Trump's DEI Purge Is Erasing Civil Rights History Across the South
Stay up-to-date with the politics team. Sign up for the Teen Vogue Take
At the National Memorial for Peace and Justice, there's a suspended iron tomb labeled 'Clarke County, Mississippi.' On this tomb, sandwiched between eight others, is the name Alma House. Alma, an African American girl who grew up in early 20th-century Mississippi, was just 16 years old — and nine months pregnant — when she was lynched by a white mob.
President Donald Trump wants us to forget about girls like Alma. His administration's attacks on diversity, equity, and inclusion are fundamentally about rewriting US history and covering up the scars of racism and brutality that are an inescapable part of our nation's past. Trump's actions — including banning words like 'inequality' and 'injustice' from government websites and documents; rewriting websites about the Underground Railroad; sanitizing school curricula; defunding museums; removing explicit segregation bans from federal contracts; targeting disparate-impact liability, one of the primary legal mechanisms used to enforce the 1964 Civil Rights Act — represent a wholesale attack on Black Americans, not to mention a clearly white supremacist agenda. What makes this agenda particularly dangerous, in my eyes, is that so many Americans seem to welcome it.
The harmful results of Trump's project became clear to me when my high school took its entire junior class of 60 girls to the Deep South for a five-day Civil Rights trip. We visited some of the major landmarks of the Civil Rights era, such as the Little Rock Central High School, where an angry mob confronted the school's first Black students; the Lorraine Motel, where Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated; the Edmund Pettus Bridge, where peaceful marchers advocating for voting rights walked from Selma, Alabama, to Montgomery and were assaulted by police; the 16th Street Baptist Church, where four little girls were killed in a Ku Klux Klan bombing; and the home of MLK.
All the while, the actions of the Trump administration hung over us like smog. At the museums we visited, the people we spoke to were deeply worried about revoked funds, their first-amendment rights, and the history they tell.
At one National Park Service-run Civil Rights site, I asked a park ranger — whose identity I'm keeping confidential to protect his job — if the government's recent moves had affected his work. (The federal government has laid off thousands of national park workers in recent weeks.) Though we were outside, with no one in earshot, the park ranger dropped his voice to a near whisper: 'We can't talk about that,' he said. 'I can't give you a positive or negative response. But…' He briefly scanned the area, a furtive glance from side to side, before gesturing for me to look at his face. Slowly, he nodded twice. 'Keep asking the questions you're asking,' he told me.
At the National Civil Rights Museum — built inside the Lorraine Motel, where MLK was shot and killed just 57 years ago — I asked my class's tour guide, whose name I'm also keeping confidential, a similar question. He told me that the museum — with its future imperiled by an Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) that has been newly decimated by the Trump administration — had issued a statement calling for community support of IMLS and pleading for the federal government to turn its chainsaw away from museums. 'Recently, we've changed the name of our DEI program,' he said. 'It's still there, but we can't call it that because of how much we're being targeted. It is something that we're immensely worried about, and it's very concerning what we're seeing nationally.'
But, he added, 'until they haul us away in handcuffs, we're not softening anything.'
The next day I spoke to a former Children's Crusader and survivor of the 1963 16th Street Baptist Church bombing — who also chose to remain anonymous for fear of government interference with her work — and asked if Trump's assault on DEI and Black history scares her. The Birmingham Civil Rights Institute, for example, which she has worked with to tell her story, is currently at risk of being wholly cut off from governmental funding. 'It does,' she said. 'Nobody can stop me from talking, but if it's banned…'
She paused before continuing: 'If you're watching the news, they're shipping [immigrants] out of here. It could be you; it could be me. We have to look out for each other. My hope is that, when you see these negative things happening, you'll remember the things I've said. I'll march as long as I can, and I'll tell these stories as long as I can, but I'm counting on you guys,' she shared, referring to young people.
'I've lived long enough to see us at our very worst, and I've seen us rise and do things I could have never imagined,' she said further. 'And I see us faltering again.'
Throughout this trip, I was struck deeply by the experience of standing at the sites where such great evils occurred — and by what the silencing of this history could mean for our country's future. It is a common adage that those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it, but it was only while standing outside the Montgomery Capitol, where Confederate and Civil Rights monuments stand side by side, watching an anti-Trump 'Hands Off!' protest develop, that I truly grasped the danger of this moment.
Too many of us have fallen for the pernicious fallacy that America has moved past these awful events. But our nation has yet to recover from Jim Crow. Alabama only legalized interracial marriage in 2000. In parts of the Deep South, white parents kept high school proms effectively segregated through the early 2000s by hosting private dances for their children. Mississippi did not officially ratify the Constitution's 13th amendment — which abolished slavery — until 2013.
As I returned home from the airport to the supposedly political safe haven of New York City, I couldn't stop thinking about a fact I learned on this trip: that Wall Street is named after a wall built by enslaved people. Then I couldn't stop thinking about the fact that many people may never know such history.
As MLK's son Martin Luther King III said when he spoke to my class, remembering history 'is not about collective guilt, but about collective responsibility. You have to ask yourself what kind of America you want to create.'
Originally Appeared on Teen Vogue
Want to read more Teen Vogue history coverage?
