logo
Four Just Stop Oil activists jailed for plotting to disrupt Manchester Airport

Four Just Stop Oil activists jailed for plotting to disrupt Manchester Airport

Indigo Rumbelow, 31, Daniel Knorr, 23, Leanorah Ward, 22, and Margaret Reid, 54, had all been convicted of conspiracy to intentionally cause a public nuisance.
Manchester Minshull Crown Court heard they were all arrested in August last year near to Manchester Airport.
They were equipped with heavy duty bolt cutters, angle grinders, glue, sand, Just Stop Oil high visibility vests and a leaflet containing instructions to follow when interacting with police.
Ward was also found in possession of a handwritten note which detailed the motive of the group to enter the airfield and to then contact the police to alert them of their activity.
They were planning to enter the airfield and stick themselves to the taxiway using the glue and sand.
Following a trial the four defendants were found guilty in February of conspiracy to intentionally cause a public nuisance. A fifth defendant was acquitted.
Rumbelow, from London, was jailed for 30 months; Knorr, from Birmingham, was jailed for two years; Ward, also from Birmingham, was sentenced to 18 months in custody; and Reid, from Kendal, Cumbria was also locked up for 18 months.
Each was ordered to pay £2,000 in costs.
Passing sentence, Judge Jason MacAdam rejected the defendants' claims that only 'minimal delay, inconvenience, cost would have occurred' had their plan succeeded.
'That claim repeatedly made by you all is plainly dishonest and completely contrary to all of your claims again repeatedly made, that you want to be held accountable,' he said.
'This was a highly organised, planned and determined conspiracy.
'If it had been successfully executed, the evidence which was either unchallenged or tested without success, demonstrated would have for some time resulted in chaos not just at Manchester Airport but to infrastructure around the airport and would have had a consequential effect on other airports.
'Many peoples flights to and from Manchester would have been delayed, rerouted or cancelled.'
Detective Chief Inspector Tony Platten, who led the investigation, said: 'We know this disruption was deliberately planned to coincide with the height of the summer holidays, targeting the public and their families.
'It was vital that we prevented this from happening. People work hard for their time off, and we have a duty to ensure they can enjoy it without fear or disruption.
'The group's actions demonstrated a complete disregard for the impact on the lives of those travelling via Greater Manchester, and I welcome the sentences handed down today.'
Rad Taylor, from Manchester Airport, said: 'The safety and security of our passengers is always our number one concern.
'What these individuals were planning would not only have caused significant disruption for tens of thousands of passengers, but also a significant safety risk.
'The potential consequences of that do not bear thinking about.'
In statements released by Just Stop Oil after the sentencing, the defendants said the action was part of a campaign for a treaty to end the extraction and burning of oil, gas and coal by 2030.
Knorr, who had been remanded in custody prior to sentencing, said: 'Since my imprisonment began, things have continued to get worse. The world still sleepwalks towards hell.
'People are taking action because they are terrified of what rising temperatures and food shortages will mean for them and for their kids.
'So as long as the climate crisis keeps getting worse, people will keep taking action, prison or not.'
Ward said: 'I'm not worried about my sentence, I'm worried about living in a world where crop failure means I can't put food on the table.
'I acted because doing nothing is unthinkable and because the science is clear. We have no other option.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I received a 30-month jail sentence for nonviolent resistance. Why so harsh? Because protest works
I received a 30-month jail sentence for nonviolent resistance. Why so harsh? Because protest works

The Guardian

time3 days ago

  • The Guardian

I received a 30-month jail sentence for nonviolent resistance. Why so harsh? Because protest works

