logo
Here's why the Texas House, Senate are beefing over the 'Official Steak of Texas'

Here's why the Texas House, Senate are beefing over the 'Official Steak of Texas'

Yahoo13-03-2025

Conflicts across the Texas Capitol rotunda are not rare, and legislative sessions are often marked by interchamber arguments. This session, a proposal to beef up the state's marketing of its cattle industry has sparked debate between the House and Senate over which cut of steak is worthy of officially representing Texas.
Sen. Kevin Sparks of Midland and Rep. Ken King of Canadian, whose Panhandle districts encompass wide swaths of one of the top beef-producing regions in the world, each filed competing resolutions last week to name a cut of beef the "official State Steak of Texas." But the lawmakers' bids diverge on which cut should hold the honor.
Sparks' proposal, Senate Concurrent Resolution 26, follows calls from Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick to rename the New York strip to the "Texas strip" and promote it as a Texas product. King's resolution, House Concurrent Resolution 101 is substantially similar, but would honor the tomahawk ribeye over the strip — "an objectively inferior cut of meat," he said.
Patrick, the three-term Republican who presides over the Senate, vowed to rename the New York strip, sometimes called the Kansas City strip, after meeting with Texas cattle industry organizations last month. He outlined his plan to rename the steak Feb. 28 in a post on X, arguing that "Texas Strip" designation would honor the state's rich history of beef production.
"I asked why we didn't call it a 'Texas Strip' because New York has mostly dairy cows," Patrick wrote of his renaming plan. "Just because a New York restaurant named Texas beef a New York Strip in the 19th century doesn't mean we need to keep doing that. Liberal New York shouldn't get the credit for our hard-working ranchers."
The New York strip is a typically tender cut from the short loin of a steer, and according to common lore, it got its name after gaining popularity at New York restaurants including Delmonico's, which dates back to 1837.
"The New York strip steak is named for New York City, where it was popularized in local steak houses; however, many of the strip steaks enjoyed by diners, both historically and in the present day, came from cattle that were raised on the sprawling ranches of Texas and should, therefore, be recognized as products of the Lone Star State," the Senate resolution states.
Sparks' proposed resolution, which would urge Texas restaurants to adopt the new name and would direct the Texas Department of Agriculture to market it, takes Patrick's call a step further and would ordain the newly renamed "Texas strip" as the state's official steak. King, however, said his preferred choice of the tomahawk ribeye — a steak cut from the beef rib with a long, protruding bone resembling a tomahawk — is a more fitting cut of beef to represent Texas.
"The Texas House is raising the steaks today, and we have a bone to pick with anyone who disputes that the tomahawk ribeye is the most premium cut in the Lone Star State," King said in a pun-heavy statement Tuesday. "While the Texas Senate butters up a lesser cut, we won't let them outflank our efforts to sear the tomahawk's rightful place in Texas history."
Patrick fired back on social media Wednesday, with a video from Bob's Steak and Chop House in Austin, where he showed off a menu featuring a $99 "Texas strip" with "shrimp from the Gulf of America."
"So the House thought they were going to bust our chops over the 'Texas strip.' Let me just tell you, it's already on the menu," Patrick said. "Thank you Dustin; thank you Ken King. Good try, but you can't beat the Senate when it comes to steak."
As Texas lawmakers debate the merits of various meats under the pink dome in Austin, a restauranteur in the shadow of another state Capitol more than 1,800 miles away is threatening to sue over Patrick's idea to rename the New York strip.
Todd Shapiro, owner of the War Room Tavern in Albany, N.Y., could seek $1 million from Texas over what he called Patrick's "cheap publicity stunt," according to the Albany Times Union.
Shapiro said his suit would "argue that such a rebranding infringes upon New York's cultural heritage and poses economic harm to businesses that rely on the recognition and popularity of the New York strip steak."
Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows, who supports King's proposal, weighed in Wednesday on X: "This lawsuit is ridiculous and should be put on the chopping block immediately."
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: House, Senate serve up different cuts for 'State Steak of Texas' honor

