
Gulf monarchs on edge as Trump's unpredictability could leave them exposed if war with Iran breaks out
Gulf monarchs on edge as Trump's unpredictability risks war with Iran:
As tensions rise between the U.S. and Iran, Gulf monarchs are growing increasingly anxious about what Donald Trump might do next. The Gulf region — led by Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and Oman — is walking a tightrope, trying to balance diplomacy with Iran while maintaining long-standing military ties with the United States. For leaders across the Gulf, a potential U.S. strike on Iran could turn their countries into battlegrounds, especially those hosting American military bases.
Trump's unpredictable approach to foreign policy has only heightened fears. And with Israel's ongoing conflict fueling the fire, Gulf monarchies now find themselves scrambling to protect their sovereignty, oil exports, and national security.
Why are Gulf countries so worried about a U.S. strike on Iran?
Gulf states like Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and Kuwait are home to major U.S. military installations. If Trump chooses to strike Iran, these bases could become prime targets for Iranian retaliation. According to Bader Al-Saif, an assistant professor at Kuwait University, U.S. involvement would be the "worst-case scenario" for Gulf allies — not because they support Iran, but because their geography and military alliances would put them directly in harm's way.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting
Luxeartisanship
Buy Now
Iran has already warned that if attacked, it will strike back 'wherever necessary', according to Majid Takht-Ravanchi, Iran's deputy foreign minister. In short, Gulf leaders worry they could be caught in the crossfire of a war they didn't start.
Missiles have already been spotted in the skies over Kuwait, and Bahrain tested emergency sirens earlier this week, signs that the region is bracing for a possible escalation. These fears are not unfounded — in 2019, a missile and drone strike believed to have been orchestrated by Iran crippled half of Saudi Arabia's crude oil production.
Live Events
How are Gulf monarchies managing ties with Iran during this crisis?
In a surprising diplomatic shift, Gulf leaders have made direct contact with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian in recent days. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and UAE President Mohamed bin Zayed both spoke to Pezeshkian to express solidarity and condemn Israeli military actions in Gaza.
Even Qatar's Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani received a letter from Pezeshkian, while the Sultan of Oman and Gulf foreign ministers have been engaging with Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. These talks show that Gulf monarchies are doing whatever it takes to cool tensions and avoid confrontation.
Despite their historically rocky relationships with Tehran, the UAE and Saudi Arabia — traditionally strong backers of Trump's 'maximum pressure' campaign — are now leaning on diplomacy. They've called for a ceasefire, pushed for a return to U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations, and are even relaying Tehran's willingness to talk with Washington via Qatar and Oman.
What role is Trump playing in the Gulf's growing unease?
While Trump enjoys warm ties with Gulf rulers — especially after a high-profile visit to the region last month — his unpredictability is causing major concern. He drew applause in Riyadh for criticizing past U.S. interventions, but leaders are still uncertain about how far he might go if Iran escalates.
After Israel launched its offensive last week, Trump called both the Emir of Qatar and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, showing continued engagement. But behind the scenes, Gulf leaders are telling Washington not to use their bases for any strikes against Iran — a clear sign of their fear of retaliation.
'Bound to be guilty by association,' said Abdulkhaleq Abdulla, a senior fellow at Harvard Kennedy School, referring to how Gulf countries could be dragged into a broader conflict just for hosting U.S. troops.
And that's not the only concern. Gulf leaders are worried that Washington won't fully commit to their defense if war breaks out. After all, Iran's 2019 attack on Saudi oil infrastructure was met with a muted U.S. response, frustrating Gulf allies and pushing them to hedge their bets with diplomacy.
Are Gulf states choosing between Iran and Israel?
The region finds itself stuck between two powerful rivals: Iran and Israel. While some Gulf states — including the UAE and Bahrain — normalized relations with Israel in 2020, the long war in Gaza and Israeli strikes in Syria have raised questions about Israel's regional ambitions.
Arab leaders have grown frustrated with what they see as Israeli overreach, despite privately welcoming the weakening of Iran-backed groups like Hezbollah. As one Gulf analyst put it, 'An imperial Israel is not good for the region.'
