logo
Blow for Government as Lords vote against ending tax relief for private schools

Blow for Government as Lords vote against ending tax relief for private schools

Yahoo18-03-2025

The House of Lords has voted against ending tax relief for private schools in a major blow for the Government.
Peers supported by 232 votes to 141, majority 91, a Conservative amendment that cut this key provision from the Non-Domestic (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill.
It came after a string of earlier defeats for the Government on the same Bill, as peers called for changes to their new plans for business rates, including an exemption from the higher band for hospitals.
The Government wants to use this Bill to end charitable rate relief eligibility for those private schools in England that are charities.
This would mean that around 1,040 private schools, roughly 40% of all independent schools, would lose their current right to claim business rates relief.
Tabling the amendment, shadow education minister Baroness Barran said that she stands by the principle that education should not be taxed.
She said: 'Clearly the Government does not agree with us and we have seen this from the egregious introduction of VAT on independent school fees, and now with this Bill.'
The former schools minister said that charities should not be subject to 'any kind of political overreach' and that the Government is set to create a 'two-tiered system, punishing charities that don't conform to its views'.
Lady Barran also argued that ending tax relief for private schools will impact vulnerable children, such as those with special educational needs and disabilities (Send), many of whom are currently educated in the independent sector.
The Government has said that the change of status does not apply to organisations 'wholly or mainly concerned with' providing full-time education for Send pupils with education, health and care plans (EHCPs).
However, it has been argued that many children with Send do not have EHCPs and that many are educated at private schools where less than half of children have additional needs.
Conservative peer Lord Shinkwin, who himself has a genetic condition called osteogenesis imperfecta and was educated at private schools, said the Government is treating children with Send as 'expendable'.
He insisted that removing the part of the Bill set to end tax relief for private schools is the 'only way to protect all pupils with Send that attend independent schools, like those that I attended, where the proportion with Send is much less than 50%'.
Lord Shinkwin said: 'The sad fact is that, in the Government's eyes, the damage to many of these children's life chances seems to be a price worth paying.
'They are expendable, immaterial, inconsequential collateral damage caught in the crossfire of what appears to be an ideological obsession with punishing anyone they perceive as rich.
'Yet, many of these children's families are not rich and the Government knows it. But they seem not to care…
'They seem not to care, incredibly, about pupils with Send's mental health, which is undoubtedly going to be hurt by the impact of this measure.'
The Tory peer branded the measure 'deeply damaging and wholly disproportionate', insisting that schools could close as a result and that it will put more pressure on the overstretched state sector, which is 'already failing to meet demand'.
Lord Black of Brentwood, deputy chairman of the Telegraph Media Group, accused the Government of burying its head in the sand and being 'impervious to rational thought' on the topic of private schools.
He said: 'Their policies simply won't end up benefiting the state sector in any meaningful or visible way. The 6,500 teachers promised are likely to be a fantasy and will end up just being another broken promise.
'But they will end up profoundly impacting the independent sector and the lives of tens of thousands of pupils and their hard-working parents.'
He added that it will negatively impact military families, faith communities, gifted children who benefit from bursaries, and local communities through a loss of partnerships with private schools.
However, the Government said the ending of tax relief for private schools is necessary to fund improvements to state education, where 93% of children are educated.
Communities minister Lord Khan of Burnley said: 'This Government committed in its manifesto to raise school standards for every child, to break down barriers to opportunity and ensure that every child has the best start in life, no matter where they come from or their financial background.
'As part of that, the Government committed to removing the VAT and business rates charitable relief tax breaks for private schools to help to raise revenue to help deliver on its commitment to education and young people.'
He added that Labour has promised to increase core school funding by £2.3 billion, including an almost £1 billion uplift for high needs, and that 'this funding needs to be paid for'.
Lord Khan told peers that ending tax breaks for private schools – including removing their VAT exemption and ending charitable rate relief for those that are charities – will raise about £1.8 billion a year by 2029-30.
Meanwhile, the minister assured peers that the carve-out for schools that wholly or mostly cater for children with EHCPs will mean that 'most private special schools will not be affected'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No decision on winter fuel allowance until autumn, minister says
No decision on winter fuel allowance until autumn, minister says

