1994, organization maintained a database tracking workers' strikes, protests, workplace accidents and other labor rights incidents in China.
As dozens of civil society groups disbanded or left Hong Kong in the wake of the 2020 Beijing-imposed national security law, China Labor Bulletin continued providing valuable resources for journalists and academics in the southern Chinese city.
Critics say the drastic political changes in Hong Kong indicated the decline of Western-style civil liberties that China promised to keep intact when the former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997. However, Beijing and Hong Kong governments insisted the law was crucial to bring stability to the city following massive anti-government protests in 2019.
China Labor Bulletin's founder Han Dongfang, a former railway worker who participated in the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press. He told the Central News Agency of Taiwan that the shutdown was his decision and he would stay in Hong Kong.
Han's decision appeared sudden to many Hong Kong civil society observers. Three weeks ago, he wrote on social media platform LinkedIn about his work anniversary and his team's progress.
'Let's keep our faith up at this abnormal time and continue our important work,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Prime Success Responds to Sinovac Biotech's False and Misleading Claims
For More Information, Visit HONG KONG, June 14, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Prime Success L.P., (together with its affiliates, "Prime Success" or "we"), a significant shareholder of Sinovac Biotech Ltd. (NASDAQ: SVA) ("Sinovac" or the "Company") with ownership of approximately 8% of the Company's outstanding shares, today issued the following letter in response to the Company's recent false and misleading claims relating to the upcoming Special Meeting of Shareholders (the "Special Meeting") scheduled for July 8, 2025. The full text of the letter is below and available at Dear fellow Sinovac shareholders, Prime Success, L.P. (together with its affiliates, "Prime Success" or "we"), a significant shareholder of Sinovac Biotech Ltd. (NASDAQ: SVA) ("Sinovac" or the "Company"), continues to be disappointed by the current Board's ("1Globe Activist Board") distortion of the facts about what is at stake at the upcoming Special Meeting of Shareholders (the "Special Meeting") scheduled for July 8, 2025. In our June 10 letter we addressed several of the 1Globe Activist Board's misstatements and are taking the opportunity to remind all shareholders why the 1Globe Activist Board cannot be trusted: 1. Prime Success is insisting that a dividend be distributed – for all shareholders The 1Globe Activist Board's false comments are just not credible – why would any investor be against receiving a dividend? The 1Globe Activist Board wants you to believe that Prime Success is the reason that dividends have not been distributed, but we are not the Company and are not on the Board, and dividend distribution decisions are not ours to make. We can only continue to advocate on behalf of all shareholders that they should be made. Under the leadership of a SAIF Partners IV L.P. ("SAIF") nominated Board — composed of seasoned professionals with proven governance experience, deep operational insight, and a track record of building real, lasting value — we are confident that the pattern of internal conflict and ongoing litigation fueled by the 1Globe Activist Board can be broken, and shareholders can look forward to more future dividends. But that will not be possible with the 1Globe Activist Board in power as they have made clear they prioritize endless litigation over the Company's long-term success. 2. The 1Globe Activist Board is deliberately baiting shareholders by setting the dividend distribution date for one day after the Special Meeting. We call upon the Company to make dividend distribution before the Special Meeting The 1Globe Activist Board deliberately set the dividend date for one day after the Special Meeting which creates the false impression that shareholders must vote for the incumbents to receive the dividends. But the upcoming Special Meeting will determine the Company's future direction and the long-term interests of all shareholders. We call on the 1Globe Activist Board to allow for a fair, pro rata distribution of dividends and to move the date of the dividend distribution to before the Special Meeting so the meeting can refocus on its proper purpose: electing a competent Board. 3. The 1Globe Activist Board distorts historic facts to aggrandize 1Globe and smear legitimate investors Let's compare facts against rhetoric of the 1Globe Activist Board. Over the past seven years, what have we contributed to the Company? The critical lifeline investments from Prime Success and Vivo Capital, LLC, combined with management's determined efforts, enabled Sinovac to seize a pivotal opportunity: the development of CoronaVac. This initiative ultimately resulted in the delivery of billions of doses to over 60 countries, generating substantial revenues while saving countless lives. Without the success of CoronaVac, there would not be any sizable dividend to distribute now. In contrast, what has 1Globe done for the Company? It has initiated multi-jurisdictional litigation against Sinovac, leading to a waste of company resources. The 1Globe Activist Board's mischaracterization of 1Globe and Prime Success' relative contribution to Sinovac and its shareholders reveals its deeply partisan nature. 