‘Torture': Australian journalist Cheng Lei's three years of hell in Chinese detention on bogus espionage charges
When a Chinese court handed Cheng Lei a prison sentence for trumped-up espionage charges, she quietly calculated how old her two young children would be when she saw them again.
Teenagers, she realised, in a harrowing moment that almost broke the Australian's will.
'My kids were very painful to think about,' Cheng recalled. 'I didn't know if I'd ever see them again. But ultimately, I knew I had to be strong and sane to be able to look after them if I got out.'
Cheng, now 49, spent more than three years cut off from the outside world in detention in Beijing, subjected to horrific mental torture after falling foul of the Communist Party.
Her crime? Discussing a government press release with a fellow journalist several minutes ahead of a supposed embargo.
Why China went after the respected broadcaster, who was the face of the country's CGTN news channel and anchor of its most popular program, is still a mystery.
But her arrest and imprisonment coincided with a deep erosion of diplomatic and trade relations between Beijing and Canberra, leading many to conclude she was a pawn in a merciless political game.
Almost five years on, she still bears the deep scars of her barbaric treatment.
In August 2020, Cheng was greeted at work by some 20 officials from the secretive Ministry of State Security.
'I am informing you on behalf of the Beijing State Security Bureau that you are being investigated for supplying state secrets to foreign organisations,' one told her.
A few months earlier, Cheng had received a press release about the Premier's Work Report, the main document to come out of the Communist Party's largest political gathering of the year.
She was sitting in a make-up chair, getting ready to go on air, and texted a colleague a brief summary of the highlights – eight million jobs target, no GDP growth target – to help them get a headstart on a story.
'And that was my crime, that I eroded the Chinese state authority, even though there wasn't an embargo [on the report],' Cheng recalled.
Much later, in court, another colleague who she barely knew testified against her – likely under coercion – and claimed she'd told Cheng there was in fact a strict embargo.
'That is bogus,' she said.
'If I had known it was a classified document embargoed before 7.30, why would I send it to my friend, and then keep the document, keep the texts?'
Cheng was taken from her office to her apartment and watched on as spies ransacked it, looking for evidence that didn't exist.
Then she was blindfolded, bundled into a blacked-out SUV and whisked to an RSDL facility, or Residential Surveillance at a Designated Location.
There, in a small room that was brightly lit around the clock, she was forced to sit perfectly still for 13 hours a day, every single day, for several months.
On either side of her were two heavily armed guards and she couldn't so much as scratch her cheek or adjust her posture.
'I wouldn't send my worst enemy there,' Cheng said.
'Sure, I wasn't cold, I wasn't starving, but it's mental torture. And that is something that is very Chinese, trying to break your mind … that constant pressure, dehumanising you.
'You are nothing, you cannot say a thing, you cannot make a move without their permission. And you see no one, you see nothing. It makes your brain go dead. And that is what they want. They want you desperate.'
For months, she was interrogated relentlessly as the Ministry of State Security tried to justify its trumped-up charges.
Had she been secretly helping Uyghurs, a persecuted minority in China? Was she trying to infiltrate the Foreign Ministry? Was she receiving suspicious sums of money?
Every bogus avenue the government explored was a dead-end.
The pain of the unknown
She was totally isolated from the outside world and only permitted a brief 30-minute video conversation with Australian diplomatic officials once per month.
Five Chinese guards would crowd closely around her during those meetings to make sure Cheng didn't say anything problematic about her treatment.
'Even when the embassy officials asked how many interrogations I'd had, when I tried to reply, they would say, no, cut. And their rule is, if you say anything that you're not allowed to say, then the visit gets cancelled, and you might lose visits altogether.'
Outside of those 13 hours of forced sitting, Cheng was monitored every other moment of the day, including when using the toilet and while sleeping.
She tried to picture the happy times with her family. She imagined them playing on a beach or eating dinner together, clinging to hope that they would one day be reunited.
A doctor would visit each day to take her blood pressure, and during one check-up, Cheng noticed he was wearing new sneakers.
'It was the first beautiful thing I'd seen in weeks. And I said, I like your shoes, even though I'm not supposed to make small talk. And he said, thank you.
'And even an exchange like that, I would just keep replaying it and remind myself of it.'
After six months, she was pressured to confess to the manufactured charges or face a more severe punishment at the end of a trial.
Reluctantly, she did, knowing her fate was inevitable. No-one is found innocent in China's justice system.
'I worked out what ages my kids would be by the time I got out,' she recalled. 'It was horrible. But had I not pleaded guilty, my sentence would have been a lot longer and my treatment would have been a lot worse.
