Is St George's Day today and can the church move the Saint's national holiday from the 23rd April?
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
SAINT George's Day is traditionally celebrated on the same day each year, but there is a major change for the 2025 version of the holiday.
The Church of England has announced that the celebration has been moved to avoid it clashing with another holiday.
2
Morris dancing is a popular way of marking St George's Day
Credit: Getty Images
2
Celebrations are held across the country for St George's Day
Credit: Getty Images
A moveable date
St George's Day is traditionally celebrated on April 23 each year as this is believed to be the date of the saint's death.
In 2025, however, the date has been moved to April 28.
This is because St George's Day cannot fall within a week before or after Easter.
Easter is a movable feast, determined by the lunar calendar.
Read More on UK news
SUPER SOAKER Morning washout as Brits soaked by 'heavy' downpours ahead of 23C next week
It is always celebrated on the first Sunday after the first full moon that occurs on or after the spring equinox.
This means it took place on April 20 in 2025, which led the Church of England to move the date of St George's Day.
The Church of England prioritises Easter as the most significant celebration in the Christian calendar.
The story of St George
The St George's Day story dates all the way back to the 9th Century, when it originally was about St Theodore Trio.
However, most modern understandings of the story are based in the 11th and 12th Century versions.
The story is focused on a village in Cappadocia, Turkey, though this is changed to Libya in later versions.
GMB guest in furious row with Ed Balls and The Apprentice's Tom Skinner as they lock horns over St George's Day
In the tale, villagers are forced to feed their sheep to a greedy dragon and, when they run out of livestock, decide to offer up their princess to the creature.
St George slays the dragon in the story, rescuing the princess from the monster.
England adopted St George as its patron saint, as his story is centred on bravery and honour.
Although it is not a bank holiday, England has celebrated St George's Day as a national holiday since the 15th Century.
England's St George's Day traditions
England has a wide variety of St George's Day celebrations, each relating to the country's long history.
Morris dancing is a particularly popular tradition, as groups gather to showcase their region's own style of dance.
Punch and Judy shows, which date back to 1662, are also popular over the holiday.
Medieval and renaissance fairs are held across the country, showcasing English culture throughout time.
Some events, such as the one in Trafalgar Square, even have huge models of the dragon.
Ahead of the 2025 celebrations, the Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer called for the day to be an opportunity for unity across the country.
He said: 'Yet now, we can see people trying to sow division in our communities.
"People taking the red and white of our flag with them as they throw bricks at businesses.
'That is what happened last year in the riots.
"And we must fight it.
"Because it was the aftermath of the riots that showed what it means to be English.
'It marked the coming together of a country.
"People who got together the morning after, all across Britain.
"With shovels, brooms, and brushes, to clean up their communities.
'Rebuilding walls, repairing damage.
"It's in that spirit that we reclaim our flag for our country.
"For English decency, honour and fairness.
'Wrench it out of the hands of those who want to divide this nation.
"And reclaim it for good.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
25 minutes ago
- Metro
Straight men are using gay dating apps for ego boosts
Less than an hour before a hookup, I was hit with that most dreaded of texts: 'Sorry but I can't come today.' Wanting to give the benefit of the doubt, I replied asking if he wanted to rearrange. Only, this time, my message went undelivered. There was no mistaking what that meant – I'd been blocked. I had met 32-year-old Jimmy* on Grindr, and we had spent half of the night exchanging nudes and compliments. He told me he was just looking for a casual hookup early on into our conversation, so while I never expected much to come from meeting him, it still stung to realise I was just his 3am bit of fun. Then again, I suppose I should have seen it coming. He did tell me he was straight, after all. Finding a straight man on a gay dating app is like spotting a cloud in the sky these days – they're everywhere. In fact, to a certain extent, it feels like our platforms have been infested by them. But what, I hear you ask, are heterosexual men doing on these platforms? Why go through these interactions if there's nothing to gain? The simple answer: They're in it for the ego boost. With thousands of members from all over the world, our vibrant LGBTQ+ WhatsApp channel is a hub for all the latest news and important issues that face the LGBTQ+ community. Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications! It's no secret that the way we date has evolved in recent years. As a key example, digital platforms continue to dominate the modern dating world with 72% of Brits meeting through apps. However, research shows that some people are using these digital spaces not to date, but to seek validation, and to be liked and affirmed. And I for one have been stung by this on more than one occasion. When I matched with 20-something Harry*, we had a lot of virtual fun. We spent two weeks entertaining each other online exchanging intimate photos and several flirty conversations, until eventually we set a time and place for a date. On the day we were supposed to meet, he became unresponsive, so I chased him down, asking if we were still on. That's when he admitted he was straight. At that moment, a weird feeling erupted in my chest; it wasn't heartbreak, more a question of how I could have got it so wrong and I knew I wanted, and deserved, answers. 