
Back on Earth, astronauts can say goodbye to blurry eyes, puffy faces, ‘chicken legs' and a little extra height
Astronauts Barry 'Butch' Wilmore and Suni Williams are back on Earth after nearly nine months in space and readjusting to life with gravity.
Down to their DNA, astronauts' bodies can change in weird and sometimes significant ways while high above Earth: They start to elongate, often developing a taller 'space height,' and because human bodies are mostly liquid, redistribution of fluids may also give them 'chicken legs' and a 'puffy head.' Once they're back, that all starts to return to normal.
NASA doctors spoke to the two just before they started their journey home, and they said they're doing 'really well' health-wise, Dr. Joe Dervay, one of NASA's flight surgeons, told CNN.
Scientists are still figuring out the long-term health effects of spending a lot of time in space, but decades of data show that astronauts undergo physical changes after even a brief period. Most of those changes will reverse themselves shortly after they return to Earth.
'There is some individual variability on how quickly they recover, but it is pretty impressive to see how they will turn the corner and really adapt quickly,' Dervay said. 'Oftentimes, if you look at them a couple days later, you really have no idea what they've just done for the last several months.'
Microgravity is behind many of the changes that astronauts can experience.
Without the pull of Earth, astronauts can lose bone density, and their muscles begin to waste away. They can lose motor control, coordination and balance in space, developing a kind of motion sickness, studies show. A lack of gravity can also affect their immune and cardiovascular systems, their vision and their very DNA.
Most of the effects seem to be short-lived — only a handful of health issues have so far been found to linger — and the astronauts can look forward to a lot of rehab exercises on Earth to get their bones and muscles back into shape.
Although Wilmore and Williams weren't initially expected to stay on the International Space Station as long as they did – their initial trip was supposed to last only eight days – NASA leaders don't believe the two will have any unusual health problems because of it.
'We don't see any need for any special precaution,' Dina Contella, deputy manager of NASA's International Space Station Program, said Friday. 'Like any astronauts coming back, there is an acclimation period, and so that will vary by crew member.'
Without gravity for the body to move against and with the body exposed to radiation in space, muscle atrophy and dysfunction can happen to even the fittest astronaut. NASA has found that astronauts' bodies can experience one-third reduction in muscle fiber size in less than two weeks.
In a single month in space, an astronaut might also lose up to 1.5% of their bone mass – about as much as a postmenopausal woman who is not in treatment loses in about a year. Such loss can make people vulnerable to fractures and lead to premature osteoporosis, but more research is needed to learn whether the bone loss persists long after the space flight.
To help mitigate bone and muscle problems, astronauts eat a special diet and do about 2½ hours of exercise daily, on average. They can use a treadmill or a stationary bike, but they also have a special Advanced Resistive Exercise Device that mimics weightlifting on Earth.
'We try to keep the bone strong and muscles strong to minimize any effects of microgravity,' Dervay said. 'Plus, from a psychological perspective, it's outstanding because it gives them that break during the day, and they know they're doing something for themselves.'
NASA has been researching whether aerobics and resistance exercises would be as helpful as a treadmill, since the spacecraft needed for future long-distance flight may not be able to accommodate heavy exercise equipment.
Dervay says the body is 'brilliant' in the way it adjusts to microgravity, but 'we want to ensure that when we bring them home, they're in the best position they can be to return … and get back into the normal flow of their lives.'
Astronauts may view one physical change to their bones as a benefit: Without the pull of gravity, a person's spine straightens, and they grow taller.
NASA says the height of a crew member can increase 3% over the first three or four days of weightlessness. Astronaut Kate Rubins, for example, went from 5'6' to a 'space height' of 5'7.' Once back on Earth, though, gravity brings astronauts back down to their regular size.
Without gravity, fluids shift. Because the body is 70% liquid, that change is felt at multiple levels.
On Earth, fluids in the body tend to shift downward, below the heart. But in space, fluids flow evenly throughout the body and shift into places they don't normally accumulate.
It's similar to doing a very long handstand: The 1½ gallons of liquid the body carries move upward. Astronauts often say they feel like they have a head cold and develop an issue that some at NASA call 'puffy face syndrome,' 'bird legs' or 'chicken legs.' The problems typically clear up after about three days on Earth, according to NASA.
The fluid movement in the body may also cause lingering back problems, regardless of the length of the space flight. One study found that the incidence of a slipped or ruptured disc is 4.3 times higher in astronauts than in terrestrial populations, and the problem typically happens soon after they return to Earth.
The fluid redistribution issue also seems to affect many astronauts' vision, a problem NASA has dubbed Spaceflight Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome. The eye flattens due to fluid redistribution, the retinal nerve fiber layer can thicken, and there is a refractive shift so the vision can blur in space.
