
Separatists in Pakistan Are Still Holding Hundreds of Hostages in Train Standoff
Pakistani security forces have been locked in a deadly standoff with armed militants for more than a day after the attackers seized a passenger train on Tuesday and held hundreds hostage.
The crisis is a dramatic escalation of a long-running separatist insurgency in the country's southwest.
The Baloch Liberation Army, or B.L.A., a banned separatist group, seized the train, which was carrying more than 400 people, in a remote mountainous region.
The group claimed to be holding at least 214 people, including military personnel and civilian law enforcement officers. It demanded that the government release its imprisoned members within 48 hours, threatening to execute the hostages if the demand was not met.
By Wednesday morning, security authorities said that more than 150 hostages had been rescued, though the fate of the remaining passengers remained uncertain. Officials also reported that at least 27 militants had been killed in the continuing operation and that hostages were being held at three separate locations.
Muhammad Tallal Chaudry, the minister of state for interior, told the Geo TV news channel on Tuesday night that some hostages had been taken into the nearby mountains.
Independent verification of events remains difficult because the hijacking took place in a remote, mountainous region with practically no cell or internet connectivity, restricting the reach of journalists. So far, information has come solely from security officials and the B.L.A. The Pakistani military, which is mainly conducting the rescue operation, has not issued an official statement.
The train was traveling from Quetta, the capital of Baluchistan, to Peshawar. But it became stranded inside a tunnel about 100 miles from Quetta as it came under attack, and the conductor was killed, according to the authorities.
After the capture of the train, Pakistan Railways announced that it would temporarily suspend train operations in Quetta and that they would resume only after security agencies had inspected and confirmed the system's safety.
Muhammad Ashraf was among a group of 80 passengers who were freed last night and said he reached a nearby railway station after walking for hours along the tracks.
'When the train was attacked, everyone threw themselves to the floor, using luggage and sacks to shield themselves from the bullets,' Mr. Ashraf said by phone after reaching Quetta. 'Screams were echoing everywhere.'
The militants took all of the passengers hostage but later released parties traveling with women and children, he said.
Baluchistan, a large and sparsely populated province that borders Iran and Afghanistan, has long been plagued by separatist violence and insurgent activity. The province is also home to major China-led projects, including a strategic port.
Ethnic separatist groups have regained momentum, increasingly attacking security forces and Chinese citizens involved in projects under the Belt and Road Initiative, China's infrastructure investment program. The separatists accuse Pakistan's government of allowing China to extract the region's wealth.
Experts, however say that separatist groups have become increasingly emboldened and sophisticated in their operations, now incorporating tactics such as suicide bombings — an approach that was previously associated primarily with Islamist militants operating in northwestern Pakistan and Afghanistan for the past several decades.
'The ability of the B.L.A. to hijack a train with such precision suggests an advanced intelligence-gathering network and strategic planning,' said Dost Muhammad Barrech, an academic at the University of Balochistan in Quetta.
Just last week, an alliance of separatist groups, including the B.L.A., announced plans to intensify attacks on Pakistani security forces, infrastructure and Chinese interests in the region.
Last year, the B.L.A. carried out one of Pakistan's deadliest terrorist attacks, a suicide bombing that killed at least 25 people, including security personnel, at a busy railway station in Quetta.
The group also claimed responsibility for another deadly bombing targeting a convoy carrying Chinese nationals near Karachi's international airport, in Pakistan's largest city.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
35 minutes ago
- New York Times
Corrections: June 15, 2025
An article on June 8 about academic freedom misstated an aspect of allegations made about Professor Amy Wax in a legal filing by the University of Pennsylvania in a lawsuit and omitted Wax's response. The legal filing noted that Wax has been accused of suggesting to a student––not saying––that Black people are inferior to white people. The article should have noted that Wax denies the allegations. An article on Nov. 10 about Uyghur refugees described inaccurately an internal Chinese government spreadsheet. The spreadsheet contained the names of more than 16,000 people, not 17,743 Uyghurs. (Close to 1,000 entries on the spreadsheet appear to be duplicates. And some entries appear to represent Kazakhs, not Uyghurs.) An article this weekend on Page 12 about six hidden shops in New York misstates the profession of Daniel Corral-Webb, a co-founder of Archivio Records. He is a D.J., not a designer. The article also misstates the online presence of High Valley Books. The shop does have a website. Errors are corrected during the press run whenever possible, so some errors noted here may not have appeared in all editions. To contact the newsroom regarding correction requests, please email nytnews@ To share feedback, please visit Comments on opinion articles may be emailed to letters@ For newspaper delivery questions: 1-800-NYTIMES (1-800-698-4637) or email customercare@

Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
How the U.S. is Handing Over Venezuela's Oil Sector to China
