Newfields executive who was terminated files discrimination lawsuit against institution
Ernest Gause, a former high-ranking Newfields executive, has filed a federal lawsuit against the art and nature campus, claiming that before he was terminated earlier this year he experienced racial discrimination and retaliation for highlighting institutional malfeasances.
Gause filed an initial complaint last week in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Indiana and amended it May 14.
Gause, who is Black, served as Newfields' chief people, diversity and technology officer. He was terminated in January after working there for almost three years. He subsequently began the process to file a charge of discrimination, a signed statement that says an employer discriminated against an employee, with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Filing a charge of discrimination is a necessary step in order to file a lawsuit for unlawful discrimination, according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
"Ultimately, at the end of the day, the bottom line is that the truth will come out," Gause said May 16 when reached by IndyStar. "That's the whole reason to file a federal lawsuit, is for people to understand what actually occurred at the institution."
In the federal lawsuit, Gause claims that multiple interim and permanent CEOs, who were both White and Black, treated him differently than non-Black C-suite executives from the beginning of his tenure. He said he was left out of meetings and his contributions ignored. Subsequently he related his concerns to the board, according to the complaint.
Newfields hired Gause as vice president of human resources and chief people officer in February 2022 and gave him more job duties over the years. He served under Jerry Wise, current chief financial officer and former interim president; Colette Pierce Burnette, who served as CEO from August 2022 until November 2023; and Michael Kubacki, interim CEO until October 2024. At that point current CEO Le Monte Booker began his tenure.
In the lawsuit, Gause claimed Newfields executives ignored a warning about IT system vulnerabilities that resulted in a data breach in June 2023, stopped his attempts to fix the situation and then retaliated against him.
Gause also claimed in the suit that he experienced retaliation after telling his superiors about race-based inequities in pay and the handling of employment matters. He was terminated Jan. 7 in a meeting with Booker.
In addition to the racial discrimination and retaliation claims, the lawsuit states that Newfields caused Gause to endure defamation and violated Indiana's whistleblower statute related to his reporting of improprieties.
In a statement provided to IndyStar, Newfields said: "As we stated in January, Mr. Gause's departure was in no way related to discrimination including race, gender or age.
"Newfields views his claims as retaliation for the termination of his employment and a wholly inappropriate attempt to damage the personal and professional reputations of Newfields leadership and the institution itself. Newfields will vigorously defend itself from these unjust attacks.'
Burnette exited Newfields suddenly and without explanation after just 15 months in November 2023. She did not respond to IndyStar's request for comment about Gause's lawsuit.
Gause joined Newfields as the institution rolled out an action plan to rebuild trust after a controversial 2021 job post for a new museum director that called for the successful applicant to maintain the museum's "traditional, core, white art audience" while attracting more diverse patrons. Gause's role was to bring diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility into hiring and retention. His position was created in response to an external review recommendation.
Gause's lawsuit calls on Newfields to reinstate him and to pay lost wages, benefits, compensatory and punitive damages, among other legal fees.
At Newfields' Annual Meeting on May 7, Booker said the institution has been interviewing candidates to fill the role of chief people and culture officer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
What's Fueling Oil Prices? Geopolitics, Not Growth
EDMONTON, CANADA, MAY 24: Close-up of a replica oil with words 'oil Country' well painted in ... More Edmonton Oilers colors, displayed outdoors in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, on May 24, 2025. (Photo by Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images) Oil prices are climbing once more. Although fundamentals such as supply and demand continue to be significant, the latest spike is largely unrelated to seasonal trends or economic expansion. Rather, it is geopolitical factors—specifically, escalating tensions in the Middle East—that are unsettling markets and pushing prices higher. Israel's recent military strikes against Iran, aimed at critical nuclear sites, have shaken the global energy landscape. This escalation has created shockwaves in the oil markets, with Brent crude experiencing a surge of up to 13%, hitting $78.50 per barrel before plateauing around $75. In a similar fashion, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude jumped over 9%, reaching a peak of $77.62 and concluding near $74. This represents the largest single-day price increase in oil since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The offensive was initiated shortly before expected U.S.