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dem Breaks With Party After Noem Security Stunt: ‘Politics as Theater'
Dem Breaks With Party After Noem Security Stunt: ‘Politics as Theater'

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dem Breaks With Party After Noem Security Stunt: ‘Politics as Theater'

A Democratic representative broke rank within his own party by describing the altercation between law enforcement and Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) on Thursday as 'theater.' Speaking to Axios, Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine) weighed in on the intense moment that occurred during a press conference with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and expressed that he felt it was out of place. 'I think that it's never good when a senator or member of Congress gets roughed up by law enforcement,' Golden told Axios Thursday in an interview at the Capitol. But, he added: 'I don't think politics as theater is what our job is here.' Padilla was forcibly removed by officers after he tried to ask Noem a question during a news conference on immigration at the Los Angeles FBI Headquarters Thursday. Democrats have since stood by Padilla; Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said the incident made him sick to his stomach, while Sen. Elizabeth Warren called it 'horrifying.' In video footage captured by reporters, Padilla can be seen introducing himself before several officers proceed to push him out of the room before detaining him, holding him to the ground, and handcuffing him. The senator was later allowed to meet with Noem however, per Axios. 'Storming into the FBI headquarters and trying to break up a press conference and rushing on a [cabinet] secretary is not really the job of an elected official,' Golden added of the moment to the outlet. Still, he noted: 'I am not in any way saying that means law enforcement should be slamming people around.' Padilla subsequently told reporters that he was at the press conference 'peacefully.' 'I was there peacefully,' the senator said, per NBC News. 'At one point, I had a question, and so I began to ask a question. I was almost immediately forcibly removed from the room, I was forced to the ground, and I was handcuffed.' In a following interview with Fox News, Noem claimed that Padilla did not identify himself before being forced out of the room despite video footage capturing him doing so. 'We were conducting a press conference to update everyone on the enforcement actions that are ongoing to bring peace to the city of Los Angeles,' Noem said, referring to the ongoing protests against immigration raids in L.A. 'And this man burst into the room, started lunging towards the podium, interrupting me and elevating his voice, and was stopped, did not identify himself, and was removed from the room,' she continued. The FBI said in a statement that Padilla was not wearing a 'Senate security pin' that would confirm his identity to federal agents. The bureau added that he was 'disruptive' at the event and was released after he was 'positively identified.' Acting ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, Democratic Rep. Stephen Lynch, further told Axios that he thinks Padilla's incident on Thursday should be investigated. 'We only saw clips of it, so I'd like to find out everything that happened and how that occurred,' Lynch told the outlet. 'He was very roughly handled, and it seemed like he was just trying to interject and attend the [press] conference. So, yeah, I think we need to take a good hard look at it.'

Crucial megabill changes could come today
Crucial megabill changes could come today

