logo
Florida higher ed board stuns UF, blocks Santa Ono from becoming president

Florida higher ed board stuns UF, blocks Santa Ono from becoming president

Yahoo3 days ago

In a stunning move, the board that oversees Florida's higher education system voted against the confirmation of Dr. Santa Ono, formerly president of the University of Michigan, as the University of Florida's 14th president.
It's the first time in the history of the 17-member Florida Board of Governors (BOG), the governing body for the state's 12 public universities, that it voted down a university trustee board's leadership selection. The vote to confirm Ono failed 6-10, with member Craig Mateer absent.
The decision comes a week after UF's Board of Trustees had unanimously approved Ono as its president-elect on May 27.
It was clear from the beginning of questioning during the board hearing in Orlando that Ono would face a more difficult time than he did back in Gainesville.
Ono was grilled for roughly three hours on his past support of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs during his time leading the University of Michigan, his views on holistic versus merit-based admissions, gender-affirming care, climate change and his response to the COVID-19 pandemic — all of which have been flashpoints in the culture wars waged by Florida's ruling conservatives.
He also was asked about an encampment of pro-Palestine protesters that remained on the Michigan campus for a month, and about his position on antisemitism.
BOG Vice-Chair Alan Levine questioned Ono for nearly 40 minutes. He asked Ono about what he felt was an inadequate response while he was at Michigan to the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack in Israel.
Ono, as he has since being announced May 4 as the sole finalist for the UF presidency, defended his actions and denounced antisemitism: "What happened on Oct. 7 deeply affected the members of my community and me personally, and so at UF I would be consistently focused on making sure antisemitism does not rear its head again."
BOG member Paul Renner, a Republican and former Florida House speaker, questioned Ono at length about past statements he had made in favor of race-based admissions and on DEI, and repeatedly questioned the timeline of those statements.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who didn't publicly oppose Ono, has inveighed against DEI initiatives and worked to eliminating them from the state's public institutions.
He signed a bill in 2023 banning DEI initiatives in public colleges. More recently, he said during a news conference on May 29 that while some of Ono's past statements have made him "cringe," he planned to leave the decision of Ono's confirmation to the members of the Board of Governors, most of whom he appointed.
Aided by a binder containing various past documents and articles, Renner's questions at times seemed to leave Ono unsure of how to answer. Ono, who also had copies of the binder's contents, said multiple times he couldn't recall when he made the statements or reverted back to comments he had made previously.
When asked by Renner about his stance on race-based admissions, Ono reiterated once again that after initially supporting DEI policies he has since realized that DEI creates more "divisiveness" and fails to support all groups of people.
"I appreciate the answer, but I didn't ask about DEI," Renner shot back.
As Renner went on, board Chair Brian Lamb said it would have been appropriate for Ono to receive the materials in advance, and BOG member Charles H. Lydecker, who served on UF's presidential search committee, emphasized that "this is not a court of law."
"I've been on this board 5-6 years and we have never used this as a forum to interrogate, and to me, in this case, it feels patently unfair," said Lydecker, who joined the board in 2019. "We're interrogating somebody who hasn't had a chance to review the materials in advance. ...Candidly, this process does not feel fair to me."
BOG member Jose Oliva, also a Republican and another former House speaker, chimed in, "If this line of questioning is something that does not sit well with you, you really won't like mine," adding, "There is an absolute need to understand what this gentleman believes, why he believes it, the things he said and when he said them."
Mori Hosseini, chair of UF's Board of Trustees, seemingly sensing things weren't headed in Ono's favor, called the questions "heartbreaking" and said that all university presidents in the state of Florida have likely made dubious decisions in their past.
He said the Board of Trustees acts as the BOG's "boots on the ground" and will provide a "backstop" to ensure Ono is doing his job properly. "And yet you all decided today is the day we're going to take somebody down," Hosseini added.
Hosseini was asked about any "detractors" of Ono who had expressed interest in the UF presidency, to which he acknowledged there were some. He surprised BOG members when he said that Renner had expressed interest in the position.
Renner quickly responded, saying he was asked by a trustee to speak to Hosseini about the position, but that Hosseini said he wasn't interested. He also said he asked about the position before taking his seat on the BOG on April 15.
"If it were offered, I'm telling you on the record, I would reject it," Renner said.
Ono had been scheduled to sign a five-year contract with an initial base salary of $1.5 million. With annual performance and retention bonuses, Ono could have earned as much as $15 million over the life of the contract, making him one of the highest paid public university presidents in the country.
UF's Presidential Search Committee must now start the process over and select a new finalist who will then be vetted again by the Board of Trustees and the Board of Governors. It's unclear if other candidates from the search that produced Ono will be considered.
Leading up to Ono's June 3 confirmation hearing, his selection by UF had faced intense backlash from some Republican lawmakers after he was announced on May 4 as the sole finalist by UF's Presidential Search Committee, including from U.S. Reps. Greg Steube, R-Bradenton, Byron Donalds, R-Naples, and Jimmy Patronis, R-Panama City.
"@UF sets the benchmark for education nationwide. There's too much smoke with Santa Ono. We need a leader, not a DEI acolyte. Leave the Ann Arbor thinking in Ann Arbor," Patronis posted June 2 on X.
Former Florida governor and current U.S. Sen. Rick Scott in a June 2 press release said he had "serious concerns about Santa Ono's nomination," and Donald Trump Jr. questioned on X whether "the decision makers at @UF lost their minds!???"
Board of Governors members who approved of Ono's appointment included Carson Dale, Kimberly Dunn, Edward Haddock, Brian Lamb, Charles Lydecker and Eric Silagy.
Voting against Ono's appointment were Ashley Bell Barnett, Timothy Cerio, Manny Diaz Jr., Aubrey Edge, Patricia Frost, Carson Good, Ken Jones, Alan Levine, Jose Oliva and Paul Renner.
This article originally appeared on The Gainesville Sun: Higher ed panel sinks Santa Ono's bid to lead University of Florida

