Saima Wazed gives call to make walking, cycling safe for all on 8th UN Global Road Safety Week
New Delhi [India], May 12 (ANI): Saima Wazed, Regional Director for WHO South-East Asia gaver a call to make walking and cycling safe for everyone. She made the remarks on the occasion of the 8th UN Global Road Safety Week.
The UN Global Road Safety Week is marked biennially, starting on the third Monday of May.
'This year, the theme urges the world to make walking and cycling safe for everyone. Walking and cycling are an integral part of the multimodal transport systems in the Global Plan for the Decade of Action for 'Road Safety 2020-2030'. They also promote healthy and sustainable cities and lifestyles', she said.
Wazed noted that globally every year, road traffic crashes take a devastating toll on communities--claiming the lives of nearly 1.2 million people and leaving up to 50 million more with non-fatal injuries.
'These tragedies are not mere statistics. They are the loss of children, parents, and loved ones--and are largely preventable', she said.
She highlighted that road traffic injuries are now the leading cause of death among young people aged 5 to 29 years, and they continue to be a pressing public health concern in the WHO South-East Asia Region.
In 2021 alone, the region accounted for more than 330,000 deaths from road crashes, representing 28 per cent of the global total.
Vulnerable road users--including pedestrians, cyclists, and operators of two- and three-wheelers--are up to 66 per cent of these fatalities.
Noting that this year's theme is a timely call to action, Wazed said that 'Pedestrians and cyclists already account for more than one in four road traffic deaths. Ensuring their safety is not only a matter of saving lives. Prioritizing walking and cycling supports physical activity, which is a key modifiable risk factor for non-communicable diseases such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and cancers. Walking and cycling also support mental well-being, helping to reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety.'
Emphasising that road safety is an important element of WHO guidance for healthy cities, Wazed noted that 'In our region, the WHO partnership for healthy cities has been working extensively with megacities such as Mumbai and Bangkok to address road safety and promote safe transportation. This included improved designs of pedestrian walkways, through the assessment of hundreds of kilometres of roads and sidewalks, and through universal inclusive designs for accessible walkways.
'Creating safe, inclusive, and accessible roads for all in the densely populated cities of South-East Asia is challenging. However, doing so will support the population, especially the most vulnerable, through improved community well-being and environmental sustainability. When we integrate road safety with the promotion of physical activity, we address interconnected challenges: injuries, non-communicable diseases, mental health, and even climate change. I urge all Member States, civil society, the private sector, and communities to push for people-centred mobility policies, safer road design, safe vehicles, and lower speed limits', Wazed said.
In her concluding remarks she gave a call for people to come together to ensure a safe walking and cycling experience in their communities. Wazed said, 'Together, let us ensure that every person--especially our children and youth--can walk and cycle safely in our communities and on roads. By doing so, we not only improve road safety but also advance climate action, health promotion, and the Sustainable Development Goals.' (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
WHO Is Finalising A New Treaty To Prep For The Next Pandemic, But US Isn't Signing
On March 20, 2025, members of the World Health Organization adopted the world's first pandemic agreement, following three years of 'intensive negotiations launched by governments in response to the devastating impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.' The U.S., however, did not participate, in part because of its intention to withdraw from the WHO. Global health experts are hailing the agreement as a historic moment. What does the agreement mean for the world, and how can it make everyone safer and more prepared for the next pandemic? The Conversation asked Nicole Hassoun, a professor at Binghamton University and executive director of Global Health Impact, to explain the pandemic accord, its prospects for advancing global health, and the significance of the U.S.'s absence from it. What will the pandemic agreement do? The accord will bolster pandemic preparation within individual countries and around the world. Countries signing onto the agreement are committing to improve their disease surveillance and grow their heath care workforces, strengthen their regulatory systems and invest in research and development. It encourages countries to strengthen their health regulations and infrastructure, improve communication with the public about pandemics and increase funding for preparation and response efforts. It also includes new mechanisms for producing and distributing vaccines and other essential countermeasures. Finally, it encourages countries to coordinate their responses and share information about infectious diseases and intellectual property so that vaccines and other essential countermeasures can be made available more quickly. The agreement will take effect once enough countries ratify it, which may take several years. Why isn't the US involved? The Biden administration was broadly supportive of a pandemic agreement and was an active participant in negotiations. Prior to Donald Trump's reelection, however, Republican governors had signed a letter opposing the treaty, echoing a conservative think tank's concerns about U.S. sovereignty. The U.S. withdrew from negotiations when President Trump signed an executive order to withdraw from the WHO on the day he was inaugurated for his second term. Why could the lack of US involvement be beneficial for the world? The lack of U.S. involvement likely resulted in a much more equitable treaty, and it is not clear that countries could have reached an agreement had the U.S. continued to object to key provisions. It was only once the U.S. withdrew from the negotiations that an agreement was reached. The U.S. and several other wealthy countries were concerned with protecting their pharmaceutical industry's profits and resisted efforts aimed at convincing pharmaceutical companies to share the knowledge, data and intellectual property needed for producing new vaccines and other essential countermeasures. Other negotiators sought greater access to vaccines and other treatments during a pandemic for poorer countries, which often rely on patented technologies from global pharmaceutical companies. While most people in wealthy countries had access to COVID-19 vaccines as early as 2021, many people in developing countries had to wait years for vaccines. How could the agreement broaden access for treatments? One of the contentious issues in the pandemic agreement has to do with how many vaccines manufacturers in each country must share in exchange for access to genetic sequences to emerging infectious diseases. Countries are still negotiating a system for sharing the genetic information on pathogens in return for access to vaccines themselves. It is important that researchers can get these sequences to make vaccines. And, of course, people need access to the vaccines once they are developed. Still, there are many more promising aspects of the agreement for which no further negotiations are necessary. For instance, the agreement will increase global vaccine supply by increasing manufacturing around the world. The agreement also specifies that countries and the WHO should work together to create a mechanism for fairly sharing the intellectual property, data and knowledge needed to produce vaccines and other essential health products. If financing for new innovation requires equitable access to the new technologies that are developed, many people in poor countries may get access to vaccines much more quickly in the next pandemic. The agreement also encourages individual countries to offer sufficient incentives for pharmaceutical companies to extend access to developing countries. If countries implement these changes, that will benefit people in rich countries as well as poor ones. A more equitable distribution of vaccines can contain the spread of disease, saving millions of lives. What more should be done, and does the US have a role to play? In my view, the best way to protect public health moving forward is for countries to sign on to the agreement and devote more resources to global health initiatives. This is particularly important given declining investment and participation in the WHO and the contraction of other international health initiatives, such as USAID. Without international coordination, it will become harder to catch and address problems early enough to prevent epidemics from becoming pandemics. It will also be imperative for member countries to provide funding to support the agreement's goals and secure the innovation and access to new technologies. This requires building the basic health infrastructure to ensure shots can get into people's arms.
