UK Government's approach to Omagh bomb hearing ‘risks undermining public confidence'
The UK Government has risked 'undermining public confidence' in its approach to a hearing of the Omagh Bombing Inquiry, its chairman has been told.
Counsel to the inquiry Paul Greaney KC told a hearing in Belfast that it was 'highly unfortunate' that legal papers relating to the redaction of names were received on the evening before the public session.
Advertisement
Mr Greaney also said that as the hearings related to transparency, he would have thought the Government 'would have been scrupulous to avoid the impression that it was behaving in a way that was procedurally unhelpful and possibly even unfair'.
Chairman of the Omagh Bombing Inquiry Lord Turnbull (Liam McBurney/PA)
The hearing was told that applications from the UK Government and the PSNI to redact names of junior civil servants and bombing suspects from documents released to core participants in the inquiry is 'putting a brake' on its work.
The Omagh Bombing Inquiry, chaired by Lord Turnbull, is holding procedural hearings in Belfast which relate to submissions to redact information from materials.
The Real IRA bomb in the Co Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, in the worst single atrocity in the Troubles in Northern Ireland.
Advertisement
The public inquiry was set up by the previous government to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the UK authorities.
Earlier this year the inquiry heard personal statements from those affected by the massacre.
On Wednesday, Mr Greaney said there were two issues which the latest hearings would deal with.
The first relates to a UK Government submission that the names of junior civil servants should be redacted from documents they provide before they are released to core participants.
Advertisement
The second relates to a PSNI application to redact the names of suspects who have not been charged from documents.
The barrister said the inquiry would see the documents in unredacted form but the issue was whether they should be redacted before they are given to core participants.
Core participants in the inquiry include the families of those who were killed in the bombing as well as multiple people who were injured.
He said the issue of whether the names would be disclosed unredacted during oral evidence hearings would be dealt with at a future point.
Advertisement
He said: 'The current position of HMG (His Majesty's Government) and PSNI is putting a brake on the work of disclosure of the inquiry.'
Setting out the background, Mr Greaney said the inquiry legal team had written earlier this year to the Government, asking it to make any applications for redaction by March 14th.
He said: 'Even at that early stage, in March of this year, as many as 80 documents were having to be withheld from disclosure.'
The barrister said the Government made an initial application on March 31st, then withdrew it and made a revised application for redactions of the names of junior civil servants on April 15th.
Advertisement
The Omagh Bombing killed 29 people, including the mother of unborn twins (Paul McErlane/PA)
He said the inquiry's legal team proceeded on the basis that this was the Government's position.
Mr Greaney added: 'It was therefore with considerable surprise and some frustration that at 4pm on 20th May, so yesterday and therefore the day before the hearing was scheduled to start, and moreover in circumstances in which we suggest it ought to have been anticipated that members of the inquiry legal team and the chairman and indeed core participants and their representatives would be travelling to Belfast, in those circumstances a skeleton argument was emailed to the inquiry legal team by the Crown Solicitor's Office on behalf of the Northern Ireland Office.
'The inquiry legal team regard the unexpected service of a skeleton argument at such a late stage as highly unfortunate.'
He added: 'This inquiry is about whether the Omagh bombing could have been prevented by UK state authorities. It is also notable this hearing concerns issues that could be described as ones involving transparency.
'It might be thought that HMG would have been scrupulous to avoid the impression that it was behaving in a way that was procedurally unhelpful and possibly even unfair.
'It seems to the inquiry legal team a risk that the approach taken by HMG to this hearing will undermine public confidence in HMG's approach to this inquiry.'
The barrister said there had seemed to be 'a chaotic rush to provide materials at the very last minute'.
