logo
Tina Brown interview: Harry should come back and be a prince

Tina Brown interview: Harry should come back and be a prince

Yahoo24-04-2025

The last time Tina Brown spoke to The Telegraph, in April 2022, the interview was left on a cliffhanger: what would happen when the Queen died?
Brown, the waspish former editor of Vanity Fair, The New Yorker and The Daily Beast, had just published The Palace Papers, her rollicking book about the recent travails of the Royal family.
Based on interviews with more than 120 sources in and around the palace, the book portrayed a family at their most precarious moment since the death of Diana, rocked by Prince Andrew's involvement in the Jeffrey Epstein case – and subsequent kamikaze interview with Emily Maitlis – and the death of the Duke of Edinburgh.
'I do think the country is going to have the most enormous national nervous breakdown when the Queen dies,' Brown told interviewer Allison Pearson. 'Losing the Queen will be a shattering blow, but I am actually more of a Charles optimist than many.'
Within months, Brown was able to put her theories to the test. When Queen Elizabeth II died at Balmoral on 8 September, the nation did indeed go into convulsions, but it was perhaps short of the full emotional breakdown she had predicted.
'The Queen managed her own death with such aplomb; every CEO should figure out how to go like she went,' Brown says, reflecting on events three years later. 'She planned her entire exit so there would be minimum bad drama. I wouldn't be at all surprised if she didn't think: 'I'll see in Liz Truss, I'll kiss off Boris Johnson and I'll stop taking my meds.' Because it was just so perfect. Everything about that managed death reassured the public: the procession of that coffin, the way it was flown back, the sight of Princess Anne with it.
'Charles impeccably took over. God knows the man had been in training for 50 years. He was flawless, except for a tiny slip over his fountain pen, you couldn't fault it. Because of that, the country changed eras. It was a beautiful transition. He had a lot of luck, because the whole debacle of Boris Johnson and Truss left him as the great statesman of England. Suddenly Charles was the most senior, measured statesman in Europe. He has become seen as that. Everybody wanted to say the House of Windsor was going to blow up, but compared to a great many things, the House of Windsor is on a pretty steady footing.'
We meet in Brown's adopted hometown of New York, in the offices of Hellman & Friedman, a gigantic American private equity fund. It is a highly Brownian setting, in a boardroom on the 30th floor of a large tower with views down Fifth Avenue. Even the sunshine beaming in through the floor-length windows has an expensive, rarefied quality. In a royal blue coat, blonde hair closer cut than during its cockatiel pomp, at 71 Brown has a smattering of Princess Diana – another of her recurring subjects – about her.
She is here to give a talk to inspirational female business leaders. She has done a lot of inspirational talking over the years, informally and through her Women in the World platform, which she founded in 2010 to 'discover and amplify the unheard voices of global women on the front lines of change'. Brown's connections and gusto brought together a dizzying array of leaders: Hillary Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, Oprah Winfrey, Angelina Jolie, Barbra Streisand.
Covid put paid to Women in the World, but since 2023 Brown has organised another annual conference, Truth Tellers, in memory of her late husband Sir Harry Evans. The third edition takes place on Wednesday, 7 May. Speakers including Alastair Campbell, Mishal Husain and the CNN boss Mark Thompson will gather in central London to thrash out the future of journalism.
Evans, who died in 2020 aged 92, was a giant of British newspapers, the editor of The Sunday Times from 1967 to 1981, who led the investigation into thalidomide babies, among other groundbreaking stories. They met in 1973, when Brown was 20 and Evans was 25 years her senior. They married in 1981 and were together until Evans died.