Politico

time9 minutes ago

  • Politico

Crucial megabill changes could come today

Presented by IN TODAY'S EDITION:— Senate Finance to tweak Medicaid, tax plans— What's in Senate Homeland, Judiciary's megabill texts— Possible changes ahead for rescissions Senate Finance Republicans could release their all-important megabill text as soon as today, outlining changes to Medicaid cuts and President Donald Trump's tax incentives. Senate Majority Leader John Thune met with the president at the White House on Thursday and told our Jordain Carney afterwards to expect Trump's campaign promises, like tax relief for tips and overtime work, to be intact in the bill text. 'The president wants his priorities,' Thune said in our brief Thursday evening interview. His comments come after Senate Republicans had been contemplating rolling some of Trump's tax policies back to make room for larger business tax cuts. But there are strategic reasons for Senate Finance Chair Mike Crapo to postpone release of his committee's text until next week. Generally, lawmakers don't like tax legislation to sit out in the daylight for lobbyists to pick apart. The bill text could also drive key policy disagreements. Sen. Josh Hawley said if the text doesn't ease up enough on the proposed Medicaid cuts, he would be willing to force a vote on the Senate floor that could include a rollback of limits on taxes that fund state obligations for the program. 'I'd be happy to amend the bill on the floor. Quote me on that,' Hawley told reporters on Thursday. 'I don't think that's probably what leadership wants.' There could also be major heartburn for blue-state House Republicans if the bill text waters down their $40,000 state-and-local-tax deduction cap. In a notable moment during Thursday's House vote on the rescissions package, one of the hardcore SALTers, Rep. Nick LaLota, suddenly switched his vote from 'no' to 'yes' after a huddle with House Speaker Mike Johnson on the floor. He declined to confirm whether SALT had to do with his flip, but said: 'I expect constituents will be quite pleased when they get $40,000 worth of SALT.' Other must-reads on megabill dynamics this morning: — Where GOP leaders are smoothing things over: Republican senators and the White House now view Senate hard-liners Ron Johnson, Mike Lee and Rick Scott as on track to support the megabill they've railed against for not slashing enough spending, Jordain reports this morning (Pros got it last night). Johnson softened his tone after convincing Trump in a one-on-one phone call to let him work with administration officials on his deficit-reduction plan. The Wisconsin Republican subsequently met with Vice President JD Vance and National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett. — Where GOP tensions are rising: Homeland Security Chair Rand Paul and Budget Chair Lindsey Graham released dueling proposals for Homeland's portion of the megabill late Thursday, after GOP leaders deemed the conservative numbers Paul put forward as unworkable. — What else the GOP is tweaking: Senate Judiciary's take on the megabill, also released late Thursday, includes new immigration fees and a carrot for Hawley (reauthorization of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act). But it leaves out House-passed language to limit the ability of federal courts to enforce contempt orders and a deregulatory provision known as the REINS Act. Republicans could still try to get a version of REINS past the parliamentarian. TGIF. Happy Friday the 13th! Email your Inside Congress scribes at bguggenheim@ lkashinsky@ mmccarthy@ and crazor@ Follow our live coverage at the Inside Congress blog at THE SKED The House is out. The Senate is out. Next week: The House is out of session next week. The Senate will continue working through Trump's nominations, including Gary Andres to be assistant secretary at HHS, and will take a final vote Tuesday on a landmark stablecoin regulatory framework. THE LEADERSHIP SUITE GOP leaders show support for Israel after strike on Iran Republicans were quick to post messages of support after Israel launched what it described as a 'preemptive' military strike aimed at Iran's nuclear facilities. Johnson posted an Israeli flag on X Thursday night, stating 'Israel IS right — and has a right — to defend itself!' Thune posted a warning to Iran and a commitment from the Senate to help Israel. 'The United States Senate stands ready to work with President Trump and with our allies in Israel to restore peace in the region and, first and foremost, to defend the American people from Iranian aggression, especially our troops and civilians serving overseas,' Thune said in a post on X. 