
Sidelined Zelensky Still Gets Trump Face Time At NATO Summit
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky may have been left largely on the margins of NATO's summit in the Netherlands -- but he still managed to score a sit-down meeting with US President Donald Trump on Wednesday.
"Couldn't have been nicer," Trump said after the 50-minute meeting, held behind closed doors.
No journalists were allowed into the room at the first encounter between the two men since they talked at the Vatican two months ago.
But they appeared to have avoided a repeat of the infamous Oval Office bust-up that soured relations between Kyiv and what had been its key backer.
"I had a good meeting with Zelensky," Trump said. "He's fighting a brave battle. It's a tough battle."
The positive mood music was about as good as Kyiv could have hoped, after NATO planners specifically sought to keep Zelensky at arm's length so as not to rile Trump.
The most Zelensky appeared to get was a vague promise from the US leader on Patriot air defence systems.
"We're going to see if we can make some available," Trump said of the missiles that Kyiv is desperately pleading for to shoot down Russian attacks.
"They're very hard to get," he added.
Trump said he would talk again soon to Russian President Vladimir Putin to push stalled peace efforts -- but there was no mention of possible sanctions on Moscow for stalling.
Zelensky hailed the "long and substantive" sit-down.
"I thank Mr. President, I thank the United States. We discussed how to achieve a ceasefire and a real peace," he wrote on X.
"We spoke about how to protect our people. We appreciate the attention and the readiness to help bring peace closer."
As US support for Ukraine has dried up under Trump, focus at the summit in The Hague was firmly on pleasing the US leader with a pledge by allies to spend more on their defence.
And while he got his face time with Trump, playing second fiddle was still a downgrade for Zelensky from the central stage he occupied at NATO's last two summits.
Last year in Washington, the war-time leader was feted by US President Joe Biden and secured a pledge from NATO that Ukraine's push for membership was "irreversible".
This year -- despite NATO chief Mark Rutte insisting that remains the case -- the final declaration of the summit had no mention of Ukraine's bid to join.
Trump has essentially ruled out NATO membership for Kyiv and Zelensky, who has been vociferous on the subject before, was quite this time round.
Unlike at previous gatherings, there was no formal session involving Zelensky and NATO's 32 leaders at the slimmed-down summit.
With the US having gone from principal supporter to a bit player under Trump, it was left to Kyiv's European backers to offer Zelensky reassurance at the two-day event.
Both Rutte and EU chief Ursula von der Leyen stressed to Zelensky that he remained "among friends" when they met him.
But there were none of the bumper pledges of new weaponry to Kyiv that had been a hallmark of recent gatherings.
The best Europe managed was to get the US to sign off on allowing NATO countries to use some of the new defence spending they were pledging to go to Ukraine.
"Allies reaffirm their enduring sovereign commitments to provide support to Ukraine, whose security contributes to ours," the final statement said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
5 hours ago
- DW
Ukraine calls for special court to try Russian war leaders – DW – 06/26/2025
The Council of Europe will set up a special international tribunal to prosecute top Russian officials for the war in Ukraine. "Every war criminal must know there will be justice," Ukrainian President Zelenskyy said. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed an agreement with the Council of Europe (CoE) on Wednesday to establish a special tribunal to prosecute those accused of orchestrating Russia's war in Ukraine. Ukraine argues that the tribunal is urgently needed to hold Russia's leadership accountable for launching the full-scale invasion in February 2022. "We need to show clearly aggression leads to punishment and we must make it happen together, all of Europe," Zelenskyy said after signing the accord with CoE Secretary General Alain Berset. The creation of the tribunal comes as ceasefire talks between the two countries remain stalled, with Russian PresidentVladimir Putin appearing to believe that time is on his side. "Every war criminal must know there will be justice and that includes Russia," Zelenskyy said. The CoE hopes the tribunal could begin its work as early as next year. Berset said the next step in establishing the tribunal would be an expanded agreement to "allow the widest possible number of countries to join, to support, and to help manage the tribunal." Logistical details, including the tribunal's location, still need to be resolved. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has already issued arrest warrants for Putin and other Russian officials on war crimes charges. However, it lacks the jurisdiction to prosecute them for the crime of aggression. Kyiv has long called for a dedicated tribunal, modeled on the Nuremberg trials, that would go beyond addressing alleged war crimes. The CoE said the tribunal "fills the gap" created by the "jurisdictional limitations" of the ICC. This would be the first special tribunal established by the Strasbourg-based CoE, which promotes human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. The CoE is not part of the European Union. European foreign ministers endorsed the creation of the tribunal during a meeting in Lviv, western Ukraine, on May 9. German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, who attended the meeting, said the "war, which violates international law, must not be allowed to remain without consequences." "Those who bear responsibility for this must also be held accountable by a legitimized court," he added. On Wednesday, Zelenskyy told the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, "It will take strong political and legal courage to make sure every Russian war criminal faces justice, including Putin." Russia does not extradite its own citizens, so whether Putin will ever face trial remains uncertain.


