WWDC Bored Me. I Need Apple's iPhone 17 Launch to Make a Splash
I've just sat through Apple's WWDC 2025 keynote, and despite all of Apple's fanfare about its new "Liquid Glass" design language, there was very little that got my blood pumping. In fact, it felt like one of the most underwhelming Apple keynotes I've sat through in my 14 years as a tech journalist, and that's not a good sign for Apple. What I can say with confidence is that it really needs to make a splash with the iPhone 17 in September.
It wasn't that Apple did anything specifically wrong with today's announcements. I actually like most of them. Fine, the new 'Liquid Glass' design language is arguably in a similar vein to Windows Vista, but it's nice to see iOS get a bit of a refresh, as it's felt a little stale for a while now. But it's hardly groundbreaking, nor will it change how we interact with our phones.
Thanks for making my app icons transparent, Apple, but what can I do with them now?
Apple
Some of the new features the company announced -- such as the call screening tool or the screenshot search function that uses Apple's Visual Intelligence -- are nice to see, but they're basically the same as Android's call screening tool and Circle to Search, so it's difficult to get excited. Ditto the glossy icons now coming to TVOS or the new pointer in iPadOS. Even Apple's Senior Vice President of Software Engineering Craig Federighi seemed to know they had nothing much to shout about: "A pointier pointer? Who'd have thought!" he quipped.
Fine, I like the windows in iPadOS. But that's one of the only things in the whole presentation that piqued my interest. I sat up with anticipation when Apple talked about the new Games app, thumbs already twitching with the excitement about new titles I might be playing thanks to new platforms or new advances in Apple's Metal graphics engine. But no, it's just an easier way to view your games and see your friend's high scores. Big deal.
I'm left feeling a little deflated by the lack of excitement overall, so I'm forced instead to look towards September, when we expect to see the iPhone 17 unveiled. It needs to be a big one. It needs some real razzle dazzle. And not just for me, but for Apple, too.
The Galaxy S25 Edge against a slice of thin crust pizza. Your move, Apple.
Jesse Orrall/CNET
The iPhone 16 is a great phone, but its biggest new feature was a new button for the camera that still feels a bit…weird. Last year saw the grand unveiling of Apple Intelligence, which so far has been a huge letdown, with Federighi stating that more information on Apple Intelligence's updates will be shared "in the coming year." In short, it feels like Apple needs a win.
The iPhone 17 could be that win. Early rumors point to upgraded cameras with advanced video features for creators, along with the potential for a slimmer iPhone Air that would compete with the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge. Will this be the year we see a foldable iPhone? Almost certainly not, but it'd definitely be something more exciting to hear about during a long keynote.
Maybe I'm being too harsh. Maybe I'm just a bit jaded after 14 years of covering Apple events. Maybe Apple's keynote starting at 6 p.m. in my UK time zone meant I can't have my dinner yet and I'm grumpy having to wait for my food. Or maybe Apple did need to put a bit more meat on the plate and prove that its biggest announcements of the year aren't just style over substance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmunds
21 minutes ago
- Edmunds
2026 Cadillac Optiq-V First Look: 519 Horsepower and 3.5 Seconds to 60 MPH
With 219 horsepower over the standard Optiq, Cadillac claims that its new Optiq-V can hit 60 mph in a launch-control-enabled 3.5 seconds. Output totals are up to 519 horsepower and 650 lb-ft of torque on this mighty mini ute. Dual-motor all-wheel drive is standard, and you'll have your choice of all-season or summer tires. Supporting this performance is an 85-kWh battery, the same size fitted to the standard Optiq. Cadillac estimates the V will travel 275 miles on a full charge, which is about 25 miles less than the standard Optiq.
CBS News
42 minutes ago
- CBS News
Sen. Warren asks for contingency plans on national security after Trump and Musk's social media fallout
Sen. Elizabeth Warren is asking Secretary of State Marco Rubio for information on the Trump administration's contingency plans if billionaire Elon Musk breaches his companies' current contracts with the U.S. amid the ongoing public fallout between him and President Trump. In a letter to Rubio as acting national security adviser and obtained by CBS News, Warren said Mr. Trump and Musk's public disagreements about the upcoming reconciliation bill that escalated into a public online spat could "have serious implications for U.S. national security." The Massachusetts Democrat mentioned Mr. Trump's proposal to terminate Musk's government contracts and subsidies, which the world's richest man followed with a threat that SpaceX would "begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately." Musk has since walked back his threat. "No petty social media fight between the president and a billionaire should jeopardize U.S. national security," Warren said. In addition to contingency plans for SpaceX, the senator asked for information regarding the impact on U.S. agencies' satellite communications if Musk's Starlink is turned off. Additionally, she asked Rubio to provide any analysis that the Trump administration has conducted "of its authorities and options under the Defense Production Act to address vendor lock, monopolies, or contractor refusal to meet national security needs." She asked to receive answers to her questions by June 14, whether through a classified briefing or preferably a public response that can be released to Congress and the public, the letter said. Warren has been a vocal opponent of Musk and his involvement in the Trump administration. Last week, she released a report that outlines instances her office has found of Musk benefiting from it. Musk's rocket company has received tens of billions of dollars from the federal government over the last decade, including $3.8 billion in the 2024 fiscal year alone, according to federal records. The bulk of those federal grants are from NASA, which has paid SpaceX billions over the last decade to ferry astronauts and supplies to and from the International Space Station. The agency has also awarded SpaceX upwards of $2 billion in recent years to design and build a lunar lander, as part of NASA's Artemis program, which aims to return humans to the moon for the first time in a half-century. While the public spat appears to have cooled somewhat, Mr. Trump told NBC News' Kristen Welker in a phone interview on Saturday that he has no plans to make up with the mega-billionaire. "I'm too busy doing other things," Trump continued. "You know, I won an election in a landslide. I gave him a lot of breaks, long before this happened, I gave him breaks in my first administration, and saved his life in my first administration, I have no intention of speaking to him." When asked by a reporter Friday if he's still considering rolling back subsidies to Musk as a money-saving move, Mr. Trump suggested he was open to it. "He's got a lot of money, he gets a lot of subsidy. So we'll take a look at that," the president said on Air Force One. "Only if it's fair for him and for the country. I would certainly think about it, but it has to be fair." This isn't the first time the president has needled Musk over his companies' federal subsidies. In a 2022 feud, Mr. Trump claimed Musk would be "worthless" without hefty subsidies for "electric cars that don't drive long enough" and "rocketships to nowhere." The two mended their relationship then and Musk spent hundreds of millions to help elect Mr. Trump in 2024. The billionaire went on to lead the Trump White House's cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency until last week. contributed to this report.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Should You Buy BigBear.ai Stock Today?