Dr. Michael Harrison, an aerospace medicine specialist at Mayo Clinic in Florida, says it's a bit like using a projector and moving it a few inches closer to the wall.
'The picture is going to get a little fuzzier,' he said. 'It's a major topic because we don't know an awful lot about it yet.'
The problem seems to be more common with longer space flights.
'The question that is on everybody's mind is, what happens when we go deeper into space for longer periods of time? Does it plateau, or is this something continues to progress?' Harrison said.
Not everyone's vision remains changed. One study found globe flattening in about 16% of astronauts post-flight.
'Some folks come back and do have what appears to be – maybe not necessarily permanent changes but chronic changes in vision and requires glasses. Others don't have it. It's a fairly new phenomenon,' Harrison said.
To study the phenomenon, the crew of the five-day commercial flight Polaris Dawn wore special contact lenses last year to measure and collect data on the pressure in their eyes.
NASA has also developed special 'space anticipation glasses' that are kept at the International Space Station. The glasses are adjustable and mitigate some of the blurriness.
Fluid in the brain tends to shift in space as well, from the top of the brain to the base. Studies of astronauts after they return to Earth have found that this shift can enlarge parts of their brains called ventricles, even beyond what can typically be seen with normal aging.
However, MRIs of the crew of the Polaris Dawn mission didn't find any concerning findings with their brains.
Time in space can weaken a person's immune system and make astronauts more susceptible to infections. The white blood cells that help the body fight infections seem to change.
'In space, there's been activation of some latent viruses that folks carry but no health effects associated with that long-term,' Harrison said.
Space also seems to chemically modify a person's DNA. On the International Space Station, astronauts wear dosimeters to record their radiation exposure, since it can damage DNA and raise the lifetime cancer risk
It's not totally clear what effects other chemical changes to the DNA might have. A study that compared data during and after astronaut Scott Kelly's mission to space against data from his identical twin brother, retired astronaut Mark Kelly, found that there were chemical modifications to both men's DNA, but both returned to normal when they returned to Earth.
Telomeres, the repetitive sequences at the end of a chromosome that protect it from deteriorating, typically decrease with age, but Scott's telomeres actually increased while he was in space. When he came back to Earth, they shortened again. Scientists say Scott's telomeres may have been positively affected by his better exercise and diet routine in space.
Even before they came home, Williams and Wilmore would have increased their fluids using salt tablets and water to try to get back some of what they lost during the early phase of space flight, Dervay said. They also put on garments like compression socks that stretch from the feet to above the waist to move fluid back to the centers of their bodies.
'Every crew that comes back comes through a fluid loading protocol, just to make sure when they get back that their body is conditioned properly,' Steve Stitch, manager NASA's commercial crew program, said Friday. 'There's nothing beyond what we'll normally do.'
The astronauts do not return to their families right away after they splash down. Return-to-Earth protocols include keeping the crew at Johnson Space Center in Houston for several days before the flight surgeons give them the OK to go home.
'Almost every organ system in the body is impacted to some degree – whether it's the skin, the neurovestibular, the bone, muscle, the immunological system, the cardiovascular system – so we have programs that our Human Health and Performance team focuses on to try and make sure that we're covering all those areas,' Dervay said.
Scientists monitor all astronauts' health from the time they start training until long after they retire, but as more people spend more days in space, researchers are gaining a much better understanding of what effect it can have on human health in the long term. It's knowledge that will be essential as government and commercial space programs aim to send humans for extended stays on the Moon and Mars.
Williams and Wilmore have spent extensive time in space before and told CNN's Anderson Cooper in February that they know what to expect physically.
When astronauts return to Earth, their rehabilitation program may involve a series of physical exercises to increase bone density and strengthen muscles. They also do cardiovascular exercises to strengthen their heart muscle, since it doesn't have to pump as hard in zero gravity as it does on Earth. Additionally, there are exercises to improve coordination to help prevent injuries.
'Gravity is really, really tough,' Wilmore told Cooper.
Williams said she usually gets her fast-twitch muscles back and her inner ear adjusts in about 24 to 48 hours after returning to Earth. She appreciates the quick physical improvements, but they're also a little bittersweet.
'That will be a little bit sad when [the dizziness] goes away, just because that means that really, physically, the space flight came to an end,' she told Cooper.
For at least some astronauts, mental health may have the biggest effects. They often experience the 'overview effect.'
'They get this profound experience that then influences their views on things when they return to Earth,' Harrison said.
Astronauts describe seeing the world from above as 'beautiful' and 'fragile.' It is a world without borders or boundaries, and seeing it causes some to feel an increased sense of connection to others.
