Letters to the Editor: Do environmental groups targeting Colorado River water use have their priorities straight?
To the editor: Environmental groups want to limit Colorado River water going to Imperial Valley farms, saying it's not of 'beneficial' use. What is a more beneficial use of water than growing food ('Groups call on Trump administration to curb wasteful use of Colorado River water,' May 6)? In addition, no one has done more in the way of conservation on the Colorado River than Imperial Valley farmers. Since the implementation of the Quantification Settlement Agreement in 2003, they have saved over 8 million acre-feet of water with another half million-acre feet saved every year. California is also part of a three-state plan to save an additional 1.5 million acre-feet a year to help balance the Colorado River.
The groups' particular beef is with alfalfa, a foundational crop that feeds the livestock that bring us protein-rich foods like milk, cheese, meat, yogurt, ice cream and more. In this time of global uncertainty, do we really want to limit food production?
Mike Wade, SacramentoThis writer is executive director of the California Farm Water Coalition.
..
To the editor: Kudos to 10 environmental groups for petitioning the Bureau of Reclamation to stop wasting water from the Colorado River. In summary, the petition argues that the water levels of the Colorado River are dwindling due to climate change, and this trend is expected to persist and worsen. Soon, we will be experiencing the quip often attributed to Mark Twain: 'Whiskey is for drinking and water is for fighting over.'
But what Twain couldn't have seen coming is the growing number of data centers using millions of gallons of our precious water. There are now 313 data centers in California, according to Data Center Map. For their cooling systems to run their cloud and internet services, hyperscale data centers operated by companies like Google, Amazon and Meta are using 200 million-plus gallons of water annually, per Dgtl Infra. Meanwhile, wholesale and retail data centers use about 6.5 million gallons annually.
To their credit, some of the hyperscalers are committed to be water positive, vowing to restore more water back to the community than they consume by 2030. But who's going to see if they are conscientious of restoring this commodity that's only going to be scarcer over the next five years as larger data centers for AI are being built? Will California agriculture and residents be at the short end of the water pipe?
John Boal, Burbank
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bonfire's new software lets users build their own social communities, free from platform control
Bonfire Social, a new framework for building communities on the open social web, launched on Thursday during the FediForum online conference. While Bonfire Social is a federated app, meaning it's powered by the same underlying protocol as Mastodon (ActivityPub), it's designed to be more modular and more customizable. That means communities on Bonfire have more control over how the app functions, which features and defaults are in place, and what their own roadmap and priorities will include. There's a decidedly disruptive bent to the software, which describes itself as a place where "all living beings thrive and communities flourish, free from private interest and capitalistic control." In other words, its mission is to build social software where people get to make the decisions, not big tech platform makers like Meta or Google. The organization itself runs as a nonprofit funded by donations and grants, and it doesn't take venture capital. Its code is open source, and it works in collaboration with the communities and researchers that use it to build and enhance online digital spaces. Bonfire Social, now offered as a 1.0 Release Candidate ahead of the public release, is just one representation of what Bonfire offers. Bonfire calls it a "flavor." Each flavor is a preconfigured bundle of Bonfire extensions, features, and defaults, sort of like a starting template. When a community opts to run a particular "flavor," it gets to govern the app as it sees fit, adding its own extensions and determining its own roadmap for product changes. This puts the social software back under users' control, instead of being subject to the whims of a platform maker with an ever-changing feature sets and algorithms. The organization is already developing other flavors like Bonfire Community and Open Science, and the Bonfire software lets any other community create their own version. In Bonfire Social, users will recognize familiar features, like feeds and tools to follow users, share posts, create user profiles, flag or block content, and more. However, it also offers other tools and features that traditional social networks may not have, like tools for customizing feeds, support for nested discussions, the ability to host multiple profiles per user, rich-text posts, and access control features. Custom feeds are a key differentiation between Bonfire and traditional social media apps. Though the idea of following custom feeds is something that's been popularized by newer social networks like Bluesky or social browsers like Flipboard's Surf, the tools to actually create those feeds are maintained by third parties. Bonfire instead offers its own custom feed-building tools in a simple interface that doesn't require users to understand coding. To build feeds, users can filter and sort content by type, date, engagement level, source instance, and more, including something it calls "circles." Those who lived through the Google+ era of social networks may be familiar with the concept of Circles. On Google's social network, users organized contacts into groups, called Circles, for optimized sharing. That concept lives on at Bonfire, where a circle represents a list of people. That can be a group of friends, a fan group, local users, organizers at a mutual aid group, or anything else users can come up with. These circles