India Gazette
5 hours ago
- India Gazette
"Taking full care of patients," Bengaluru's Bowring and Lady Curzon hospital administers to 11 injured in stadium stampede
Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India], June 5 (ANI): In the wake of the stampede at M Chinnaswamy Stadium that claimed 11 lives and injured 33 others, Medical authorities at Bowring and Lady Curzon Hospital reported receiving six bodies and 18 injured on the day of the incident. Speaking to the media, Medical superintendent Dr T. Kemparaju said, 'After the stampede, we received 18 injured persons and six bodies. Out of the 18 injured persons, eight received treatment and went home, and the remaining 10 patients were admitted to the hospital for observation. Among the 10 persons admitted to the hospital, three sustained fractures in the legs. We have received instructions to take full care of the patients.' Meanwhile, Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has ordered a magisterial inquiry into the incident. The tragedy unfolded when thousands of fans overwhelmed the stadium area during Royal Challengers Bangalore's IPL victory celebration. Karnataka Home Minister Dr G Parameshwara confirmed that the state government had no role in organising the event. 'We did not request RCB or the KCA, they organised it (the victory celebration). They are the ones who brought the team to Bengaluru. The government also felt it should facilitate this, as it was the Bengaluru team. I feel very sorry that this incident happened,' Parameshwara said after inspecting the site. CM Siddaramaiah, addressing the media, said, '11 died and 33 were injured in the stampede. This tragedy should not have happened. The government expresses deep sorrow over this incident.' He announced a compensation of Rs 10 lakh for the families of the deceased and assured that all the injured will receive free medical treatment. 'I have ordered a magisterial inquiry and given 15 days. People even broke the gates of the stadium. There was a stampede. No one expected such a huge crowd. The stadium has a capacity of only 35,000 people, but 2-3 lakh people came,' the Chief Minister said, underlining the scale of the crowd and security strain. The Home Minister will convene a meeting with Bengaluru Police Commissioner, senior police officials, DCPs, and Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) representatives at the stadium on Thursday to review crowd management lapses. (ANI)
Hans India
6 hours ago
- Hans India
AB-PMJAY, Jan Aushadhi Kendras boosting healthcare for middle class in last 11 years
New Delhi: Flagship scheme like the Ayushman Bharat-Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY) and the Jan Aushadhi Kendras under the Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Janaushadhi Pariyojana (PMBJP) has significantly enhanced healthcare for middle class in the last 11 years, according to an official statement issued on Thursday. 'Healthcare in India has seen a quiet but far-reaching shift in the last eleven years. Through a blend of targeted public schemes and digital reach, the Government has made quality healthcare both affordable and accessible for millions, especially the middle class,' the statement said. With more than 41.02 crore Ayushman Cards created in 33 States and Union Territories, as of May 30, AB-PMJAY has emerged as one of the world's largest publicly funded health assurance schemes. The scheme has enabled 8.59 crore hospital admissions worth Rs 1,19,858 crore, ensuring access to secondary and tertiary care without pushing families into debt, the statement said. Further, with the number of Jan Aushadhi Kendras rising to 16,469, as of May 30, from just 80 in 2014, the PMBJP brought essential medicines within reach of the common citizen. These outlets offer medicines that cost 50 to 80 per cent less than branded options, with strict quality standards ensured through WHO-GMP certified suppliers. The scheme serves around 10 to 12 lakh people daily, and cumulative savings over the last eleven years are estimated to be more than Rs 38,000 crore, the statement said. The product range now includes 2,110 medicines, including for chronic conditions like diabetes or heart disease, and 315 surgical products, covering all major treatments, cutting down financial stress for millions of families, especially the middle class. 'From free hospitalisation for senior citizens to low-cost medicines available nationwide, people today have better control over their health expenses. The digital backbone supporting these schemes has made enrolment, access, and tracking easier than ever. This change has allowed the middle class to benefit from savings on medicines, timely treatment, and greater medical security without bureaucratic hassles,' the statement said. 'Over the past eleven years, the government has shown unwavering commitment to uplifting the middle class in meaningful ways. The policies and reforms introduced have not only eased everyday challenges but also strengthened financial security, housing, healthcare, and skill development,' it added.
