Karen Read's defense rests its case in her retrial for the death of her police officer boyfriend
Defense attorneys for Karen Read rested their case Wednesday, bringing her retrial for the death of her Boston police officer boyfriend one step closer to its blockbuster conclusion.
Judge Beverly Cannone indicated closing arguments will begin Friday, with jurors expected to begin deliberating thereafter.
Prosecutors have accused Read of hitting John O'Keefe with her SUV in January 2022 during a wintry night out drinking with friends – alleging she struck the off-duty officer while driving in reverse and left him to die outside a home in Canton, Massachusetts.
Read's defense has claimed she is the victim of a cover-up, alleging other off-duty law enforcement inside that home killed O'Keefe, placed his body on the lawn and conspired to frame her. But their case during the retrial – the first ended with a hung jury – appeared more focused on sowing doubt in jurors' minds about the quality of the investigation, rather than substantiating the theory of a third-party culprit.
Both sides have concentrated on the forensic evidence, with expert witnesses for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Read's defense offering conflicting theories about what caused O'Keefe's fatal injuries.
The Commonwealth presented testimony and evidence it said showed O'Keefe was hit by Read's vehicle around 12:30 a.m. on January 29, 2022, pointing to data taken from his phone and Read's SUV, as well as fragments of the vehicle's taillight found scattered across the scene. In prosecutors' telling, the collision threw O'Keefe to the cold ground, causing blunt force injuries to his head that left him incapacitated as the snowfall buried him.
Prosecutors also presented evidence suggesting the couple was at odds leading up to O'Keefe's death. That included text messages indicating they were fighting on January 28. In the hours after prosecutors say O'Keefe died, Read called him dozens of times, testimony showed, leaving eight scathing voicemails. 'F**k yourself,' Read said.
Read's attorneys challenged this theory: Their experts testified some of O'Keefe's injures – specifically cuts and scratches on his arm – were caused by a dog, and that the damage to Read's taillight was inconsistent with it striking a person.
The defense also worked to undermine confidence in the investigation, highlighting sexist and offensive text messages the lead investigator, Michael Proctor, sent about the defendant, which ultimately led to his dishonorable discharge from the Massachusetts State Police. Proctor, however, was never called to testify.
Read also chose not to take the stand. Throughout the prosecution's case, the Commonwealth played numerous clips taken from interviews Read provided news outlets and documentary film crews, using her own words to highlight inconsistencies in her account and refute the defense's arguments.
'I didn't think I hit him, hit him,' Read said in one clip taken from her October 2024 interview for NBC's 'Dateline.'
'But could I have clipped him? Could I have tagged him in the knee and incapacitated him? He didn't look mortally wounded as far as I could see,' Read said, 'but could I have done something that knocked him out and, in his drunkenness, and in the cold, (he) didn't come to again?'
Asked Tuesday if she would testify, Read confirmed she would not, nodding to the many clips played in court, according to CNN affiliate WCVB.
The jury, she said, has 'heard my interview clips. They've heard my voice. They've heard a lot of me.'
This story has been updated with additional information.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
16 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Ex-boyfriend accused of killing D.C. woman and leaving body in dumpster
In April, after Richard Dyson beat and suffocated his ex-girlfriend in their bedroom, D.C. police allege, he went to a nearby Home Depot and purchased a large black Rubbermaid tub. Homicide detectives say Dyson — who was arrested and charged with murder Wednesday — placed the body of Donnella Bryan, 62, in the tub. Then, according to police, he and a neighbor dragged the tub out of a Northeast Washington apartment building, hailed a ride share and hauled the container to a dumpster in the parking lot of Hechinger Mall in the 1500 block of Benning Road NE. The tub was found April 19, four days later. There was a gray sock in Bryan's mouth, police said. On Thursday, Dyson, 57, charged with second-degree murder, made his initial appearance in D.C. Superior Court and was ordered held without bond. His attorney, Corinne Schultz, argued that there was no evidence that Dyson killed Bryan. She said there may be evidence that he moved the body, but no evidence he killed her. But a judge said there was enough evidence to hold him in D. C. jail until next hearing, set for Wednesday. A prosecutor said that although the two lived together, their previous romantic relationship had ended. Bryan, a mother of three and grandmother of two, relocated to Washington from Connecticut in 2015 to be near her daughter, family members said. According to a 53-page arrest warrant affidavit, detectives viewed security video showing Dyson and Bryan entering their apartment on April 15, but Bryan is never seen exiting. Dyson, however, was captured on security cameras leaving the apartment building and going to the nearby Home Depot where, according to receipts, he paid about $38 for the container. Authorities found Bryan's blood in the entryway of Dyson's apartment and in his bedroom next to his bed, according to court documents. Police also said they found Bryan's blood on a pair of Dyson's tan pants, which matched the pants he was wearing when he visited Home Depot, as seen on security camera footage. Dyson was the only person arrested in Bryan's killing. The neighbor whom detectives say helped Dyson carry the tub later turned up dead inside his own apartment. Detectives said they found a bag of white powder next to the bed where the body lay.
