‘Bound,' the Wachowskis' dynamic debut, plus the week's best films in L.A.
Hello! I'm Mark Olsen. Welcome to another edition of your regular field guide to a world of Only Good Movies.
There are so many exciting events happening in Los Angeles this weekend, folks will face some inevitable hard decisions about scheduling, travel times, ticketing, etc. But it will also be a hearty reminder of why Los Angeles, for all its issues, is still such a vibrant, vital place to live and/or visit.
The Los Angeles Times Festival of Books is celebrating its 30th edition on Saturday and Sunday at the USC campus. Among the many events and guests, I will be hosting a panel on Saturday titled 'Hollywood in the Golden Age: Sex, Scandal and the Making of an Industry' with authors Kenneth Turan, Claire Hoffman and Mallory O'Meara
There are many other events of interest for film fans, including a panel of Times journalists Ryan Faughnder, Vanessa Franko, Meg James and Stacy Perman discussing 'Is Hollywood Poised for a Comeback?' Elsewhere, a panel about covering the Oscars and other award shows will feature Matt Brennan, Nicolas Ducassi, Glenn Whipp and Mary McNamara.
Authors Griffin Dunne and Matthew Spektor will be in conversation with David Ulin about their books on growing up around Hollywood. 'Wicked' director John M. Chu will discussing his new book with The Times' Ashley Lee. Patt Morrison will lead a conversation with Lili Anolik, Alissa Wilkinson and Katherine Bucknell on Hollywood-adjacent literary figures Joan Didion, Eve Babitz and Christopher Isherwood.
Already underway, having launched on Thursday with a 45th anniversary screening of 'The Empire Strikes Back' with writer-director George Lucas in attendance, the TCM Classic Film Festival will bring many top titles, rare prints and special guests to Hollywood over the weekend, proving there is still new life in old movies. Also on Thursday was 1933's 'Moonlight and Pretzels,' which may be one of my new favorite titles for a movie.
Among the highlights of this year's festival are a series of prints from the British Film Institute to celebrate the 90th anniversary of the BFI National Archive, including a nitrate print of 1945's 'Mildred Pierce,' the premiere of a newly restored 35mm print of 1933's 'The Private Life of Henry VIII' and a rare 1975 Technicolor dye-transfer release print of 'Jaws.'
Other highlights include a conversation with director Michael Schultz followed by a screening of 'Car Wash,' a 35mm screening of Josef von Sternberg's 'Morocco,' a world premiere 4K restoration of Sidney Lumet's 'The Wiz,' a world premiere restoration of Herbert Brenon's 'Beau Geste' with live musical accompaniment and a 30th anniversary screening of 'Heat' with filmmaker Michael Mann and actor Al Pacino.
Plus, the Criterion Mobile Closet will make its L.A. debut with the first of two upcoming local stops, appearing outside Vidiots on Saturday and Sunday. The truck celebrating physical media and film history will also be at the Aero Theatre on June 6 and 7 for the American Cinematheque's 'Bleak Week' festival.
When the truck appeared in New York City last fall and at South by Southwest in March, the lines to get in were many hours long, with fans waiting patiently for their three minutes to browse the selection of Criterion Collection titles. (They're being sold at 40% off.) I spent some time hanging around the truck and talking to people in line in Austin, Texas, during SXSW and it was such a positive and inspiring experience soaking up the energy of people so jazzed about movies.
Filmmaker Lily Wachowski will be at Vidiots on Saturday for a Q&A after a screening of 1996's 'Bound,' a first feature made with sibling Lana Wachowski before their career-defining success just a few years later with 'The Matrix.' Lily Wachowski will also be introducing a 9:45 p.m. screening of 2006's 'V for Vendetta' on Saturday.
Similar in a way to the relationship between Quentin Tarantino's 'Reservoir Dogs' and 'Pulp Fiction,' the Wachowski's 'Bound' set the stage for much of what was to come with 'The Matrix,' displaying the roots of an exuberant visual style, a playful attitude toward genre storytelling and a complex relationship to depictions of identity. In the film, Gina Gershon and Jennifer Tilly play Corky and Violet, two women who become entangled in an illicit, erotic affair that becomes even more complicated when Violet introduces a plan to steal $2 million from her gangster boyfriend, Caesar (Joe Pantoliano).
In his review Kevin Thomas called the film a 'zesty, gratifying little picture.' He referenced films such as the Coen brothers' 'Blood Simple' and John Dahl's 'Red Rock West,' adding, 'Above all, it's a good thing that the Wachowskis are as darkly hilarious as they are because they go in for the Quentin Tarantino-style, in-your-face brutality. 'Bound' is not for the faint of heart. In short, 'Bound' is admittedly derivative, but it's such an amusing low-down entertainment it really doesn't matter.'
