Macron team in chaos over Brigitte ‘shove'
Emmanuel Macron's communications team is in disarray over the Brigitte 'shove', with splits reportedly emerging on how to handle the furore over viral footage of France's first couple in an apparent marital dispute in Vietnam.
The video in question showed Mrs Macron raising her hand and pushing her husband's face moments before they stepped off their presidential jet to be greeted by delegates in Hanoi on Sunday evening.
With online reaction snowballing, the Elysée initially suggested that it was fake, AI-generated footage.
In a sharp reversal, it later admitted that the images were real, but that claims France's First Couple were having some kind of dispute were wide of the mark.
'It was a moment when the president and his wife were relaxing one last time before the start of the trip by having a laugh. It was a moment of closeness,' said an Elysée aide.
The panicked reaction – and u-turn – reflected simmering 'tensions within the Elysée's communications unit' according to state radio channel France Info.
One Macron ally told the channel that the Élysée 'ballsed up' by first talking about fake images.
Credit: Reuters
Another insisted that they had to act quickly: 'When they don't, it turns into the conspiracy theory sphere, we're in a world where there's a need for clarity so as not to let crazy stuff flourish.'
France Info said Elysée spin doctors were struggling to set the right tone. 'On its social networks, the Élysée almost presents itself as a news fact-checking unit, issuing one denial after another,' it said.
Philippe Guibert, a commentator on Europe1 radio, said that whatever really happened behind the scenes, the reaction smacked of a 'very, very poor communication exercise'.
'The best thing would have been to say nothing and wait for it to die down because it's ridiculous compared to current world events.'
Fellow commentator Jean-Claude Dassier also bemoaned a 'catastrophic' PR reaction over what for him was 'clearly a row' but not an affair of state.
'Why haven't we heard from Brigitte? For once, it would have been useful to have her plain and simple explanation.'
Paris Match, the weekly glossy magazine, leapt to the Macrons' aid with a fawning photo story showing France's first couple looking radiant and entitled: 'Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron forget the row and get their smile back at a state dinner in Vietnam.'
'Their faces betrayed nothing of the controversy raging in the French media and on social networks,' it wrote.
'Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron were all smiles and relaxed as they attended the state dinner hosted by Vietnamese president Luong Cuong and his wife Nguyen Thi Minh Nguyet on Monday evening as part of the couple's official visit to the country.'
On Tuesday, the couple was seen arm in arm as the president arrived at Hanoi's University of Science and Technology to deliver a speech.
On Monday night, Mr Macron blasted 'crackpot' conspiracy theorists for seeking to intensify speculation around the state of his marriage.
He pointed out that he had recently been falsely accused of taking cocaine with Sir Keir Starmer and Germany's chancellor Friedrich Merz, and of having a physical altercation with Turkey's Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who held onto his finger.
'My wife and I were squabbling, we were rather joking, and I was taken by surprise,' Mr Macron told reporters.
Now it has 'become a kind of planetary catastrophe, and some are even coming up with theories', he added.
'For three weeks, there have been people who have watched videos and who think that I shared a bag of cocaine, that I had a mano-a-mano with a Turkish president and now that I am having a domestic dispute with my wife.
'In these three videos, I took a tissue, shook someone's hand and just joked with my wife, as we do quite often. Nothing more,' he went on.
'None of this is true… so everyone needs to calm down.'
Meanwhile, Russia's foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, who had actively promoted the cocaine disinformation earlier this month, wrote on Telegram that Mr Macron had received 'a right hook from his wife'.
She said Mr Macron's advisers would try to explain away the gesture by blaming Russia. She quipped: 'Maybe it was the 'hand of the Kremlin?''
Mr Macron's visit to Vietnam, the first by a French president in almost a decade, comes as he aims to boost France's influence in south-east Asia and position the country as a 'third way' between the US and China.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Barcelona stars Lamine Yamal & Raphinha's updated Ballon d'Or odds after PSG's UCL triumph
An update on the chances of one of Barcelona pair Lamine Yamal and Raphinha lifting this year's Ballon d'Or has been forthcoming online. And the info points towards the hopes of the pair beginning to fade. Advertisement The subject of the Ballon d'Or race has of course taken its place front and centre in the chatter across Europe once more over recent days. This comes after Paris Saint-Germain secured the club's first-ever title in the Champions League. Ousmane Dembélé, who was already considered as being amongst the frontrunners to lift the 'Golden Ball', played a starring role in the Munich showcase, notching a pair of assists en route to a 5-0 drubbing of Inter Milan. And if the latest word stemming from the media is anything to go by, then such exploits appear to have put Dembélé in prime position to be named world football's best player. Advertisement As per French outlet Actu Foot, citing the latest bookmakers' odds, PSG's in-form frontman is now considered as having a 66% chance of winning the Ballon d'Or' Lamine Yamal, meanwhile, sits some way back in 2nd on 27%, with Barcelona teammate Raphinha rounding out the top-3, joining Mohamed Salah on 9% odds. Conor Laird – GSFN
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Federal lawsuit claims California's labor code discriminates against Vietnamese nail techs, salon owners