'What is the point of a defence lawyer? There's only the state. The state is the only thing that matters.
'And at least in jail, I could see a bit of the sky.'
A star sacrificed
Cheng was working as an accountant in China 'right on the cusp of its globalisation' when demand boomed for English reporting on the country's expanding economy.
Having felt like a corporate zombie and wanting a change, she made the leap to television journalism.
'I knew nothing about TV or even much about journalism, except that I liked it, and it was a steep but pleasurable learning curve,' she recalled.
'And I was super happy when I got the call from CNBC, a year-and-a-half after I got into the business, that they wanted me to be their China correspondent.'
For nine years, Cheng brought viewers the latest news about China's roaring economy and increasing global dominance.
When she left CNBC, she became the face of CGTN in China, anchoring its major news program and rising to become a star of the industry.
She loved her job, but it came with its challenges in a country where information is tightly controlled by an army of censors and propaganda-pushers.
'Once, we interviewed the head of China's top brokerage and I asked a question that he didn't like, that he deemed derogatory to the Communist Party. He ordered his people to not let us go and seized our camera and said we had to delete the footage.
'There were some frantic negotiations and eventually we got out, but they wouldn't let us play the interview with that question in there.'
Those handful of run-ins aside, Cheng felt relatively self. After all, she was reporting on business and finance – not politics or international affairs.
But as Beijing's thirst for power grew, the line between the corporate world and the Communist Party became worryingly blurred.
In the early part of the Covid outbreak, Cheng's pursuit of a new show format saw the two become intertwined.
'The Covid eruption meant that my kids couldn't come back from their holiday in Australia. I was at a loss because I'd been a working mum all this time, and I was adept at juggling work and motherhood, and I really loved bringing up little people.
'So, I tried to channel my extra energy into other things, like an idea for another show. It was about dining and cooking with ambassadors. I thought it'd be a nice way to bring international flavours to viewers.
'It meant going to a lot of embassies, speaking to a lot of ambassadors. Now that I know the Chinese mindset – I mean, recently at a trial, a court declared all diplomats in the Japanese embassies are spies, fair dinkum – now that I know the way they think, my activities must've been extremely suspicious to them.'
But Cheng felt like her career was at its peak. She was successful, popular and extremely well-regarded in the corporate world.
Even as colleagues began quietly talking about their experiences of being surveilled or questioned by officers from the Ministry of State Security, there didn't seem to be cause for alarm.
When she was detained, the accusation was so crazy that Cheng was sure it would all be sorted out swiftly.
'The idiot that I was, I thought I'd be back in a few days. I was thinking, this is just a big mix-up. I can explain it. I've done nothing wrong.'
Freedom, finally
In all, Cheng spent three years in detention before eventually being freed in October 2023 after a long-running public campaign tirelessly fought by her peers and friends, and the diplomatic efforts of the Australian Government.
Had that fight failed, she would still be behind bars until November.
When she left the detention centre, she was taken to a halfway house and for the first time years, she was able to enjoy what she describes as being a host of 'luxuries' like a mirror, a sit-down toilet, and a string to hang her washing on.
The moment her plane home to Australia left the ground, a sense of total relief washed over Cheng.
'For once I could say anything. The embassy had given me a phone, but I just looked at it and I thought, I'm surrounded by people, I want to see and touch and talk to every one of them. What am I going to do with a phone?
'For years, I could only talk to a few people. Now I'm free to express again. To be able to speak English, to use my name, because all that time I was just known by my number, 21003.'
Back on Australian soil, the experience of seeing her kids again after so long was 'euphoric' but also bittersweet.
They had grown up so much in her absence.
'I think both were trying to impress me. My son wore his favourite Barcelona jersey, and my daughter wore her school uniform because she loves her school.
'But they weren't little kids anymore. I'd missed all that. They had to go without mum for all that time, not sure when I'd be back.'
Cheng is now sharing her story via a Sky News documentary Cheng Lei: My Story and in a powerful new book Cheng Lei: A Memoir of Freedom.
Working on both has been a deeply cathartic experience, as has returning to screens as an anchor on Sky News.
'I'm trying to use the miserable time that I've had to endure to make something meaningful out of it, like writing this book, like being part of this documentary, so people know what China does behind closed doors.'
But returning to normal life is a long process and Cheng is still dealing with the trauma of her false imprisonment.
Some things will never be normal, though, like the high likelihood Chinese spies based here in Australia are monitoring her.
'I assume there is some monitoring, but I have a very fearless attitude. I was there, they could do [those things] to me, they can't do that to me here.