'What was the point?' I asked, to which he blurted out something about how it 'felt good' and how he'd liked it when I'd 'gassed him up' – GenZ for 'giving compliments'. Suddenly I started thinking back to conversations I'd had with other men who I'd thought had ghosted me. If my conversations with Harry had given him a sense of validation all from a few compliments, then maybe other men who never followed through were in the same position – straight and seeking an ego boost. While I tried to get my head around that, one question remained: If these men seek validation, why not turn to their heterosexual counterparts? Once upon a time, I suppose straight men could have expected to get their egos inflated by straight women. But from what I've gathered, mostly through conversations with the women in my life, many women aren't here to stroke men's egos anymore. It's like they've developed a no nonsense attitude towards attention-seeking men. While I applaud that, it means these men are then left searching for new places to feel validated – and that's why they've turned to our queer spaces. And sadly, in a world where queer people still desire to be seen, these men are able to easily take advantage, hit us up and later neglect us. They'll flirt, chat, flood us with dick pics, waiting for us to praise the size of their cocks, and tease us with the idea of meeting up, then, when they've had their fun, they ghost us like we were a blip. The flirting followed by the cancelling of plans, blocking and dismissiveness has a profound effect on queer people. It's one thing if the guy is still struggling with his sexuality, but it's another when he's just using queer men for his midnight pleasure, a fleeting ego boost with no care behind it. We're left feeling invisible and disposable, questioning what's real or not. As a community we already face discrimination, sometimes from these very men in the outside world. So when we're exploited for their ego boosts online, it feels casually cruel. More Trending Though they might not be snapping heartstrings, they're manipulating them, which feels like the worst betrayal of all. If you're a straight man after some online fun, queer people just have one request: Be honest. We already struggle to find intimacy, so false promises on meeting up just deepens wounds. Using us as a source to boost your ego won't get you anywhere, but being upfront with your intentions might just score you a cheeky bum pic. View More » *Names have been changed Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: I've been revising for my son's GCSEs – I'm more stressed than him MORE: I won't sleep with anyone else until I figure out my sexuality MORE: Two people stabbed and one shot during World Pride parade
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
June warning that gardeners who cut hedges could 'face jail and unlimited fine'
If gardeners are cutting hedges and a bird's nest is damaged or destroyed - intentionally or otherwise - then they're breaking the law and could face a fine or jail time Green-fingered Brits are being warned against falling foul of the law this June as they spruce up their gardens, with warnings that illegal hedge trimming could land them in hot water – including potential jail time and an 'unlimited fine'. With the sun making a welcome return recently, albeit punctuated by showers, gardening enthusiasts have been eagerly tending to their outdoor spaces, keen to ensure their greenery is looking shipshape. However, those reaching for the shears to neaten up their hedges might not just be impacting the plant's health during its blooming period but could also inadvertently breach environmental regulations. Strict rules prohibit the cutting of farm hedgerows from April 1 to August 31, barring exceptional circumstances which would necessitate a licence. While domestic garden hedges can be legally trimmed during this period, any harm caused to bird nests, whether deliberate or accidental, constitutes a legal infringement. With many birds still in the midst of nesting and rearing chicks in June, specialists at Husqvana highlight the legal implications: "Under Section 1 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, it's an offence to intentionally damage or destroy a wild bird's nest while it is being built or in use. "That includes consciously using a hedge trimmer when there is a bird's nest in your hedge, and in the process of doing so, causing the nest to be damaged or destroyed." This stance is backed up by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, reports the Express. According to the RSPB, anyone who intentionally damages a bird's nest while it is in use or under construction is in breach of the law, and this includes trimming hedges. The charity states: "The moment it becomes active, it is illegal to destroy it." Violating this law may lead to an unlimited fine and up to six months in prison. The RSPB adds: "The consequences for the above, even in the event of harm to a single bird, nest or egg, is an unlimited fine, up to six months in jail or both. Suffice to say, it is certainly not a risk worth taking." Wildlife specialists Arbtech provide insight into how the legislation is enforced in practice. They state: "Pieces of environmental legislation such as the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 as amended are regulated by a combination of the police, Natural England/Natural Resources Wales/Scottish Natural Heritage (based on location), the Environment Agency, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, the Food, Farming and Countryside Commission (FFCC), the local authorities, the Partnership of Action against Wildlife Crime (PAW), various public bodies, and relevant organisations based on the endangered species in question. "Once an action breaking the rules of the Act has been carried out, the offence will inevitably result in a police investigation. "The police will enforce part 1 of the Act, as it focuses on the fundamental wildlife protection over wildlife species and what exactly necessitates a breach of the rules. "In fact, dedicated departments of the police specialise in breaches of environmental and wildlife laws, such as the National Wildlife Crime Unit (NWCU) and Wildlife Crime Officers (WCOs). "Any law relating to the environment and wildlife are taken just as seriously as any other piece of active legislation. "Even in respect of a breach of the Act involving a single animal or habitat, the person responsible would be liable to pay a potentially unlimited fine, spend up to six months in prison, or possibly even both."