Written and directed by Preston Sturges, 'Sullivan's Travels' is both a satire of Hollywood and an earnest exploration of the human spirit, as one man attempts to find meaning in his life. The film is showing at the Academy Museum in 35mm on Wednesday.
Successful Hollywood film director John L. Sullivan (Joel McCrea), having grown dissatisfied with making moves such as 'Ants in Your Plants of 1939,' wants to make a serious picture about the human condition, to be titled 'O Brother, Where Art Thou?' As research, he heads out on the road dressed as a hobo and experiences much more than he bargained for.
Writing about the film in 1942, Richard Griffith said, 'It is, in fact, the most serious, earnest and convincing representation of Hollywood, of moviemaking and the motives behind it that we have ever had.'
Griffith added that if anyone thinks Hollywood is only good for making superficial entertainment, ''Sullivan's Travels' is in itself a refutation of that tiresome theory. It is serious enough to move a philosopher and entertaining enough to reach the most superficial. Realistic, touching, hilariously amusing by turns, it make the spectator live in its world and experience the adventures of its characters.'
Writing about the film before a single screening in 1974 at LACMA's Bing Theater, Kevin Thomas said, 'It's hard to recall a film that makes more drastic shifts in tone — a film that manages with complete success to have it both ways, as a sparkling madcap comedy part of the way and a stinging social satire the rest.'
'Sinners' box office reactions
Ryan Coogler's 'Sinners' opened last week to overwhelmingly positive reviews and a strong showing at the domestic box office, bringing in $48 million. Yet some of the coverage of the film's robust take took an unexpectedly sour view, citing international box office, marketing costs, the specifics of Coogler's deal with Warner Bros. for the movie and other factors to dampen any growing enthusiasm.
Conversely, Ryan Faughnder noted that following the success of 'A Minecraft Movie,' this was particularly good news not just for embattled Warners studio heads Michael De Luca and Pam Abdy but potentially for the industry at large.
As Faughnder wrote, 'It's a bright spot for an industry that has been struggling to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, even as Broadway and concerts bounce back. 'Sinners' has stellar reviews, an 'A' CinemaScore (the first for a horror movie) and viral momentum online, so it should have a long and healthy run.'
Stepping back to look at a broader picture, Faughnder added, 'If franchise-type films like 'Minecraft,' 'Superman' and 'The Batman' keep working, it gives De Luca and Abdy the ability to take more chances on filmmaker-driven projects. You know, the types of films everyone complains that Hollywood doesn't make anymore.'
Coogler himself celebrated the film's success with an open letter expressing his 'eternal gratitude' to those who bought tickets to the movie.
Coogler's letter added, 'I believe in cinema. I believe in the theatrical experience. I believe it is a necessary pillar of society. It's why me and so many of my colleages have dedicated our lives to the craft. We don't get to do what we do if you don't show up.'
The letter concluded, 'Every time you show up to theaters you allow us to come back and do it again. And together maybe we can expand the definition of what a blockbuster is, what a horror movie is, and of what an IMAX audience looks like. I'll see you at the movies, popcorn bucket in hand!'
Coogler's letter also included a list of cinematic influences that would itself make for a dazzling film education, 'including but not limited to Spike Lee, John Singleton, Ernie Barnes, Steve McQueen, Ava Duvernay, Euzhan Palcy, Eudora Welty, Oscar Micheaux, Robert Rodriguez, Barry Jenkins, Quentin Tarantino, Nicolas Roeg, Andrea Arnold, Jeremy Saulnier, Paul Thomas Anderson, Joel and Ethan Coen, Bill Gunn, Jordan Peele, John Carpenter, Boots Reilly, Shaka King, Nia Dacosta, Terence Nance, Rian Johnson, Bradford Young, David Cronenberg, David Lynch, Chris Nolan, Emma Thomas, Theodore Witcher, Francis Coppola, Julie Dash, Steven Spielberg, Kahlil Joseph, Mati Diop, Ben and Josh Safdie, Stephen King, Robert Palmer, Amiri Baraka, Martin Scorsese, Brian De Palma, George Lucas, Ta-Nehisi Coates, Walter Mosley, Stephen Graham Jones, Joel Crawford, Wes Craven, and many others.'