'I miss him every day,' Brown says. 'We were both such news junkies. And he was a walking compendium of points of view, and so passionate. He was the archetypal resister. He despised cowardice. He was very benign as a person and convivial, so people would not realise that he was also tough when it came to moral stands. He was the most tenacious person I've ever met. He could not be deterred. I don't think he did a shabby thing in his life, actually. How many people can we say that of?'
These are high times for news junkies. We meet days after it has been revealed that the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg, had been erroneously added to a group chat with members of the US cabinet, including JD Vance and the defence secretary Pete Hegseth, to discuss the bombing of Houthi rebels. It is only the latest story in Donald Trump's shock-and-awe approach to his second term as president. Fellow Republicans have been typically slow to attack the president for what is an obvious security breach.
'They're all so tepid and timid,' she says. 'Why are they all so frightened [of Trump]? I think with all these Republican congressmen and senators, is their job really so great that they will just eat worms all the time? There has to be something you would quit for.'
If the UK-based Royal family members have enjoyed a surprisingly solid few years, the Duke of Sussex's trajectory since Queen Elizabeth's death has been less fortuitous. Where the King and Queen and the Prince and Princess of Wales have looked dignified, managing illness and responsibility with grace, Harry has cut a lonely figure in California, reduced to the Invictus Games and bit-part appearances in his wife Meghan's curious TV programmes.
'There is still a Harry-shaped hole [in the Royal family], but I don't think that hole's going to close,' Brown says. 'It's a pity, because that's all they lack, that bit of sizzle coming out. The side-sizzle Margaret provided for the Queen is actually very good for a Royal family because it takes the pressure off William and Catherine to have to be perfect, which is very boring for them. What's unfortunate is that Harry is the most talented in the family at human relations, like his mother.'
She believes that in his role as roving celebrity, Harry has ironically rediscovered that he likes being a prince.
'He really knows how to play the role of the prince,' she says. 'I think he really likes it. That's what's so ironic. For a bit he thought he didn't because the Palace is boring and oppressive and so on. Now he's had a few years doing it without them, I think he really misses being a prince because he was good at it. He and Meghan talk about 'doing good' but what good are they doing? The good you can do as a royal is so much more potent. When Diana shook the hands of the Aids patient without gloves, when royals always wore gloves before, how much more potent was it that she was a princess than if she'd simply been a celebrity?'
The difference was obvious after the wildfires that devastated Los Angeles in January, when Harry and Meghan paid a visit to meet victims. 'You become a disaster tourist,' Brown says. 'I think Harry feels it keenly. But he's obviously loyal to his wife.' Three years ago, Brown wondered if the death of Queen Elizabeth might bring Harry back into the fold, but instead the rift has only grown deeper, exacerbated by Harry's tell-all memoir, Spare.
'Unfortunately, his appetite – their appetite – for money made him make disastrous decisions,' she says. 'The disastrous decision of the book was very hard to return from. I think the Oprah [Winfrey] interview was the most gratuitously stupid move. There wasn't any money in it. The relationship between the brothers sounds like it's very hard to repair. I think Harry would make it up, but I don't think William can.'
What did she make of Meghan's feather-light lifestyle programme, With Love, Meghan? 'She's back in 2013, doing the Tig,' Brown says, referring to Markle's earlier feather-light lifestyle website. 'I think Suits and the Tig was the last time she felt successful. It's all been hellish ever since. Every week she announces a new project. Stop announcing projects! She's almost compulsive about announcing things and they don't really happen. They fade and she looks ridiculous. I feel sorry for her, because she's so lost. I think Harry's a talent that's worth more than that. I hope he gets a life back.'