–Iran nuclear negotiations and was justified by Israel as a crucial measure to prevent Iran from nearing nuclear weapon capabilities. Central to the current instability is the Strait of Hormuz, a slender waterway linking the Persian Gulf with the Arabian Sea. While it measures only 21 miles at its narrowest point, its strategic significance is immense: approximately one-third of the world's seaborne oil transits through this crucial channel each day. Presently, this essential route is under increased observation. Although Israeli attacks have upheld Iran's oil infrastructure for the moment, the threat of retaliation looms large. Iran has persistently warned it might close the Strait—a move that would instantly disrupt global energy supplies. The mere potential for such disruption is sufficient to elevate prices as traders prepare for volatility. OPEC+ Output Rises: On May 31, 2025, OPEC+ revealed its third consecutive monthly production increase, adding 411,000 barrels per day (bpd) in July. This action, motivated by Saudi Arabia's ambition for market share, occurs amid internal tensions, particularly with Russia, and follows the reinstatement of 1.37 million bpd of a planned 2.2 million bpd increase by the end of 2026. While indicating a strategic change, the group emphasized that future increases are contingent upon market conditions, with the next policy decision scheduled for July 6. A Market in Surplus: As of May, the global oil market already exhibits a surplus of approximately 0.5 million bpd. In the meantime, non-OPEC producers like the U.S. and Brazil are continuing to elevate their output, contributing to a more substantial global supply situation than was previously expected. This increasing surplus coincides with the OECD's recent downgrade of its global GDP growth forecast for 2025, from 3.1% to 2.9%—indicating softer demand on the horizon. Although summer travel and a slight resurgence in emerging markets are currently sustaining demand, any additional economic downturn could tip the scales. Demand Uncertainty: Optimism regarding a rebound in China's oil demand is tempered by escalating trade tensions and tariffs, which may hinder global growth. Slower economic activity could suppress demand, while disrupted supply chains may also limit output, creating a complex, conflicting impact on oil prices that defies straightforward forecasting. The confluence of increasing supply, uncertain demand, and macroeconomic challenges places the oil market in a delicate state. On one side, prices could soar towards $80 per barrel if tensions in the Middle East intensify and supply risks materialize, particularly if the Strait of Hormuz comes under threat. Conversely, OPEC+ production increases and economic softness could restrain price gains and revive oversupply worries as autumn approaches. The recent increase in oil prices is not merely an economic occurrence—it reflects escalating global anxiety. As long as the Strait of Hormuz remains a focal point of geopolitical tension, markets will remain on edge. Investors, consumers, and policymakers should brace for ongoing price fluctuations, driven more by geopolitical factors than by supply. If history serves as a lesson, geopolitical risk premiums can dissipate rapidly—but they can also increase sharply. As oil prices escalate, upstream oil companies such as Halliburton (NYSE: HAL) and SLB (NYSE: SLB) typically tend to benefit in such conditions. For investors seeking growth with reduced volatility, the Trefis High Quality Portfolio has outperformed the S&P 500 with 91% returns since its inception, offering a steadier experience amid turbulence.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Georgia court determines DAT violated factoring non-compete with OTR Capital
Load board and data company DAT has been told to stop its factoring operations In a decision handed down Thursday afternoon. Introduction to the Case On June 10, 2025, the Superior Court of Cobb County, Georgia, granted emergency relief to OTR Capital, ordering DAT Solutions to suspend operations of its Outgo subsidiary and comply with a 2021 non-compete agreement. The court found that OTR was likely to succeed in its claims and faced 'a substantial threat of irreparable harm' without immediate judicial intervention. The dispute alleges that DAT Solutions breached non-compete and confidentiality provisions by acquiring Outgo, Inc., a factoring service provider competing directly with OTR in the transportation sector. The court's emergency order requires DAT to cease competitive actions through Outgo and stop using a 'blue checkmark' on its digital of the Relationship Between OTR and DAT Before the dispute, OTR and DAT maintained a cooperative business relationship. Founded in 2011, OTR, a Roswell, Georgia-based firm, provides factoring, banking, and payment services to the transportation industry, with factoring as a core operation. In February 2021, the parties signed a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to explore a referral partnership. DAT agreed to protect OTR's confidential data, acknowledging that any breach would cause 'irreparable harm' not quantifiable by financial damages. Their collaboration deepened in August 2021 with a 'Referral and Revenue Sharing Agreement,' including:A non-compete clause prohibiting DAT from directly competing with OTR's U.S. factoring business. Provisions barring DAT from using OTR's proprietary information to divert clients to competitors. A confidentiality agreement extending the NDA's terms, preventing DAT employees with access to OTR's confidential data from developing or supporting a DAT-affiliated accounts receivable financing service. Under this agreement, OTR became the preferred factoring provider on DAT's 'Load Board,' an online marketplace connecting trucking firms with freight clients. OTR paid DAT substantial referral fees, and the Load Board displayed a blue checkmark to indicate customer orders vetted by OTR for creditworthiness. DAT Solutions' Acquisition of Outgo, Inc. On May 15, 2025, DAT acquired Outgo, Inc., a financial technology and factoring service specializing in automated invoice payments. This acquisition shifted DAT into direct competition with OTR in the factoring services market. Post-acquisition, DAT integrated Outgo into its operations and marketed it aggressively. DAT's website promotes Outgo as 'Get smart factoring with Outgo, a DAT Product,' featuring a dedicated 'Freight Factoring' section. Outgo's CEO joined DAT's executive team, and Outgo's website emphasizes its status as a 'DAT Product.' Industry reports confirmed DAT's entry into factoring services, highlighting this competitive shift. Alleged Breaches of Agreements by DAT OTR alleges that DAT's acquisition and actions violated their agreements in several ways: Direct Competition Violating Non-Compete Clause: By acquiring and operating Outgo, DAT directly competes with