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers
Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers

USA Today

time20 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers

Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers The threat culminated a week of clashes between Trump and Musk over federal policy. Show Caption Hide Caption Six takeaways from the President Donald Trump, Elon Musk feud From disappointment to threats, here are six takeaways from the public spat between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Trump told NBC News there would be 'very serious consequences' if Musk financed challenges to Republicans who support his legislative priorities. Musk, who contributed nearly $300 million to help Republicans including Trump win the 2024 election, has harshly criticized the legislative package. President Donald Trump said his former adviser, billionaire Elon Musk, would face 'very serious consequences' if he financed candidates to challenge Republicans who support the president's legislative package for tax cuts and border security. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News on June 7. He declined to share what those would be. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that.' The rupture between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man reaches far beyond their own relationship. Musk contributed nearly $300 million to help Republicans, including Trump, win the 2024 elections. He was a special White House adviser recommending ways to dismantle federal agencies and lay off workers. Trump thanked him repeatedly for his service and presented him with a gold key in the Oval Office on May 30. But in the week after, Musk harshly called the House-passed legislative package of Trump's top priorities a "disgusting abomination" and urged lawmakers to kill it, as the Senate debates the measure. In response, Trump has already threatened to cancel Musk's government subsidies for electric carmaker Tesla and contracts for rocket company SpaceX. Trump said he thought Musk turned on him because the legislation would end subsidies for electric vehicles and because Trump discarded Musk's choice to lead NASA. Musk replied by threatening to shut down the Dragon spacecraft program that helps the U.S. transport astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station. Trump has seemingly tried to temper his public comments about Musk, wishing his companies well. But he told reporters on Air Force One on June 6 that retaliation was possible. 'He's got a lot of money. He gets a lot of subsidy, so we'll take a look at that,' Trump said. 'Only if it's fair for him and for the country, I would certainly think about it. But it has to be fair.'

Los Angeles Democrats clash with Trump administration amid ICE crackdown
Los Angeles Democrats clash with Trump administration amid ICE crackdown

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Los Angeles Democrats clash with Trump administration amid ICE crackdown