She says Queen Elizabeth's 'in or out' rule might not have helped. 'In today's world, there probably was a way they could have been in Montecito six months of the year and the rest of the year he could do his gigs. He should do foreign tours. He ought to be able to be sent as an emissary of youthful England for the next 10 years.'
Although you could happily talk to Brown about the ins and outs of the Royal family for days, possibly years, she says she has found herself less interested in it since The Palace Papers came out. They have been too competently run. Besides, there is other news to feast on. Already a journalistic prodigy when she was at Oxford, Brown started on The Sunday Times and The Telegraph before becoming editor of Tatler when she was just 25, and Vanity Fair in New York when she was 29.
'I was always very excited by America,' she says. 'Harry was even more so. I would have gone back to London after Vanity Fair but Harry wouldn't. He loved America because he was a train driver's son, he hated the English class stuff. When he came to America he felt the sky was the limit. I love America too. But I see Europe with much more nostalgia now. I don't know how happy I would be moving back to London to live, but I think about it more. I'm happy I have two passports. You get tired of the ugly American-ness. It has become so much nastier. There's so much rancour and thuggery. It's not attractive.'
She stayed at Vanity Fair for eight years before being poached to make the venerable New Yorker something akin to a modern magazine. The magazine recently celebrated its 100th anniversary; the occasion for an entertaining post on Brown's Substack newsletter, Fresh Hell.
'I enjoyed writing that,' she says. 'You only know you're in a golden era when you're out of it. I realised how lucky I had been to have this fabulous pool of talent to work with. It was such a lucky moment.'
She has always kept pace with the new media. In 2008 she founded The Daily Beast, which gave her rigour and eye for a story a social-media-friendly online spin. It merged with Newsweek in 2010; she stepped down three years later. The Daily Beast continues in diminished form. Now her attention is on her Substack, where readers pay a small monthly fee for regular emails from her. 'I like to be an early adopter,' she says. 'Not that I'm especially early with Substack. But I like being in this community. It took a year for me to agree to it.' She's making money from it. 'I'm doing rather well, which is rather addictive. There are times I miss the structure [of a newspaper or magazine] but on the other hand if we keep growing we can bring in a few other people as well. I'm taking it very experimentally.'
It doesn't sound like she has plans to retire, or even slow down. 'I can't help myself,' she says. 'I'm such a news junkie. It's a terrible addiction. I see these stories all the time and I think 'I can't stop'. There are so many great writers around who don't have a home. So anything that helps to give them a home and an audience is gratifying.'
The New York minute is up. The female CEOs are waiting for Brown to come and have a drink with them. As chance would have it, she is heading back to London after we speak, a flying visit for the historian Simon Schama's 80th birthday party. By the time she gets back Trump will have sent the markets spinning yet again by announcing sweeping global trade tariffs. Brown will be there, watching, writing, documenting, at the same pace she has kept up for half a century.
'It's a strange thing,' she says, articulating the journalist's paradox of living in such chaotic times. 'We'll all be writing about it for decades. It's great copy, if you can keep up.'
Truth Tellers: Sir Harry Evans Investigative Journalism Summit is in London on 7 May; sirharrysummit.org
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump might be the most accessible president ever — for spies or scammers
Trump might be the most accessible president ever — for spies or scammers