Gulf leaders now fear a destabilized balance of power. They still see a nuclear-armed Iran as a grave threat, but not at the expense of a dominant Israel that could upend regional equilibrium.
Republican Congressman Don Bacon, who recently visited the region, said Arab officials were united in their view: 'Iran, a nuclear-armed Iran, is an existential threat.' Yet, those same leaders are also worried that Trump's confrontational style could push Iran to lash out — and their nations could pay the price.
Can diplomacy hold off another Gulf crisis?
Right now, Gulf monarchs are betting on back-channel diplomacy to keep the fire from spreading. They've opened communication lines with Tehran, urged restraint from Washington, and are even acting as regional mediators.
But with Trump's decision-making up in the air, and the U.S.–Israel alliance as strong as ever, Gulf leaders know things can spiral quickly. They're trying to avoid a repeat of 2019 or worse — a full-scale war that could pull the entire Gulf into chaos.
The situation remains tense, but for now, the Gulf is talking more and striking less — a risky but necessary move in one of the world's most volatile neighborhoods.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
From Jerusalem, Haifa to Tel Aviv, Iran unleashes missiles on Israeli cities
Projectiles appeared to be intercepted by Israeli air defence systems on Friday (June 20) over the skies of Haifa. Air-raid sirens sounded across Israeli cities and Jerusalem on Friday (June 20) while interceptions were seen in the sky after another apparent barrage of missiles launched from Iran. Israeli media said initial reports pointed to Iranian missile impacts in Tel Aviv, the Negev and Haifa. Israel said it had struck dozens of military targets overnight, including missile production sites, a research body involved in nuclear weapons development in Tehran and military facilities in western and central Iran. Iran launched a new barrage of missiles at Israel early on Friday, striking near residential apartments, office buildings and industrial facilities in the southern city of Beersheba. After air raid warnings later on Friday, Israeli media said initial reports pointed to missile impacts in Tel Aviv, the Negev and Haifa. Show more Show less


Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Israel hasn't threatened any country with annihilation unlike Iran, says Ambassador Reuven Azar
New Delhi, Nuclear powers around the world, while possessing significant military might, do not pose the same threat as Iran does due to their lack of aggressive policies and extreme ideologies, Israeli Ambassador Reuven Azar said on Friday. Israel hasn't threatened any country with annihilation unlike Iran, says Ambassador Reuven Azar He also called on Iran to abandon its nuclear program and said "Israel hasn't threatened any country with annihilation." Speaking to PTI Videos, Azar said, "We have stated that Israel will not be the first country to introduce nuclear weapons to the Middle East." He emphasized that the situation is fundamentally different when it comes to Iran, a "regime that has repeatedly called for Israel's destruction". "We must be cautious with countries that have radical ideologies, especially those that deceive the international community repeatedly," Azar said. He also expressed gratitude to the US for its support but emphasized that Israel is committed to defending itself independently. He stressed that Israel's actions are rooted in self-defence. "We are a democracy, and we go to war, unfortunately, only when we are threatened, and in this case, we are threatened with our own existence. We had no choice, and this is a consensus in Israel. It comes from all the parties that we have to take action because we want to survive," he added. Azar asserted that Tel Aviv has definitive evidence that Iran's nuclear program posed a grave and immediate threat to Israel's security. "We acted at almost the last moment we had in order to foil and remove Iran's plan for the extermination of our state," he said. He claimed that Iran has been working for over three decades to build a strategy that could potentially destroy Israel. While many find this hard to believe, he said, the evidence is clear. "First and the most dangerous track is the nuclear track because this regime that has sworn to destroy Israel, has stated that, multiple times, was actually acquiring the means to have weapons of mass destruction. So, they have deceived the international community and the IAEA for many years and only last week, ten days ago, the IAEA issued a report saying that Iran is in a situation of non- compliance of the safeguard agreement of the NPT," he said. According to Azar, Iran's high-level uranium enrichment was unjustified by any peaceful, civilian nuclear programme and pointed directly to the weaponization of their nuclear materials. "We couldn't allow a country that has sworn to destroy us to acquire these capabilities," Azar said, adding. "That is why we took action against their nuclear programme." In addition to its nuclear pursuits, Azar said Iran's "ballistic missile