Honestly, that is just the kind of expansive, inclusive, international and generation-spanning cinematic worldview we try to encourage and follow with the recommendations that come from this newsletter. And it is stirring to see those names all laid out together.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Doc Explores How Julia Sweeney's ‘SNL' Favorite Pat Became a Complex Nonbinary Icon
Julia Sweeney's popular Saturday Night Live character Pat gets their plaudits (and some criticism) as a gender non-conforming pioneer in a new clip from the upcoming documentary, We Are Pat, premiering exclusively on Rolling Stone. Sweeney played Pat throughout her run on SNL in the early Nineties and even got to star in a spin-off film, It's Pat. The inscrutability of Pat's androgyny was pushed to comedic extremes, effectively offering prominent, yet thorny representation for gender non-conforming people on television long before the term 'nonbinary' was being widely used. More from Rolling Stone USC's SoCal VoCals Are Pitch Perfect in 'Just Sing' Documentary Trailer See 'SNL' Spoof Mike Myers' Infamous Kanye West Moment in Elevator Sketch 'SNL': Watch Bad Bunny Perform 'NUEVAYoL,' 'PERFuMITO NUEVO' We Are Pat director Ro Haber tells Rolling Stone in an email they 'wanted to make a film about transness that had humor at the heart of it,' and kept coming back to their complicated feelings about Pat. 'Why am I laughing at something that's meant to laugh at me? Why do I love Pat? Is Pat a nonbinary icon or a transphobic trope of yesteryear?' Haber continues. 'In exploring these questions, it was really important that the film embraced a spirit of curiosity and conversation rather than cancel culture and judgment.' The new clip opens with Karam Ann, a professor of TV studies, noting the prescience of Pat and how the relatively new discussion around nonbinary identity and the use of they/them pronouns has 'reanimated Pat from the grave.' Actor and filmmaker River Gallo, who is nonbinary, adds, 'What's interesting to me about being nonbinary, and the definition of nonbinariness, is it's saying you're not these two things. It's not really definable but only by what it isn't. It's interesting thinking of Pat in those ways.' We Are Pat will have its world premiere at the Tribeca Film Festival on Sunday, June 8. It's set to feature interviews with an array of queer and trans comedians and writers, including Molly Kearney, Esther Fallick, Abby McEnany, Pink Foxx, and Roz Hernandez. Sweeney also partook in the film, as did her SNL co-star Kevin Nealon. Haber says one of the most profound things they learned while making the film was from Sweeney, who created Pat while grappling with her 'own gendered pressure as a woman trying to make it in the Ninetes boys club of comedy and SNL.' 'Pat grew out of familial and societal expectations of femininity that were placed on Julia during that time, and Pat was something of an escape for her,' Haber says. 'In the film, she says, 'It was actually a joy to be Pat because I got to have a break from having to be a girl too.' That sense of reacting to a gender expectation placed on you felt really relatable to the comics in the film and me.' { pmcCnx({ settings: { plugins: { pmcAtlasMG: { iabPlcmt: 1, }, pmcCnx: { singleAutoPlay: 'auto' } } }, playerId: "d762a038-c1a2-4e6c-969e-b2f1c9ec6f8a", mediaId: "4665abb0-57e9-4e09-a93a-fa846cda00cb", }).render("connatix_player_4665abb0-57e9-4e09-a93a-fa846cda00cb_2"); }); Best of Rolling Stone The 50 Best 'Saturday Night Live' Characters of All Time Denzel Washington's Movies Ranked, From Worst to Best 70 Greatest Comedies of the 21st Century
Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
How the Disney-Midjourney Lawsuit Could Reshape the Battle Over AI and Copyright
On Wednesday, the long-simmering dispute between Hollywood and the AI industry escalated dramatically when Disney and Universal sued Midjourney, one of the most prominent AI image generators, for copyright infringement. The two Hollywood heavyweight studios argue that Midjourney allows its users to 'blatantly incorporate and copy Disney's and Universal's famous characters,' such as Shrek and Spider-Man. 'Piracy is piracy, and the fact that it's done by an AI company does not make it any less infringing,' Horacio Gutierrez, Disney's chief legal officer, said in a general statement. The lawsuit challenges one of the AI industry's fundamental assumptions: that it should be allowed to train upon copyrighted materials under the principle of fair use. How the case gets resolved could have major implications for both AI and Hollywood going forward. 'I really think the only thing that can stop AI companies doing what they're doing is the law,' says Ed Newton-Rex, the CEO of nonprofit organization Fairly Trained, which provides certifications for AI models trained on licensed data. 'If these lawsuits are successful, that is what will hopefully stop AI companies from exploiting people's life's work.' A growing backlash against AI training norms AI companies train their models upon vast amounts of data scoured from across the web. While most of these companies have resisted admitting that they scrape copyrighted material, there are already dozens of AI copyright-related lawsuits in the U.S. alone alleging otherwise. Midjourney, which allows its millions of registered users to generate images from prompts, faces a class-action suit led by artists including Kelly McKernan, who found that users were inputting the artist's name as a keyword in Midjourney to spit out eerily similar artworks. 