offers cutting-edge artificial intelligence, machine learning, and computer vision solutions that enhance organizations' decision-making processes. The company is targeting an international expansion while leveraging its national security expertise into new enterprise AI applications. Mixed financial trends, including a muted growth outlook, may keep shares volatile. 10 stocks we like better than › Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are rapidly transforming the global economy by automating complex workflows and delivering predictive insights that unlock unprecedented levels of productivity. (NYSE: BBAI) is a prime example of an emerging leader in the field that deserves a closer look by investors. The technology sector small-cap is developing AI-powered decision intelligence solutions positioned to capitalize on a significant long-term growth opportunity. Does a promising outlook for make its stock a good buy for your portfolio today? Here's what you need to know. While most companies are rushing to add artificial intelligence features to their existing product offerings, stands out as a pure play on the transformative technology at the core of its data analytics platform. The company has carved out a niche specializing in operationalizing AI and machine learning capabilities for mission-critical intelligence and national defense applications. Through high-profile clients such as the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Army, has gained credibility as a defense tech innovator in areas like autonomous systems, cybersecurity, and intelligent supply chain management. Perhaps even more exciting are the ongoing efforts to leverage this expertise in enterprise AI and the private sector as a new growth driver. Within digital identity services, several airlines and airports worldwide already rely on its Vision AI technology, which combines real-time images with actionable insights. Products include "TrueFace" and "veriScan" verification systems that streamline the passenger screening process. The potential of vision AI extends beyond airports, with applications in supply chain logistics for warehouse inventory management and cargo inspection. Ultimately, is positioning itself to capture growing AI demand across multiple industries. Despite the commercial momentum, financial results at the start of 2025 have been muted. The company reported first-quarter revenue of $34.8 million, a 5% year-over-year increase for the period ended March 31, reflecting new Department of Homeland Security contracts and wins in the Digital Identity business. This growth was offset by delays in government program funding for other initiatives. Increased spending, including on research and development efforts, led to an adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) loss of $7 million, widening from a $1.6 million loss in the prior-year quarter. Management is projecting optimism in its outlook, citing "encouraging signs" that the strategic focus is resonating with customers. Favorably, its current order backlog of $385 million is up 30% from $296 million at the end of Q1 2024, suggesting room for stronger growth. is guiding for full-year revenue between $160 million and $180 million, at the midpoint, representing an 8% increase from 2024. The company also expects its recurring loss to narrow, targeting 2025 adjusted EBITDA in the "negative single-digit millions." There's a lot to like about as it moves to expand into new industry verticals and enter international markets. Yet, it's important to recognize that the stock remains a speculative investment, given the company's high price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, lack of profitability, and long-term uncertainties. Shares are down 63% from their 52-week high, underscoring underlying market skepticism regarding the company's potential. First, will face intense competition from larger tech rivals pursuing many of the same market opportunities. Companies like Palantir Technologies, defense industry consultant Booz Allen Hamilton, and even cybersecurity giants have greater financial resources and pose challenges in both defense and commercial AI applications. Second, it's unclear whether proprietary technology can maintain its innovative edge. Furthermore, while modest growth outlook is a step in the right direction, the market will likely want to see evidence of accelerating trends to drive the stock price higher. The possibility that results disappoint and that any timetable for generating consistent profitability gets pushed out would likely keep the stock volatile -- a risk for investors to balance. The next several quarters will be pivotal for to demonstrate its commercial traction and the success of its growth initiatives. Without a major catalyst on the horizon, I believe the prudent move for investors is to adopt a wait-and-see approach before buying the stock. Ultimately, there may be more compelling AI stocks with a better combination of growth and value available elsewhere. Before you buy stock in consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Dan Victor has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends Booz Allen Hamilton. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Buy Stock Today? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
