
Syria to help locate missing Americans: US envoy
The announcement came a day after the United States formally lifted sanctions on Syria, ending more than a decade of diplomatic freeze.
Relations have steadily improved since former president Bashar al-Assad was overthrown in an Islamist-led offensive in December.
"The new Syrian government has agreed to assist the USA in locating and returning USA citizens or their remains," US special envoy for Syria Tom Barrack wrote on X, describing it as a "powerful step forward".
"The families of Austin Tice, Majd Kamalmaz, and Kayla Mueller must have closure," he added, referring to American citizens who had gone missing or been killed during Syria's devastating civil war that erupted in 2011.
Tice was working as a freelance journalist for Agence France-Presse, The Washington Post, and other outlets when he was detained at a checkpoint in August 2012.
Kamalmaz, a Syrian-American psychotherapist, was believed to have died after being detained under the Assad government in 2017.
Mueller was an aid worker kidnapped by the Islamic State group, which announced her death in February 2015, saying she was killed in a Jordanian air strike, a claim disputed by US authorities.
"President (Donald) Trump has made it clear that bringing home USA citizens or honoring, with dignity, their remains is a major priority everywhere," said Barrack, who also serves as the US ambassador to Turkey.
"The new Syrian Government will aid us in this commitment," he added.
Americans killed by IS
A Syrian source aware of the talks between the two countries told AFP there were 11 other names on Washington's list, all of them Syrian-Americans.
The source added that a Qatari delegation began this month, at Washington's request, a search mission for the remains of American hostages killed by IS.
Britain-based war monitor the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights meanwhile said that "the Qatari delegation is still searching in Aleppo province for the bodies of American citizens executed by IS".
Two US journalists, James Foley and Stephen Sotloff, were videotaped in 2014 being beheaded by a militant who spoke on camera with a British accent.
El Shafee Elsheikh, a jihadist from London, was found guilty in 2022 of hostage-taking and conspiracy to murder US citizens -- Foley and Sotloff, as well as aid workers Peter Kassig and Kayla Mueller.
The formal lifting of US sanctions also coincided with Syria's new authorities reshuffling their interior ministry to include fighting cross-border drug and people smuggling, as they seek to improve ties with the West.
The lifting of sanctions paves the way for reconstruction efforts in the war-torn country, where authorities are relying on foreign assistance to help foot the massive cost of rebuilding.
Syria's foreign ministry on Saturday welcomed the US lifting of sanctions, calling the move "a positive step in the right direction to reduce humanitarian and economic struggles in the country".
The sanctions relief extends to the new government on condition that Syria does not provide safe haven for terrorist organisations and ensure security for religious and ethnic minorities, the US Treasury Department said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
25 minutes ago
- France 24
What is genocide and is it happening in Gaza?
Israel says it is seeking to wipe out Gaza's Islamist rulers and free its hostages still held in the occupied Palestinian coastal strip since the Hamas militant attack in Israel on October 7, 2023. But Israel's devastating war on Gaza -- largely populated by descendants of Palestinian refugees who were expelled from or fled what became Israeli land in 1948 -- has killed tens of thousands of civilians and sparked growing global outrage. The accusation against Israel of genocide has been made with increasing force from quarters ranging from "Schindler's List" star Ralph Fiennes to Amnesty International and some Israeli historians. What does the legal term really mean and who can decide whether it applies? What is 'genocide'? The word genocide -- derived from the Greek word "genos", for race or tribe, and "cide", from the Latin for "to kill" -- was coined in 1944 by Raphael Lemkin. Lemkin, a Polish Jew who had fled to the United States, used it to describe the crimes committed by Nazi Germany during the Holocaust. It was used for the first time within a legal framework by an international military tribunal at Nuremberg to try Nazi leaders for their crimes in 1945. However, those accused were eventually convicted on charges of crimes against humanity. It has been recognised within international law since 1948 and the advent of the UN Genocide Convention. That text defines genocide as any of five "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group". These five acts include killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births and forcibly transferring children out of the group. Regardless of the definition, the qualification of "genocide" has been hugely sensitive over the decades. What is happening in Gaza? Israel's military offensive on Gaza since October 2023 has killed 54,677 people, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in the occupied Palestinian territory. The United Nations has said the territory's entire population of more than two million people is at risk of famine, even if Israel said last month it was partially easing the complete blockade on aid it imposed on Gaza on March 2. Despite international calls for an end to the war, a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas remains elusive. The latest war started after Hamas fighters attacked Israel on October 7, 2023. The attack resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official Israeli figures. Of the 251 hostages seized, 55 remain in Gaza, including 32 the Israeli military says are dead. Who speaks of 'genocide' in Gaza? In December 2023, South Africa brought a case to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the United Nations' highest judicial