'Iran should heavily consider the consequences before considering any action against Americans in the region.' See also from Rachael Bade late last night: MAGA warned Trump on Iran. Now he's in an impossible position. Padilla incident divides top Republicans Johnson suggested the Senate should censure Sen. Alex Padilla after the California Democrat interrupted Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's Los Angeles press conference Friday and was forcibly removed and handcuffed by officers. Johnson told reporters Padilla's 'behavior … rises to the level of a censure' and that 'there needs to be a message sent by the body as a whole that this is not what we're going to do.' Padilla is unlikely to face Senate reprimand — the last time a member was censured was in 1990, for fiscal improprieties. Even if he was formally rebuked, unlike in the House, Padilla wouldn't be stripped of rights and privileges. Thune didn't go as far. He said Thursday evening that he had spoken to Padilla and reached out to Noem but hadn't connected yet. 'We want to get the full scope of what happened, and do what we would do on any incident like this involving a senator, which is to try to gather all the relevant information,' Thune said. Meanwhile, top Democrats have rushed to Padilla's defense. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who spoke to Padilla Thursday afternoon and said he's 'standing strong,' said the incident 'reeks of totalitarianism' and demanded 'answers now.' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said 'every single person who was involved in manhandling Senator Padilla should be held accountable to the full extent of the law.' Dozens of House Democrats marched to Hill GOP leaders' offices Thursday afternoon in protest (though Thune and Johnson weren't there). Several are demanding Noem testify before Congress; some even called for her to resign. Thune gears up for another spending fight The Senate majority leader is already signaling that the $9.4 billion rescissions package narrowly passed by the House Thursday 'could be' changed in the Senate. 'We'll see,' he told reporters Thursday. But even senators pushing for changes acknowledge that doing so would be highly complicated. That includes Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins, who reiterated to Lisa Thursday that she's concerned with several aspects of the White House's request to rescind funding for public broadcasting and foreign assistance. Sen. Lisa Murkowski told Calen Wednesday evening that she's worried about potentially defunding local Alaska affiliates of NPR and PBS. Thune said he expects to take up the rescissions package in July. Congress has until midnight on July 18 to act on the legislation, otherwise the proposal will expire and the White House is required to spend the money as lawmakers intended. Schumer's 'DEFCON 1' approach to saving clean-energy credits Schumer is tapping a wide network of allies to help him sway Republicans away from wholesale repeals of green credits from the Biden-era climate law he helped pass. The New York Democrat told our POLITICO E&E News colleague Kelsey Brugger he's strategized with clean-energy executives and enlisted a group of people to call 16 senators who have shown 'some discomfort' with the repeals. That includes advocates; tech executives; governors with major renewables investments; Duke Energy and Southern Co. executives; Sean McGarvey, president of North America's Building Trades Unions and even 'friendly' Trump administration officials. Senate Republicans left town saying they're considering various pathways to back away from the House's harsh rollbacks by extending phaseout timelines and easing other restrictions. Sen. John Curtis, a leading defender of the credits, told our Josh Siegel Thursday that 'we're getting to a good place' and he's 'encouraged' by the state of conversations. Sen. Thom Tillis, another advocate, told Lisa Thursday that Republicans are still putting baseline text together. POLICY RUNDOWN CRUZ'S FED RESERVE PLAN HITS A SNAG — A group of Republicans is questioning a proposal from Sen. Ted Cruz that would bar the Federal Reserve from paying interest to banks, potentially dooming its chances of making it into the GOP megabill, our Jasper Goodman and Victoria Guida report. Cruz, the Senate Commerce chair, and other Republicans argue that stopping the Fed from paying interest to financial institutions that keep reserves at the central bank could deliver large savings over the next decade if passed in the party-line bill. But Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott, whose panel has jurisdiction over the Fed, rejected the idea of including it in the 'big, beautiful bill,' saying in a statement on Thursday that it 'is not a decision to be rushed.' 