California Democrats and Trump administration officials are locked in a battle over a wave of immigration raids targeting Los Angeles this week, as protests over the detentions swelled in the Democratic stronghold amid President Donald Trump's broader immigration crackdown. Federal agents in tactical gear appeared during protests on Friday afternoon against the detention of over 40 individuals in immigration sweeps across Los Angeles earlier in the day, sparking clashes between officers and protesters that turned violent and resulted in police throwing tear gas canisters in the middle of the crowd. As the situation escalated, the president of the labor union SEIU California, David Huerta, was arrested, sustaining injuries during his detainment that required brief hospitalization, according to a statement from the union. A video of Huerta's arrest shows officers knocking the labor union president to the ground. Following Friday's clash, a group of Democratic members of Congress from the Los Angeles area said they were barred on Saturday from visiting the federal building where people in immigration detention were reportedly being held. 'The reports of what is happening inside the Roybal Federal Building is a complete violation of our laws and a stain on our values as a country,' Rep. Luz Rivas (D-Calif.) said in a statement. 'The Trump Administration blocked my colleagues and me from conducting our congressional oversight duties into the reported abuses and neglect that is taking place at this facility.' According to a statement from SEIU on Friday evening, Huerta was released from the hospital but remains in custody. U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli — a former lightning-rod Republican lawmaker — posted on X that he will be arraigned in federal court on Monday. 'What happened to me is not about me; This is about something much bigger,' Huerta said in a statement. 'Hard-working people, and members of our family and our community, are being treated like criminals. We all collectively have to object to this madness because this is not justice. This is injustice. And we all have to stand on the right side of justice.' Meanwhile, Trump administration officials sought to cast Friday's events as a violent attack on federal immigration officials, spurred by Democratic politicians who have been outspoken in their condemnation of the administration's immigration policy. Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement that the situation that unfolded was a direct result of the 'repeated vilification and demonization of ICE' by Democratic politicians, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. 'The violent targeting of law enforcement in Los Angeles by lawless rioters is despicable and Mayor Bass and Governor Newsom must call for it to end. The men and women of ICE put their lives on the line to protect and defend the lives of American citizens,' McLaughlin said, adding that the 'violent rhetoric' of 'sanctuary politicians is beyond the pale.' ICE acting Director Todd Lyons also blasted local law enforcement, claiming it took the Los Angeles Police Department over two hours to respond 'despite being called multiple times.' Other administration officials also snapped back at Newsom and Bass, casting the two Democrats as supporters of violence against federal authorities. After Newsom wrote a post to X in support of Huerta, saying that 'no one should ever be harmed for witnessing government action,' the official DHS account replied that 'shoving ICE officers is not 'witnessing government action.' It's assaulting law enforcement,' adding that 'Governor Newsom must call on this violence to end — not glorify rioters that endanger our brave law enforcement.' Bass got similar treatment from FBI Director Kash Patel on social media after she released a statement saying she was 'deeply angered' by the detentions, and that 'these tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city.' 'We will not stand for this,' she captioned the posted statement on X. Patel came back with an unequivocal response on Saturday. 'We will,' he wrote in a post replying to the mayor. As outcry poured in on Saturday from major liberal organizations — including labor union giant AFL-CIO and the Southern California chapter of the ACLU — condemning the raids and demanding Huerta's release, ICE doubled down on its position and warned that Friday's events were by no means the end of their immigration clampdown. 'These violent rioters will be held accountable if they harm federal officers, and make no mistake, ICE will continue to enforce our nation's immigration laws and arrest criminal illegal aliens. Sanctuary politicians would do well to remember that impeding our efforts only endangers their communities, law enforcement officers, and the detainees they claim to support,' the ICE statement read.

Polling on Elon Musk glaring red light for Republicans
Polling on Elon Musk glaring red light for Republicans

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Polling on Elon Musk glaring red light for Republicans

Even as Elon Musk and President Donald Trump no longer appear to be on speaking terms, the Tesla CEO's popularity among the Republican base is on the rise, according to polling. Trump and Musk's friendly relationship came to a dazzling end on Thursday as their disagreement over the Republicans' spending package went into full bloom. Musk called the bill, which significantly increases the deficit, a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump said his former friend had gone 'crazy' as Musk called for his impeachment and removal and claimed that the president is included in the 'Epstein Files.' He later deleted that post. While Musk isn't set to take over as the top figure in the Republican Party, he could create chaos surrounding the GOP's agenda and its plans for the 2026 midterms. Seventy-six percent of Republicans see Musk favorably, according to the most recent poll by The Economist and YouGov. Meanwhile, just 18 percent view him unfavorably. According to a poll conducted by The New York Times and Siena College in late April, 77 percent of Republicans view Musk favorably. Since the start of the second Trump administration, Musk's popularity has been over 70 percent in most polls, Politico noted. The billionaire is more popular than House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, or almost anyone else in the GOP. Among Republicans, both Trump and Vice President JD Vance are more popular than Musk, with 87% and 80% approval, respectively, according to the Economist/YouGov survey. Musk's polling strength with the Republican base may partly be rooted in the fact that GOP voters believed in the mission of the Department of Government Efficiency from the outset, with almost 90 percent backing the notion that the government needs to be downsized. A recent Harvard-Harris poll found that about the same percentage of Republicans believe that DOGE has been effective at scaling back spending. Meanwhile, Democrats and independents are less likely to trust DOGE's accomplishments and are much less likely to view Musk favorably. Fifteen percent of Democrats and 34 percent of independents have favorable views of the billionaire. Musk may become a dangerous rival for the Republican Party, whose values align with the DOGE mission of cutting spending and reducing the deficit. Musk's wealth and social media influence as the owner of X may pose a threat to Trump and his party. This comes as Trump told NBC News on Saturday that he has 'no intention' of speaking to Musk or attempting to repair the relationship. 'I'm too busy doing other things,' said Trump. 'I have no intention of speaking to him.' 'I would assume so, yeah,' he said when asked if his relationship with Musk was over. 'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President,' he added. He also issued a threat, saying that Musk will face 'very serious consequences' if he chooses to use his significant wealth to fund Democrats. Musk's opposition to the spending bill could lead the billionaire to fund challengers to Republicans who voted in favor of it. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store