'And I think if we live in fear and self-censor and always check ourselves, just in case China gets the s***s again, then what's the point of freedom? We may as well be living in China.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
7 minutes ago
- ABC News
What will NSW Aboriginal treaty discussions look like and when will they begin?
From his home in Eden, on the south coast of New South Wales, Uncle BJ Cruse reflects on the continuous connection his people have to the region. "We're coastal people. We migrated up and down the coast, living off the seafood, and we migrated into the western districts during the non-snow season to harvest bogon moths. "Since colonisation, our people haven't left our Country, even when missions were established." In a couple of months' time, treaty conversations will begin in New South Wales, and the Yuin elder says he will be having his say. "Treaty means a formal agreement reached between Aboriginal people and governments to redress the outstanding matter of a proper and just settlement relating to Aboriginal birthrights to this country." The long-serving chairman of Eden Local Aboriginal Land Council supports a treaty with the NSW government, and while he knows not all would agree, he suggests treaties could be negotiated based on land council and native title boundaries. "I think there need to be treaties in different areas based on how the people relate to each other, how they can work together … and what opportunities are already existing." Growing up queer in the rural town of Condobolin and the Sydney suburbs of Mount Druitt, Todd Fernando said he never dreamed he could be leading treaty discussions. "These types of spaces that you occupy are sometimes foreign because you're walking into a system that you've got to try and fit in and work out." Last year, the former Victorian LGBTIQ+ communities commissioner was appointed, along with former Koori Mail CEO Naomi Moran and ex-senator Aden Ridgeway, as the state's first treaty commissioners. "What's happening now in New South Wales isn't a talkfest," the Wiradjuri and Gomeroi man said. "This is the first time Aboriginal people across this state are being asked, not told, what kind of relationship do you want with the government and how we structure that moving forward." While the exact locations and dates have not been publicised, Mr Fernando said there will be 27 regional hubs set up for five days each in the bigger cities, with an additional 50 day-long sessions in communities within a two-hour drive of those hubs. That is when the year-long consultation begins. He said the question Aboriginal people will be asked is: "Do they want a treaty or formal agreement-making processes? And if so, what does that look like?" "We are not here for symbolism, and this consultation will not be safe for the status quo," he told the Indigenous Affairs Team. For the past seven months, he said, they have been setting up their commission and "establishing relationships with community leaders, grassroots organisers [and] cultural authorities", such as Stolen Generations organisations and the NSW Aboriginal Land Council, who have helped shape how consultation will proceed. The commissioner wants to hear from as many Aboriginal people as possible — including those for and against treaty. "We will meet people where they're at, whether that's at the kitchen table, in the front yard or backyard, large town hall gatherings, dedicated targeted sessions with young people, LGBTIQ+ folk and elder discussions. We'll go into high schools and correctional facilities." In Moree, on Kamilaroi Country, land rights activist Lyall Munro Junior said he is in the dark about the New South Wales treaty plans. "We don't know anything about it … I don't agree with impositions from government ideologies," he said from his town in northern NSW. "Non-Indigenous people will control the debate anyway." While this consultation aims to gather the sentiments from First Peoples about whether they want a treaty to progress, the elder is concerned who will speak on behalf of his nation. "I don't agree with appointees, I come from the old system … where our elected voices are elected by the people. It's about the Aboriginal ways of doing things." Uncle Lyall was 13 years old when a bus led by Charles Perkins arrived in town, known as the Freedom Ride. It was a moment that sparked a "fire" in Uncle Lyall's belly. He said he would rather attention on the high cancer rates and youth incarceration than state treaty discussions. "We're expecting to reconcile a sad state of affairs at the moment," he said. "How can we negotiate treaties if we're a landless people? What about the question of sovereignty? "That's why 50 years of the struggle for land rights was more of an issue that we can relate to than this issue of reconciliation and now treaties," he said. In Orange, Todd Fernando admits there hasn't been a lot publicly available about the NSW treaty process, but that will soon change — with a website to be launched, as well as social media campaigns and fact sheets. He said the commissioners had been staying "quiet" and "under the radar", waiting for the right political climate after the federal election. "The nature and the turbulence of that political environment at the time didn't afford us a strong attitude around wanting to introduce language like treaty into a national framework pre-consultation, in part that the Voice referendum had a role to play in that decision." Uncle Lyall Munro wants the commissioners to "come over the mountain" and discuss the plans in person. "[Treaty] means sweet f*** all at the moment, simply because we haven't been contacted and we know nothing about it." Uncle BJ Cruse would like to see agreements that include compensation royalties, without