organ, alleging that Israel's Gaza offensive breached the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Israel denies the accusation. In rulings in January, March and May 2024, the ICJ told Israel to do everything possible to "prevent" acts of genocide during its military operations in Gaza, including by providing urgently needed humanitarian aid to prevent famine. While no court has so far ruled the ongoing conflict is a genocide, human rights groups and international law experts -- including several who are Israeli -- have used the term to describe it. Amnesty International has accused Israel of carrying out a "live-streamed genocide" in Gaza, while Human Rights Watch has alleged it is responsible for "acts of genocide". A UN committee in November found Israel's warfare in Gaza was "consistent with the characteristics of genocide". And a UN investigation concluded in March that Israel carried out "genocidal acts" in Gaza through the destruction of the strip's main IVF clinic and other reproductive healthcare facilities. Omer Bartov, an Israeli scholar of the Holocaust, wrote in August last year that "Israel was engaged in systematic war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocidal actions". Fellow Israeli historians Amos Goldberg and Daniel Blatman in January co-wrote an article in which they said: "Israel is indeed committing genocide in Gaza." Western governments have largely refrained from using the word, with France's President Emmanuel Macron saying it was not up to a "political leader to use to term but up to historians to do so when the time comes". But Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has used it, while Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has accused Israel of "premeditated genocide". What does Israel say? Israel alleges it is exercising its right to security and "self defence", an argument echoed by its staunch ally the United States. Israel has dismissed accusations of genocide as "blatant lies" and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accused the UN Human Rights Council of being "an antisemitic, corrupt, terror-supporting and irrelevant body". He has said UN experts should instead focus on "crimes against humanity and the war crimes committed by the Hamas terrorist organisation in the worst massacre against the Jewish people since the Holocaust", referring to October 7. The International Criminal Court (ICC) in November issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant over alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Israel's war in Gaza -- including starvation as a method of warfare. It also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas military chief Mohammed Deif over allegations of crimes against humanity and war crimes in the October 7 attack, but the case against him was dropped in February after confirmation Israel had killed him. ICC prosecutor Karim Khan also initially sought warrants against Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar and Ismail Haniyeh, but dropped those applications after their deaths in Israeli attacks. Who decides and when? Thijs Bouwknegt, a genocide expert, said the Israeli policy in Gaza seemed to be "designed to make a civilian population either perish or leave" but a court would have to decide if it was genocide. "It bears the hallmarks of it but we still have to wait and see whether it actually was," said the historian, who has conducted research for the ICC and observed trials over genocide in Rwanda and former Yugoslavia. In the case of Rwanda, in which the United Nations said extremist Hutus killed some 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus in 1994, it took a decade for the International Criminal Tribunal to conclude genocide had happened. It was not until 2007 that the ICJ recognised as genocide the murder by Bosnian Serb forces of almost 8,000 Muslim men and boys in Srebrenica in 1995 during the Bosnian war. "The threshold for genocide is nearly impossible to meet," Bouwknegt explained. "You have to prove that there was an intent and that there was the only possible explanation for what happened." Has there been intent? French-Israeli lawyer Omer Shatz said "there is no doubt that war crimes, crimes against humanity are being committed" in Gaza. But the international law expert agreed intent was more difficult to prove. That is why, after the ICC issued an arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant, he filed a report with the court in December arguing they were among eight Israeli officials responsible for "incitement to genocide in Gaza". "If incitement is established, that establishes intent," he told AFP. His 170-page report lists such alleged incitements, including Gallant at the start of the war saying Israel was fighting "human animals" in Gaza and far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich urging "total extermination" in the Palestinian territory. It cites President Isaac Herzog failing to differentiate between Palestinian militants and civilians when he spoke of "an entire nation out there that is responsible" for the October 7 attack. Mathilde Philip-Gay, an international law expert, said it was ultimately up to a judge to decide on whether the genocide label applied. But, she warned: "International law cannot stop a war." "The judiciary will intervene after the war. The qualification (of genocide) is very important for victims but it will come later," she said. What now? The 1948 Genocide Convention says signatories can call on UN organs "to take such action... for the prevention and suppression of acts of genocide". But while it implies they should act to stop any such crime from occurring, it does not detail how. Activists have called for an arms embargo and sanctions against Israel. The European Union last month ordered a review of its cooperation deal with Israel and Britain halted trade talks with the government. But the United States and Germany, two major weapons suppliers, are not likely to want to review their relationship with Israel.


Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Syria to give IAEA inspectors immediate access to former nuclear sites
Syria's new government has agreed to give UN inspectors access to suspected former nuclear sites immediately, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has said. Rafael Grossi confirmed the development after talks with Syria's interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa and other officials in Damascus. The UN agency's aim is "to bring total clarity over certain activities that took place in the past that were, in the judgement of the agency, probably related to nuclear weapons", Grossi said. He described the new Syrian government as "committed to opening up to the world, to international cooperation", and expressed hope that the inspection process could be completed within months. In 2024, an IAEA team visited some sites of interest while former President Bashar al-Assad was still in power. Since al-Assad's fall in December, the IAEA has been seeking to restore access to sites associated with Syria's nuclear programme. Under the former dictator's rule, Syria is believed to have operated an extensive clandestine nuclear programme, which included an undeclared nuclear reactor built by North Korea in the eastern province of Deir el-Zour. The IAEA described the reactor as being "not configured to produce electricity," raising the concern that Damascus sought to construct a nuclear bomb there by producing weapons-grade plutonium. The reactor site only became public knowledge after Israel destroyed the facility in airstrikes in 2007. Syria later levelled the site and never responded fully to the IAEA's questions about it. Grossi said inspectors plan to return to the reactor in Deir el-Zour as well as to three other sites. A miniature neutron source reactor in Damascus and a facility in Homs that can process yellow-cake uranium are among the sites under IAEA safeguards. While there are no indications that there have been releases of radiation from the sites, Grossi said the watchdog is concerned that "enriched uranium can be lying somewhere and could be reused, could be smuggled, could be trafficked". He said al-Sharaa, who has courted Western governments since taking power, had shown a "very positive disposition to talk to us and to allow us to carry out the activities we need to". Apart from resuming inspections, Grossi said the IAEA is prepared to transfer equipment for nuclear medicine and to help rebuild the radiotherapy, nuclear medicine and oncology infrastructure in a health system severely weakened by nearly 14 years of civil war. "And the president has expressed to me he's interested in exploring, in the future, nuclear energy as well," Grossi said. A number of other countries in the region, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Jordan, are pursuing nuclear energy in some form. Grossi said Syria would most likely be looking into small modular reactors, which are cheaper and easier to deploy than traditional large ones. PSG's Champions League triumph wrapped an incredible football season in Europe. Luis Enrique's team crushed Inter 5-0 in the Munich final, winning an historic treble, and making it the biggest margin ever in a major international football showdown. It is worth noting, however, that Ajax beat AC Milan 6-0 in the last leg of the 1974 UEFA Super Cup, although the trophy is not widely regarded as a major one. PSG's win also marked a long-awaited milestone in the Champions League era. They now hold the record for the longest gap between a club's first Champions League appearance and their first title: 31 years, according to data analysed by The team also became the only one to have seven different goalscorers in a single Champions League match, following their 7-0 win over Brest on 19 February: Barcola, Kvaratskhelia, Vitinha, Doué, Mendes, Ramos and Mayulu. Inter's 5-0 thrashing however should not overshadow their extraordinary run to the final. True to the great Italian tradition of defending, the Nerazzurri set an incredible record by going 539 minutes without conceding a single goal from the start of the tournament, despite playing against top opponents such as Manchester City and Arsenal. The previous record was held by Manchester United, who kept opposition teams out for 481 minutes in the 2010-11 season when they got all the way to the final. Although Barcelona didn't make it to the final, many of their players broke individual records. Starting with Rafinha, the 28-year-old Brazilian matched Cristiano Ronaldo's 2014 record for the most goal involvements in a single Champions League season: 21 in total, thanks to an astonishing 13 goals and 8 assists. That wasn't the only individual record set by the Catalans. Described as one of the most difficult opponents to face by several players, Lamine Yamal became the youngest footballer to ever score in a Champions League semi-final, at just 17, against Inter. That smashes Kylian Mbappe's previous record, set at 18 years of age when he scored for Monaco in the 2016-17 campaign. There was some joy for Bayern Munich and Real Madrid, too. Thomas Müller extended his record for the most appearances for a single club in the Champions League era to 163, while Harry Kane became the first player to ever score a hat-trick of penalties, in September's game against Dinamo Zagreb. When it comes to appearances, Real Madrid bumped their record with 28 straight seasons in the competition, as well as extended their streak of reaching the knockouts 28 times in a row. Similarly, their former manager, Carlo Ancelotti, now at Brazil, extended his record for managerial appearances to 218 and further increased his record for Champions League victories by reaching 124. On the other hand, Girona and Feyenoord broke the record for the most own goals in a single Champions League season, with four each, breaking Fenerbahçe's previous record of three own goals in the 2007-08 season. At the same time, Feynoord's Austrian defender Gernot Trauner became the first player to ever score two own goals in a single UCL game, in a 6-1 loss to Lille in January.


