
2025 Volvo EX90 Performance First Test: A Few Buttons Short of Perfection
Pros Drives exactly how a Volvo should
Seats so comfortable, you'll want them in your house
Practical three-row seating with ample cargo space Cons Rivals offer more range and faster charging
Safety settings revert to DEFCON 5 before every drive
Minimalist user experience isn't for everyone
The first Volvo engineered from the ground up to be an EV is, in nearly every way, exactly what Gothenburg's crown jewel should be. The 2025 Volvo EX90 Ultra Twin Motor Performance is as practical as it is luxurious, quiet and comfortable with a timeless design and effortless performance.
0:00 / 0:00
There's just one hurdle that might trip up buyers willing to fork over $90,640 for the 510-hp three-row SUV. Volvo's embrace of the latest tech trends has completely changed how you interact with the car. Are Volvo buyers really clamoring for a button-free cockpit? Did they ask for an alternative to the tried-and-true key fob? And how much Tesla is too much Tesla for a Volvo owner?
The Flagship Volvo Driving Experience
The tech will likely push some shoppers outside their comfort zones, but that's the only way an EX90 can make anyone uncomfortable. The Ultra trim's air springs and adaptive dampers relax the optional $800 22-inch wheels with rubber-band tires, turning hard impacts into soft, distant thumps. The cabin is a blissful sanctuary free from wind noise, road noise, and the constant thrum of an internal combustion engine. The front seats cradle you like a bean-bag chair and give a Swedish massage so good we dropped a $20 tip in the cupholder.
Toggling the steering and suspension between soft and firm effects changes big enough to be felt and subtle enough that every combination is a natural fit for a Volvo with 'Performance' in its name. This car isn't fierce, it's fluid. Its 671lb-ft of torque pour out of the motors like fondue—smooth, creamy, indulgent goodness.
Hitting 60 mph in 4.2 seconds and clearing the quarter mile in 13.0 seconds might not be all that quick by time-warping EV standards, but it's a quiet riot in a Volvo. Stopping a 6,084-pound SUV on all-season tires from 60 mph in just 110 feet is a revolt against the laws of physics.
With one-pedal driving switched on, the right pedal transitions from acceleration to coasting to deceleration with uncommon grace. The regenerative braking isn't quite as aggressive as what you'll get in a Rivian or a Tesla, and the EX90 is better for it. No matter how quickly you lift off the accelerator, it's impossible to bobble your passengers' heads.
All this makes the EX90 Performance unique in how it blends comfort and athleticism, which we want to stress is different than a luxury SUV that can switch between comfort and sport—plenty of German SUVs already have the Jekyll and Hyde thing covered. The EX90 never feels flustered by a fast curve or unsettled by a rough road. It is always smooth and quick at the same time.
In the age of electronic controls and software-defined features, it's rare for a new car to be so laser focused on a singular, consistent driving character. The dynamics engineers appear to have a narrow idea of what a Volvo should be—the right idea.
We have just one complaint about how it drives: There are brief moments where the EX90 is the mellowest 510-hp car we've ever driven. Stomp the right pedal from a roll at suburban or interstate speeds, and the EX90 takes its sweet time before rocketing toward the horizon. You can literally count out loud—one, two, three—before the full force hits you. If you want the immediacy EVs are known for, you have to activate Performance AWD, which keeps the front permanent-magnet motor engaged at all times at the expense of efficiency and range.
Volvo EX90 Real-World Range and Fast-Charging
Officially, the EX90 Performance with 22-inch rollers is rated for 300 miles, down from 310 miles with the Ultra's standard 21-inch wheels. Run through the MotorTrend Road-Trip Range test (a steady 70 mph from 100 to 5 percent charge), the EX90 scored a mediocre 247 miles. A 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQS580 4Matic SUV and 2022 BMW iX xDrive50 hit 315 and 312 miles, respectively, in our testing (both models have since seen some slight revisions).