'Any legislative change to the Federal Reserve's framework must follow regular order,' he said, as opposed to through the reconciliation process. TICK TOCK ON TIKTOK — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testified on Thursday that the uncertain fate of TikTok in the U.S. is not a part of the ongoing trade talks with China, our Anthony Adragna reports. Bessent's comments to the Senate Finance Committee came a day after Trump touted a 'deal' with China following trade talks in London. Congress passed a bill last year requiring the ban on TikTok in the U.S. if it was not sold from Beijing-owned ByteDance. But Trump has pushed back enforcement of the ban with two 75-day extensions. The next deadline is June 19, but Trump has floated yet another extension. GOP GRILLS 'SANCTUARY' STATE GOVS — GOP lawmakers on Thursday hammered blue-state Govs. Kathy Hochul, Tim Walz and JB Pritzker over their states' so-called sanctuary policies as Republicans look to cast Democrats as soft on immigration enforcement in upcoming elections. The House Oversight hearing served as a platform for politically ambitious Republicans to test their attacks, our Shia Kapos, Emily Ngo and Elena Schneider report. Rep. Elise Stefanik, who's weighing a bid for Hochul's job after Trump yanked her nomination for U.N. ambassador, grilled the governor over undocumented immigrants accused of violent crimes in New York. 'These are horrific crimes, and they're heartbreaking,' Hochul sought to interject. But Stefanik cut her off: 'They're horrific crimes that are committed on your watch.' The Democratic governors walked a careful line, attempting to balance immigrants' rights while insisting that undocumented people with criminal records should be deported and casting immigration enforcement as a federal issue. But the hearing also highlighted tensions within the Democratic Party over immigration policy and messaging, as protests over the Trump administration's ICE raids spread from Los Angeles to other cities. Best of POLITICO Pro and E&E: CAMPAIGN STOP NEW CAMPAIGN ETHICS WORKING GROUP — The House Ethics Committee is launching a subpanel to review its guidance on campaign activities, our Hailey Fuchs reports. The new working group on the bipartisan committee was announced Thursday and will be led by GOP Rep. Nathaniel Moran and Democratic Rep. Sylvia Garcia, both of Texas. The two members will 'review and make recommendations to improve, clarify, and modernize the Committee's guidance regarding campaign activity by House Members, officers, and employees,' according to the committee. THE BEST OF THE REST Officers sue to compel Congress to install a Jan. 6 riot memorial at Capitol, from Michael Kunzelman at The Associated Press Democratic Lawmakers Are Taking Out Liability Insurance As Trump Ramps Up Legal Threats, from Oriana González and Riley Rogerson at NOTUS House passes bill that would void DC 'sanctuary' policies, from Jim Saksa at Roll Call CAPITOL HILL INFLUENCE FIRST IN INSIDE CONGRESS: NEW CODEL — A bipartisan group of House lawmakers is scheduled to leave for the first-ever privately sponsored congressional trip focused on the Abraham Accords today, Nicholas Wu writes in. Reps. Brad Schneider, Jimmy Panetta, Zach Nunn and Don Bacon are traveling to Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Israel for a trip hosted by the Atlantic Council's N7 Initiative. They'll head into a volatile political environment after Israel launched a strike against Iran last night, though we're told the trip is still on. JOB BOARD Austin Gage is now a senior associate at Innovative Federal Strategies. He previously was legislative director and counsel for Rep. Hal Rogers. HAPPY BIRTHDAY Rep. Jerry Nadler … Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton … POLITICO's Eli Stokols … Carnegie Mellon's Margaret Harding McGill … Patrick Cuff … Kirtan Mehta … Mara Liasson … Andrew Lavigne … Society for Vascular Surgery's Dylan Lopez … Michelle Korsmo … National Journal's Casey Wooten … John Del Cecato of AKPD Message and Media … Victoria Maloch … Jo Eckert … Jessica Ek of American Cleaning Institute … Sarah Lovenheim … Landy Wade of Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand's office … Trent Allen … Patrick McGill … Will King of the House Natural Resources Committee TRIVIA THURSDAY'S ANSWER: Gregory Clark correctly answered that Ron Paul was the fiscal hawk who hit a home run out of the park in the 1979 Congressional Baseball Game. TODAY'S QUESTION, from our Katherine Tully-McManus: Name the former House lawmaker whose insider trading indictment included video footage of the White House Congressional Picnic.

