Social prescribing growing in popularity in the South
Tucked away behind Forton medical centre in Gosport is a community garden, which was once a former wasteland but now is filled with beautiful flower beds, fruit trees and raised vegetable patches.It has been created by volunteers and patients, with many of them having been "socially prescribed" the sessions.One patient, Neil was told to come to help him lose weight. Digging out a patch of hard soil with a hoe, he said: "If I'm at home bored, I think of food all the time and when I come here, I'm happy being here and working hard. And I'm burning calories."
His sister Marie is also a regular at the Willow Wellies group."It's just socialising, it's quiet and a sense of doing something useful and they're here to help you if you have any other problems," she said.
There are now 90 social prescribers working in GP practices in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight. They use local services, groups and activities to help people avoid medicine for conditions like diabetes, anxiety, stress or obesity.Amelia Jackson is a social prescriber working in Eastleigh. She said they had databases of social groups and discounted gym and swim memberships to help people with all sorts of conditions and limitations."It could be Tai-Chi, knitting, painting or a walking group," she said. "Whatever suits the individual we will find and the social prescriber often goes along for the first session to help them get through the door and settle in."
It can be hard to quantify the benefit the groups have, but primary care lead Ingrida Lelyte-Merrell said she had seen improvements in patients.She said these included people who had reversed their type two diabetes, and others who had stopped needing statins, taken to reduce cholesterol. "There is almost always something that can be done, before people become reliant on medicine," she said. "And tackling stress and loneliness can stop conditions developing."
You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Doctor guilty of misconduct over girl's death that led to Martha's Rule
A doctor has been found guilty of misconduct for his failings in the treatment of a girl whose death led to Martha's Rule. Prof Richard Thompson failed to escalate the treatment of Martha Mills, 13, before she died from sepsis in 2021, a disciplinary panel found on Monday. The teenager's death prompted the introduction of Martha's Rule, which gives patients and families the right to a second medical opinion if their own or a loved one's condition deteriorates in hospital. Martha died from sepsis after doctors missed its symptoms and did not heed warnings from her parents that her condition was rapidly deteriorating. A medical tribunal in Manchester has now ruled that Thompson committed 'misconduct which impairs his fitness to practise' during her treatment. The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) panel found that the doctor, who was the on-duty consultant at King's College hospital (KCH) in London, had made 'particularly grave' failings. It ruled that Thompson should have referred Martha to intensive care on Aug 29 2021 and that he had failed to conduct an in-person assessment of her condition. The doctor was on-call at home for part of the day. Robin Ince, the chairman of the panel, said there was 'no sound reason' why Thompson did not assess Martha's condition himself. 'The tribunal was of the view that, as more serious and unexplained factors had come into play, there were clear points (at 17.00 and 20.30) when Prof Thompson should have taken action not only to see Martha himself but also to refer Martha to PICU (paediatric intensive care unit) and these combined failures to do so makes them more serious,' he said. 'The tribunal appreciated that it was assisted by hindsight but concluded that there were sufficient adverse clinical indicators at the time of something unexplained going on such that direct review and escalation to PICU was required.' Martha was only transferred to intensive care on August 30, by which point she had septic shock. She died from sepsis on August 31 at Great Ormond Street hospital (GOSH), where she had been transferred. A coroner ruled in 2022 that she would have likely survived if doctors at KCH had identified the warning signs of the condition and transferred her to intensive care sooner. The trust has since apologised for mistakes in Martha's care. Martha was in hospital with a pancreatic injury after a fall from her bike while on a family holiday in Wales. King's is a specialist national referral centre for children with pancreatic problems. 'Gravity of mistakes' In a statement, Merope Mills and Paul Laity, Martha's parents, welcomed the recognition of the 'gravity of mistakes' made before her death. 'It is important to us that allegations denied have been found proved and the gravity of mistakes that led to our daughter's preventable death has been recognised,' they said. 'We will always have in our minds the failures of culture, training and policy on Rays of Sunshine ward at King's College Hospital, as well as the responsibility of individuals. We'd like to thank all of the thoughtful doctors who have helped us to understand what happened to Martha.' Thompson's sanction will be determined at a separate hearing on Tuesday. Mr Ince said the panel believed he had been 'remediated' and that it was 'highly unlikely that anything like this will ever happen again and there is no current impairment of Prof Thompson's fitness to practise on this basis '. But he added: 'The tribunal concluded that the misconduct was such that a finding of impairment was required to uphold public confidence in the profession as well as uphold proper professional standards, and that it would be undermined if no finding of impairment were found.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Senior doctor's failures in teenager's care ‘amounted to gross negligence'