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

No decision on winter fuel allowance until autumn, minister says

No decision will be taken on the winter fuel allowance until the Autumn budget – dispelling speculation that the government would make an announcement on it at next week's spending review. Sir Keir Starmer last month announced his intention to give more people access to winter fuel payments, just months after Labour decided to means test the previously universal payment. But weeks later, chaotic government messaging had left millions of pensioners with no idea what the changes will look like or when they will be announced. Asked about the changes, Peter Kyle, the secretary of state for science, innovation and technology, told Sky News: 'These issues are going to be dealt with in the run up to the autumn where these decisions are going to be taken and announced. 'But this is a spending review that's going to set the overall spending constraints for government for the next period, the next three years.' Pressed on whether that means no details will be unveiled on winter fuel next week, the technology secretary said: 'I think what you're going to see is the overall spending constraints and allowances for each government department, and then each department is then going to start talking about how it's going to allocate those.' Last week, Rachel Reeves confirmed the expected U-turn on the controversial cuts would be in place for this winter, meaning that the government will be faced with a scramble to get the changes rolled out between the October budget and the winter months. While the chancellor had previously confirmed that they would not set out how the changes would be paid for until the autumn, there was a growing suggestion from the government that details on who the changes would affect could be set out at next week's spending review. The chancellor is expected to unveil a swathe of spending cuts on Wednesday as she attempts to walk the tightrope between delivering on the party's election promises and sticking within the bounds of her self-imposed fiscal rules. Mr Kyle's comments come days after pensions minister Torsten Bell confirmed there was no prospect of returning to a universal winter fuel payment for all, saying that '95 per cent of people agree that it's not a good idea that we have a system paying a few hundreds of pounds to millionaires, and so we're not going to be continuing with that.' Winter fuel payments are a £300 payment to help with energy costs in the colder months. In July, the chancellor announced that pensioners not in receipt of pension credits or other means-tested benefits would no longer receive the benefit. As a result, just 1.5 million pensioners received the payment in winter 2024-25 – a massive drop from the 10.8 million pensioners who received it the year before. The cuts were deeply unpopular because they were seen as being disproportionately damaging to vulnerable people, and were criticised for leaving thousands of poorer pensions who were on the borderline missing out on the payment. In November, it was revealed that the government's own figures indicated it would force 100,000 pensioners into poverty in 2026. The policy was partly blamed for Labour's poor performance at the local elections – which saw them lose two-thirds of the council seats they had in 2021– as well as the previously Labour-held Runcorn and Helsby parliamentary seat to Reform UK. The cuts – combined with the £5bn welfare cuts and the party's decision to keep the two child benefit cap in place – have sparked growing concern over the direction of the government among Labour MPs.

Voices: Government needs the can-do mindset I experienced in the Army to push change through fast
Voices: Government needs the can-do mindset I experienced in the Army to push change through fast

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Voices: Government needs the can-do mindset I experienced in the Army to push change through fast

Government moves too slowly. That's not just the fault of the current government or the last one – it's the system. Slowed down by bureaucracy. Paralysed by 'can't-do' figures. Obsessed with process over progress. I come from a background of delivery. In the Army, working in a 'human intelligence unit' – liaising with agents and special forces – we had to move from first gear to fifth in an instant. Lives depended on it. Getting ahead of the enemy, protecting our people and achieving results was the mission – not talking it to death. Confirming the location of a high-value target, whilst also ensuring they were alone and targetable, or identifying the precise site of an improvised explosive device factory, required creativity and a determined mindset – a willingness to take calculated risks to save lives and win. When I worked in counterterrorism at the Ministry of Defence, delivery wasn't optional. We built a culture of 'can-do'; creative, risk-aware and focused on action. It wasn't about perfection. It was about progress. Government could learn a lot from the mindset of the finest military in the world and the departments that work every day to protect the public from the threat of terrorism. An unstoppable political will must go hand in hand with a mindset of delivery. I think back to our counterterror planning meetings. The mission? To stop terrorists attacking our great country. No timewasters. Just serious professionals putting ideas on the table, pulling them apart, war-gaming every outcome, then locking in a plan and going all-out to deliver. That mindset – challenge, rigour and rapid execution – is what the system of government has desperately lacked for decades. Too often, it's delay by design. Endless consultations. Five-year strategies that take ten. Pet projects blocked by internal turf wars. Take the Lower Thames Crossing: more than £1.2 billion spent before a single spade in the ground – all because of drawn-out decision-making and red tape. Or the A9 dualling project in Scotland – promised by 2025, now pushed back to 2035. Ten years of drift. These delays are not acts of God. They are failures of will. The truth is, Whitehall needs reform. There are dedicated, brilliant people across the civil service – but too many are trapped in a system built to say 'no'. Risk aversion is often rewarded, not challenged. Delivery is too often deprioritised in favour of process, and meaningful reform is blocked by a sprawling web of arms-length bodies and quangos that diffuse responsibility and stifle urgency. We need a leaner, more focused state – one that empowers departments to move at pace and is held accountable for outcomes, not paperwork. That means streamlining quangos where appropriate, ending duplication, and changing the mindset within government itself. Ministers must be prepared to challenge officials – not to attack, but to sharpen decision-making and force clarity on delivery. Wes Streeting's approach to the NHS offers a blueprint. He's made clear that, as health secretary, he expects faster delivery, more accountability, and a culture that doesn't settle for 'this is just how things are done'. Abolishing NHS England shows a steely commitment to the change he expects. But reforming structures is only half the battle – changing the culture is the real prize. Government must operate with a sense of mission, not maintenance. The British public doesn't care whether a successful policy comes from Bevan or Thatcher. They care that it works. That it's delivered. We need to strip out the ideology and face complex problems with a solutions-based mindset. Let the evidence lead. Move fast. Be willing to make mistakes in the name of making progress. And above all, get things done. Because there's serious work to do.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store