penalising pensions, and that land under the treaty agreement isn't subject to strict zoning laws restricting social and economic development. The Yuin elder fears any agreement could be overturned by the whims of new governments and so would want assurances "underwritten". "I think if a trade is given, that needs to be given in a way that it can't be amended and regulated, and things taken away without the prior, free and informed consent of the Aboriginal people." But he said non-Indigenous people shouldn't be concerned about treaty. "This country is big enough and there's enough resources and enough wealth for Aboriginal people to receive a proper and just settlement without taking away from other people." When asked what the NSW government's commitment to treaty was, Treaty Minister David Harris said in a statement that the government will await the commissioners' findings. "We will not pre-empt the wishes of Aboriginal peoples in NSW." Commissioner Fernando said treaty was about "a shared understanding of who's responsible for what and what happens when those responsibilities aren't met." "I think mob need to understand that this isn't about having a say in someone else's system. It's about deciding whether we want to change the terms of the relationship entirely," he said. "That means asking ourselves a lot of hard questions. Do we want to negotiate? Who has authority to do that? What's the threshold for consent? What does cultural legitimacy look like? "We're not building a treaty for 1788. We are building a treaty for the future." Across Australia there have been major changes to treaty discussions during the past year. In Victoria, elected representatives of the First Peoples Assembly are continuing talks with Indigenous communities amid negotiations with the Allan government for a statewide treaty by the end of this year. It came as the Tasmanian government said it was dropping its treaty process to prioritise truth-telling and fund commissioners to lead that work. South Australia's Aboriginal affairs minister told the ABC they were still committed to restart treaty discussions in this term, but with just nine months until the election they "we're not keen to rush it". Last year, the Northern Territory's new CLP government scrapped the long-running treaty process. Queensland this year repealed the Path to Treaty Act and dismantled their truth inquiry process. The Western Australian government said they are instead focussed on native title settlements, such as the South West Native Title Settlement. "Our focus is delivering nation-leading native title settlements across Western Australia, which deliver strong economic, social and cultural outcomes for Aboriginal people. "Native Title determinations in Western Australia now cover more than 2 million square kilometres, which equates to around 90 percent of the State's landmass," a spokesperson for the state government said.

ABC News
7 minutes ago
- ABC News
Five things we learned yesterday in Erin Patterson mushroom murder trial
It was a significant day of evidence on Wednesday, as accused triple-murderer Erin Patterson again took to the stand in the regional Victorian town of Morwell. The 50-year-old has pleaded not guilty to charges of murder and attempted murder after three relatives died from death cap mushroom poisoning following a meal prepared and served by Ms Patterson. Another relative, Ian Wilkinson, fell seriously ill but survived. Here are five key things we learned yesterday. Ms Patterson told the court she began cooking preparations the night before the lunch by salting the meat, before preparing the mushroom duxelles, or paste, the morning of the lunch — July 29, 2023. She was using mushrooms purchased from Woolworths, she told the court yesterday. "As I was cooking it down, I tasted it a few times and it seemed a little bland," she said. "So I decided to put in the dried mushrooms that I'd bought from the grocer that I still had in the pantry." She said at the time she believed they were dried mushrooms purchased from Melbourne but then conceded they may have been foraged. "Now I think that there was a possibility that there were foraged ones in there as well." This week, Ms Patterson has told the court she developed an interest in foraging and eating mushrooms during Victoria's COVID lockdowns in 2020, eventually building up the confidence to cook and eat the mushrooms she gathered from areas around her Gippsland home. Ms Patterson said she organised the lunch as part of an ongoing bid to proactively bolster her relationship with the wider Patterson family, who she feared was becoming more distant during her separation from husband Simon. Ms Patterson told the court she realised around May or June that she probably needed to be more "proactive" in maintaining her relationships. "I had become a little worried that perhaps … that there might be some distance growing between me and the Patterson family," she said. "I wasn't sure if there was a gathering or two that I hadn't been invited to." In June, she had invited Simon Patterson and his parents over for lunch, which her children also attended. She said that was a "great" lunch and the kids "really enjoyed it".Ms Patterson said she invited Heather Wilkinson and Gail Patterson to the July 29 lunch after a church service. "'Would you like to come to lunch at my house?'" she recalled asking them. "They said 'we'd love to'." Ms Patterson said during the lunch, she recalled her father-in-law Don Patterson talking about his brother, who was battling cancer. She said the cancer topic lingered, and at the end of the meal she mentioned she had had an "issue" a year or two earlier when she feared she may have ovarian cancer. "Then, I'm not proud of this, but I led them to believe that I might be needing