Strike action threat over University of Bradford cuts
Union members at the University of Bradford have voted to strike over a £16m budget cut which could see jobs axed and some courses closed.The University and College Union (UCU) said a ballot had a turnout of 57% of which 82% voted in favour of industrial action.The union said members would meet on Thursday to decide on what steps to take, which could include a strike or action short of strike beginning as soon as 12 June, unless management ruled out compulsory redundancies.A University of Bradford spokesperson said, like many similar institutions, it was "facing significant financial challenges" and was in the middle of a review to help "reshape" how it delivered higher education.
The UCU said the university had failed to set out where the cuts would fall, but said 230 professional service staff and more than 90 academics were already at risk.The union said a further 200 academics would be put at risk of redundancy in the coming weeks.At an all-staff meeting earlier this year, the university's chief financial officer said the aim was to reduce staffing to the level it was in 2019, the UCU claimed."This would equate to around 300 full-time equivalent jobs, but well over 300 staff once part-time roles are included," a union spokesperson said.The cuts would see chemistry and film & television courses shut down, according to the UCU.
UCU general secretary Jo Grady said: "Bradford staff have overwhelmingly backed strike action because they refuse to see important courses cut, jobs axed, and staff and students pay the price for management's financial failings."The proposed cuts would also harm businesses throughout the region that rely on the university and limit the cultural offer available to local students."She said management and the vice chancellor needed to listen to the union's concerns and rule out compulsory redundancies.The university spokesperson said: "Like many UK universities, we are facing significant financial challenges."We are currently in the middle of a review that will help reshape the way we deliver higher education."We appreciate this is a difficult time for our staff and we will continue to support them in any way we can."
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
38 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Here is the real reason River City is being axed by BBC bosses
The letter's subject was BBC Scotland cancelling River City, an act I had previously described as cultural vandalism. My correspondent had a cooler disposition and a better way with words. Summing up how the soap had been brought low in recent years, she wrote: 'Its viewing figures were adversely affected by stop/start production runs, erratic scheduling and a general lack of promotion.' Spot on. And then came this: 'I began watching River City out of loyalty to my city, but came to the view that it makes an important contribution to the culture of central Scotland.' BBC Scotland HQ at Pacific Quay Watching out of loyalty to my city. How wonderful, how generous, how Scottish is that? Of the thousands of words written and spoken about River City, all the BBC statements, the petition to save the show, the debate in the Scottish Parliament, not one sentence hits home as hard as that contribution. Watching out of loyalty to my city. There writes someone who 'gets' what River City means, and why it is not just another programme that can be binned by BBC Scotland because its face no longer fits. But what do you know, no one is listening. Not to my correspondent, not to those who have signed the petition, not to MSPs, or ministers. It seems the main arguments in favour of keeping River City - that it provides jobs and training for working-class Scots who might otherwise never get a start in TV, as well as being a pretty decent drama beloved by its audience - are not enough for BBC Scotland to change its mind. We know this because the executive who made the decision appeared before Holyrood's culture committee at the end of May and said so. Hayley Valentine, director of BBC Scotland, told MSPs that River City, with its 200,000 viewers in Scotland compared to Shetland's 700,000 'did not pass the value for money test'. But the money saved by axing River City would help to fund three new short-run dramas, she confirmed. Though these will 'absolutely cost more to make', the BBC would 'expect' them to deliver much bigger audiences than River City and 'really hope' they will. Expectations and hope. In other words, BBC Scotland is taking a punt. Making all those people redundant on a gamble. Having said that axing River City was a creative decision, it really does come down to money. As for River City being a way into TV, Ms Valentine said opportunities would still be offered across a wide range of other programmes. So that's okay then. Nothing more to see here, folks. Except it is not okay. It is very far from okay. Cancelling River City has always been about more than the end of one programme. It's about BBC Scotland fighting Scotland's corner within the corporation, and making sure the BBC represents and is reflective of all those who pay for it. Read more On the former, was London asked for more money to fund the short-run dramas? Was there ever a chance of building on the UK-wide iPlayer audience for River City by running a promotion campaign? Where are the figures showing potential job and training opportunities lost versus those created? Was there any analysis or was this simply a case of executives thinking they knew best? I understand BBC Scotland's ambition. It wants another Baby Reindeer. It wants the next Adolescence. But it doesn't have the money of a Netflix or an Apple+, which makes it all the more important to ensure that it is making decisions for the right reasons. When it comes to River City, I'm not sure it is. Just as to govern is to choose, running the BBC is all about choice. Who is out and who is in, who gets the money and who doesn't. BBC Scotland decided, ultimately, that River City was expendable. It has made the arguments about viewing figures and opportunities offered elsewhere, but I think there is another factor at work here. For my money - £174.50 licence fee - River City was vulnerable because it was a Scottish working-class soap made by working-class casts and crews. No one thought there would be the backlash there has been. It wasn't like cancelling Question Time with its well-connected panellists and audiences (now there's an idea). The class ceiling exists in the media in general - heck, in society as a whole. It's not just BBC Scotland. Indeed, BBC Scotland has done more than most to widen