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Paternity leave system needs to change - we just need to know how
AFP via Getty Images Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A few weeks ago, I suggested that shifting the conversation about better paternity leave to better-supporting maternity leave was a better argument than flat-out demanding more leave for fathers. After returning from paternity leave last month, I stand by this, with a few amendments. On Wednesday, June 11th, Dads are being encouraged to picket the Scottish Parliament "to speak out against the UK's shockingly bad paternity leave." Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Dad Shift group notes the UK "has the worst paternity leave in Europe. Two weeks at less than minimum wage is not enough." Few would disagree on this point, generally. However, an evolving policy argument must catch up with societal expectations, present legislation, and ambitions. For starters, paternity is a relatively new phenomenon. Statutory paid paternity leave was introduced in the UK in 2003. This meant fathers became eligible for a minimum of two weeks' paid leave upon the birth of their child. Before this, fathers had only been entitled to unpaid parental leave. The first official introduction of paternity leave was in 1999 with the Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations. Secondly, in those 20 years, the expectation of what fathers do has transformed and banished the myth of the distant, well-meaning, but ultimately elective role of dads. They are now expected to run parallel with mums but are castigated as conceited egomaniacs if we suggest out loud that statutory entitlement should reflect that. Fathers are either sexists for saying we are as important as mothers or misogynistic for stating that mums are biologically more necessary (particularly in the first months of a baby's life). There is even a bizarre subset of 'trad' dads online advocating for a return to the historic gender divisions, traditional values, and disciplinary approaches to raising children. There's also a coterie of reactionaries wanting less time with their children. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Among that debate is the slew of exhausting jokes about 'daddy daycare'. Fathers are still seen as inherently incompetent next to mothers. Perhaps in reactionary response, nothing is as vicious as fathers passively trying to one-up each other about who can do the most and get the most time with their child. Support WhatsApp groups and social media are replete with sanctimonious and grandstanding accounts of 'dadding'. The policy landscape is decidedly simpler than the rabbit hole of differing opinions among dads about what they can or should bring to the parenting table. This is far from a united front of men demanding their slice of statutory cake. If a policy shift is going to take place, then there needs to be a massive tonal and societal change in how we view and understand fathers' contributions and when they matter most. God is in the details. Fathers are entitled to up to a fortnight of statutory paternity leave, which can be taken as one continuous two-week block or two separate one-week blocks. Statutory Paternity Pay for eligible employees is either £187.18 a week or 90 per cent of their average weekly earnings (whichever is lower). Mothers on maternity leave receive 90 per cent of their average weekly earnings for the first six weeks, then £187.18 for 33 weeks. When my son was born, I took two weeks of annual leave and saved my statutory leave as part of a month-long transition for my wife's return to work. It feels taboo to note that my role was significantly less relevant in those first months than what I dub the 'junction point' for my wife returning from maternity leave, particularly when factoring in childcare and how our son would fare. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The transition phase we have just moved through was wrought with challenges, anticipated and not so predictable. In conjunction with more annual leave, my recent 'formal' paternity leave made for a month in which I was more directly involved, relevant, and essential than those first ones. The picket in Edinburgh—and a concurrent one at Westminster—is meaningless without a coordinated clarification of what policy change is being demanded. It's a fundamental stepping stone to clearly establish what dads want to see to enact real change while navigating the politics of devolution and taking advantage of the forthcoming Scottish general election next year. After all, paternity leave, along with maternity leave and pay, is a reserved matter and the responsibility of the UK Parliament. This means that the statutory entitlements to paternity leave and pay are the same across the UK, including Scotland. A coordinated public affairs strategy to secure cross-party support, create an obtainable and realistic list of policy asks and keep ambitions in check is critical to achieving sustained change. Paternity leave can be taken within 52 weeks of the baby's birth, but not before the birth. Employees can take leave any time during this period, but it must end within the 52-week timeframe. Is there scope, for example, to extend this timeframe, given that mothers are still expected to drop everything to tend to a sick child, collect kids from nursery and school, and serve as primary caregivers? Could we give parents a statutory package of 100 per cent full-time pay and several months' leave that can be utilised within the first five years of a child's life Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Advocacy groups should not box themselves in, but they should be realistic. In a Westminster debate last year on Paternity Leave and Pay, Labour MP Shaun Davies called paternity leave a "segregated system." Others who contributed added that the present arrangement is inherently disadvantageous to the self-employed, "classist", and counterproductive to keeping mums in the workplace and increasing uptake by dads.