The Volvo at least doesn't try to fool you into believing 300 miles is possible. While most automakers reset the range estimate to show the EPA figure (or close to it) every time you charge to 100 percent, the EX90 consistently indicated 250 miles of range with a full battery—a number that's realistically achievable if you drive the SUV to empty.
The EX90's DC fast-charging performance also left us underwhelmed. While Volvo claims a peak of 250 kW, we saw power top out at 193 kW in our charging test that added 94 miles of range in 15 minutes. The Mercedes gained 126 miles and the BMW 122 in the same time.
A Different Kind of Luxury
In the Scandinavian tradition, the EX90 spoils occupants without being flashy. You don't buy it to inform your neighbors and coworkers that you've arrived. You buy it to tickle your eardrums with the $3,200 25-speaker Dolby Atmos–enabled Bowers & Wilkens audio system or to treat your lower back to those therapeutic seats. The only hint of ritzy opulence comes from the warm, white glow that shines through the sustainably harvested wood trim at night, a tasteful counterpoint to the ribbons of carnival lights used by the luxury-car establishment.
If it helps to justify the near-six-figure price tag, you can rationalize the EX90 Ultra Twin Motor Performance as a pragmatic family vehicle, too. The three-row SUV comes in six- and seven-seat configurations with a booster seat integrated into the center position of the second-row bench. Squeezing into the third row will be a workout for passengers of all sizes, but the rear seats are a pleasant place even for average-size adults thanks to the abundant natural light pouring through the glass roof and a dedicated cupholder, USB-C port, and chest-level HVAC vent for each passenger.
There's surprisingly generous cargo space behind the third row, especially if you make use of the spacious underfloor well that can swallow a couple of medium-sized duffel bags. Unfortunately, the decent-sized frunk has been rendered nearly useless by two curious decisions.
Volvo segmented the tray into three sections to skirt the regulations that would have otherwise required an internal emergency release, and you can only open the hood by yanking a lever by the driver's left shin, a strange holdover from the internal combustion era.
How Much Tech Is Too Much Tech?
All that leaves us with one thing left to discuss: the software. To understand why the EX90 is the way it is, you first need a basic understanding of the central computing platform at the core of Volvo's Scalable Product Architecture 2 (SPA2).
Rather than the old piecemeal approach where every widget in the car had its own computer, the bulk of the EX90's code runs on just two Nvidia chips and a Qualcomm Snapdragon processor. The same idea has allowed Tesla and Rivian to develop innovative new features, launch powerful and genuinely useful phone apps, and deliver over-the-air updates for any system in the vehicle. Volvo is chasing after those frontrunners, and the EX90 puts the company way out ahead of most legacy automakers in this regard.
For buyers and shoppers, this change shows up as a pervasive Teslafication of how you interact with the vehicle. All the EX90's secondary controls save for the volume knob and audio power button have been digitized in the vertical 14.5-inch touchscreen. To activate adaptive cruise control or the lane-centering Pilot Assist system, you'll first have to retrain your neurons that grabbing the gear selector at 70 mph is a totally normal thing to do.
The EX90 unlocks and flips out its door handles as you approach with the buttonless fob (or your phone loaded with a digital key) in your pocket, and the ignition powers up only when you shift into drive (you can actually get the car moving a fraction of a second before the power steering assist kicks in).
Whether these are good or bad developments depends on your relationship with technology and your outlook on change—although surely we can all agree that giving the driver just two switches and a fussy capacitive button to control four windows is patently dumb.
Not up for debate is the fact that the new infotainment system vaults Volvo from the digital stone age into the modern era. Volvo's current gas models (and the EVs based on them) are dated by tiny screens with grainy resolution and a clumsy interface at least five years past its expiration. The EX90's infotainment, built on Android Automotive OS, is exactly the reboot Volvo needs.
The tiled home screen is dominated by Google Maps plus widgets for audio and a paired phone and two rows of controls along the bottom of the screen. The layout and logic feel like a bridge between the old way of doing things and Tesla's approach, which comes with a steepish learning curve.