'I'm not going to necessarily use the word 'magical,'' Harrison said, 'But it is a very profound philosophical experience being in space.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Sun's Fury Is Making SpaceX Satellites Plummet From The Sky
The Sun is the angriest it's been in a while – and it's taking out that rage on the thousands of tiny satellites that make up SpaceX's Starlink fleet. A new analysis of Starlink satellites falling from the sky has revealed a distinct pattern: as the Sun escalated towards the peak of its activity cycle between 2020 and 2024, so too did the number of satellite falls as a direct result of that activity. A team of scientists, led by space physicist Denny Oliveira of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, studied 523 Starlink satellites that fell back down towards Earth during that time, and found a clear link with the Sun. "We clearly show that the intense solar activity of the current solar cycle has already had significant impacts on Starlink reentries," they write in their paper. "This is a very exciting time in satellite orbital drag research, since the number of satellites in low-Earth orbit and solar activity are the highest ever observed in human history." The solar cycle is an 11-year cycle of fluctuations in the Sun's activity that centers around a periodic magnetic reversal of the solar poles. It primarily manifests as sunspots, solar flares, and coronal mass ejections that steadily increase towards solar maximum (when the poles flip), and then wanes to a minimum before inching back up again. It's just the Sun's normal way to be, and we're currently at the peak of the 25th cycle since we started keeping track of them. It's actually been a pretty strong cycle; not the strongest on record, but still displaying much more solar activity than scientists predicted at its beginning. This means that its effects on Earth have been pretty strong. You may have noticed a lot of aurora activity; that's the effect of solar particles pummeling Earth's atmosphere, borne by coronal mass ejections and the solar wind. But the increase in solar activity has another, less noticeable effect: the increase in solar ejections buffeting the upper atmosphere heats it up significantly. We don't notice it here on the surface. But the increased energy puffs up the atmosphere – enough to increase the amount of drag on spacecraft in low-Earth orbit. This means they cannot hold course at their current trajectory, and need to make adjustments to remain in the sky. To be clear, all satellites in low-Earth orbit are vulnerable to the increase in drag associated with solar activity. To date, however, SpaceX has launched 8,873 Starlink satellites into low-Earth orbit, of which 7,669 remain operational. These sheer numbers provide an excellent laboratory for studying the effect of solar maximum on satellites in low-Earth orbit. "Here, we use … Starlink orbital data to perform a superposed epoch analysis of orbital altitudes and velocities in order to identify impacts caused by storms with different intensities," the researchers write. "The Starlink reentries coincide with the rising phase of solar cycle 25, a period with increasing solar activity." SpaceX first started launching Starlink satellites in 2019, and the first atmospheric reentries began in 2020. Initially these figures stayed relatively low. There were just two in 2020. In 2021, 78 satellites fell; 99 in 2022, and 88 in 2023. But then 2024 saw a whopping increase – a total of 316 Starlink satellites fell out of the sky. The researchers grouped these reentries according to the geomagnetic conditions at the time – that is, how powerfully solar activity was affecting Earth. Oddly, some 72 percent of all reentries occurred during weak geomagnetic conditions, not the powerful geomagnetic storms. This, the researchers found, was because of the cumulative effect of drag over the rising period of the solar cycle. Rather than being taken down in one fell swoop, the orbits of these satellites degraded subtly over time. Meanwhile, the satellites that did fall during strong geomagnetic conditions fell faster than those that fell in weaker conditions. It's fascinating stuff, actually. We don't have a lot of data on this phenomenon; the work of Oliveira and his colleagues may help design strategies to mitigate the orbital decay induced by solar activity, keeping satellites in low-Earth orbit where they should be (and not, for example, smacking into other satellites and triggering a nasty Kessler cascade). "Our results are promising because they point in the direction of using short-cadence Starlink data (precise orbit determination, neutral mass density, ram direction area, drag coefficient) for the improvement of orbital drag models during geomagnetic storms, particularly during extreme events," the researchers write. The paper has been accepted for publication in Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Science, and is available on arXiv. Astronomers Just Discovered The Biggest Explosions Since The Big Bang Titan's Atmosphere 'Wobbles Like a Gyroscope' – And No One Knows Why A 'Crazy Idea' About Pluto Was Just Confirmed in a Scientific First
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump drops Nasa nominee Jared Isaacman, scrapping Elon Musk's pick