programme is the second major threat". Over the years, Iran has developed an arsenal of thousands of ballistic missiles, capable of launching an unprecedented number of warheads, he claimed. Azar said that the Iranian missile program could potentially lead to the production of 20,000 ballistic missiles within six years, each carrying the destructive power equivalent to a nuclear bomb, he further claimed. The White House on Thursday said Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in "a couple of weeks" once given the go-ahead from Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. However on March 25, US President Donald Trump's director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said Iran was not moving towards building nuclear weapons. Azar said Israel is "grateful to the US because it has given us the assistance that we need, first of all, to defend ourselves by ourselves". He, however, said his country's principle has been - "Israel defends itself, and we do not expect others to fight our wars." He made it clear that while Israel values American support, both military and moral, the country does not expect the US to take on a fighting role. "We are not requesting others to come to our defence. We are defending ourselves," he added. "Whatever the United States decides to do, and President Trump decides to do, is going to be according to American interests and American national interests," Azar said. The White House on Thursday said Trump will decide whether or not the US gets directly involved in the Iran-Israel conflict within the next two weeks. On whether Israel has found it easier to work with Trump's current administration compared to the previous one of Joe Biden, Azar said that their world view was more aligned with the current administration. "We've been working with all administrations because the US is not only the biggest ally of Israel, but it's really our friend, and we share values and we share interests. And sometimes, you know, this doesn't mean that we will agree on everything. There were administrations which found it harder to see things eye to eye. "Sometimes we had differences. So even by the administration that we, you know, had differences, we still enjoyed very generous assistance for which we are very grateful. I think that with the Trump administration, our world view is more in alignment, especially when it comes to dealing with elements like the Iranians." Israel and Iran entered into an open military conflict when Israel, on June 13, launched a major attack with air strikes, setting off explosions in Tehran following which Iran retaliated. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Once prosperous, Hungary is now the poorest nation in EU — meanwhile, this tiny nation tops the wealth rankings
Once seen as one of Europe's rising stars, Hungary has officially become the poorest country in the European Union in terms of household welfare , Kyiv Insider reported, citing the latest Eurostat data. The numbers show that Hungarian households now consume just 72% of the EU average, which is the lowest among all 27 member states, according to the report. Hungary's Fall to the Bottom of EU Living Standards Hungary's figure is in contrast to Luxembourg, as it now leads the European Union in the Actual Individual Consumption (AIC) per capita with 141%, followed by the Netherlands at 120% and Germany at 118%, reported Kyiv Insider. Even Poland has outpaced Hungary in real living standards by about 13 percentage points, and its AIC is at 85% of the EU average, according to the report. ALSO READ: Pro-Israel hackers nab $90 million from Iranian crypto exchange - then burn it all in symbolic blockchain move Luxembourg Leads, Hungary Lags Behind While Hungary's GDP is currently at about 77% of the EU average, which is above several low-income EU nations, its households continue to remain poorer in terms of consumption, as per a Kyiv Insider report. This gap reflects that Hungary's economic output is not transforming into real benefits for Hungarian families, according to the report. Economic Output Isn't Reaching Families The poor economic conditions come under the Prime Minister of Hungary, Viktor Orbán , who is an increasingly authoritarian and pro‑Russian Fidesz regime, which has been systematically pillaged, according to Kyiv Insider report. Live Events Under Orbán's leadership, "the state-owned industries have been hollowed out, public subsidies redirected to political allies, and EU funds commandeered by power networks close to the government," as reported by Kyiv Insider. Along with this, ordinary Hungarians are facing other issues like low real wages, high inflation, brain drain, and a hollowed middle class, according to the report. FAQs What does it mean that Hungary ranks last in AIC? It means Hungarian families have the least access to goods, services, and public resources like healthcare compared to others in the EU. How is this different from GDP? GDP shows how much a country produces, but AIC shows how much people actually benefit. Hungary produces more than some countries, but its people are getting less.