Veterans remembered for service in 'forgotten war'
Former navy pilot Norman Lee makes a touching gesture for his fellow Korean War veterans every time he passes the memorial in the nation's capital.
The 95-year-old retired commodore flew many successful bombing missions across North Korea during his service in the conflict.
A ceremony was held at the National Korean War Memorial in Canberra on Wednesday to mark the 75th anniversary of Australian service.
"I must admit, each time I go past the memorial, I give a salute," Mr Lee said, nodding towards it.
"War is a human condition. Man will always be at war, I'm afraid."
About 40 veterans who served in the conflict - now with an average age of 93 - attended the commemorative service.
Their families wiped away tears during the ceremony, which included readouts by the veterans and their children.
During the service, the veterans in attendance were asked to stand up to applause.
Australia's defence force chief Admiral David Johnston laid a wreath.
South Korea's ambassador to Australia Seungseob Sim, in addition to representatives of other countries that participated in the war, also braved wet and windy conditions to mark the anniversary.
The conflict was fought from 1950 to 1953 between North Korea and South Korea, after the former - backed by China and the Soviet Union - invaded its southern neighbour in a bid for reunification under communist rule.
More than 18,000 Australians served during the Korean War and post-armistice ceasefire monitoring.
The conflict killed 340 Australians, while more than 1200 were wounded.
Of those who died, 42 have no known grave.
In an address, Veterans' Affairs Minister Matt Keogh paid tribute to the Australians who fought to help South Korea become the prosperous and thriving democracy it is today.
"The Korean War is sometimes called the forgotten war," he said.
"To all the Korean War veterans here today and around the country, I say we remember.
"As a nation, we say thank you for the sacrifices you made in our name.
"We thank you for the way you turned out to help the people of a nation so thoroughly and illegally invaded by a belligerent neighbour."
Opposition veterans' affairs spokesman Darren Chester said the service of Australians in Korea stood as a powerful testament to the nation's commitment to freedom and international co-operation.
"We owe a deep debt of gratitude to those who served and to the families who supported them," he said.
"Their courage and commitment helped shape the peace we enjoy today."
It's believed 1077 Australian veterans of the Korean War are still living.
More than 87,000 United Nations soldiers died in Korea, while more than one-and-a-half-million Koreans are believed to have been killed in the conflict.
Lifeline 13 11 14
Open Arms 1800 011 046
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
‘Rise up': Strike on notorious prison carried message for Iranians, released Australian says
An Australian academic who spent more than two years as a political prisoner in Iran says the Israeli missile strike on the notorious Evin Prison where she was held was a symbolic blow against Iran's repressive regime, intended to send a message to Iranians about the weakness of their rulers. Iranian state television shared black-and-white surveillance footage of the overnight strike at the prison, which is known for holding dual nationals and Westerners who are often used as bargaining chips in negotiations with the West. 'It was very affecting for me to see the footage of the strike on gates which I have passed through too many times to remember,' Kylie Moore-Gilbert told this masthead. 'In my view this was a symbolic strike designed to send a message to the Iranian people about the regime's weakness. Evin Prison is a hugely potent symbol of the regime's repressive apparatus and destroying the prison gates might have been a not-so-subtle nudge for the people to rise up and reclaim their freedom.' Now a specialist in Middle Eastern political science at Macquarie University, Moore-Gilbert was arrested after attending a conference in Qom in 2018 and imprisoned by the regime in an act of hostage diplomacy. She was held in solitary confinement and sentenced to 10 years in jail on trumped-up charges of espionage but returned to Australia as part of a prisoner swap in November 2020. 'From what I can discern no prison blocks or residential wards were targeted, just the gates and some judicial and administrative buildings,' she said of the overnight strike. 'I am very worried about the prisoners inside, particularly as word has begun to emerge of terrifying scenes, with crazy behaviour from guards, [of] prisoners refused medical treatment and families gathering in desperation outside.' After the strike social media posts contained descriptions of people being injured as guards raced to safety and of using force to strengthen security rather than aid injured inmates.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
NATO bowed to Trump's defence demands. It'll cost them 19,800 fighter jets