Download a few apps like Spotify, Waze, and PlugShare, and the EX90's native infotainment system almost makes the included wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto redundant, if only an automaker could find a solution for text messaging.
The Work That's Left Unfinished
It's one thing for a startup to reinvent how cars are wired from a clean sheet of paper and another thing entirely for a 98-year-old company to reimagine the way things have been done for decades. Reorganizing teams, bringing in fresh talent, creating new policies and processes, and throwing out all that time-tested software isn't easy, and in many legacy automakers it might cause the whole house of cards to collapse.
The good news is Volvo appears to have exterminated most of the bugs from the system. Aside from one drive where the center screen failed to boot, our two weeks with the EX90 were happily error-free.
You get a sense, though, that Volvo left some work unfinished to get the EX90 out the door even after it delayed the launch more than six months. Or maybe Volvo's evolving minimalist sensibilities have convinced the engineers that buyers want less control.
The following distance of the adaptive cruise control has one setting that leaves a gap large enough to invite semis into your lane. Setting up a driver profile and tying it to your key ensures the seats are exactly where you want them before you sit down, but the safety systems revert to their high-anxiety default before every drive. I lost count of how many times the driver distraction alert beeped at me as I drove through my neighborhood while pecking at the screen to reset everything to my liking.
The unseemly wart on the EX90's forehead also does nothing for the driver. The lidar sensor inside hoovers up data and beams it back to the mothership for now. Volvo says a software update coming later this year will activate the sensor so that the driver assistance systems can see further ahead, but even then, Pilot Assist won't allow the driver to take their hands off the wheel. GM's Super Cruise (a MotorTrend Best Tech winner) does more without sullying the design team's work. That hits especially hard, since Volvo's mastery of proportion, surfacing, and detail is on full display with the EX90.
Don't Let the Tech Push Your Buttons
Evaluate it as a car rather than a computer, and the 2025 Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance is brilliant. It delivers the cosseting luxury, rejuvenating comfort, and sure-footed dynamics we want in a flagship driving experience. It's also refreshing that, after more than a decade of lagging the rest of the industry, Volvo finally has in-car tech worthy of a luxury brand.
At the same time, we can empathize with the buyers who don't want to relearn the basics of operating a car. Whether Volvo has pushed the techy minimalism too far is a question for each individual buyer to answer. But it'd be a shame to ignore a car this good—and seats this spectacular—over a few buttons you'd soon learn to live without.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Motor 1
13 minutes ago
- Motor 1
You Can Get a Stupid Cheap Maserati From Hertz
Want a great deal on a vehicle that's lived most of its life as a rental car? Hertz is the place to go. With one of America's largest rental fleets, the agency regularly puts its former rental cars up for sale for cheap. Not even luxury brands like Maserati are immune to price drops. As Carscoops uncovered , Hertz currently has a fleet of Maseratis for sale in the US—and many of them cost less than a new Honda CR-V. The Maseratis in question are all Grecale SUVs, and they range in price from as little as $36,543 at the time of writing to a still-pretty-reasonable $48,022 for the most expensive. Photo by: Hertz And even for rental cars, the mileage on most of these Grecales isn't that bad. The cheapest one of the bunch only has 28,371 miles, while a handful of other examples have fewer than 15,000 miles. There's even one Grecale with less than 10,000 miles that costs a cool $38,999. Not bad at all. Those prices are pretty shocking considering that a brand-new Maserati Grecale will set you back at least $77,900, with the most-expensive trim—the electric Folgore—starting at a whopping $119,900 for 2025. Of course, Maserati isn't known for its reliability, and that's likely keeping consumers from snapping up these lightly used luxury SUVs. As Carscoops notes, this is already the second price drop for Hertz's Grecale fleet in recent months. That said, there haven't been many known issues surrounding the Grecale from a reliability standpoint. Maserati's SUV rides on the same platform as the Alfa Romeo Stelvio, which has been hit or miss historically in terms of reliability. We say roll the dice, what could go wrong? More From Maserati Maserati Is Not for Sale Maserati Sales Aren't Doing Great Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Source: Hertz via Carscoops Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )


Forbes
28 minutes ago
- Forbes
EU Employment Committee Draft Opinion Opposes Reductions In Sustainability Reporting
JUNE 26: People walk by an European flag (Photo by) The future of sustainability reporting in the European Union is in peril as legislators debate the Omnibus Simplification Package. The current proposal includes significant changes to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directives. As the legislative process unfolds in the Parliament, members are submitting proposed amendments through various committees. In the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, a draft opinion expresses clear opposition to any reductions to the CSRD or the CSDDD. From 2020 - 2024, a trilogy of directives were passed by the EU to force businesses to address climate change and report greenhouse gas missions. The Taxonomy for Sustainable Activities created a classification system for business and investors to know what activities are considered green or climate friendly. The CSRD created requirements for businesses to report GHG emissions and other environmental, social, and governance actions. The CSDDD, also known as the CS3D, created legal liability for companies in relation to their supply chain. While the gains excited activists, the cost of these proposals on businesses and the broader impact on the EU economy became a theme during the 2024 European Parliament elections. The shift to the right in EU politics embolden opponents to the European Green Deal directives. As a result, the Commission proposed a package of new directives to 'reduce the burden' on businesses. The Omnibus Simplification Package was officially adopted by the Commission in February. The proposal is being debated in the Council and the Parliament. In the Parliament, the debate is public and working through multiple committees, giving interest parties and MEPs the opportunity to voice their opinions. The Committee on Legal Affairs, known as JURI, is the primary committee that will produce the legislation that will be sent to the full Parliament for a vote. However, related committees will draft opinions to be considered during the process. Each committee designates a rapporteur to lead the drafting. The Parliament states that a 'rapporteur is appointed in the responsible parliamentary committee to draft a report on proposals of a legislative or budgetary nature, or other issues. In drafting their report, rapporteurs may consult with relevant experts and stakeholders. They are also responsible for the drafting of compromise amendments and negotiations with shadow rapporteurs.' The amendments change the Commission's language in the Omnibus Simplification Package, not the original CSRD and CSDDD. Rather than offering sweeping amendments that encompass every change a MEP or Party wants to see, every change to every subparagraph is offered in a separate amendment. This results in a high volume of amendments. The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, known as ECON, and the Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety, known as ENVI, posted 987 amendments proposed by their respective members. In the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, known as EMPL, the committee chose to post a draft opinion by the rapporteur before posting amendments by members. Committee members have until June 3 to offer amendments before the June 4 vote. European Parliament The draft opinion was submitted by MEP Li Andersson of The Left, rapporteur for the opinion. The draft included language that directly criticizes the Commission and objects to changes. While the opinion is may not be adopted as the final committee draft, and will likely have minimal impact on the final vote, the language will certainly excite activists and like minded MEPs. In the 'short justification' included in opinions to provide context for canges, Andersson made her opposition to the changes clear. "The current Commission proposal risks watering down the core elements of this newly established sustainability reporting and due diligence framework. Although the aim of simplification in terms of reporting duties for companies is laudable… simplification cannot mean broad sweeping deregulation that changes the entire purposes of the previous directives. Dismantling core parts of the legislation risks not only creating regulatory uncertainty for companies, barring proper access to justice for those harmed, but also hampers the availability of quality, comparable and granular sustainability data that is much called for by investors and business partners alike…" Of the MEP's 49 proposed amendments, 40 simply