If you see purple paint, stop walking. What your state's paint law means.
If you spot purple paint on your early morning hike, it may be best to turn around and find another route, because you might be trespassing.
Many U.S. states abide by the "purple paint law," which allows land and property owners to use purple paint marks on trees and fences to deter people from trespassing. Using the paint is akin to posting a "No Trespassing" sign, although not everyone knows what it means.
So far, more than 20 states have a "purple paint law" in place, the Hudson Valley Post reported. Officials chose the color purple because it stands out in a natural setting, is not used in the forestry industry and is a hue people who are colorblind can identify, the outlet said.
Purple paint is also a preferred option over signs because property owners often struggle with keeping signs up due to wind, rain or even vandals, according to Carolina Forestry & Realty.
While purple is used in most U.S. states, some states with similar laws designate different colors, such as orange, blue, silver, yellow and red. For example, the paint used in Maryland is blue since the state's law was passed in 1989, according to the University of Maryland Extension.
According to AL.com, the U.S. states with laws identifying purple paint (or designated colors) for "no trespassing" include Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia.
The laws have some restrictions depending on the state. For instance, in Pennsylvania, the statute is effective in all but Philadelphia and Allegheny counties.
Consequences of violating the "purple paint law" vary depending on the state, but they include charges, fines and possibly jail time.
According to David M. Lurie, a Missouri-based criminal defense attorney, not knowing what the lines mean and unintentionally trespassing is "not a valid defense." He added that the punishment for crossing the lines could vary depending on what happened after "you went onto someone else's property by mistake."
"If you harmed an animal or took something, that would be yet another offense," the attorney says. "If you did no harm and left when you were told to leave or realized you were on someone's private property, many property owners wouldn't call law enforcement."
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 'Purple paint law': See which states have it, what it means.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Saudi Arabia executes a journalist after 7 years in prison — for online posts, activists say
DUBAI — A prominent Saudi journalist who was arrested in 2018 and convicted on terrorism and treason charges has been executed, the kingdom said. Activist groups say the charges against him were trumped up. Turki Al-Jasser, who was in his late 40s, was put to death Saturday, according to the official Saudi Press Agency, after the death penalty was upheld by the nation's top court. Authorities had raided Al-Jasser's home in 2018, arresting him and seizing his computer and phones. It was unclear where his trial took place or how long it lasted. According to the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists, Saudi authorities maintained that Al-Jasser was behind a social media account on X that levied corruption allegations against Saudi royals. Al-Jasser was also said to have posted several controversial tweets about militants and militant groups. CPJ's program director Carlos Martínez de la Serna condemned the execution and said the lack of accountability in the aftermath of the killing of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul in 2018 allows for continued persecution of journalists in the kingdom. 'The international community's failure to deliver justice for Jamal Khashoggi did not just betray one journalist,' he said, adding that it had 'emboldened de facto ruler Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to continue his persecution of the press.' Al-Jasser's 'execution once again demonstrates that in Saudi Arabia, the punishment for criticizing or questioning Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is death,' said Jeed Basyouni, head of the Middle East and North Africa section at Reprieve, an international anti-death-penalty advocacy group. Basyouni added that Al-Jasser was tried and convicted 'in total secrecy for the 'crime' of journalism.' A Saudi assassination team killed Khashoggi at the consulate in Istanbul. The U.S. intelligence community concluded that the Saudi crown prince ordered the operation, but the kingdom insists the prince was not involved in the killing. Al-Jasser ran a personal blog from 2013 to 2015 and was well known for his articles on the Arab Spring movements that shook the Middle East in 2011, women's rights and corruption. Saudi Arabia has drawn criticism from human rights groups for its number of executions and its methods of capital punishment, including beheadings and mass executions. In 2024, executions in Saudi Arabia rose to 330, according to activists and human rights groups, as the kingdom continues to tightly clamp down on dissent. Last month, a British Bank of America analyst was sentenced to a decade in prison in Saudi Arabia, apparently over a since-deleted social media post, according to his lawyer. And in 2021, a Saudi American dual national, Saad Almadi, was arrested and later sentenced to more than 19 years in prison on terrorism-related charges stemming from tweets he had posted while living in the United States. He was released in 2023 but has been banned from leaving the kingdom. Levin writes for the Associated Press.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Can a Missouri officer in an unmarked car pull you over? Here's what state law says