4. Shareholders: looking forward, it's time to focus on what truly matters – the future of your investment in Sinovac Sinovac needs a Board that will roll up its sleeves and run the business, guiding the Company forward on a stable, productive path. The slate put forward by SAIF, consisting of representatives from all shareholders owning more than 5% of the Company's equity stake, many of whom possess deep industry experience, achieves exactly that. We urge all shareholders to focus on the future and choose the leadership that will best secure our Company's success in the years to come. We look forward to continuing to make our case for change to our fellow shareholders and encourage them to wait for and read SAIF's proxy materials before voting for the Special Meeting on July 8, 2025. Sincerely,Prime Success, L.P. About Prime Success, L.P. Prime Success is an investment vehicle established by Advantech Capital specifically to invest in Sinovac and Sinovac Life Sciences; Advantech Capital is a private equity fund established in 2016 with a focus on innovation-driven growth opportunities in China. View source version on Contacts Media Contact Longacre Square PartnersDan Zacchei / Miller Winstonadvantech@
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trade With China Is Becoming a One-Way Street
President Trump is trying to further open up China's market to U.S. companies as Beijing's appetite for the rest of the world's exports is diminishing
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
City approves College of Charleston request to demolish former YWCA building, making way for new dorm
CHARLESTON, S.C. (WCBD) – Members of the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) in Charleston voted Wednesday to allow the demolition of a historic building downtown. Members voted to approve the College of Charleston's request to demolish the former Young Women's Christian Association (YWCA) site at 106 Coming Street. The YWCA sold the property in 2014, and it has sat vacant for years. The College plans to build new student housing under the Coming Street Commons plan, which includes 1,000 beds in mostly double rooms. Some single-bed rooms will be available also. The building, which is considered mid-century as it was built in 1964, is where the African American branch of the YWCA was headquartered and served as a community space, particularly during the Civil Rights Movement. During this time, the branch was run by notably Black civil rights leaders, including Septima Clark. Not only is the former YWCA building a site of significance for the civil rights movement, but it sits on top of a potter's field. Charleston potter's fields were public burial grounds for unnamed individuals who were likely enslaved or the poorest citizens. This one opened in 1794 and is encased in a block connected by Vanderhorst, Coming, and Calhoun streets. That area was declared to be at burial capacity thirteen years later in the summer of 1807, according to Charleston County Public Library. About 4,600 individuals were buried in the space. 'In this particular case, we believe the history of the property is more significant than the existing structure. That's why I want to reaffirm our strong and sincere commitment to properly commemorate both the YWCA and the potter's field that once occupied this site,' said College of Charleston President Andrew Hsu at the meeting. 'This history matters to us, and we are committed to honoring it in a way that is respectful, lasting, and visceral,' Hsu added. Detailed plans for the future memorial have yet to be announced. During the public comment portion, several individuals spoke, including representatives from the Preservation Society of Charleston, Historic Charleston Foundation, and Charleston Black Lives Matter, asking members to defer their vote until the College had a more complete plan of what to do during possible excavations and further community input. Anna-Catherine Alexander with the Preservation Society said that after her team assessed the site, they found no structural deficiencies that required demolishing the building. 'Further, the argument that the building must be removed to facilitate site work and removal of potential burials that may be found on the site is not within the BAR's purview to consider and, therefore, not grounds for demolition…' said Alexander. 'If a decision on demolition has already been made it calls into question of having this dialogue at all. Community involvement can not be rushed on arbitrary timetables. Once a building is gone, it's gone forever,' Alexander continued. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
