
Fury as Labour drops cross-party talks to fix social care crisis
Cross-party talks to solve the long-term crisis in social care funding have quietly been abandoned, The Telegraph can disclose.
Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, repeatedly stressed the importance of working with political rivals to secure consensus when he launched a review into the area in January.
Failure to get cross-party backing for whatever fix Labour eventually outlines could undercut the chance of it ever being implemented, potentially prolonging the funding crisis for families across the country.
A gathering with health representatives from opposition political parties had been scheduled in February but was postponed at late notice.
Now it can be revealed that Baroness Casey, the Whitehall fixer tasked with leading the social care review, has scrapped plans for group cross-party talks on the issue.
Instead, she has written to opposition political parties and asked them to meet her one-on-one rather than together to discuss the challenges in social care.
The approach is markedly different from the one Mr Streeting publicly touted at the start of the year and has led to accusations of walking back past promises.
The Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats are now demanding the cross-party talks are reinstated, warning there is the 'risk of missing the real opportunity'.
Labour is already facing criticism over delays to tackle the social care crisis, which sees families facing soaring costs for elderly loved ones with little help from the state.
The party fell short of a promise to spell out their solution to the challenges in its election manifesto last year and then ditched the Tory policy of a social care costs cap.
Mr Steering has tasked Baroness Casey with a two-part review but proposals for a long-term solution will not come until 2028 and the peer is still stuck doing a different grooming review.
When Mr Streeting announced the review in early January the press release repeatedly stressed the importance of building a 'cross-party consensus' on social care reform.
Mr Streeting said in an interview at the time: 'We will have cross-party talks next month. And I'm really encouraged by the fact that since the election, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats and Reform have all said that they want to work across-party on this, and those talks will begin next month.'
Edward Argar, the Tory shadow health secretary, said: 'The decision by the Health and Social Care Secretary to scrap the cross-party talks he'd promised, and switch to an independent commission, holding individual conversations with parties runs the risk of missing the real opportunity to make the cross-party progress this issue needs, and the British people deserve.'
Rachel Reeves 's spending review allocated £4 billion extra to adult social care in 2028 compared to 2023, but councils have warned a long-term fix is needed.
A spokesman for the Casey Review indicated that the cross-party talks could be revived at a future date but gave no specifics.
They said: 'Baroness Casey has made initial contact with political parties and looks forward to working with them.
'She intends to initially meet party spokespeople individually to understand each party's position. She will bring colleagues from across the political divide together in due course.'
A Health Department spokesman said: 'Baroness Casey's independent commission into adult social care, which started in April, will start a national conversation, build cross-party consensus and provide recommendations for a social care system that is fair and affordable for all.
'As the commission is independent, Baroness Casey and her team are taking forward arranging discussions with political parties.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Top Gear
24 minutes ago
- Top Gear
The government has promised 100,000 new EV chargers for England
Electric And they'll be aimed at people without any off-street parking Skip 1 photos in the image carousel and continue reading The Future of Roads minister Lilian Greenwood has keys to the nation's piggy bank, and claims the government has lined up £4 billion of investment 'to support the switch to electric cars'. Translation: more EV charge points are coming. How many more? Apparently the aim is to make more than 100,000 re-juicing devices available on England's streets, to help those living in properties without driveways on which to charge overnight. Advertisement - Page continues below You might like Why? Well the Department for Transport (DfT) says the government's chunk is coming from the already-existing Local Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (LEVI) pot, sitting at a committed... £381 million. So how is the DfT promising more than three times the amount of chargers with only £81m more in cash than Believ? Not a BOGOF discount, no. The DfT tells us the kitty will be used to leverage 'significant private investment', expected to total £6 billion with 'tens of thousands' of points in place by 2030. Advertisement - Page continues below In plain English: taxpayers aren't footing all of the bill for these chargers, only some of it. Oh and for those wondering, the focus on England is because Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own separate funding pots for road transport. Greenwood said: 'A charge point [gets installed] every 29 minutes and our support to roll out over 100,000 local chargepoints in England shows we're committed to making even more progress.' Elsewhere, Ed Miliband and his team over at the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero have obtained a set of the piggybank keys, confirming £500 million for hydrogen energy infrastructure – welcome news for BMW, Hyundai, Toyota and anyone else still trying to make hydrogen-fuelled passenger cars a reality. Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox.


BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
Lower Thames Crossing project awarded £590m by Rachel Reeves
A project to build the UK's largest road tunnel has been granted £590m by the the Lower Thames Crossing, linking Tilbury in Essex and Gravesend in Kent, will cost an estimated £ for the 14.5-mile (23km) route were approved in March after a 16-year process that has already cost £ Rachel Reeves said the crossing would aid "smoother, less congested passage of vital goods from Europe to our regions". It came as part of a £1bn package to improve transport infrastructure across England, announced on Monday. The government said it was looking to source private finance to build the Lower Thames Crossing, branding it a "national priority".National Highways hoped the road would reduce traffic at the Dartford Crossing by 20%.Construction was expected to begin in 2026 ahead of an expected opening by 2032. "This is a turning point for our national infrastructure, and we're backing it with funding to support thousands of jobs and connect communities," Reeves Secretary Heidi Alexander added: "This project is essential for improving the resilience of a key freight route and is critical to our long term trade with Europe."The road will link the A2 and M2 in Kent with the A13 and M25 in 2.6 miles (4.2km) of the route is to be underground, with northbound and southbound tunnels running next to each other beneath the funding announcement was welcomed by Logistics UK, which represents the transport and logistics sector."Efficient logistics with minimal delays is critical to the delivery of the government's growth agenda, and our members are delighted to hear that funding has been made available to start work on the long-planned Lower Thames Crossing, after a decade of holdups at this vital interchange," said policy director Kevin Green."It is imperative that the government also sets out a plan for providing and securing the full funding required to complete the project – our members deserve to be able to deliver efficiently for the industry they support, so that the economy can benefit."However, campaigners have raised concerns about ancient woodland being impacted by the Todd, director of Transport Action Network, previously said the decision was "absolute madness".He added: "The only way that the government can afford this white elephant would be to take money from all the other nations and regions in the UK." Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Why are Ely North junction improvements taking so long?
There are dozens of rail schemes waiting for government funding but few have had their hopes raised and then dashed as often as Ely North 25 years campaigners have argued that improving it would make it possible to run more freight and passenger services and help grow the local despite the project getting the go-ahead from previous governments on at least two occasions, the work is yet to costs, complicated engineering and a slowness to make decisions are being the government about to publish its 10-year infrastructure strategy, there are hopes that the project will make it on to this list for funding. But why is it taking so long? Lines from Norwich, Cambridge, King's Lynn, Peterborough and Ipswich all meet at Ely North first started talking about improving the junction back in 2011 the politicians were involved with the South West Norfolk MP Liz Truss bringing together local councils and business then, there have been numerous meetings, reports written and several ministerial visits to Ely argument has never really changed: extra track and improve the signalling would lead to an increase in services, encouraging more passengers to use the train and take thousands of lorries off the why has nothing happened? Engineering challenges The more you study the problem, the more complicated it becomes."Ely isn't called the Isle of Ely for nothing," says Charlotte Cane, the local Liberal Democrat MP."It is surrounded by wetland, making the soil difficult to build heavy infrastructure on. But we know how to do it; it just needs commitment and money"And that isn't the only problem."The B1382 Ely and Prickwillow Road is another serious sticking point" says Chris Burton from lobbying group Rail Future."It crosses the line to Norwich, the line to King's Lynn and the busiest line to March and Peterborough."Local people already keep getting caught at the [three] level crossings and it will be even worse if they start running more trains."There is no space to put a bridge in so you will need another project to get the road out of the way of the railway."It is these obstacles that have driven up the estimated cost of improving the junction to £0.5bn. Treasury delays The longer the project is delayed, the more the cost goes up."Every new government or [rail] minster wants to look at everything again," says Cain."You do a business case under one set of criteria and then, five years later, you're asked to do a business case under another set of criteria."Governments need to be less fixated on making new announcements which are their announcements, and more willing to continue things that have already been started."There is also a fear that the Treasury is reluctant to commit money to the scheme."I think we have been making enough noise and making the best case that can be made, but Ely never seems to glow well enough in the political spectrum to move itself up the list," says Mr says rail schemes linking bigger conurbations in other parts of the country, particularly the north, seem to get funding more wonders if governments think too much about seats that could be under threat at the next election when they allocate Palmer, the former Conservative Mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, and now chair of the Eastern Powerhouse lobbying group, is more damning."The Treasury does not look at infrastructure as a way of bringing growth," he says."They just look at it as a cost to the Treasury. They don't particularly care if you say to them 'Build this infrastructure and it will bring you economic growth over a sustained period and therefore give you more money.'"Treasury insiders insist that every scheme is judged on its economic merit and the benefits it can bring to the economy. What next? Network Rail was given £13m by the government in 2020 to develop options for the junction and prepare an outline business says the report was submitted to the Department for Transport (DfT) in 2022 and is awaiting a DfT was given extra money for capital projects in last week's spending review. It has already announced £6.4bn for East West Rail between Oxford and Cambridge and more announcements are expected MPs insist that the government understands the importance of Ely and remain confident that it will soon receive even if it does, producing a new business case, finding a solution to the B1382 issue, applying for planning permission, acquiring land and then actually doing the work means that it is likely to be the best part of a decade before Ely North junction is improved.