Lord Turnbull will hear legal submissions from a number of interested parties on Wednesday and Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Two dead after car falls 300ft off cliff at beauty spot
Two people have died after a car plunged 300ft off a cliff at a beauty spot. Police, ambulance crews, firefighters and the Coastguard rushed to the scene at Alum Bay in the Isle of Wight just before 7.30pm on Friday. Hampshire Police said in a statement at the time: 'We're currently at the scene of a serious incident in Totland. 'We were called at 7.21pm this evening after a car, which was being driven along Alum Bay New Road, left the road, came off the cliff top and came to rest in the water below.' Pictures of the aftermath show the grey vehicle submerged in water. A member of the Coastguard can be seen searching the shore around the car, which had its bonnet and roof crumpled. A man was hauled to shore and given CPR. On Sunday, police confirmed to Isle of Wight County Press that both victims have been pronounced dead. A spokesman said: 'Formal identification has yet to take place, but their next of kin have been notified. 'As part of the ongoing investigation into the incident, on behalf of the coroner, officers have been carrying out enquiries at an address on Arctic Road, Cowes.' Detectives were carrying out searches at an address in Cowes earlier on Sunday.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Fury as taxpayers forking out £1million a WEEK to migrant-chasing lawyers
TAXPAYERS are forking out £1million a week to migrant-chasing lawyers. Some £54.2million last year went to legal teams seeking to thwart deportations or argue asylum seekers should remain. Campaigners say solicitors are lining their pockets by convincing clients to mount appeals. Between March and December last year alone, some 45,787 Legal Aid claims were granted at an average cost of £827 per case. It means solicitors pocket public cash — at £52 an hour — even if their clients have no realistic cases. Bizarre excuses include the case of woman-beating Konrad Makocki, 37, who used European human rights laws to say he had to be near his twin sister. Figures seen by The Sun show the cost of operating the judiciary in the Immigration and Asylum Tribunal Chamber hit £53.5million in the year to March, whilst staffing appeals cost £31.4million. And rates are set to rise. Former minister Sir Alec Shelbrooke said: 'It's clear that too many lawyers in the system are raking it in from public funds. 'You'd hope the government would realise that the system is ripe for exploitation, but I have serious doubts that lefty lawyer Sir Keir would do anything other than side with his own chums.' A Government spokeswoman said: 'We are restoring order to this system, with a rapid increase in asylum decision-making.' Fury as hotel firm housing asylum seekers in 'all-inclusive resorts' paid £700M a year of YOUR money 1
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Nottingham victim's parent complain about ‘offensive' IOPC meeting
The family of a student killed in the Nottingham attacks have formally complained to the police watchdog over an 'offensive' meeting with one of its directors. Valdo Calocane killed Grace O'Malley-Kumar, Barnaby Webber and Ian Coates in a spate of attacks in the city in June 2023. He was sentenced to an indefinite hospital order after pleading guilty to manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility as a result of paranoid schizophrenia and three counts of attempted murder. It was announced in February that prosecutors, police and medical professionals would be scrutinised in the two-year inquiry, including the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). Grace's father, Dr Sanjoy Kumar, said that an IOPC regional director had behaved inappropriately when the bereaved families met the watchdog in March 2024, including by starting the meeting with a prayer. 'I found it patronising and offensive,' Kumar told the Sunday Times. 'I didn't want a prayer, I wanted answers. I've lost my daughter and it was his job to give me the truth, not a prayer. 'There are plenty of places to pray and the IOPC isn't one of them.' The regional director at the meeting, Derrick Campbell, is now the watchdog's director of engagement, the newspaper reported. An IOPC spokesperson said: 'We can confirm we've received a complaint about one of our directors and we are dealing with it in line with our complaints and feedback procedure.' The watchdog previously prepared a report that concluded Leicestershire police officers had failed to properly investigate an assault on warehouse workers by Calocane which could have stopped his killing spree a month later. Three officers were due to face a misconduct meeting but the force postponed this. In March, the IOPC said it would reinvestigate whether Calocane's previous history and an outstanding arrest warrant were seen by officers before the investigation was closed down. The watchdog said it had made its decision 'after the force provided new evidence, which had not previously been available to the IOPC' and 'representations by the bereaved families which led to further inquiries with Leicestershire police'.