are private by default but can be shared with others. Another unique feature on Bonfire Social is Boundaries, which let you control who can see or engage with your content. For instance, you could share a post with a number of your circles, but only allow one specific circle's members to comment. Bonfire also supports threaded conversations (nested discussions) where replies can branch out into their own sub-threads. This can be useful for communities where deeper discussions and collaboration are more valuable than those where everyone competes for attention. Plus, Bonfire users can customize the app using one of the 16 built-in themes, or they can design their own layout and pick their own colors and fonts. Accounts on Bonfires can also host multiple profiles that have their own followers, content, and settings. This could be useful for those who simply prefer to have both public and private profiles, but also for those who need to share a given profile with others -- like a profile for a business, a publication, a collective, or a project team. Other features available at launch include PWA support for mobile devices, community blocklists, custom emoji support, full-text search (with opt out), direct messages, private group discussions (also with nested threads), and more. Extensions, which add different features, can be enabled or disabled by both admins and users. Admins simply decide what the defaults are. That means users could turn on or off features they don't like, even core features such as likes or boosts (the federated version of the retweet/repost). Because Bonfire is built on ActivityPub, it also federates with Mastodon, Peertube, Mobilizon, and others. The software is meant to be self-installed, though work to develop a hosting network is under way. For those who just want to kick the tires, a demo instance is available.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump, Musk trade barbs as spending bill dispute continues
WASHINGTON (NewsNation) — President Donald Trump hit back at criticism from former adviser Elon Musk on Thursday, saying Musk knew what was in his 'big, beautiful' spending bill and only stopped supporting it once he learned of cuts related to electric vehicle funding. While meeting with new German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump said he was 'very disappointed' with Musk after the billionaire former supporter and adviser turned on the Republican-backed spending bill. 'I've helped Elon a lot,' Trump said. Musk, whose company Tesla is the nation's largest electric vehicle manufacturer, has called the bill a 'disgusting abomination.' 'We have a deal,' Trump says, after trade talks with China's Xi Trump said he was unsure if he would continue to have a great relationship with Musk, a powerful ally who has led efforts to reduce government spending. He suggested Musk misses being in the White House and has 'Trump derangement syndrome.' Trump said Musk hasn't said anything 'bad' about him but predicts 'that'll be next.' As Trump was speaking from the Oval Office, Musk posted to his social platform, X, 'Slim Beautiful Bill for the win.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk Escalates Trump Feud, Says President Was in Epstein Files and He'd Have Lost Election Without Him: ‘Have a Nice Day, DJT!'
Tesla CEO and former special government employee Elon Musk dropped a 'really big bomb' on his relationship with Donald Trump on Thursday, alleging that the president is directly implicated in documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and is keeping those documents a secret for that reason. Musk also complained that Trump is being 'ungrateful' and would not have won the 2024 presidential election without his help. The rapidly disintegrating friendship between the two men appeared to completely fall apart Thursday morning when Trump acknowledged Musk's repeated criticisms of his Big, Beautiful Bill. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told White House reporters. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' The president also insisted that he would have easily won the state of Pennsylvania and, therefore, last year's election even without Musk's endorsement and help. In response to a video of Trump's remarks, Musk tweeted, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' In an additional tweet, the billionaire accused Trump of expressing 'such ingratitude.' Earlier Thursday, Trump suggested that Musk was opposing his spending bill because of its proposed cutting of the federal electric vehicle tax credit. 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here,' Trump said of Musk. 'He only developed [a] problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate.' In the same press conference, Trump noted that Musk has not yet said anything bad about him personally, but remarked, 'I'm sure that'll be next.' Musk has disputed Trump's claims about both his knowledge of the spending bill's details and his purported, self-interested reasons for opposing it. 'This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Musk wrote in one tweet. The billionaire spent part of Thursday morning retweeting and quote-tweeting 12 and 13-year-old tweets from Trump, in which he criticized the national debt and deficit under President Obama. Musk even created a poll on X asking users, 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' In response to a tweet from far-right personality Laura Loomer asking whether Republican officials will choose to side with Trump or Musk, the latter also replied, 'Some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years…' For his part, Trump indirectly addressed on Truth Social Musk's latest tweets. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!,' Trump posted. The president further threatened, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' The post Musk Escalates Trump Feud, Says President Was in Epstein Files and He'd Have Lost Election Without Him: 'Have a Nice Day, DJT!' appeared first on TheWrap.