The Senate GOP's hard-liners are suddenly sounding softer on the megabill
The Senate GOP's hard-liners are suddenly sounding softer on the megabill

Politico

time13 minutes ago

  • Politico

The Senate GOP's hard-liners are suddenly sounding softer on the megabill

The Senate's conservative hard-liners vowed to wage holy war against the 'big, beautiful bill.' Now they appear to be coming to Jesus. The recent rhetorical downshift from some of the loudest GOP critics of the pending megabill underscores the political reality for conservatives: As much as they want to rail publicly about the legislation and the need to address any number of pressing national emergencies in it, very few are willing to buck President Donald Trump on his biggest priority. None of them are ready to cave just yet. But the White House and their GOP colleagues increasingly believe that three senators in particular — Sens. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Mike Lee of Utah and Rick Scott of Florida — are now on track to support the bill. Johnson, in particular, has softened his once-fierce criticism of the legislation in recent days. 'We all want to see President Trump succeed,' he said in a brief interview this week. 'Everybody is trying to help. That's why, if I seem to have been striking a more hopeful tone, it's because I am more hopeful.' Just a couple of weeks ago, Johnson was demanding near-unworkable levels of spending cuts and warning that the bill would drive the nation off a fiscal cliff. Then the Trump administration and members of Republican leadership went to work. Johnson made a pitch to Trump during a recent one-on-one phone call to let him work with administration officials on his deficit reduction plan. That led to a meeting with Vice President JD Vance and Kevin Hassett, the director of the National Economic Council. A person with knowledge of the meeting, granted anonymity to speak candidly, said afterward that the White House is 'optimistic that there's a path to getting Johnson to yes.' Trump also privately urged Johnson during a meeting with other Finance Committee Republicans last week to speak more positively about the bill. The callout came after Trump officials — and Trump himself — grew annoyed watching Johnson savage the bill on television. His message: You should be out there selling this bill proudly, he told Johnson, according to two White House officials granted anonymity to describe the meeting — arguing that even if he doesn't love every detail, there was plenty in the bill for Republicans to be proud of. 'When the president says, 'Ron, you've been so negative, that's just not even helpful,' I want to be helpful,' Johnson said, acknowledging Trump's message in the meeting and admitting he has 'downplayed what is good in the bill.' One of the White House officials summarized the approach to Johnson: 'Don't be negative to create leverage for yourself,' the person said. 'If you want to negotiate, like, we can negotiate in private. We're all reasonable people.' The hands-on efforts to win over Johnson are part of a larger effort to try to help the fiscal hawks find a soft landing — and at least the semblance of some concessions that will be able to hold up as wins in the end. That's played out in face-to-face meetings with administration officials, negotiations over pet provisions and discussions about how to continue the fight to cut budget deficits down the road. Being able to win over their deficit hawks would be a huge boon to Majority Leader John Thune, who has acknowledged that he's got one hard 'no' vote in Sen. Rand Paul, who firmly opposes the bill's debt-ceiling hike. Thune can only afford to lose three GOP senators, with Vance breaking a tie. That has given the fiscal hawks leverage, since the GOP leaders can't afford to lose all of them, and that's on top of the other potential headaches they have to navigate elsewhere in the conference. To hear the fiscal hawks tell it, they are sounding a more positive note about their ability to support the bill because the administration is starting to take their demands seriously. To help appease their holdouts, GOP leaders have tried to scrounge up additional savings beyond what is included in the House bill. 'I believe we'll get a deal done. I'm doing everything I can to represent my state,' Scott said in a brief interview. GOP leaders are working to assuage Lee by tucking one of his top priorities into the bill. The deregulatory proposal, known as the REINS Act, was initially expected to run afoul of Senate rules for the party-line reconciliation process, but leaders have been working to try to find a version that could pass muster. House conservatives, meanwhile, have grown increasingly worried that the Senate, with the blessing of their fiscal-hawk allies, will send back a bill that waters down some of their hard-fought victories. The House Freedom Caucus has laid out public demands, while its members have met privately with Lee, Scott and Johnson to strategize about additional spending reductions and maintaining their policy wins. The Senate hard-liners aren't ready to concede just yet. Senate Budget Chair Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has promised Johnson he will advance a second reconciliation bill, giving conservatives another chance to enact cuts. But Johnson said that wouldn't be enough to get him on board. Instead he wants a 'forcing mechanism' to maintain a longer-term push to return to 2019 spending levels. He's letting the White House brainstorm other ideas and described himself as 'reasonably flexible.' Lee said in a statement he's 'been working with my colleagues and the White House to make the Big Bill Beautiful.' But added: 'It's not where it needs to be yet.' 'We need to sell federal land to help fix the housing crisis, terminate benefits that flow to illegals, end the Green New Scam, and get rid of the Medicaid provider tax. I want to see this effort cross the finish line, but we need to do more,' he added. Even as they continue to push, their colleagues see the signs of late softening — and aren't surprised whatsoever. 'They'll fold,' said a GOP colleague who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) said that Republicans have 'made progress' with Johnson and 'I wouldn't count him out.' And two others, Sens. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) and John Kennedy (R-La.), said they expect Lee, Scott and Johnson to come around when the bill comes up for a final vote, even if they don't ultimately love every provision. 'They're very gettable,' Kennedy said. 'At some point people are just going to have to decide, is this good enough?' Rachael Bade and Meredith Lee Hill contributed reporting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store