Failures of a senior doctor in his care of a teenager who died days later from sepsis were 'particularly grave' and 'essentially amounted to gross negligence', a medical tribunal has found. Professor Richard Thompson did not refer Martha Mills, 13, to intensive care despite her displaying several high-risk indicators of sepsis and the on-call consultant also chose not to return to London's King's College Hospital to assess her in person. Martha had been an inpatient on the hospital's Rays of Sunshine Ward at King's College Hospital after she suffered a serious injury to her pancreas when she slipped while riding a bike on a family holiday in Wales in July 2021. Weeks later, she experienced a fever, increased heart rate and had a catheter inserted into her vein, which was 'ultimately considered' to be a likely source of the infection that led to her death from sepsis, the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) hearing was told. More spikes in her temperature followed, before the consultant hepatologist saw Martha on his morning ward round on Sunday August 29 at the hospital, one of three locations in the UK which specialise in the treatment of paediatric pancreatic injuries. The on-call consultant left the hospital at 3pm, but was phoned at home two hours later by a trainee doctor, who gave an update on Martha's condition. Medical records showed she had deteriorated over the course of the afternoon, and into the early evening, with a drop in her blood pressure, the appearance of a new rash and increases in heart rate, respiratory rate and body temperature. Tribunal chairman Robin Ince noted that by 5pm there were 'several high-risk indicators' as set out in the Nice guidelines relating to sepsis. The duty registrar called Prof Thompson again at 8.30pm because of ongoing concerns over Martha's fever, but she was kept on the ward despite the continued presence of moderate to high-risk indicators and the absence of meaningful clinical improvement, said the tribunal. On Monday, the tribunal concluded that Prof Thompson's conduct fell so far short of the standards reasonably expected of a doctor so as to amount to misconduct. Mr Ince said: 'The tribunal was of the view that Professor Thompson's omissions were 'particularly grave' and essentially amounted to gross negligence about the serious risk of harm to patients (albeit only on this one occasion) and were sufficiently serious in any event such as to amount to misconduct.' Martha collapsed on August 30 and was moved to intensive care, before she was transferred to London's Great Ormond Street Hospital, where she died in the early hours of August 31. At a 2022 inquest into her death, a coroner ruled that Martha would most likely have survived if doctors had identified the warning signs and transferred her to intensive care earlier. Martha's mother, Merope Mills, an editor at The Guardian, said she and her husband, Paul Laity, raised concerns about Martha's deteriorating health a number of times but these were not acted on. The couple later successfully campaigned for Martha's Rule to give patients, families and carers the chance to easily request a second opinion from a senior doctor in the same hospital in the event of a suspected deterioration or serious concern. The tribunal will now consider what sanction, if any, to impose on Prof Thompson's registration. The MPTS hearing, sitting in Manchester, continues on Tuesday.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Screen time is creating a vicious cycle for kids. Here is the good and bad
Screen time can result in a vicious cycle for children's' mental health, researchers warn. An array of issues in children - including anxiety, depression and aggression - have been linked to a high screen time. But, children experiencing these problems were also found to be more likely to turn to screens. In the study, screen-based activities include social media, video games, TV and online homework. 'Children are spending more and more time on screens, for everything from entertainment to homework to messaging friends,' Dr. Michael Noetel, an associate professor at Australia's Queensland University, said in a statement. 'We found that increased screen time can lead to emotional and behavioral problems, and kids with those problems often turn to screens to cope.' Noetel was one of the authors of the American Psychological Association study, which was published Monday in the journal Psychological Bulletin. To reach these conclusions, the group of international study authors reviewed and meta-analyzed 117 studies, including data from more than 292,000 children worldwide. They were hoping to better understand the relationship between screen time and socioemotional problems, including aggression, anxiety, and low self-confidence. Most of the studies were conducted in the U.S., but there were also studies from Canada, Australia, Germany, and the Netherlands. They included any study with participants under 10 years old that measured screen use and socioemotional problems, where the kids were followed up for at least six months. They found that older children between the ages of six and 10 years old were more likely to develop socioemotional problems with greater screen use, and girls were generally more susceptible to these kinds of problems. Boys were more likely to increase their time with screens when facing such challenges. Gaming was associated with higher risks compared with educational or recreational screen use. Children experiencing socioemotional problems were also more likely to turn to games to cope. 'Online games, in particular, pose additional risks because they often function like social media platforms,' Vasconcellos told CNN. 'Since these games continue even when a player logs out, children may feel pressure to stay connected for longer periods, which can lead them to neglect important real-life activities like sleep, schoolwork and face-to-face interactions. While some games may benefit mental health for children and teens with anxiety, depression and ADHD, help kids to find a community, perform better cognitively, or develop problem-solving abilities, gaming has also been tied to developing fewer relationships with peers and increased aggression. Although, every child and how they use the games are different, the Kids Mental Health Foundation points out. Still, these findings suggest that parents may want to proceed cautiously regarding allowing screen time — and not just pass screens to them to help them calm down. Right now, federal health officials recommend not utilizing media viewing and computers with children younger than the age of two. About half of U.S. teens report being on screens for four or more hours a day. Among that group, the number of them reporting symptoms of anxiety and depression was higher. Too much screen time may also lead to problems sleeping, less reading, not enough physical activity or time outside, and weight problems, according to the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. There may also be issues with patience, doctors say. Noetel noted that the authors couldn't rule out other contributing factors that could influence screen use and emotional problems, including parenting style. 'This comprehensive study highlights the need for a nuanced approach to managing children's screen time,' lead author Dr. Roberta Vasconcellos, a lecturer at the University of New South Wales, said. 'By understanding the bidirectional relationship between screen use and socioemotional problems, parents, educators, and policymakers can better support children's healthy development in an increasingly digital world.'