delete language proposed the Omnibus Simplification Package, leaving the existing language in original directives intact. This includes the employee thresholds for companies to fall under reporting requirements. Three proposed amendments include language that is worth highlighting. The first proposed amendment addresses the first paragraph of the Omnibus in which the Commission states their reason for the changes. The Commission references 'A simpler and faster Europe: Communication on implementation and simplification' sent on February 11 in which they outline their vision. Andersson, and many like minded individuals, took issue with the process used and the need for action. Original language as proposed by the Commission: '… the European Commission set out a vision for an implementation and simplification agenda that delivers fast and visible improvements for people and business on the ground. This requires more than an incremental approach and the Union must take bold action to achieve this goal…' Andersson's Proposed Amendment: "…the European Commission set out a vision for an implementation and simplification agenda, which is leading to unpredictability and legal uncertainty by rolling back on legal obligations recently adopted at Union level under the guise of reducing administrative burden. The consequences of such an agenda will have rippling effects, with increasing political risks particularly for first movers. In order to safeguard the ambition of the current legal acquis, it is important to oppose such measures." The second proposed amendment addresses the second paragraph in which the Commission states their goals. Andersson not only takes issue with, what some perceive as, an overbearing approach by the Commission, but also addresses concerns relating to the process used. Those concerns have resulted in an investigation by the European Ombudsman, although they are unlikely to impact the final result. Original language as proposed by the Commission: "In the context of the Commission's commitment to reduce reporting burdens and enhance competitiveness, it is necessary to amend Directives 2006/43/EC3 , 2013/34/EU4 , (EU) 2022/24645 and (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council, whilst maintaining the policy objectives of the European Green Deal, and the Sustainable Finance Action Plan." Andersson's Proposed Amendment: 'In the context of the Commission's commitment to reduce reporting burdens and enhance competitiveness, the Comission (sic) has declared that it is necessary to amend Directives 2006/43/EC3 , 2013/34/EU4 , (EU) 2022/24645 and (EU) 2024/1760 of the, without conducting any impact assessment and limiting public consultation to a closed-door stakeholder event.' A major theme in the push for simplification is the impact sustainability reporting could have on small and medium-sized enterprises. In addition to the high cost on businesses that are required to comply with sustainability reporting requirements, businesses interests also expressed concerns that the costs will adversely impact SMEs that are not required to report, but are indirectly forced to gather information in the course of doing business with large companies. The Commission has made it clear they want to prevent SMEs from being forced to pay to gather data beyond minimum requirements. Original language as proposed by the Commission: "Member States shall ensure that, for the mapping provided for in paragraph 2, point (a), companies do not seek to obtain information from direct business partners with fewer than 500 employees that exceeds the information specified in the standards for voluntary use referred to in Article 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU…" Andersson's Proposed Amendment: 'Where necessary in the light of resource and knowledge constraints of an SME that is a business partner of a company, Member States shall ensure that companies provide targeted and proportionate support. Support may include financial support, providing or enabling access to capacity building or training, or support in upgrading management systems or facilitating the upgrading of such systems in order to support the identification of adverse impacts.' The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs has placed the draft opinion on the June 4 meeting agenda. Committee members have until June 3 to offer their own amendments. Given the amendments proposed in other committees, expect conflicting opinions to be stated. The draft opinion will be sent to the Committee on Legal Affairs for consideration. The final vote in the Parliament is expected to take place on October 13. The Commission, Council, and Parliament will then meet to negotiate the final changes to the sustainability reporting requirements. They are expected to be approved in December.