A federal civil lawsuit against California alleges that the state's Labor Code discriminates against Vietnamese-American manicurists and salon owners, following the passage of a 2020 law that changed how employees and independent contractors are classified. The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in Santa Ana on Saturday, argues that only nail technicians are excluded from being classified as independent contractors due to a California law enacted in 2020. Nail technicians, many of whom are Vietnamese-American, were also considered independent contractors before the law's passage. According to the suit, 'in California, approximately 82% of all nail manicurists/ pedicurists ('nail technicians') are Vietnamese American, and 85% of these are women.' 'The penalties for misclassifying a worker as an independent contractor are severe, and when the defendants, as heads of their enforcement agencies, enforce the new rule prohibiting nail technicians from being independent contractors, the damage to the plaintiffs will be severe and irreparable. In this regard, the salon plaintiffs will be forced out of business and will be forced to close their doors. In addition, the salon plaintiffs will be subject to significant assessments and financial penalties that will be impossible to pay,' the suit added. California Assemblyman Tri Ta (R-Westminster) stated that he has introduced legislation, Assembly Bill 504, to restore equal rights to manicurists. The labor law switch occurred in 2020, when AB 5, a law that altered the classification of workers as employees or independent contractors, took effect. Before its passage, in 2018, the California Supreme Court changed the requirements companies must use to label their workers as independent contractors. At the time, companies that opposed the bill waged a campaign to prevent its passage. The businesses that filed the suit include multiple locations of Happy Nails & Spa, Holly and Hudson, and Blu Nail Bar. 'Since January, Vietnamese American manicurists have faced blatant discrimination under California's labor laws, stripped of the same rights and freedoms afforded to others in their industry,' Scott Wellman, attorney for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. 'If the State of California refuses to fix this injustice, we are prepared to hold them accountable in federal court.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Federal lawsuit alleges discrimination against Vietnamese women nail techs
The fight for licensed manicurists to be able to work as self-employed without passing a test is going to court. Backed by Vietnamese American nail technicians and nail salon owners holding protest signs, including 'stop Asian hate,' Republican Assemblyman Tri Ta announced Monday morning the filing of a discrimination lawsuit outside of the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Santa Ana. 'Earlier this year, our office received many concerns from Vietnamese American manicurists and nail salon owners,' Ta said at a news conference. 'Their lives were turned upside down overnight when the independent contractor status expired on January 1.' 'It is not just unfair, it is discrimination,' he added. Licensed barbers, cosmetologists, estheticians and electrologists can still work as independent contractors under state labor law without being subjected to a rigorous test. But exemptions under Assembly Bill 5 expired this year for manicurists. The change has left manicurists and nail salon owners alike confused as to whether non-employees can continue renting booths for their businesses — a decades-long industry practice. Ta, whose 70th Assembly District encompasses Little Saigon, said 82% of manicurists in the state are Vietnamese, with 85% of those being women. The federal discrimination suit, filed on May 31, represents several Orange County nail salon businesses as well as individual manicurists. Gov. Gavin Newsom and the heads of five state agencies and boards are named as defendants. 'This lawsuit seeks only one thing — to make sure that all professionals in the beauty industry are treated equally and to eliminate the obvious discrimination against the Vietnamese community,' the complaint reads. Attorney Scott Wellman, who is litigating on behalf of the nail salon owners and manicurists, held up a copy of the complaint during the news conference. He claimed the equal protection rights of his clients under the U.S. Constitution are being violated by the lack of an exemption. 'This wrong has to be righted,' Wellman said. The suit represents a change in strategy for those fighting on behalf of aggrieved manicurists and nail salon owners. In February, Ta introduced Assembly Bill 504, which aimed to reinstate the exemption for manicurists, but later claimed the proposed legislation couldn't even get a hearing from the committee on labor and employment. He followed up in March by calling for the U.S. Department of Justice to launch an investigation into alleged racial discrimination codified in California labor law, before ultimately turning to federal court. 'These hardworking professionals deserve the same freedom to set their own hours, to choose their own clients, to rent their own booths and to run their own businesses on their own terms just like other peers in the beauty industry,' Ta said Monday. Ta and the suit cite statistics from a UCLA Labor Center report on California's nail salon industry that was published last year. Co-authors of the report, though, have been publicly critical of Ta's efforts to have the exemption reinstated. 'As an industry predominantly consisting of Vietnamese and female manicurists, AB 5 protects the community from misclassification and labor violations that have long existed at the workplace so that they can receive the wages, benefits and protections that all workers deserve,' said Lisa Fu, executive director of the California Healthy Nail Salon Collaborative and report co-author. The report found that 80% of nail salon workers are considered low-wage earners, with 30% of manicurists in the state classified as self-employed, which is triple the national rate. Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, who authored the sunset provision in AB 5, previously told TimesOC that the nail salon industry has a long history of high misclassification rates that needed added guardrails for labor rights 'while still allowing individual business owners the ability to work as a sole proprietor and simply rent space from a salon.' Manicurists who back the federal discrimination suit spoke out at Monday's press conference. 'I want to be able to continue to work as an independent contractor,' said Loan Ho. 'It gives me more flexibility. I have time to raise my children.' Emily Micelli works out of Blu Nail Bar at Fashion Island in Newport Beach, which is the lead plaintiff in the suit. She has more than 20 years of experience as a nail technician and doesn't want to be a nail salon employee. Micelli left the previous nail salon she worked out of when the owner wouldn't allow her to continue as an independent contractor. 'I cannot keep clients on my phone, make appointments and come up with my own custom design packages,' Micelli said after the news conference. 'I have to abide by the salon's rules. It will make me lose business.' Micelli believes that while the law may be well-intended, it otherwise serves to discriminate against Vietnamese American women like herself. 'I know the law wants to protect us as workers,' she said, 'but being a W-2 [worker] is better for office workers not for people like us, who are artists. I'm actually an artist — a nail artist.'