Int'l Business Times
6 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Hegseth Downplays His Department's 'Leaked' Assessment of US Strike on Iran: 'It Was Low Confidence'
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth downplayed the Pentagon's assessment claiming that the U.S. strikes in Iran did not result in significant damage on Wednesday. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth downplayed the Pentagon's assessment of the U.S. strike on Iran over the weekend, after the report claiming that the strikes did not result in significant damage was "leaked" to CNN. Hegseth accompanied President Donald Trump to the NATO Summit Wednesday, where they were asked by reporters about the validity of the report. "The 30,000 pounds of explosives and capability of those munitions — it was devastation underneath Fordow. And the amount of munitions, six per location — any assessment that tells you it was something otherwise is speculating with other motives," Hegseth said. Details about the report created by the Defense Intelligence Agency, an agency of Hegseth's Pentagon, was revealed to CNN Tuesday. Multiple anonymous sources told the outlet that the sites struck by the U.S. on Saturday were damaged, but not "obliterated" as Trump had previously declared. As one source said, the report allegedly indicated that the strikes had only set Iran's nuclear capabilities back "months." "We know that because when you actually look at the report — by the way it was a top secret report — it was preliminary, it was low confidence. You make assessments based on what you know—," Hegseth said before Trump jumped in. "And it said it could be very devastating, very serious," the president said. "Moderate to severe, and we believe far more likely, severe and obliterated. So this is a political motive," Hegseth continued. The defense secretary announced the FBI would be assisting in a "leak investigation" to determine how the report was shared with the press. Various Trump administration officials condemned the report and its implications following its initial publication Tuesday night. 🚨FAKE NEWS CNN STRIKES AGAIN:This alleged "assessment" is flat-out wrong and was classified as "top secret" but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community. The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean… — Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) June 24, 2025 "This alleged 'assessment' is flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt wrote on X . Secretary of State Marco Rubio also pushed back against the report in an interview with Politico Wednesday morning, insisting that Iran suffered "significant, very significant, substantial damage" to multiple components of their work. Originally published on Latin Times © Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.


Int'l Business Times
7 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
MAGA Influencer Turns on Trump, Calling Him a 'Chronic Disappointment': 'I Feel Embarrassed I Told People to Vote for Him'
Candace Owens, a prominent MAGA influencer, criticized President Donald Trump in a recent interview, calling him a "chronic disappointment" over his decision to enter the Israel-Iran war. Owens, a conservative commentator who gained popularity on YouTube by championing Trump during his first term, said she was invited on "Piers Morgan Uncensored" to discuss the growing divide within the MAGA movement. Owens argued the movement was rooted in non-interventionism and claimed Trump's decision to bomb Iran directly contradicted that principle. "He's been a chronic disappointment, and I feel embarrassed that I told people to go vote for him because this wasn't going to happen, and it is happening," Owens said. Owens stated Trump bombed Iran last week at the behest of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and the president's subservience to Israel is to blame for the MAGA split. "The reason that America wants a regime change in Iran is because Bibi Netanyahu is demanding it, and that answers the question as to why there is a split in the MAGA movement," Owens stated. "What we are seeing right now is the infiltration of Israel-first people; the neocons, people who have always wanted never-ending wars and the people who have recognized that following Israel's foreign policy initiatives has led to America being on the decline." "That's where I stand," Owens continued, adding that there was "no imminent threat to the United States" before the Trump administration dropped bunker-busting bombs on three of Iran's nuclear facilities. Elsewhere, Owens championed a regime change in Israel since "Iran's regime is not negatively impacting America on a day-to-day basis." When asked how she felt about aligning with New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), Owens stood by her stance. "The MAGA movement has always been a movement that explicitly did not want to keep involving our sons and daughters in the Middle East, so we have not changed that position. If AOC was always antiwar then she should have thrown on a red hat in 2020 and 2015 and joined the MAGA movement. That would have been fantastic," Owens stated. Originally published on Latin Times