some treatment in regards to that in the next few weeks, or months," she said. Ms Patterson said the reality was she was about to get gastric bypass surgery to deal with long-running concerns over her weight and was too embarrassed to tell them. She did not want their caring attention to stop and was mindful that she may need assistance in the lead-up to and after her planned operation. "I thought perhaps letting them believe I had some serious issue that needed treatment might mean they'd be able to help me with the logistics around the kids, and I wouldn't have to tell them the real reason," she said. During her third day in the witness box, Ms Patterson told the court she disposed of a food dehydrator at the Koonwarra tip after the fatal lunch because she knew that child protection workers were on their way to her house. She feared being blamed for making her guests sick. A conversation alleged to have taken place on July 31 in hospital was again raised in court by the defence. Ms Patterson told the court that while alone, her estranged husband put forward a shocking allegation. "He said to me, 'Is that how you poisoned my parents, using that dehydrator?'" she told the court. Earlier in the trial, Ms Patterson's defence lawyer, Colin Mandy SC, asked Mr Patterson if he had said, "Is that what you used to poison them?" "I did not say that to Erin," Mr Patterson replied. Ms Patterson told the court about several factory resets carried out on a phone referred to in the trial as Phone B, and which she handed to police on August 5 after they searched her Leongatha home. One of the resets was because she "panicked" about the fact her phone had all her apps on it, including a Google account storing her photos, Ms Patterson told the court on Wednesday. "I knew that there were photos in there of mushrooms and the dehydrator and I just panicked and didn't want them [the detectives searching the house] to see them." Ms Patterson said she carried out another factory reset of her phone while it was in a police locker. "At some point, after the search of my house and the interview and the detectives had brought me home, I remember thinking 'I wonder if I can log into my Google account and see where all my devices are?'" she told the court. "So, I did that, and I could see my phone, and [my children's devices], and it was really stupid, but I thought, 'I wonder if they've been silly enough to leave it connected to the internet?' "So, I hit factory reset to see what happened and it did."


Daily Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Daily Telegraph
$486 billion warning to NSW homeowners
There is a tranche of strata laws starting on July 1 in NSW, and then even more later in the year, which are aimed at improving the lives of residents. It comes at a time when data from UNSW Sydney and the Strata Community Association reveals their growing number to about 17 per cent of NSW residents. There were 91,346 strata plans across NSW as at 2024, up from 89,049 in 2022. The total number of individual lots grew to 1,077,277, up from 1,043,690 in 2022. The estimated total insured value of strata plans grew to $486bn, up from $456bn as the number of buildings and the construction cost to replace them increases. With 55 per cent of all strata plans built before 2000, it means no let up in the pressure on repairs and maintenance for those owners corporations, according to Hazel Easthope, from the City Futures Research Centre at UNSW Sydney. MORE: Wild reason Aussie has 300 homes Prior research put the number of annual call-out jobs at 1.7m, costing $2.5bn. Unfortunately the strata management industry has some dreadful practices. It was highlighted when the ABC reported in May last year that Netstrata, one of the state's biggest, had been using its wholly owned insurance arm to charge apartment complexes excessively high insurance brokerage fees. NSW Fair Trading recently issued a 24-page report by McGrath Nicol Advisory into Netstrata that identified possible breaches of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015, including instances of nondisclosure of commissions received; instances of failing to obtain at least two quotes for expenses exceeding $30,000; and nondisclosure of commissions received from a third-party service debt collection agency, Strategic Collection Services. The report advised there were other practices not in the best interests of the consumer, including charging a premium to strata plans who did not use Netstrata's wholly owned insurance broker, Strata Insurance Services (SIS) along with a remuneration structure which incentivised its strata managers to bill for add-on charges. It found a 'highly saturated use of related entity suppliers' with whom Netstrata had a commercial arrangement. 'Netstrata's own interests appear to have trumped the interests of the people it had a duty to act on behalf of,' the Fair Trading commission's Natasha Mann advised. Netstrata disputes this. MORE: Neighbours become $200m richer overnight Last month, Minister for Fair Trading Anoulack Chanthivong announced the appointment of Angus Abadee to oversee the strata industry as the NSW Strata and Property Services Commissioner. Abadee will lead 'initiatives to enhance industry integrity and lift consumer confidence' having held senior positions in the Building Commission NSW. The McGrathNicol review did not consider Netstrata's actions under the new laws. The July 1 changes are aimed in part 'to protect owners in strata from unfair contract terms and facilitate an uplift of strata management services to improve owners' confidence'. NSW Fair Trading advises a meeting needs to be held between the committee and strata manager to allocate and complete the new specific task. MORE: Kmart set to change everything in Temu war