New York Times
34 minutes ago
- New York Times
Oscar Piastri quickest again
Follow live coverage of today's Formula 1 action with Oscar Piastri getting the better of Lando Norris in qualifying Getty Images McLaren's Oscar Piastri has qualified on pole position at the Spanish Grand Prix. The Australian, who leads the F1 World Driver's Championship standings, beat his team-mate Lando Norris as McLaren secured a one-two for tomorrow's race. Max Verstappen qualified third, ahead of British duo George Russell and Lewis Hamilton. Email: live@ GO FURTHER F1 Spanish GP qualifying: Oscar Piastri secures pole as McLaren dominates Connections: Sports Edition Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Getty Images Wow! A 1:11.836 to go top! George Russell moves into second with a superb 1:12.075, ahead of Max Verstappen in third. Despite the dark clouds growing near the circuit, the team radars aren't showing anything due to hit the track itself through Q3. I think we'll get to the end without showers. Can anybody stop McLaren here?! Getty Images I think Alex Albon and Williams will be pretty happy with 11th there. Albon gave his car up for Williams young driver Victor Martins in FP1, and then was sidelined by a suspected brake issue through much of Q3, meaning he had just one flying lap completed on Saturday heading into qualifying. At a track that really does not suit Williams, to be so close to reaching Q3 is a decent return. 11. Alex Albon , Williams , Williams 12. Gabriel Bortoleto , Sauber , Sauber 13. Liam Lawson , Racing Bulls , Racing Bulls 14. Lance Stroll , Aston Martin , Aston Martin 15. Ollie Bearman , Haas , Haas 16. Nico Hulkenberg , Sauber , Sauber 17. Esteban Ocon , Haas , Haas 18. Carlos Sainz , Williams , Williams 19. Franco Colapinto , Alpine , Alpine 20. Yuki Tsunoda, Red Bull And as Yuki Tsunoda slumps to last, Isack Hadjar puts in another great qualifying display for Racing Bulls to reach Q3, off the heels of finishing sixth in Monaco last weekend. He's putting in a good case for future consideration for that second Red Bull seat, surely... Getty Images The young Racing Bulls driver looked to be in trouble but produced a fine lap to go sixth. Ollie Bearman is the last man out on the track … but fails to significantly improve his time and stays in P15. Alex Albon, Gabriel Bortoleto, Liam Lawson and Lance Stroll join him in exiting Q2. His last flying lap is only good enough for 8th. Lance Stroll is out. He's currently sat in 13th. The top five are all in the pits. Just about everybody else is on an out lap. Getty Images The drivers in the danger zone are: Gabriel Bortoleto, Liam Lawson, Alex Albon, Lance Stroll and Oliver Bearman. Oscar Piastri still on top at this stage, but Lando Norris again had to pass a slower car at Turn 12, which will have contributed to the 0.058 second gap to the other McLaren. They are so close right now, with Piastri edging it in the first sector, Norris mighty in sector two. Max Verstappen actually has the quickest time in sector three, with a big 0.36 second gap to the leaders. Getty Images Lando Norris goes quickest with a 1:12.056. But Lewis Hamilton and Oscar Piastri are both on flying laps and both go quicker through the first sector… Hamilton, however, loses time in the third and final sector and goes third, behind Norris and Max Verstappen. Piastri then nudges them all down a spot with a blistering 1:11.998. Max Verstappen has set the quickest lap so far in Q2: a 1:12.358. He's followed by Gabriel Bortoleto, Liam Lawson and Alex Albon. Getty Images Looks like a big 0.2 second gap between the McLaren drivers in Q1, but Lando Norris had a big moment three corners from home when he passed a slower car and had to step off the gas to save a big snap. There's surely more time to come from him heading into Q2. Fernando Alonso is the first out onto the track. Getty Images Oscar Piastri, once again, was the fastest man of the session. He was followed by Max Verstappen, Lando Norris, George Russell and Kimi Antonelli. Getty Images 16. Nico Hulkenberg , Sauber , Sauber 17. Esteban Ocon , Haas , Haas 18. Carlos Sainz , Williams , Williams 19. Franco Colapinto , Alpine , Alpine 20. Yuki Tsunoda, Red Bull Oh dear, that's not a good result for Yuki Tsunoda. The second Red Bull 'curse' shows zero sign of abating right now. He's plum last in qualifying, even if he is 'only' six-tenths of a second off Verstappen's lap time up in P2. Getty Images Yuki Tsunoda has qualified last! 0.834 seconds behind the leader, Oscar Piastri. There's also disappointment for home favourite Carlos Sainz, who qualifies 18th, one place ahead of the unlucky Franco Colapinto. Nico Hulkenberg is 16th, Esteban Ocon 17th.