Last week, at Minshull Street crown court in Manchester, I was sentenced to two and half years in prison for conspiring to intentionally cause a public nuisance. The prosecution's case was that I intended to 'obstruct the public or a section of the public in the exercise or enjoyment of a right that may be exercised or enjoyed by the public at large' – in other words, that I was part of Just Stop Oil's plan to obstruct planes at Manchester airport. I did intend that – and I have a defence for my actions. The offence of public nuisance – which falls under the Criminal Law Act 1977 and the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 – was traditionally and frequently used to prosecute significant environmental offences. It punished big corporations causing real harm to the general public by poisoning water, polluting air, emitting dust and noise or dumping chemical waste. There is no irony lost in the fact that the same offence in statutory form is now being zealously deployed to prosecute environmental protesters. After spending nine months in prison on remand, my stomach was tied in knots but my head was held high as I climbed the steep, gloomy concrete steps from the court cells into the glass dock, which stands in the centre of the imposing Victorian gothic courtroom in Manchester. At last I was due to find out my sentence. At the end of the long ruling our fate was made clear: Leanorah Ward, Margaret Reid, Daniel Knorr and I were given 18 months, 18 months, 24 months and 30 months respectively. I was taken back to prison, where I remain, with time left to serve. Make no mistake, this sentence was passed because nonviolent resistance has the potential to spark revolutionary change. The judge, Jason MacAdam, deemed it necessary to hand down 'deterrent' sentences in order to inspire fear in others considering similar actions. There was much in the judgment that I disagree with, but I do agree with the judge's assertion that I considered 'the cause to trump inconvenience to others whether that be the general public at Manchester airport or other court users'. The climate crisis is not our cause; it's a matter of life or death for everyone. We set out to disrupt the planes at Manchester airport because history shows that resistance can be a catalyst for change, and science shows that we need to change our destructive way of life now to prevent disaster. When we were arrested on the way to airport, we had a banner in our pockets that said 'Oil Kills'. When we were sentenced in court we each raised signs saying, 'Billions will die'. The science is clear, and the judge is right: I consider the facts to be so alarming, so stark, so utterly heartbreaking that disruption to everyday life is warranted. And I have spent each day in custody, questioning why others equipped with the same knowledge as I have do not feel the duty to act in the same way that I do. The judge agreed that we acted on our conscience, but for sentencing he wanted to see remorse. But how can it be possible to take part in an act of conscience and then show remorse? How could I be morally compelled to take action one week, and then filled with regret for acting the next? I took action to disrupt the status quo, as I believed that carrying on as normal meant complicity in many unnecessary deaths. I pleaded not guilty and chose to defend my actions in court because I wanted to present the case that I was acting out of necessity to prevent harm. But this defence was ruled out. The judge stated that 'the stance taken by you [by pleading not guilty] distinguishes you all from others who have chosen to follow the long and honourable tradition of civil disobedience on conscientious grounds, that is accepting that you have broken the law and accepting the punishment that follows'. In doing this he not only disregarded the 1670 trial of Penn and Mead (where Quakers pleaded not guilty to unlawful assembly), the Ploughshare Four trial (where peace activists defended themselves by arguing that they acted to prevent harm), and the Rivonia trial of Nelson Mandela (who defended himself against conspiracy charges brought by the apartheid South African government). They all pleaded not guilty. He also denies the very essence of the tradition of protest: its ability to evolve and adapt to different contexts in order to find the confrontational edge essential to nonviolent action. Just Stop Oil is not a re-enactment group, it is an action group, which has taken a strategic decision to continue resistance into the courtroom. By asserting the necessity for our actions, we include the legal system in the debate over our duty and responsibilities. Later in the judgment, MacAdam appeared to reveal outright contempt for those in resistance, as he mused 'how wrong it is in a free and democratic society to consider that your own belief in the worthiness of a cause to be justification for breaking the law'. As if centuries of political and social struggle had never taken place, as if the current 'free and democratic society' has delivered the protection and defence we need from ever-increasing heating and extreme weather events. My time incarcerated will be spent in service. I will continue to follow in the noble tradition of civil resistance, using my time to read about past campaigns and the people behind them. People who also served time in prison, in the belief that despite the reaction of the state, their actions were a necessary public service. I will consider how to hold those responsible for the greatest crime ever committed against humanity to account. Indigo Rumbelow is co-founder of Just Stop Oil. She is serving a sentence in HMP Styal

Shock moment brazen Manchester Airport worker WEES on driver's Range Rover in long-stay carpark
Shock moment brazen Manchester Airport worker WEES on driver's Range Rover in long-stay carpark

Scottish Sun

time4 days ago

  • Scottish Sun

Shock moment brazen Manchester Airport worker WEES on driver's Range Rover in long-stay carpark