AFP
2 hours ago
- AFP
Doctored video falsely linked to recent Kenya-Tanzania diplomatic dispute
Activists and politicians from Kenya and Uganda recently travelled to Tanzania to show solidarity with opposition leader Tundu Lissu, who is facing treason charges. However, several of them were detained and deported, and two of the activists accused authorities of torture and sexual assault. A video published on social media claims to show CNN's Fareed Zakaria weighing in on the events. But the clip is altered; the audio is AI-generated, and CNN confirmed it did not publish the video. 'Tanzania vs Kenya Gen-Zs @CNN-Today News,' reads the text overlaid on a TikTok post published on May 22, 2025. Image Screenshot of the altered post, taken on May 28, 2025 The clip includes what appears to be a segment from the CNN show Global Public Square with host Fareed Zakaria. Below are photos of Tanzanian President Samia Suluhu Hassan and Kenyan activist Boniface Mwangi. The chyron reads: 'Fareed's Take' and 'Not in My Country: Why Tanzania is going after Open Society'. 'Let's step back for a moment and recognise where we are right now,' Zakaria says at the beginning of the clip. The CNN host is not seen again from the four-second mark of the video, but a voice that sounds like Zakaria's is heard over images, speaking about last year's 'Kenyan Gen-Z-led demonstrations that began as a tax revolt and quickly evolved into a national reckoning'. 'This week, Tanzania's President Samia Suluhu Hassan issued one of her strongest warnings yet. 'Not in my country,' she said, referring to a group of East African organisers who, according to Tanzanian intelligence, were flown into Dar es Salaam, booked into $400-a-night hotels, handed shopping money, and sent to target her government,' the voice adds. The video further claims that the 'Open Society Foundation's Southern Africa office' was responsible for funding the activists in what is part of a bigger 'digitally coordinated, foreign-funded' disruption. Towards the end of the audio, the voice says that 'Suluhu isn't rejecting activism,' but 'rejecting manipulation'. The audio is illustrated by visuals: images from Kenya's 2024 anti-government protests, a recent address by Hassan, clips of Open Society Foundations founder George Soros, and old articles regarding the suspension and regulation of non-governmental organisations in Ethiopia, Uganda, Rwanda and Zimbabwe. The video was published elsewhere on Facebook, X, Instagram and YouTube. Foreign activists A diplomatic row erupted between Kenya and Tanzania after Kenyan and Ugandan activists and politicians who travelled to Tanzania to witness opposition leader Lissu's treason trial on May 19, 2025, were detained and subsequently deported. As the trial proceeded, Hassan issued a stern warning stating she would not allow foreign activists to interfere with Tanzania's internal affairs or cause chaos (archived here). Two of the activists, Agather Atuhaire from Uganda and Kenya's Boniface Mwangi, later accused Tanzanian authorities of torture and sexual assault during their incommunicado detention (archived here and here). These events have attracted both local and international attention, as calls for investigations intensify (here, here and here). However, the video showing Zakaria's assessment of the situation is doctored. Doctored video AFP Fact Check conducted reverse image searches on keyframes from the clip and found that the introduction was taken from a real Fareed Zakaria segment published by CNN on May 4, 2025 (archived here). In the first three seconds of the original segment, Zakaria starts with the initial footage used in the TikTok video and says: 'Let's step back for a moment and recognise where we are right now.' However, rather than talking about Kenya and Tanzania, he goes on to say that 'the United States has launched a trade war with the world's second-largest economy, China'. The chyron font and text also look different in the original footage. 'Fareed's take,' it reads, without any subhead about Tanzania. Image Screenshots comparing the doctored video (top) and the original CNN footage (bottom) While the voice sounds like Zakaria's throughout the TikTok video, there are some noticeable discrepancies in the audio -- the slightly robotic tones, unnatural pacing and odd inflections -- starting from the moment he is no longer visible onscreen. For example, there are unnatural pauses in the middle of sentences, such as when the voice says 'Kenyan [long pause] Gen-Z-led demonstrations that began as a tax revolt' and 'a group of East African organisers who, according to Tanzanian intelligence, were flown [long pause] into Dar es Salaam'. This is corroborated by InVID-WeVerify's audio detection tool which suggests strong evidence of voice cloning. Image A screenshot of InVID-WeVerify's voice cloning detector results, taken on May 28, 2025 AFP Fact Check found no record of Zakaria commenting on the recent Tanzania-Kenya dispute. 'This video purportedly showing CNN's Fareed Zakaria's take on foreign influence in Tanzania and Kenya never aired on CNN and is entirely fabricated,' Mariana Piñango, a spokesperson for CNN, told AFP Fact Check. Additionally, contrary to the claim in the AI-generated video, there has been no public statement from Tanzania's national intelligence authority addressing the detention of the Kenyan and Ugandan activists or linking them to any paid foreign influence operations. The Open Society Foundations denied the accusations made in the video in an email response to AFP Fact Check. 'The video is an AI-generated fake that includes false allegations against the Open Society Foundations. We are a nonpartisan charitable organisation that works across Africa and around the world to promote human rights, equity, and justice.' AFP Fact Check previously debunked another claim related to the recent Kenya-Tanzania tensions.