edition 23-Jun-2025 to 29-june-2025
Lavish living, cramped spaces
Loading factor has surged
Live Events
Same budget, different loading factors
Balancing act
Housing prices have shot up sharply
How to calculate loading factor
Get clarity on the loading factor
Ask your builder, the exact carpet area you are paying for and compare it with the super built-up area. 'Request a clear breakdown of costs, what portion goes to actual usable space and what is for common amenities,' says Rathod.
Compare carpet-to-super built-up ratios across similar projects, thoroughly study floor plans, and, if needed, consult an architect or a real estate adviser. 'Comparing loading percentages across projects can highlight anomalies and offer a strong basis for negotiation, especially if the loading appears excessive,' Purohit comments.
Imagine an Olympic-size swimming pool, a swanky multistorey clubhouse, badminton and tennis courts, and landscaped gardens. A few years ago, you would have been picturing a luxury retreat nestled somewhere in the hills. But what was once a dreamy escape is now part of everyday life for many. An oasis of calm, comfort and luxury awaits Indian homeowners within plush housing complexes mushrooming amid the hustle-bustle of its big cities. However, this elevated living comes with a sharp trade-off: homebuyers are paying through the nose for open spaces, while making do with less living space.When you buy an apartment, you do not just pay for the liveable area within its four walls. A portion of the cost also goes toward shared spaces in the housing society—this is known as the ' loading factor '. It refers to the proportionate share of ancillary common areas and amenities added to the carpet area (usable inner home area) and included in the price charged to the buyer. It essentially refers to the difference between the super built-up and the carpet area of an apartment. To put it simply, the carpet area refers to the floor space where you can actually lay a carpet. The built-up area includes the carpet area plus the space taken up by the walls and ducts. The super built-up area includes the built-up area along with a proportionate share of common spaces such as the staircases, lift shafts, entrance lobbies, corridors, parking areas, and amenities. 'In India, property prices are usually calculated based on the super built-up area. While developers market homes based on this figure, the real value lies in the carpet area,' points out Akhil Rathi, Head– Financial Advisory at 1 Finance.A recent report by ANAROCK throws light on the steep premium homebuyers are paying for their lap of luxury. According to the real estate consultancy, the average loading factor in apartments across India's top seven markets has climbed sharply from 31% in 2019 to 40% in January-March 2025. This means that of the total space you are paying for, only 60% is the home interior, while 40% of the cost is for the common areas and amenities. In the past, a loading of 25-30% was the norm.MMR faces highest loading; Bengaluru sees steepest riseHomebuyers' preferences for a certain lifestyle is contributing to this trend. Nowadays, homebuyers covet expansive lounge areas with cafes, state-of-the-art gymnasiums, rooftop decks and multi-purpose utility areas. Experts point out that the loading factor is directly proportional to the amenities in a project. The cost of additional amenities provided by the developer is usually passed on to customers in the form of loading charges. Invariably, loading will be higher for larger projects, where more space is allotted to amenities and common areas.Prashant Thakur, Regional Director & Head–Research & Advisory, ANAROCK Group, observes, 'Today, higher amenity loading has become the norm across most projects partly because homebuyers are no longer satisfied with basic lifestyle amenities— they expect fitness centres, clubhouses, park-like gardens, and grand lobbies.' Additionally, regulatory and safety requirements, such as fire escapes, utility zones, and larger elevators, further increase the common areas, thereby adding to the loading, points out Rahul Purohit, Cofounder & Chief Business Officer, Square Yards.But the flip side is that homebuyers end up giving up on actual living spaces. Buyers often end up paying a premium for homes with less actual living area because the pricing is based on the super built-up area, not the space the residents actively use, Rathi explains. 'While such facilities may enhance the community living experience, they also reduce the size of individual units, resulting in tighter bedrooms or smaller living spaces,' he says. Jayesh Rathod, Co-Founder and Director of The Guardian Real Estate Advisory, asserts, 'Homebuyers are increasingly paying a significant portion of their total home cost for shared spaces rather than actual liveable space.''While high loading doesn't automatically lower resale prices, it may narrow the pool of interested buyers due to perceived space inefficiency", says Akhil Rathi, Head – Financial Advisory, 1 Finance.According to the ANAROCK report, Mumbai Metropolitan Region continues to see the highest loading among the top seven cities, with 43% in January-March 2025. Bengaluru has seen the highest percentile jump in average loading over the last seven years–from 30% in 2019 to 41% in January-March 2025. The ANAROCK report suggests this dovetails with the increasingly higher saturation of modern amenities that developers now include to cater to the higher lifestyle ask in the IT hub. Chennai, on the other hand, has the least average loading rise in January-March 2025 with 36%, aligning with a city-specific demand profile where homebuyers prefer to pay more for usable space within their homes rather than for common areas. In 2019, Chennai's average loading percentage was 30%.Knowing the loading factor helps assess value.For homebuyers, the loading factor of an apartment is critical when evaluating projects with extensive amenities and open spaces. It is indicative of the functionality of the house. It also reveals the real value behind the price tag. Loading ratio tells you how much space you get for the money you spend. If the ratio is higher, it implies that you are paying