'These companies are profiting wildly off our unpaid labor,' they told TIME in 2023. For the last few years, Hollywood has refrained from entering the fray, while sending mixed messages about AI. During contract negotiations in 2023, AI was a major source of contention between unions like SAG-AFTRA and producers, who advanced a 'groundbreaking AI proposal' involving the use of 'digital replicas' to fill out the backgrounds of film scenes. But while some in Hollywood hope AI will make filmmaking more efficient and less expensive, many more have grown concerned about the AI industry's usage of copyrighted material. This concern has come to a head with the Disney-Universal lawsuit, which is the first major lawsuit brought by Hollywood studios against an AI company. The lawsuit seeks damages and an injunction that would immediately stop Midjourney's operations—and casts generative AI theft as a problem that 'threatens to upend the bedrock incentives of U.S. copyright law.' Midjourney did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 'We are bringing this action today to protect the hard work of all the artists whose work entertains and inspires us and the significant investment we make in our content,' said Kim Harris, executive vice president and general counsel of NBCU. Newton-Rex believes that this lawsuit is particularly significant because of the size, influence and resources of Disney and Universal. 'The more that these mainstays of the American economy weigh into this fight, the harder it is to ignore the simple truth here,' he says. In February, a Delaware judge dealt a blow to the AI industry's 'fair use' argument, ruling that a legal research firm was not allowed to copy the content of Thomson Reuters to build a competing AI-based legal platform. If the Disney-Universal lawsuit is similarly successful, that would have major implications for both AI and Hollywood, says Naeem Talukdar, the CEO of the AI video startup Moonvalley. Many AI companies might have to retrain their visual models from the ground up with licensed content. And Hollywood, if given legal clarity, might actually accelerate its usage of AI models built upon licensed content, like ones built by Natasha Lyonne's and Bryn Mooser's Asteria Film Co. 'Nobody wants to touch these models with a 10-foot pole, because there's a sense that you'll just get sued on the outputs later,' Talukdar says. 'I would expect that if this judgment falls a certain way, you'll see a lull, and then you'll have a new class of models emerge that pays the creators. And then you'll see this avalanche of studios that can now actually start using these models much more freely.' A governmental loophole? Unsurprisingly, AI companies are fighting back in court. They're also working on another path forward to retain their ability to train their models as they see fit: through governmental policy. In January, OpenAI sent a memo to the White House arguing their ability to train on copyrighted material should be ' preserved.' They then relaxed several rules around copyright in the name of 'creative freedom,' which triggered a flood of Studio Ghibli-style images on social media. In the U.K., the government announced plans to give AI companies access to any copyrighted work that rights holders hadn't explicitly opted out of, which drew a huge backlash from stars like Paul McCartney and Dua Lipa. Last week, the House of Lords rejected the legislation for a fourth time. Newton-Rex says that this dispute over AI and copyright will not be resolved any time soon. 'Billion-dollar AI companies have staked their entire businesses on the idea that they are allowed to take people's life's work and build on it to compete with them. I don't think they're easily going to give that up because of one lawsuit,' he says. Nevertheless, he says that the announcement of this lawsuit is 'really good for creators everywhere.'
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Fans are wearing bald caps to Pitbull shows. Miami rapper thanks his "baldies"
Ladies love him. Everyone wants to be him — bald head and all. Pitbull, the Miami native and club-rap superstar, is embracing a viral trend where fans show up to his concerts wearing bald caps and fake beards to copy his signature look. Why it matters: It's the latest iteration of the concert uniform, as the New York Times describes it, popularized by artists like Taylor Swift, Beyoncé and — historically — the late Florida singer Jimmy Buffett. Catch up quick: The social media-fueled phenomenon started after COVID-19 but has gone "to a whole other level" during Pitbull's current European tour, the rapper — real name: Armando Christian Pérez — told BBC News. The globe-trotting Cuban-American artist, nicknamed Mr. Worldwide, has always been a favorite target for fan imitation: His quotable lyrics ("Dale!"), nostalgic party anthems and trademark look have made his brand eternally durable. The latest: Masses of fans showed up to his London concert on Monday in full Pitbull regalia, turning the crowd into a "sea of nude latex," the Times reported. "To wander among the Pitbulls feels like Halloween night, if Halloween had only one costume option and it was Pitbull," Times reporter Callie Holtermann wrote. "I'm pretty sure every party shop in London is sold out of bald caps," a fan told the newspaper. Pitbull, ever the business man, even started selling a " Mr. 305 kit" with a bald cap and bowtie for $19.99. Outside the O2 Arena, fans told the Times that it was "one big inside joke" or "mob mentality" that motivated them to draw on fake mustaches with liquid eyeliner and cut up stockings to make bald caps. It resembled, per the Times, "one of the planet's largest and most haphazardly assembled drag shows." What they're saying: Pitbull told the BBC it's "an honor" and makes him "very happy" to have fans dress as him for his shows. "To be able to motivate and inspire them, and see that they feel that it's deeper than just music, like they're a part of a movement and have a purpose in what we got going on, that to me is priceless." The bottom line:"So to all the baldies, thank you, I appreciate you — and they're the baldies because we soar high like bald eagles."