The White House has withdrawn as its nominee for Nasa administrator, abruptly yanking a close ally of Elon Musk from consideration to lead the space agency. Donald Trump said he would announce a new candidate soon. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head Nasa,' the US president posted online. 'I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be mission aligned, and put America first in space.' Related: Drugs, marital advice and that black eye: key takeaways from Trump's Oval Office send-off for Elon Musk Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut who had been Musk's pick to lead Nasa, was due next week for a much-delayed confirmation vote before the US Senate. His removal from consideration caught many in the space industry by surprise. Trump and the White House did not explain what led to the decision. Isaacman, whose removal was earlier reported by Semafor, said he was 'incredibly grateful' to Trump 'and all those who supported me throughout this journey'. 'I have gained a much deeper appreciation for the complexities of government and the weight our political leaders carry,' he posted. 'It may not always be obvious through the discourse and turbulence, but there are many competent, dedicated people who love this country and care deeply about the mission.' Isaacman's removal comes just days after Musk's official departure from the White House, where the SpaceX CEO's role as a 'special government employee' leading the so-called department of government efficiency (Doge) created turbulence for the administration and frustrated some of Trump's aides. Musk, according to a person familiar with his reaction, was disappointed by Isaacman's removal. 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk wrote of Isaacman on X, responding to the news of the White House's decision. Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It was unclear whom the administration might tap to replace Isaacman. One name being floated is the retired US air force Lt Gen Steven Kwast, an early advocate for the creation of the US space force and a Trump supporter, according to three people familiar with the discussions. Isaacman, the former CEO of the payment processor company Shift4, had broad space industry support but drew concerns from lawmakers over his ties to Musk and SpaceX, where he spent hundreds of millions of dollars as an early private spaceflight customer. The former nominee had donated to Democrats in prior elections. In his confirmation hearing in April, he sought to balance Nasa's existing moon-aligned space exploration strategy with pressure to shift the agency's focus on Mars, saying the US can plan for travel to both destinations. As a potential leader of Nasa's 18,000 employees, Isaacman faced a daunting task of implementing that decision to prioritize Mars, given that Nasa has spent years and billions of dollars trying to return its astronauts to the moon. On Friday, the space agency released new details of the Trump administration's 2026 budget plan that proposed killing dozens of space science programs and laying off thousands of employees, a controversial overhaul that space advocates and lawmakers described as devastating for the agency. The Montana Republican Tim Sheehy, a member of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation committee, posted that Isaacman had been 'a strong choice by President Trump to lead Nasa'. Related: Universe's mysteries may never be solved because of Trump's Nasa cuts, experts say 'I was proud to introduce Jared at his hearing and strongly oppose efforts to derail his nomination,' Sheehy said. Some scientists saw the nominee change as further destabilizing to Nasa as it faces dramatic budget cuts without a confirmed leader in place to navigate political turbulence between Congress, the White House and the space agency's workforce. 'So not having [Isaacman] as boss of Nasa is bad news for the agency,' Harvard-Smithsonian astronomer Jonathan McDowell posted. 'Maybe a good thing for Jared himself though, since being Nasa head right now is a bit of a Kobayashi Maru scenario,' McDowell added, referring to an exercise in the science fiction franchise Star Trek where cadets are placed in a no-win scenario. With Reuters
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Musk backs down on threat to retire SpaceX Dragon spacecraft amid Trump dispute
Elon Musk, the world's richest person, on Thursday said his company SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft after he engaged in an extraordinary public fallout with Donald Trump who had threatened to cancel government contracts with Musk's businesses. He later appeared to back down. 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' Musk posted on the social media platform X, which he owns. A few minutes earlier Trump had posted on Truth Social – the media platform that he owns – that he might cancel huge lucrative contracts with Musk's businesses, which include the SpaceX company that is building a fleet of rockets. Related: Trump and Musk's very public feud is like Alien v Predator for political nerds 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump said. Nasa relies on SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS). Hours after issuing his threat, Musk appeared to take pleas from users on his social media platform X to 'cool down' and he posted: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Since 2008, SpaceX has received more than $20bn in government contracts, largely from Nasa and the Department of Defense. In March, two Nasa astronauts returned to Earth in a Dragon capsule after being stranded on the ISS for nearly nine months, after their Boeing Starliner capsule faced technical issues and returned to Earth without them. The next SpaceX Dragon launch is scheduled to take place on 10 June. The Dragon is expected to carry four people to and from the ISS on Axiom Mission 4. Nasa's press secretary, Bethany Stevens, in a statement on X after Musk's announcement, said the agency 'will continue to execute upon the president's vision for the future of space'. Related: Trump v Musk: 10 ways they can further hurt each other 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met,' she added. Musk's announcement came amid an escalating dispute with Trump that began after he denounced the president's tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination'. Musk later accused Trump of 'ingratitude' for the millions he spent to get him elected. Trump, in turn, said he was 'very disappointed' in Musk. The president wrote earlier on Thursday that Musk was 'wearing thin' and that the tech billionaire 'went crazy' after he was asked to depart the White House last week as head of Trump's 'department of government efficiency' .