a higher price per square foot than the advertised cost. Homebuyers can effectively compare relative value proposition of different projects. For example, if two apartments—Unit A and Unit B—each have a super built-up area of 1,000 sq ft and are priced atRs.75 lakh, but their loading factors are 25% and 33% respectively, it means Unit A offers more liveable space at 800 sq ft compared to Unit B's 750 sq ft. This trade-off between amenities and functional space begs careful consideration.'This trade-off, paying more for less private space, has become a growing concern among urban homebuyers, especially in cities where affordability is already a challenge,' says Rathi. Individual preferences may differ, so buyers should evaluate offers accordingly.'Higher amenity loading has become the norm across most projects partly because homebuyers are no longer satisfied with basic lifestyle amenities," says Prashant Thakur, Regional Director & Head -Research & Advisory, Anarock.'For buyers who value access to curated amenities and community experiences, the premium associated with such projects can be well worth it, even if it means a slightly smaller functional space,' avers Purohit. Conversely, for those who prioritise maximum carpet area and functional layouts over lifestyle features, choosing a project with minimal loading and fewer amenities might be more suitable, he adds.Loading may also impact the resale value of your house. It can bolster or dilute the appeal of the tenement, depending on buyer preferences in the secondary market, experts say.Bengaluru has seen highest jump; Mumbai commands biggest premium.'On one hand, projects with premium amenities and lifestyle-driven features often appeal to a certain segment of buyers looking for comfort, convenience, and community living. However, if the functional space feels significantly compromised, it could limit the resale pool or affect price appreciation over time,' contends Purohit.'Higher loading may affect the resale value in some cases, particularly when similar properties in the vicinity or even nearby locations offer more usable space at the same price,' Thakur remarks.Buyers must verify charges to avoid overpaying for less space.If super built-up area is 1,000 sq ft and carpet area is 750 sq ft:Older or more thoughtfully designed homes with minimal loading and better space distribution often attract greater interest during resale, Rathi points out.However, if a new project is developed by a well-known builder and offers premium amenities, some buyers may still find value in the overall lifestyle offering. 'So, while high loading doesn't automatically lower resale prices, it may narrow the pool of interested buyers due to perceived space inefficiency,' Rathi adds.For homebuyers, clarity on the loading factor and actual living area is essential. Unfortunately, the practise of 'loading' in real estate is shrouded in a web of secrecy. Developers conveniently do not mention the loading factor in their glossy sales brochures. Regulations do not mandate developers to disclose this figure either. This leaves homebuyers in the dark about the value they are getting. To be sure, the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, requires developers to mention the total carpet area provided to homebuyers. But not all states enforce the law. 'In most cases, buyers across cities, except in Maharashtra, are unaware of how much they pay towards the overall usable space within their apartment,' avers Thakur.Besides, there is no law that currently limits the loading factor in residential housing. It is left to the discretion of the developers, who justify higher loading for the amenities provided. In the absence of any regulation, some developers charge loading as high as 50% or more for their projects, experts point out.The onus is on buyers to remain vigilant. Here's what you can do:

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Retired IAS officer gives reasons why middle-class life in 2025 is better than in the 1970s
The generational debate over whether life was better in the 1970s or in 2025 has taken over social media, and now, an unexpected but powerful voice has joined the conversation. Shailaja Chandra , an 80-year-old retired IAS officer , took to X (formerly Twitter) to share her experience of growing up in a middle-class family during the '70s and why, despite the noise and burnout of modern life, she believes today's generation might actually have it better. Her post came as a response to a viral LinkedIn note by Himanshu Kalra, which painted a bleak picture of the modern Indian middle-class experience. Kalra compared the linear and 'sorted' path of a middle-class man in the 1970s—college, job, house, family—to the relentless rat race of 2025, where debt, job insecurity, high inflation, and mental health issues dominate the narrative. Chandra, however, had a different perspective. Reflecting on her own lived reality, she wrote that while the 1970s may have seemed simple, they were in fact 'very limiting.' Most families lived in joint households, constantly tracked their spending, and lived without the luxuries we now take for granted. Foreign vacations were a fantasy, eating out was rare, and even local travel was limited to trains like the Rajdhani, not flights. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo — over2shailaja (@over2shailaja) In contrast, she argued, today's middle class enjoys a far more enriched lifestyle. Be it the freedom to rent or own well-located homes, the ability to pay for children's extracurricular activities, or the convenience of online shopping and net banking—modern life, she said, offers comforts the older generation could never have imagined. Two working parents, CCTV-monitored housing, and access to leisure and fitness activities have made life more secure and enjoyable for many. She also praised the hustle culture of upskilling, saying that today's professionals constantly improve their value by learning and moving between roles, something that wasn't as common or even possible back then. Chandra ended her post with a cheeky note, asking people not to argue with 'nanis and dadis' because they, too, have 'eyes, ears, and a brain.'