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A HOLIDAYMAKER was 'disgusted' when his Tesla's security camera caught an airport's 'meet and greet' parking attendant deliberately urinating up against a customer's brand new Range Rover. The traveller had just landed in Turkey for a week-long break when he received a motion alert. 4 The worker in a hi-vis vest can be seen checking for any onlookers moments before 4 He walked from side to side to cover the car He was stunned when he logged in to find a male employee at Manchester's Terminal 1 relieving himself up against another vehicle. The parking attendant unzips his trousers on May 25 at 12.30am before walking up to the £70,000 white Range Rover - taking a leak against the side bodywork. The 30-second clip even captures him moving in a side-to-side motion for maximum coverage. The man said: 'Shortly after arriving in Turkey, I received a motion alert from my vehicle's security system. 'Curious, I checked the footage - initially thinking it was just a staff member moving the cars - but as the video continued, I was absolutely stunned by what I saw. 'It appeared that the worker, rather than simply relieving himself discreetly, urinated all over a customer's car. 'I was completely disgusted. It's one thing if nature calls unexpectedly- but to do that on someone's vehicle? It's vile and completely unacceptable. 'What makes it worse is imagining families returning from their holidays, unknowingly touching contaminated door handles and loading their kids into those cars. 'It's revolting to think about.' The staff member is in uniform, wearing a high-vis jacket with his hood up. The shocked holidaymaker, who paid £70 for the week-long parking, added: 'Needless to say, my car will be getting a full valet when I return. I chose the meet and greet service for peace of mind, expecting my vehicle to be safe and returned in the same condition I left it. 'Instead, I've lost all trust in this service. 'I genuinely feel awful for the owner of the car targeted. It was a brand-new 25-plate Range Rover. 'That kind of disrespect is beyond comprehension. 'I won't be using this service again. 'Next time, I'll just book a taxi—at least then I'll know my car is safe and clean at home.' The incident last week was at Terminal 1, with the car park service run by the airport. An airport spokesman said: 'The behaviour shown in this video is completely unacceptable and does not represent the conduct we expect from any of our colleagues. 'While it is an isolated incident and not reflective of our wider team, we want to apologise to anyone offended by the incident. 'We have a zero tolerance approach to this kind of behaviour and, with that in mind, it will be dealt with in line with our disciplinary procedures." Manchester Airport has also been plagued by privately run rogue 'meet and greet' firms in recent years, sparking a police crackdown. Complaints included reports of cars being stolen, damaged, dumped in fields, and even driven thousands of miles on joy rides. One firm had crashed a couple's brand new £157k BMW, and another traveller said they returned from an eight-week trip to find 3,000 miles had been added to their mileage clock. Some companies were moving vehicles to fields or abandoning them on residential streets while owners were on holiday. 4 The vile act was captured on camera at the airport

Holidaymakers caught smuggling 37kg of cannabis after dream Thai trip
Holidaymakers caught smuggling 37kg of cannabis after dream Thai trip

Wales Online

time6 days ago

  • Wales Online

Holidaymakers caught smuggling 37kg of cannabis after dream Thai trip

Holidaymakers caught smuggling 37kg of cannabis after dream Thai trip A judge later described their actions as 'naïve and stupid' Lewis Ellis and James Poutch have been sentenced Two young men who jetted off for a three-week holiday in Thailand ended up in the dock after being stopped at Manchester Airport on their return. Lewis Ellis and James Poutch had travelled to the South-east Asian country in April to attend the Water Festival. But when they landed back in the UK, they were stopped by customs officials — and questioned about what they were bringing home. Ellis, 20, immediately came clean, telling officers: 'I have cannabis in my bag, I may as well tell you because you're going to see it.' ‌ Border Force officers went on to discover a total of 37 kilograms of cannabis, packed in vacuum-sealed plastic packages, inside the two men's luggage. Both later pleaded guilty to being concerned in the fraudulent evasion of a prohibition on the importation of class B drugs. Don't miss a court report by signing up to our crime newsletter here ‌ A judge later described their actions as 'naïve and stupid' and handed down suspended sentences. Prosecutor Georgia Kennedy-Curnow told the court that Ellis and Poutch, 19, were stopped at Manchester Airport after arriving on a flight from Bangkok via Abu Dhabi. She said Ellis explained he had been on a leisure trip with a friend he knew from school. A search of Ellis' suitcase revealed 19.83 kilograms of cannabis. ‌ James Poutch (Image: Facebook ) Poutch was stopped shortly after. He told officials he had packed the suitcase himself and was not carrying it on anyone else's behalf. His luggage contained 17.22 kilograms of the drug. 'The defendant said he had lost his phone abroad and both defendants gave no comment in their interviews,' Ms Kennedy-Curnow said. ‌ Defence barrister Simon Hustler, representing both men, told the court: 'The defendants would not seek to persuade the court that this was anything other than naked stupidity by two young men. 'Their families are in court today and are as livid as they were when they were before the lower court.' Lewis Ellis (Image: Facebook ) ‌ Mr Hustler added that Ellis, who had eight previous convictions, was now in a 'last chance saloon.' Sentencing the pair, Recorder Geoffrey Lowe said: 'You had an operational function in the chain, to courier these drugs into another country. 'This was naive and stupid for both of you - you exposed yourselves to the risk of imprisonment.' ‌ Poutch, of Fenby Gardens, Bradford, received a 16-month sentence, suspended for two years. Mr Hustler explained that both men had paid for the trip themselves and initially travelled with the intention of attending the Water Festival. It was during their time in Thailand that they encountered individuals and agreed to transport the drugs. Ellis, of no fixed abode, was sentenced to 18 months, also suspended for two years. Article continues below Both were ordered to complete 240 hours of unpaid work and 20 rehabilitation activity requirement days.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store