Axios

time32 minutes ago

  • Axios

Trump might be the most accessible president ever — for spies or scammers

President Trump reportedly picks up when his cell rings even if he doesn't know who's calling. Senior members of his team also love chatting on their personal devices. That makes the administration uniquely vulnerable to basic scams like spoofed calls and impersonation attempts. Why it matters: If Trump is willing to answer unknown numbers, as The Atlantic reported this week, there's no guarantee a scammer, impersonator, or even a foreign intelligence operative couldn't have a chat with the president. There's no evidence that has actually happened. But recent reports involving Trump and other top officials have raised red flags about the security of their communications. Driving the news: Federal authorities are investigating a scheme where someone spoofed the phone number of White House chief of staff Susie Wiles to impersonate her in calls to senators, governors, and CEOs, per the Wall Street Journal. Meanwhile, Chinese hackers reportedly penetrated U.S. telecom networks as early as summer 2023, according to Bloomberg — a year earlier than previously known. That access has been used by China-backed group Salt Typhoon to spy on Trump, Vice President Vance, and other officials, the NYT reported. Then there are the series of Signal-related scandals involving former national security adviser Mike Waltz, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and others. Between the lines: Eavesdropping on world leaders isn't new — but it's a lot easier if the leader in question is using a personal phone and eschewing standard cybersecurity practices. Flashback: In 2017, Trump had two phones — one issued through the White House and only capable of making phone calls, and a less secure phone equipped just for social media. At the time, he was urged to swap out his Twitter phone at least once a month. Politico reported he'd instead go months without security checks. It's unclear how many of those security protocols were brought back in this time around. "I think people gave up on that years ago," one adviser told The Atlantic. In a written statement, White House communications director Steven Cheung said the administration would "not discuss or disclose security measures regarding the President." "President Trump is the most transparent and accessible President in American history," Cheung said. "World leaders, heads of state, elected officials, and business titans all reach out to him because they know America is back under President Trump's leadership. "Whereas, Joe Biden was hidden and sheltered by his handlers because he was a total embarrassment and bumbling idiot during his time in office," Cheung added. The big picture: Since returning to office, the Trump administration has: Ignored basic security norms, including heavy reliance on Signal and personal numbers. Gutted existing federal cybersecurity leadership, with one-third of CISA's staff already gone. Empowered security-weakening tech initiatives through Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has been pursuing projects like using a buggy AI tool to crawl sensitive government data. Threat level: AI tools can clone a voice using just a few seconds of audio, and the FBI warned last month that scammers are already using them to impersonate senior officials.

Chinese hackers and user lapses turn smartphones into a 'mobile security crisis'
Chinese hackers and user lapses turn smartphones into a 'mobile security crisis'

San Francisco Chronicle​

time33 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Chinese hackers and user lapses turn smartphones into a 'mobile security crisis'