OTR, breaching the non-compete agreement. Misuse of Confidential Information: OTR claims DAT exploited confidential client lists and pricing data, accessed under prior agreements, to compete against OTR. Client Targeting: Post-acquisition, OTR received communications from suggesting DAT used insider data to solicit OTR's clients. Removal of OTR References: DAT replaced OTR mentions on its platforms with Outgo, allegedly violating promotional obligations under the Referral Agreement. Market Confusion from Checkmark Usage: DAT's continued use of the blue checkmark, previously tied to OTR's credit evaluations, has confused clients about OTR's involvement. Consequences and Harm to OTR The court recognized DAT's actions as causing potential irreparable harm to OTR in several ways:Market Confusion: DAT's use of the blue checkmark misleads customers into associating DAT's services with OTR's credit evaluations, risking damage to OTR's reputation if services are inconsistent. Unfair Exploitation of Goodwill: DAT appears to capitalize on OTR's established market reputation by retaining similar markers while offering its own services, benefiting from OTR's brand without compensation. Ongoing Competitive Harm: Each day DAT competes directly with OTR results in lost client relationships, potentially causing permanent loss of current and future clients. This harm is exacerbated as OTR paid significant referral fees to DAT, assuming no competitive conflict. Unaware of DAT's plan to enter the factoring market, OTR inadvertently funded its own competitor. Legal Actions and Court Orders OTR filed a Verified Complaint for Injunctive Relief and Damages in Cobb County Superior Court, followed by a Motion for Emergency Hearing, which was granted. On June 10, 2025, Senior Judge Adele P. Grubbs issued an emergency order after the hearing, finding: OTR faced a significant threat of irreparable harm without immediate relief. The harm to OTR outweighed any potential harm to DAT from compliance. OTR was substantially likely to prevail on its claims. The order served the public interest. The emergency order mandates DAT to comply with the non-compete clause by: Refraining from competing with OTR's U.S. factoring business through Outgo. Ceasing all U.S.-based factoring services via Outgo. Discontinuing the use of the blue checkmark for factoring indications on DAT-controlled online platforms. This order remains in effect until a full hearing on OTR's request for an expedited interlocutory injunction. The post Georgia court determines DAT violated factoring non-compete with OTR Capital appeared first on FreightWaves. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
UK food, drink export revenues rose in Q1 but volumes flat
UK food and drink exports rose in value in the first quarter but volumes were flat amid a "continued struggle" to return to pre-pandemic levels. That was the view of the UK's Food and Drink Federation (FDF) as the industry trade body revealed shipments of food and beverages climbed 6.3% to £6bn ($8.1bn) in the opening three months of the year. However, with volumes relatively flat from the year-earlier quarter, the FDF highlighted in its latest Trade Snapshot report that food exports from the UK are 20.4% lower than they were in 2020, while non-alcoholic beverages are down 9.2%. 'Significant growth is needed to return to pre-pandemic levels' in the long term, the FDF said. Export volumes to the EU, the UK's largest trade partner, declined by 3.7% for food and 1.7% for non-alcoholic drinks compared to the first quarter of 2024. An agreement between the UK and EU in May to simplify sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) controls - yet to be rubber stamped and finalised - could increase UK exports to the bloc by 22.5%, though not until 2027 at the earliest, the industry body said. Balwinder Dhoot, the director of industry growth and sustainability at the FDF, said the SPS talks are a 'positive step towards reversing a concerning decline in exports from the UK' but added that a deal is "far from a silver bullet'. 'It is vital that through these negotiations the UK secures the ability to influence EU regulatory decisions that will impact British businesses,' Dhoot said. Away from the EU, the FDF highlighted the potential "positive impact" for the UK's food and drink producers from recent trade deals with India and the US. The value of UK food and beverages exports to non-EU countries rose by 10.5% in the first three months of 2025 as "food producers take advantage of improved access to growing global markets", according to the FDF. For instance, the FDF said that since the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) came into effect in December, UK exports of soft drinks to Malaysia have increased by 103% and sweets by 48%. Meanwhile, the trade body said the free-trade agreement with India is likely to benefit UK exporters of soft drinks, biscuits and chocolate in particular. "While there are encouraging signs of an improved global trade outlook ahead, FDF warns that there's more work to be done. It's vital that government continues to build closer trade relationships with trade partners, near and far, and prioritises British competitiveness in ongoing negotiations," it said. UK food and drinks exports to the US increased 23.4% in the first quarter, which the FDF said was probably in anticipation of US tariffs, before an agreement was struck between the two governments in May. However, the FDF added that negotiating the removal of the new 10% tariff should be a priority. Dhoot added: 'This new data demonstrates that there are also plenty of opportunities for UK food and drink beyond the EU, meaning government should keep its foot on the gas when it comes to improving the UK's trade relationships across other global markets. "Removing trade barriers and helping more businesses expand into new markets abroad presents a crucial growth opportunity, while diversifying our import markets is vital to protecting the UK's food security." "UK food, drink export revenues rose in Q1 but volumes flat " was originally created and published by Just Food, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