access and should be commended for it. Now and then, a youngster will appear who doesn't sound like your typical BBC sort. They thrive on the attention and encouragement, but then at some point they hit that class ceiling. They don't get invited into the room where it happens, so they can't shape the corporation's future, and the story of inequality rumbles on. Representation matters. As the old saying goes, if you can see it, you can be it. For many working-class Scots, River City was 'their' soap, and therefore 'their' way into TV. Doors opened that had too often been closed, and if it could happen for the guy down the road, it could happen for you. You cannot put a price on that kind of positive PR. The same goes for viewer loyalty. Fans of River City have had their patience tested to a degree that would not have happened with any other show. Yet they've kept faith with the programme. Even now, they trust executives will repay that faith and cancel the cancellation, but will they? Back to you, BBC Scotland. Alison Rowat is a senior politics and features writer on The Herald. Contact
Top Gear
39 minutes ago
- Top Gear
A mint Ferrari 458 Speciale Aperta will now cost you £1m+
A mint Ferrari 458 Speciale Aperta will now cost you £1m+ Rare mid-engined super convertible starts to reach unobtanium status. Shock horror Skip 18 photos in the image carousel and continue reading Turn on Javascript to see all the available pictures. 1 / 18 The Ferrari 458 Speciale: you see it, you hear it, you want it. The issue these days is that a near-factory-fresh 'Aperta' will set you back over a million quid, as evidenced by this 350-mile example listed at RM Sotheby's. Good lord. It does at least get the traditional 'Rosso Corsa' paint finish, and has just about every option ticked off Ferrari's list, including titanium exhausts, racing seats and heaps of Alcantara and carbon fibre trim. Advertisement - Page continues below Aside from that utterly flawless body, the reason we take a liking to the Speciale is because of its mid-mounted, naturally aspirated 'F136' 4.5-litre V8. It'll kick and scream its way to a redline of 9,000rpm, and thanks to a healthy 597bhp/398lb ft, 0-62mph is sorted in just three seconds en route to a 199mph top speed. Supplementing that sonorous engine are various other highly technical bits, such as a seven-speed DCT transmission and adaptive damping. Plus, the Speciale gets an F1-derived traction control system with a rear-biased e-diff. Add in Ferrari's now familiar and still brilliant Side Slip dynamics control unit, and there's an incredible amount of duality to the Speciale: it'll dance when you want it to and grip when you don't. Given that just 499 Apertas were ever built, it's likely this car will only appreciate with time. So you may as well grab it now while it's 'only' a million-and-a-bit pounds. Advertisement - Page continues below Top Gear Newsletter Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox. Success Your Email*
The National
an hour ago
- The National
John Swinney in final message to voters ahead of Hamilton by-election
The First Minister urged people to vote for the SNP "to stop [Nigel] Farage", as he warned of the "concerning rise" of the Reform UK leader. Both Swinney and Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar are expected to visit the constituency on Wednesday, for the final day of campaigning before the polls open. READ MORE: Nigel Farage's Scottish conspiracy theories fit Reform's agenda. Don't fall for it It comes after the Reform UK leader's visit to the constituency on Monday, where he hid from the public and the press after protesters tracked down where he was due to speak to the media. Swinney said on Wednesday: 'Tomorrow, the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse have an opportunity to chart a different course for Scotland. 'This campaign has made it crystal clear that the SNP is the only party listening to people and taking action on what matters to them; from bringing back the Winter Fuel Payment to investing record sums in our NHS." Swinney (above) said that the Labour Party "has lost its way" as he continued: "Keir Starmer's abject failure to deliver on his promises has led to the concerning rise of Nigel Farage across the UK – something that will worry many across Scotland. 'Farage does not care about Scotland, and he also poses a threat to many of the things that we hold dear: our NHS, our parliament and transformative policies like free tuition. 'This by-election is an opportunity to reject the politics of Farage and make sure Scotland's interests are front and centre, and only a vote for the SNP will do that." READ MORE: The Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse constituency, explained The SNP leader added: 'On Thursday, vote Katy Loudon – for an MSP that is on your side and to stop Nigel Farage.' Loudon, the SNP's by-election candidate, said local communities have been "let down" by Labour, while the "extreme language" of Reform UK has served only as a distraction. She said: 'The Labour-run council cut school bus provision from 8000 pupils and at UK-level they took away the Winter Fuel Payment from 36,000 South Lanarkshire pensioners. 'And now Farage has appeared, churning out extreme language in the hopes that people won't see it for what it is – a distraction. 'The people of this community deserve better. They deserve an MSP who is always on their side. 'That is what I hope to be. I will always stand up for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse and against those who are letting down Scotland.' Meanwhile, Scottish Labour, which has put forward Davy Russell as their candidate, said that Reform UK were a "convenient distraction" for the SNP as they insisted that Thursday's by-election is "a direct fight between Scottish Labour and the SNP". READ MORE: Scottish Labour by-election candidate flounders after dodging question 11 times The party's deputy leader, Jackie Baillie, said that Thursday's poll gives voters 'the chance to put this incompetent SNP Government on notice and chart a new direction for the whole of Scotland'. She stated: 'The SNP's woeful record is plain to see here – chaos in local NHS services, high streets in decline, and a generation of young people let down. 'The SNP Government has failed this community and Katy Loudon has made it clear she will toe the party line no matter what – but Davy Russell will be a tireless champion for the community he calls home.' The by-election on June 5 is being held following the death of MSP and SNP Government minister Christina McKelvie. The polls will open at 7am on Thursday and will close at 10pm.