WASHINGTON (AP) — Cybersecurity investigators noticed a highly unusual software crash — it was affecting a small number of smartphones belonging to people who worked in government, politics, tech and journalism. The crashes, which began late last year and carried into 2025, were the tipoff to a sophisticated cyberattack that may have allowed hackers to infiltrate a phone without a single click from the user. The attackers left no clues about their identities, but investigators at the cybersecurity firm iVerify noticed that the victims all had something in common: They worked in fields of interest to China's government and had been targeted by Chinese hackers in the past. Foreign hackers have increasingly identified smartphones, other mobile devices and the apps they use as a weak link in U.S. cyberdefenses. Groups linked to China's military and intelligence service have targeted the smartphones of prominent Americans and burrowed deep into telecommunication networks, according to national security and tech experts. It shows how vulnerable mobile devices and apps are and the risk that security failures could expose sensitive information or leave American interests open to cyberattack, those experts say. 'The world is in a mobile security crisis right now,' said Rocky Cole, a former cybersecurity expert at the National Security Agency and Google and now chief operations officer at iVerify. 'No one is watching the phones.' U.S. authorities warned in December of a sprawling Chinese hacking campaign designed to gain access to the texts and phone conversations of an unknown number of Americans. 'They were able to listen in on phone calls in real time and able to read text messages,' said Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois. He is a member of the House Intelligence Committee and the senior Democrat on the Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, created to study the geopolitical threat from China. Chinese hackers also sought access to phones used by Donald Trump and running mate JD Vance during the 2024 campaign. The Chinese government has denied allegations of cyberespionage, and accused the U.S. of mounting its own cyberoperations. It says America cites national security as an excuse to issue sanctions against Chinese organizations and keep Chinese technology companies from the global market. 'The U.S. has long been using all kinds of despicable methods to steal other countries' secrets,' Lin Jian, a spokesman for China's foreign ministry, said at a recent press conference in response to questions about a CIA push to recruit Chinese informants. U.S. intelligence officials have said China poses a significant, persistent threat to U.S. economic and political interests, and it has harnessed the tools of digital conflict: online propaganda and disinformation, artificial intelligence and cyber surveillance and espionage designed to deliver a significant advantage in any military conflict. Mobile networks are a top concern. The U.S. and many of its closest allies have banned Chinese telecom companies from their networks. Other countries, including Germany, are phasing out Chinese involvement because of security concerns. But Chinese tech firms remain a big part of the systems in many nations, giving state-controlled companies a global footprint they could exploit for cyberattacks, experts say. Chinese telecom firms still maintain some routing and cloud storage systems in the U.S. — a growing concern to lawmakers. 'The American people deserve to know if Beijing is quietly using state-owned firms to infiltrate our critical infrastructure,' U.S. Rep. John Moolenaar, R-Mich. and chairman of the China committee, which in April issued subpoenas to Chinese telecom companies seeking information about their U.S. operations. Mobile devices have become an intel treasure trove Mobile devices can buy stocks, launch drones and run power plants. Their proliferation has often outpaced their security. The phones of top government officials are especially valuable, containing sensitive government information, passwords and an insider's glimpse into policy discussions and decision-making. The White House said last week that someone impersonating Susie Wiles, Trump's chief of staff, reached out to governors, senators and business leaders with texts and phone calls. It's unclear how the person obtained Wiles' connections, but they apparently gained access to the contacts in her personal cellphone, The Wall Street Journal reported. The messages and calls were not coming from Wiles' number, the newspaper reported. While most smartphones and tablets come with robust security, apps and connected devices often lack these protections or the regular software updates needed to stay ahead of new threats. That makes every fitness tracker, baby monitor or smart appliance another potential foothold for hackers looking to penetrate networks, retrieve information or infect systems with malware. Federal officials launched a program this year creating a 'cyber trust mark' for connected devices that meet federal security standards. But consumers and officials shouldn't lower their guard, said Snehal Antani, former chief technology officer for the Pentagon's Joint Special Operations Command. 'They're finding backdoors in Barbie dolls,' said Antani, now CEO of a cybersecurity firm, referring to concerns from researchers who successfully hacked the microphone of a digitally connected version of the toy. Risks emerge when smartphone users don't take precautions It doesn't matter how secure a mobile device is if the user doesn't follow basic security precautions, especially if their device contains classified or sensitive information, experts say. Mike Waltz, who departed as Trump's national security adviser, inadvertently added The Atlantic's editor-in-chief to a Signal chat used to discuss military plans with other top officials. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth had an internet connection that bypassed the Pentagon's security protocols set up in his office so he could use the Signal messaging app on a personal computer, the AP has reported. Hegseth has rejected assertions that he shared classified information on Signal, a popular encrypted messaging app not approved for the use of communicating classified information. China and other nations will try to take advantage of such lapses, and national security officials must take steps to prevent them from recurring, said Michael Williams, a national security expert at Syracuse University. 'They all have access to a variety of secure communications platforms,' Williams said. "We just can't share things willy-nilly.'

How much has World Cup's global party been spoiled already by Trump's tantrums, threats?
How much has World Cup's global party been spoiled already by Trump's tantrums, threats?

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

How much has World Cup's global party been spoiled already by Trump's tantrums, threats?