Usually unassuming cars on Missouri highways are just that: unassuming. But sometimes they turn on sirens and flashing lights and pull you over. In Missouri, law enforcement is allowed to use unmarked cars to pull over drivers. This means police don't have to display bold decals to pursue you. Turning on red or blue flashing lights or a siren is enough, according to state law. The Missouri State Highway Patrol said in a May Facebook post that less-visible vehicles allow officers 'help us monitor aggressive & dangerous driving more effectively.' In this post they announced the installation of barely visible 'ghost graphics' on some vehicles, which are invisible in daylight. Thousands of Facebook commenters criticized the graphics, one saying, 'Trying to be as hidden as possible from the public is definitely a unique way of protecting and serving,' while another wrote, 'Your cars should all be high-vis so it is easy to locate you in case of emergency.' While both Missouri and Kansas allow officers in unmarked vehicles to enforce traffic laws, some states like California, New Mexico and Idaho prohibit the practice. When the highway patrol is making their patrol cars blend in, the Kansas City Police Department's vehicles will soon stand out. Starting July 1, some marked KCPD vehicles will now have their blue roof lights steadily on, after a city council vote. The lights are supposed to act as a deterrent and make it easier for residents to flag down officers. Jake Becchina, a KCPD spokesperson, offered these tips on what to do if you're pursued by an unfamiliar vehicle in Kansas City: Pull over to the nearest well-lit spot. KCPD vehicles have sirens and red and blue lights. KCPD officers are 'dressed in police uniform or other clearly marked as police.' If you're concerned, verify by calling 911 or KCPD's nonemergency number, 816-234-5111. Have more questions about traffic laws in Missouri? Ask the Service Journalism team at kcq@


Boston Globe
16 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Saudi Arabia executes a journalist after 7 years behind bars. Activists say it was over his tweets.
According to the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists, Saudi authorities maintained that Al-Jasser was behind a social media account on X, formerly Twitter, that levied corruption allegations against Saudi royals. Al-Jasser was also said to have posted several controversial tweets about militants and militant groups. Advertisement CPJ's program director Carlos Martínez de la Serna condemned the execution and said the lack of accountability in the wake of the killing of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul in 2018 allows for continued persecution of journalists in the kingdom. 'The international community's failure to deliver justice for Jamal Khashoggi did not just betray one journalist,' he said, adding it had 'emboldened de facto ruler Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to continue his persecution of the press.' Al-Jasser's 'execution once again demonstrates that in Saudi Arabia, the punishment for criticizing or questioning Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is death,' said Jeed Basyouni, head of the Middle East and North Africa section at Reprieve, an international anti-death penalty advocacy group. Advertisement Basyouni added that Al-Jasser was tried and convicted 'in total secrecy for the 'crime' of journalism.' A Saudi assassination team killed Khashoggi at the consulate in Istanbul. The U.S. intelligence community concluded that the Saudi crown prince ordered the operation but the kingdom insists the prince was not involved in the killing. Al-Jasser ran a personal blog from 2013 to 2015 and was well-known for his articles on the Arab Spring movements that shook the Middle East in 2011, women's rights and corruption. Saudi Arabia has drawn criticism from human rights groups for its numbers and also methods of capital punishment, including beheadings and mass executions. In 2024, executions in Saudi Arabia rose to 330, according to activists and human rights groups, as the kingdom continues to tightly clamp down on dissent. Last month, a British Bank of America analyst was sentenced to a decade in prison in Saudi Arabia, apparently over a since-deleted social media post, according to his lawyer. And in 2021, a dual Saudi American national, Saad Almadi, was arrested and later sentenced to more than 19 years in prison on terrorism-related charges stemming from tweets he had posted while living in the United States. He was released in 2023 but has been banned from leaving the kingdom.