Governments around the world agreeing to the change will need to make some tough decisions in the context of other budget pressures, says Euan Graham, a senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. 'How the government cuts the pie of the tax take is going to require hard, hard decisions,' Graham says. The UK, for example, which has agreed to hit the 5 per cent target by 2035, is slashing foreign aid to pay for its additional $155 billion defence spending bill. 'That is not an announcement that I am happy to make,' UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said of the change. 'However, the realities of our dangerous new era mean that the defence and national security of our country must always come first.' Other countries lifting their spending to meet the new target include Germany, France and Italy. They will need to boost their annual spending by $220 billion, $153 billion and $135 billion, respectively. Earlier this month, Rutte warned NATO members that if they didn't pledge to up defence spending to 5 per cent, 'you'd better learn to speak Russian'. But Spain, which spent just 1.3 per cent of its GDP on defence last year, refused the increase. The extra spending would force the country to 'drastically raise taxes on the middle class, or severely cut the size of our welfare state,' Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said. The NATO agreement could see Australia dragged further into the debate over defence spending by bolstering the Trump White House's argument that US allies can spend more on defence. US Defence Secretary Peter Hegseth has told Australia to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, which the Albanese has pushed back against in favour of its plan to lift expenditure to 2.3 per cent. The Coalition went to the election promising to lift defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP by 2035-36, which the Parliamentary Budget Office said this week would cost $156 billion and add $24 billion in interest costs. If Australia's defence spending was lifted to 5 per cent in the same time frame, the cost to the federal budget would be $261 billion and have an additional $40 billion in interest. Rabobank senior strategist Ben Picton said the debate was about 'guns or butter'. 'The Australian government is faced with choices between increasing the defence budget to expand capability or increasing spending on social programs like the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), aged care, and childcare,' Picton said in a research note this week. 'Clearly, Australia is currently choosing 'butter' but retains substantial headroom in the budget to increase spending by comparison to peer economies.' Loading The Australian government spent about $56 billion on defence in 2024-25 – more than the $44 billion it spent on the NDIS. Eminent economist Saul Eslake believes that no government will cut spending on social services to beef up defence. 'You'd make a lot of people pissed off and it's hard to do, which to me means you've got to look to the revenue side [to raise more money],' Eslake says. But Graham says Australians would understand a cut to services – like the NDIS – if the government was 'honest about the nature of the threat' posed to national security.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
NATO bowed to Trump's defence demands. It'll cost them 19,800 fighter jets
Governments around the world agreeing to the change will need to make some tough decisions in the context of other budget pressures, says Euan Graham, a senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. 'How the government cuts the pie of the tax take is going to require hard, hard decisions,' Graham says. The UK, for example, which has agreed to hit the 5 per cent target by 2035, is slashing foreign aid to pay for its additional $155 billion defence spending bill. 'That is not an announcement that I am happy to make,' UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said of the change. 'However, the realities of our dangerous new era mean that the defence and national security of our country must always come first.' Other countries lifting their spending to meet the new target include Germany, France and Italy. They will need to boost their annual spending by $220 billion, $153 billion and $135 billion, respectively. Earlier this month, Rutte warned NATO members that if they didn't pledge to up defence spending to 5 per cent, 'you'd better learn to speak Russian'. But Spain, which spent just 1.3 per cent of its GDP on defence last year, refused the increase. The extra spending would force the country to 'drastically raise taxes on the middle class, or severely cut the size of our welfare state,' Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said. The NATO agreement could see Australia dragged further into the debate over defence spending by bolstering the Trump White House's argument that US allies can spend more on defence. US Defence Secretary Peter Hegseth has told Australia to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, which the Albanese has pushed back against in favour of its plan to lift expenditure to 2.3 per cent. The Coalition went to the election promising to lift defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP by 2035-36, which the Parliamentary Budget Office said this week would cost $156 billion and add $24 billion in interest costs. If Australia's defence spending was lifted to 5 per cent in the same time frame, the cost to the federal budget would be $261 billion and have an additional $40 billion in interest. Rabobank senior strategist Ben Picton said the debate was about 'guns or butter'. 'The Australian government is faced with choices between increasing the defence budget to expand capability or increasing spending on social programs like the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), aged care, and childcare,' Picton said in a research note this week. 'Clearly, Australia is currently choosing 'butter' but retains substantial headroom in the budget to increase spending by comparison to peer economies.' Loading The Australian government spent about $56 billion on defence in 2024-25 – more than the $44 billion it spent on the NDIS. Eminent economist Saul Eslake believes that no government will cut spending on social services to beef up defence. 'You'd make a lot of people pissed off and it's hard to do, which to me means you've got to look to the revenue side [to raise more money],' Eslake says. But Graham says Australians would understand a cut to services – like the NDIS – if the government was 'honest about the nature of the threat' posed to national security.