Last month, when President Donald Trump was asked about growing tension between the United States and our 2026 World Cup co-hosts, Canada and Mexico, he said with a smile, 'Tensions are a good thing. It'll make it more exciting.' Apparently there is so much tension that it has become plural. Tensions. Hey, the more the merrier. The excitement has ramped up since Trump made that comment. Back then, the tensions involved just those three countries, and just the World Cup. Trump's recently announced travel ban on visitors from 19 countries has added more tensions/excitements. Now we can also tense up excitedly about the Olympics in Los Angeles in 2028 and even the Super Bowl in Santa Clara next year! Events like the Olympics and World Cup are world parties, and what we're doing is rearrange the schedule a bit. We're going to have the hangovers before the parties. Here's an interesting headline from Marca, Spain's daily sports newspaper: 'Trump, FIFA scandals spark movement planning to boycott 2026 World Cup.' Don't mind Spain. They're just cranky because of Trump's 20% tariffs on their exports of olive oil, auto parts and other goods. If only Spain would take a deep breath and remember that Trump's tariff policies change by the hour, so maybe better deals are ahead. Same with the new travel ban. Its effect on fans coming to America for the World Cup and the Olympics, and its implementation, are so vague and unknown that visitors from, say, Spain or Iraq might just have to get on the plane to America and hope for the best. American roulette: Maybe you come and go easily, maybe you accidentally wind up behind bars on Alcatraz. The Marca story says, 'As anger (at Trump and FIFA president Gianni Infantino) mounts, fan groups and some national associations are considering bold measures to demand change — including refusing to play or attend matches hosted in the U.S. unless FIFA addresses governance concerns and Trump's immigration policy is clarified.' Spain might not be the only whiny country. China doesn't seem thrilled with Trump's tariffs. Trump and Russia's Vladimir Putin are slow dancing one day, mud wrestling the next. Canada is steamed about Trump's tariffs and bluster over Canada becoming the 51st state. Will future Olympics and World Cup host countries slap reciprocal travel bans and restrictions on U.S. fans? The tariffs, the travel ban, the broken alliances, the global political and financial chaos, all cast a pall over America's place in global sports. The Super Bowl at Levi's Stadium in February, the World Cup games in California next summer and the L.A. Olympics in 2028 could all be negatively impacted by Trump, who threatens to withhold billions in federal funding, and to levy high fines, because of the state following its own rules to let a high school trans athlete compete in the CIF state track meet. As for the more distant future? The host of the 2038 World Cup likely will be chosen later this year. One actual scenario that has been given credibility is that FIFA could name another set of tri-hosts: New Zealand, Fiji and the U.S. Considering recent developments, what FIFA voter in his/her right mind would send Trump another World Cup? Why would tariff-squeezed New Zealand agree to join hands with America? Crazy stuff, but you have to admit, it's exciting. Tensions up the wazoo. Deeper thoughts and cheaper shots • Rick Carlisle is on his way to NBA sainthood, assuming the requirement is the performance of two miracles. His Pacers' win in the first game of the NBA Finals on Thursday night put Carlisle three wins away from his second miracle. Carlisle coached the Mavericks to a title in 2011 over the heavily favored, LeBron-led Miami Heat superteam, after the Heat took a 2-1 lead. That Mavericks title got Dirk Nowitzki and Jason Kidd their rings. Going into this season, the Pacers had the 15th best odds to win it all (per Basketball Reference). Just saying, maybe the guy's a good coach. • Still the worst idea in basketball since the invention of the Eurostep: The Commissioner's Cup in-season tournament. The WNBA one-ups the NBA by using a different ball for Cup games, a ball with alternating black and white panels instead of the regular fire orange and white. At least they didn't embed blinking lights in the seams. How about: Cut through the gimmicks and make each tournament game win count as 1½ wins? • Let's all thank Brock Purdy for signing that low-ish contract, quickly, thus sparing the San Francisco 49ers the ghastly task of sifting through the pile of discarded quarterbacks, and maybe plucking out Aaron Rodgers. The tinfoil-helmeted veteran agreed to sign with the Pittsburgh Steelers about two weeks after Purdy inked his deal, so it's possible Rodgers was the 49ers' Plan B. But Rodgers is only 41, so maybe he'll stick around the game long enough to get a third shot at a 49ers' job. • Commissioner Adam Silver is starting to talk about NBA expansion. He's not naming names, but others are, and Las Vegas is at the top of most lists. That puts more pressure on A's owner John Fisher to get his ballpark built ASAP, because MLB really wants to beat the NBA to Vegas. The A's say actual construction will begin this month. A's fans in Vegas must be heartened by the fact that the team isn't squandering all its winning luck in West Sacramento.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store