Associated Press
18 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Weinstein case judge declares mistrial on remaining rape charge as jury foreperson won't deliberate
NEW YORK (AP) — Harvey Weinstein 's sex crimes retrial came to a disjointed end Thursday as the jury foreperson declined to deliberate and the judge declared a mistrial on a remaining rape charge, a day after a split verdict on other charges in the landmark #MeToo-era case. The outcome positions the ex-studio boss for a third New York trial — prosecutors said they're ready to retry the rape count — even as he faces a new sentencing on his sexual assault conviction. Weinstein, 73, denies all the charges. The Oscar-winning movie producer had a blank, drained expression as court officers escorted him out Thursday in his wheelchair. His lawyer said he plans to appeal. 'What happened in that jury room was absolutely improper,' attorney Arthur Aidala said outside court. Weinstein is due back in court July 2 for discussion of retrial and sentencing dates. His first-degree criminal sex act conviction carries the potential for up to 25 years in prison, while the unresolved third-degree rape charge is punishable by up to four years — less than he already has served. He's been behind bars since his initial conviction in 2020, and he later also was sentenced to prison in a separate California case, which he's appealing. In Wednesday's partial verdict, Weinstein was convicted of one criminal sex act charge but acquitted of another. Both concerned accusations of forcing oral sex on women in 2006. Those verdicts still stand. While the jury of seven women and five men was unanimous on those decisions, it got stuck on the rape charge involving another woman, Jessica Mann. The hairstylist and actor testified at length — as she did in 2020 — that Weinstein raped her amid a years-long consensual relationship. 'I will never give up on myself and making sure my voice – and the truth – is heard,' Mann said in a statement Thursday, confirming she's ready to testify yet again. Jury-room strains started leaking into public view Friday, when a juror asked to be excused because he felt another was being treated unfairly. Then Monday, the foreperson complained that other jurors were pushing people to change their minds and talking about information beyond the charges. The man raised concerns again Wednesday, telling the judge he felt afraid in the jury room because another juror was yelling at him for sticking to his opinion and suggested the foreperson would 'see me outside.' When Judge Curtis Farber asked the foreperson Thursday whether he was willing to return to deliberations, the man said said no. And with that, Farber declared a mistrial on the rape count. Two jurors disputed the foreperson's account as they left court. One, Chantan Holmes, said that no one mistreated the man and that she believed he was just tired of deliberating. 'We all felt bad. Because we really wanted to do this. We put our hearts and souls in here,' she said. Another jury member, who identified himself only by his juror number, said the deliberations were contentious, but respectful. Weinstein's 2020 conviction seemed to cement the downfall of one of Hollywood's most powerful men in a pivotal moment for the # MeToo movement. The anti-sexual-misconduct campaign was fueled by allegations against him. But that conviction was overturned last year, and the case was sent back for retrial in the same Manhattan courthouse. Weinstein's accusers said he exploited his Tinseltown influence to dangle career help, get them alone and then trap and force them into sexual encounters. 'These hopeful young women were trying to follow their dreams in a world that he controlled,' Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, said at a news conference Thursday. Weinstein's defense portrayed his accusers as Hollywood wannabes and hangers-on who willingly hooked up with him to court opportunity, then later said they were victimized to collect settlement funds and #MeToo approbation. Miriam Haley, the producer and production assistant whom Weinstein was convicted — twice, now — of sexually assaulting, said outside court Wednesday that the new verdict 'gives me hope.' Accuser Kaja Sokola also called it 'a big win for everyone,' even though Weinstein was acquitted of forcibly performing oral sex on her when she was a 19-year-old fashion model. Her allegation was added to the case after the retrial was ordered. Holmes, the juror who spoke outside court, said the panel all felt Sokola 'wasn't credible.' The Associated Press generally does not name people who say they have been sexually assaulted, unless they agree to be identified. Haley, Mann and Sokola did so. ___ Associated Press journalists Joseph B. Frederick and Ted Shaffrey contributed.
CBS News
19 minutes ago
- CBS News
Dramatic rescue from Joliet apartment fire caught on body cam video
Joliet police released body cam video that shows a dramatic rescue at a burning apartment building in the southwest suburbs Tuesday. Seven people were injured when the building at 115 Essington Road caught fire. They arrived to find flames shooting out of the building and heavy smoke coming from the attic. Joliet police and firefighters rushed to save a family trapped on their third-floor balcony. In the body cam video you can see a man hit the ground after jumping from the balcony, though he appears to be OK. Rescuers then scale a ladder to save a little girl. After grabbing her, you can see them go back to get the girl's mother down the ladder. The video then shows them going back into the burning building evacuate any residents still inside. Only minor injuries were reported and all residents of the apartment building are accounted for. The Joliet Office of Emergency and Disaster Management is working with the residents who have been displaced.