6 of the Most Famous Cults in U.S. History
This Deadly Georgia Lake Holds Secrets About U.S. History
Helen Keller's Legacy Has Been Sanitized
Why We're Still So Obsessed With the Salem Witch Trials
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs resolutions killing California's zero-emissions rules
This story was originally published on Trucking Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Trucking Dive newsletter. President Donald Trump moved to sever California's EPA waivers by signing a series of joint resolutions Thursday, rolling back the Golden State's strict truck and auto emissions policies. The president's signing of joint resolutions under the Congressional Review Act reverses the Biden administration's approval of California's Advanced Clean Trucks rule. That earlier rule called for requiring 75% of Class 8 trucks sold in the state to be zero-emissions vehicles by 2035. Another resolution also prevents the state's low-nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions rule for heavy-duty trucks from being implemented, per a statement by the president. The NOx rule intended to regulate emissions from manufacturers by cutting heavy-duty NOx emissions by 90% and overhaul engine testing procedures. The Trump administration has described his predecessor's environmental policies as overreach and unjustified mandates. Trump said the congressional moves he signed further restrict California from implementing a similar policy in the future. "Under the Congressional Review Act, the EPA cannot approve any future waivers that are 'substantially the same' as those disapproved in the joint resolutions," Trump said in a statement. "Accordingly, the joint resolutions prohibit the EPA from approving future waivers for California that would impose California's policy goals across the entire country and violate fundamental constitutional principles of federalism, ending the electric vehicle mandate for good," the statement said. In response, California Gov. Gavin Newsom declared the federal measures illegal and moved to sue the federal government, seeking to pursue the state's zero-emission vehicle policy. Newsom signed an executive order on Thursday for the state to continue regulation requiring that 100% of sales of new vehicles be zero emission by 2035 for cars, pickup trucks and drayage trucks and by 2045 for medium- and heavy-duty trucks. Trucking leaders applauded Trump for the measures. The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association said the news was a big win for both men and women behind the wheel. 'Our 150,000 small-business members have been saying it all along—electric trucks just aren't a realistic option right now. They're too expensive, the charging infrastructure isn't there,' OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in an emailed press release to Trucking Dive. Industry advocates, including the American Trucking Associations and the Washington Trucking Associations, also warned that electric truck technology and charging infrastructure were not caught up to accommodate California's ambitious EV policies. 'We've done our part to reduce carbon emissions while keeping America's economy moving,' ATA President and CEO Chris Spear said in a press release. 'But what we need is federal leadership to set realistic and achievable national emissions standards. And today brings us one step closer toward that goal,' he added. Werner Enterprises truck driver Gina Jones shared a similar sentiment, speaking as part of the signing ceremony at the White House. 'We cannot allow one state's regulations to disrupt our entire nation's supply chain,' Jones said. 'Allowing California to do so would have [negatively] impacted the hundreds of thousands of truck drivers who deliver critical goods across the country each and every day.' Recommended Reading Congress revokes Advanced Clean Trucks waiver, creating ambiguity for refuse fleets Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio

19 minutes ago
Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the government's terms
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But the iconic American steelmaker and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a ' golden share" — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected against cutbacks in steel production. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership," the two companies said. "This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. U.S. Steel rose $2.66, or 5%, to $54.85 in afterhours trading Friday. Nippon Steel's original bid to buy the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in late 2023 had been valued at $55 per share. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work, what other provisions are in the national security agreement and how specifically the $11 billion would be spent. White House spokesman Kush Desai said the order 'ensures U.S. Steel will remain in the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and be safeguarded as a critical element of America's national and economic security.' James Brower, a Morrison Foerster lawyer who represents clients in national security-related matters, said such agreements with the government typically are not disclosed to the public, particularly by the government. They can become public, but it's almost always disclosed by a party in the transaction, such as a company — like U.S. Steel — that is publicly held, Brower said. The mechanics of how a golden share would work will depend on the national security agreement, but in such agreements it isn't unusual to give the government approval rights over specific activities, Brower said. U.S. Steel made no filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday. Nippon Steel originally offered nearly $15 billion to purchase U.S. Steel in an acquisition that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. As it sought to win over American officials, Nippon Steel gradually increased the amount of money it was pledging to invest into U.S. Steel. American officials now value the transaction at $28 billion, including the purchase bid and a new electric arc furnace — a more modern steel mill that melts down scrap — that they say Nippon Steel will build in the U.S. after 2028. Nippon Steel had pledged to maintain U.S. Steel's headquarters in Pittsburgh, put U.S. Steel under a board with a majority of American citizens and keep plants operating. It also said it would protect the interests of U.S. Steel in trade matters and it wouldn't import steel slabs that would compete with U.S. Steel's blast furnaces in Pennsylvania and Indiana. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, and using his authority Biden blocked the transaction on his way out of the White House. But Trump expressed openness to working out an arrangement once he returned to the White House in January. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans,' although Nippon Steel has never backed off its stated intention of buying and controlling U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' Trump said. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Citizens of Augusta prepare ahead for ‘No King's' protest
AUGUSTA, Ga (WJBF) – Protestors will be waving their flags and signs in opposition to the Trump administration. This is just one of more than 1,000 protestors that are expected to happen on Flag Day across the country; there is also a protest planned in Aiken. People joined together before the protest to make their flags and signs. Krista Gentry, Communication Lead for Indivisible CSRA, said, 'A lot of the people in the community are really upset about what is going on, on a national level in our country and they're scared, and they want to come out and show that they're not okay with what's going on and want to see changes.' The name 'No King's' came from the 50501-organization dismissing the idea of a 'king' ruling the United States, advocating for democracy. Organizers say the protests are purposefully happening on the Army's 250th birthday, Flag Day and President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. 'We just want to draw attention away from that and to communities. We don't want this authoritarian feeling celebration happening for one person in Washington D.C. I think it's crossing a dangerous line with the use of the military,' said Gentry. 1,400 people are already signed up to attend the protest in Augusta with the potential for more to show up. 'It's actually really, really encouraging and is instilling my faith again in humanity and our country. The community here is so supportive, and I think they really care about what's going on and they want to make their voices heard,' Gentry said. Organizers say this will be a nonviolent protest and anyone who does not follow that will be asked to leave. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.