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Anushka Sharma once said she was 'afraid' about 'hating' her body after pregnancy: 'I click a picture and...'
Anushka Sharma is one of India's most loved actresses—not just for her hit films but also for her honesty and her approach to life, marriage, and motherhood. She married Indian cricketer Virat Kohli in a fairytale ceremony in Tuscany, Italy, in December 2017. Since then, the couple have welcomed two children: their daughter Vamika , born in January 2021, and their son Akaay, born in February 2024. The 'Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi' actress has often kept her personal life private, she once opened up about a deeply personal struggle many women face—how their bodies change after pregnancy. The fear of hating her own body After giving birth to her daughter Vamika, Anushka shared that she had worried about not being able to accept her post-pregnancy body. In a past interview with Grazia, she said, "Only a week ago, I was telling a friend how afraid I was because of this pressure that's thrust upon women to look a certain way, even before they become mothers, before they get pregnant, and definitely after they've had a baby. Despite being somebody who is fairly self-aware, I was worried. I kept thinking - am I going to hate my body?" Finding comfort in her own skin As she continued to reflect on her journey, the 'PK' actress shared that she now feels more at ease with herself and her body. She said, "I've realised that it's a state of mind, it has nothing to do with how you look." She admitted that her body isn't the same as it used to be, but that doesn't bother her the way it once might have. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025 Top Trending local enterprise accounting software [Click Here] Esseps Learn More Undo "My body's not as it used to be; it's not as toned as it was. And I'm working towards it because I like to be fit. Having said that, I am so much more comfortable in my skin today than I was before, even when I had that perfect body." Letting go of perfection One of the biggest changes Anushka noticed in herself was how she stopped constantly checking how she looked. She further added, "I don't do that anymore. I click a picture and I post it without obsessively scrutinising how I look. You have to be accepting of the body that's done something so profound and miraculous for you." As a mother, she also wants to make sure her daughter Vamika grows up in a world where girls don't feel the need to meet unrealistic standards. She said, "I'd never want my daughter to grow up with that sense of lacking that we're always made to feel as women. Ultimately, it's all about perspective. The girl who has the 'perfect' body can still not feel great while the girl who doesn't have a body that aligns with societal beauty standards can still, be immensely confident. " Anushka was last seen on screen in a short cameo in the OTT film 'Qala'. Since then, she has taken a step back from acting to focus on her growing family and enjoy motherhood. Virat Kohli & Anushka Hosts Shubman Gill, Rishabh Pant & Siraj at Their London Home Exclusive | Kajol CANDID On Horror Fears and Son Yug's Voice Debut In 'Karate Kids: Legends'


Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Aditya Birla Group eyes billion-dollar club for clothing brands
MUMBAI: Aditya Birla Group expects four of its lifestyle brands - Louis Philippe, Van Heusen, Allen Solly, and Peter England - to achieve billion-dollar status within a decade, benefiting from rising consumer interest in fashion, and higher discretionary spending, among other factors. While international lifestyle brands such as Louis Vuitton, Nike, Chanel, and Adidas have achieved multi-billion-dollar status, Indian fashion brands are yet to reach the billion-dollar milestone. Currently, Louis Philippe and Van Heusen each generate sales over Rs 2,000 crore, with Allen Solly and Peter England exceeding Rs 1,000 crore each. For comparison, the Raymond brand, owned by Gautam Singhania, generates sales exceeding Rs 3,000 crore. Aditya Birla Group ventured into fashion and lifestyle in 1999 by purchasing the four brands from European company Coats. Since then, the apparel business has seen several structural reorganisations. Initially operating as a division of Indian Rayon and Industries, the four brands were subsequently transferred to Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail. Currently, they operate under Aditya Birla Lifestyle Brands, which commenced trading on the stock exchanges on Monday. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Its shares closed at Rs 159 on the BSE, showing a decline of nearly 5%. Group chairman Kumar Mangalam Birla said, "Our ambition is clear: to build India's first portfolio of billion-dollar brands in fashion and lifestyle." The quartet of brands, which began their journey in menswear, have since diversified their product range to include womenswear, footwear, bags and fashion accessories. The Indian fashion industry is projected to expand to $170 billion by 2030, representing a 1.5-fold increase from current figures. According to the group, this expansion, driven by consumers shifting from unbranded to branded products, presents an "incredible opportunity" for the brands to grow substantially. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now