After coming into office, the administration of President Donald Trump has eliminated licenses for oil companies to operate in Venezuela, despite initial hints that it would continue them, with presidential envoy Richard Grenell's visits to Caracas. This means that sanctions on state-owned PDVSA are fully back on. Chevron, the main U.S. corporation on the ground, is back to having only a secret license for minimum maintenance and security, as it still a shareholder in four joint ventures. In the last few months, this has sparked a question. Is the U.S. government leaving the South American country at the mercy of Beijing? Could Chinese companies replace Chevron in Venezuela? There are two short answers. In terms of oil exports, yes. And this has already happened. Before the first round of economic and financial sanctions hit in 2017, the U.S. took almost 800,000 barrels per day from Venezuela. This figure went all the way down to zero in 2019, with the highest level of restrictions known as 'maximum pressure.' This happened again in May of this year, as Chevron, Repsol and others were blocked by the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). So, where does all the oil go? In past years, Caracas was able to strike agreements with Rosneft or with Indian buyers. But as the U.S. introduced secondary sanctions, and now secondary tariffs, there was only one buyer left, the only one that does not fear Washington's threats: China. Reuters has already reported that crude that was produced in joint ventures with Chevron has been on its way to East Asia. And the Chinese market does have the capacity to absorb Venezuelan oil. The only problem is how much PDVSA gets paid, when there is only one buyer on the block—a monopsony. When it comes down to Chinese companies taking over Chevron's operations, this is unlikely to happen in the near to medium term. More than anything else, because it does not need to happen for Beijing to expand its influence and control. The same goes for Moscow or Iran. First, investors have plenty of options before them, from greenfield opportunities to mature fields that only need repairs. Venezuela has thousands of square kilometres with billions of barrels of oil underneath. And most joint ventures are effectively dormant: just 20 out of 64 areas of operation are producing more than 10,000 barrels per day of crude, while most are stuck at 0 or below the 1,000 mark. Second, regime officials will prefer to keep the fields where Chevron invested for themselves. 240,000 barrels per day is a great business opportunity. This means millions of dollars in contracts for goods and services, that used to be managed by a foreign corporation—not anymore, courtesy of President Trump. Can Chinese companies take over Chevron's oil fields? Now, Chinese companies entering Chevron's former operations can definitely happen. Let us start with Productive Participation Contracts (known as CPP for their initials in Spanish), which are a form of production-sharing agreement coupled with exclusive rights to contract goods and services. Hong Kong-based China Concord Petroleum (CCP) has started working in oil fields which are part of a joint venture with Belorusneft, using a CPP. Given that 'Petrolera Bielovenezolana' was not productive—with an average output of just 200 barrels per day—the Venezuelan government effectively put it up for rent. The Venezuelan government is not just signing production sharing agreements in areas where there are joint ventures; it is even figuring a way to normalise this framework. This could include that not just PDVSA, but the other shareholders in the joint venture get paid dividends as well by the CPP company. Thanks to the minimum maintenance license, Chevron is still a partner to PDVSA. But with no way to pay, the Venezuelan government feels entitled to remove it from operational control. In the coming years, it should be no surprise if a new company—Chinese or from any other country—effectively takes over. Here is another point that cannot be overlooked: CPPs are negotiated and signed in secret, since they were created under a special law to bypass sanctions. So far, we only know that CCP, Anhui Guangda Mining Investment and Kerui Petroleum Group have been eyeing up opportunities in Venezuela, but there could be more companies out there that we just do not know of yet. While Anhui Guangda has signed a deal for a greenfield project in the Orinoco Oil Belt—the Ayacucho 2 block—there are reports that these firms have also shown interest in the joint ventures where Petrobras was involved. China's mineral monopsony Oil is only one part of the story. In the mining sector, China and Iran are the only major foreign states. Initially, many U.S. and other Western companies left due to expropriations, especially during Hugo Chávez's expropriation spree between 2007 and 2012. But now, while there is more openness to foreign capital, the OFAC is sanctioning the gold sector, which makes the entire mining industry riskier. India's Jindal Steel & Power was nonetheless able to start up at the Cerro Bolívar iron mines last year. For some minerals, China is the only game in town. An example is cassiterite, a type of rock which contains tin (about 65%) and smaller quantities of tantalum, platinum and other rare minerals. Buyers are keeping production at arm's length, which is mostly done by artisanal mining. But they nonetheless have an outsized influence on the sector—this is a monopsony—and the same is happening with oil. By Elias Ferrer for More Top Reads From t Read this article on


Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Houthis Say '1000 Leaders' in Store Amid Israel Assassination Strike Report
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A source within Yemen's Ansar Allah movement, also known as the Houthis, has told Newsweek that the group would persist in its battle with Israel after reports that Israeli forces carried out a targeted strike against senior figures at a meeting. The Israeli attack, which comes amid an unprecedented exchange of strikes between Israel and Ansar Allah's Axis of Resistance coalition ally, Iran, was reported by a number of Israeli outlets as well as Saudi Arabia's Al-Hadath network. The reports cited unnamed sources suggesting that the target was Ansar Allah military Chief of Staff Mohammed Abdel Karim al-Ghamari. Al-Hadath also reported that Ansar Allah-led Supreme Political Council President Mahdi al-Mashat was also in attendance at the meeting. Their fates have yet to be confirmed. The Ansar Allah source with whom Newsweek spoke to declined to discuss the details of the strike but affirmed that the group was prepared to move forward with its missile and drone campaign against Israel even in the case of losing high-level leaders. "We are all projects of martyrdom, and we are not afraid of being targeted," the Ansar Allah source said. "Every leader is succeeded by a thousand leaders." Newsweek has reached out to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) for comment. Ansar Allah has fired dozens of missiles and drones at Israel since October 2023, intervening in support of the Palestinian Hamas movement after it launched a surprise attack on Israel. The ensuing conflict sparked a still-ongoing war that has spread across the Middle East, drawing in Iran and allies non-state allies across the region. Rising tensions over the conflict took a dramatic new turn this week when Israel launched a sweeping and unprecedented series of strikes across Iran. The operating, dubbed "Rising Lion," has involved hundreds of attacks targeting facilities and personnel tied to Iran's armed forces and nuclear program. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.